Proof check: Show that $x_n + 1 = f(x_n) = 15 - x_n^2$ is a (Smale) horseshoe
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A solution is given here:
However, I believe it to be incorrect because $f(K_1) = f(K_2) neq (-sqrt15, sqrt15)$.
Attempt at a solution:
Referring to the diagram from the question...
By the IVT there is some $xi_3 in (sqrt15, 5)$ such that $f(s) = x_2$. Further, by the IVT there is some $xi_1 in (-sqrt15, 0)$ and some $xi_2 in (0, sqrt15)$ such that $f(xi_1) = f(xi_2) = xi_3$.
Let $K_1 = (x_2, xi_1)$ so $f(K_1) = (x_2, xi_1)$ and let $K_2 = (xi_2, xi_3)$ so $f(K_2) = (xi_2, xi_3)$. Letting $K = (x_2, xi_3) approx (-4.405, 4.405)$, note that $K_1 subset (x_2, 0) subset K$ and $K_2 subset (0, xi_3) subset K$ and that $K_1 cap K_2 = emptyset$. Hence, since $f(K_1) = f(K_2) = K$, the map is indeed a horseshoe.
Question
Is my attempt at the solution correct?
nonlinear-system chaos-theory nonlinear-analysis non-linear-dynamics
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A solution is given here:
However, I believe it to be incorrect because $f(K_1) = f(K_2) neq (-sqrt15, sqrt15)$.
Attempt at a solution:
Referring to the diagram from the question...
By the IVT there is some $xi_3 in (sqrt15, 5)$ such that $f(s) = x_2$. Further, by the IVT there is some $xi_1 in (-sqrt15, 0)$ and some $xi_2 in (0, sqrt15)$ such that $f(xi_1) = f(xi_2) = xi_3$.
Let $K_1 = (x_2, xi_1)$ so $f(K_1) = (x_2, xi_1)$ and let $K_2 = (xi_2, xi_3)$ so $f(K_2) = (xi_2, xi_3)$. Letting $K = (x_2, xi_3) approx (-4.405, 4.405)$, note that $K_1 subset (x_2, 0) subset K$ and $K_2 subset (0, xi_3) subset K$ and that $K_1 cap K_2 = emptyset$. Hence, since $f(K_1) = f(K_2) = K$, the map is indeed a horseshoe.
Question
Is my attempt at the solution correct?
nonlinear-system chaos-theory nonlinear-analysis non-linear-dynamics
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
A solution is given here:
However, I believe it to be incorrect because $f(K_1) = f(K_2) neq (-sqrt15, sqrt15)$.
Attempt at a solution:
Referring to the diagram from the question...
By the IVT there is some $xi_3 in (sqrt15, 5)$ such that $f(s) = x_2$. Further, by the IVT there is some $xi_1 in (-sqrt15, 0)$ and some $xi_2 in (0, sqrt15)$ such that $f(xi_1) = f(xi_2) = xi_3$.
Let $K_1 = (x_2, xi_1)$ so $f(K_1) = (x_2, xi_1)$ and let $K_2 = (xi_2, xi_3)$ so $f(K_2) = (xi_2, xi_3)$. Letting $K = (x_2, xi_3) approx (-4.405, 4.405)$, note that $K_1 subset (x_2, 0) subset K$ and $K_2 subset (0, xi_3) subset K$ and that $K_1 cap K_2 = emptyset$. Hence, since $f(K_1) = f(K_2) = K$, the map is indeed a horseshoe.
Question
Is my attempt at the solution correct?
nonlinear-system chaos-theory nonlinear-analysis non-linear-dynamics
A solution is given here:
However, I believe it to be incorrect because $f(K_1) = f(K_2) neq (-sqrt15, sqrt15)$.
Attempt at a solution:
Referring to the diagram from the question...
By the IVT there is some $xi_3 in (sqrt15, 5)$ such that $f(s) = x_2$. Further, by the IVT there is some $xi_1 in (-sqrt15, 0)$ and some $xi_2 in (0, sqrt15)$ such that $f(xi_1) = f(xi_2) = xi_3$.
Let $K_1 = (x_2, xi_1)$ so $f(K_1) = (x_2, xi_1)$ and let $K_2 = (xi_2, xi_3)$ so $f(K_2) = (xi_2, xi_3)$. Letting $K = (x_2, xi_3) approx (-4.405, 4.405)$, note that $K_1 subset (x_2, 0) subset K$ and $K_2 subset (0, xi_3) subset K$ and that $K_1 cap K_2 = emptyset$. Hence, since $f(K_1) = f(K_2) = K$, the map is indeed a horseshoe.
Question
Is my attempt at the solution correct?
nonlinear-system chaos-theory nonlinear-analysis non-linear-dynamics
edited Jul 17 at 17:52
asked Jul 17 at 15:43
LMZ
310110
310110
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2854627%2fproof-check-show-that-x-n-1-fx-n-15-x-n2-is-a-smale-horseshoe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password