Any suggestions on how to compute $limsup |cos n|^n^2$?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
This problem has proven very difficult, does anyone have any suggestions on how to tackle it? Any little known theorems/identities that might help?
number-theory trigonometric-series diophantine-approximation
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
This problem has proven very difficult, does anyone have any suggestions on how to tackle it? Any little known theorems/identities that might help?
number-theory trigonometric-series diophantine-approximation
Would you like to share your thought on the problem? It is easy to show this limsup is non-zero.
– pisco
2 days ago
1
Based on the continued fraction approximations of $pi$ I'd expect it to be at least $exp(-pi^2/8)$.
– WimC
2 days ago
And the given problem is equivalent to finding the $limsup$ of the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$. This still is an open problem.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
This problem has proven very difficult, does anyone have any suggestions on how to tackle it? Any little known theorems/identities that might help?
number-theory trigonometric-series diophantine-approximation
This problem has proven very difficult, does anyone have any suggestions on how to tackle it? Any little known theorems/identities that might help?
number-theory trigonometric-series diophantine-approximation
edited 2 days ago


Jyrki Lahtonen
104k12161355
104k12161355
asked 2 days ago


Sully Chen
866
866
Would you like to share your thought on the problem? It is easy to show this limsup is non-zero.
– pisco
2 days ago
1
Based on the continued fraction approximations of $pi$ I'd expect it to be at least $exp(-pi^2/8)$.
– WimC
2 days ago
And the given problem is equivalent to finding the $limsup$ of the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$. This still is an open problem.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
Would you like to share your thought on the problem? It is easy to show this limsup is non-zero.
– pisco
2 days ago
1
Based on the continued fraction approximations of $pi$ I'd expect it to be at least $exp(-pi^2/8)$.
– WimC
2 days ago
And the given problem is equivalent to finding the $limsup$ of the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$. This still is an open problem.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
Would you like to share your thought on the problem? It is easy to show this limsup is non-zero.
– pisco
2 days ago
Would you like to share your thought on the problem? It is easy to show this limsup is non-zero.
– pisco
2 days ago
1
1
Based on the continued fraction approximations of $pi$ I'd expect it to be at least $exp(-pi^2/8)$.
– WimC
2 days ago
Based on the continued fraction approximations of $pi$ I'd expect it to be at least $exp(-pi^2/8)$.
– WimC
2 days ago
And the given problem is equivalent to finding the $limsup$ of the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$. This still is an open problem.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
And the given problem is equivalent to finding the $limsup$ of the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$. This still is an open problem.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let us consider the continued fraction of $pi$:
$$ pi = [3; 7, 15, 1, 292, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 14,ldots]$$
together with its convergents $fracp_1q_1=frac227,fracp_2q_2=frac333106,fracp_3q_3=frac355113$ etcetera.
The sequence $p_n_ngeq 1$ provides a set of natural numbers where the cosine function attains values estremely close to $pm 1$. By the properties of continued fractions we have $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac1q_n^2$, hence $left|p_n-pi q_nright|leq frac1q_napproxfracpip_n$ and by the Lipshitz-continuity of $sin$
$$left|cos(p_n)right|^p_n^2=left(1-sin^2 p_nright)^p_n^2/2 approx left(1-fracpi^2p_n^2right)^p_n^2/2to e^-pi^2/colorred2geq frac1140$$
so the wanted $limsup$ is at least as large as $frac1140$. On the other hand, if we assume that the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded, the constant $2$ above can be replaced by any larger constant and the wanted $limsup$ is just one. The pity is we do not actually know if the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded or not. For sure, if we consider $n=710$ the value of $left|cos nright|^n^2$ is very close to $1$, being equal to $approx 0.999084$. Additionally, since $pinotinmathbbQ(sqrt5)$, infinite terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are $geq 2$, from which we have WimC's claim
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cos(n)right|^n^2geq e^-pi^2/8>frac2379.$$
Following the same lines we have
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cosfracpi neright|^n^2=1$$
since the terms of the continued fraction of $e$ are unbounded, due to
$$ e=[2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,1,1,10,ldots].$$
At least terms $geq 2$ must occur infinitely often. That's where my denominator $8$ came from.
– WimC
2 days ago
@WimC: agreed (otherwise $pi$ would be algebraic with degree $2$ over $mathbbQ$, precisely of the form $a+bsqrt5$). If you like it, feel free to improve the answer.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
Ah yes, I have proved the same result, but with a different method: by using the 2nd degree Taylor expansion of $cos$. Fascinating proof using with denominator 8 though!
– Sully Chen
2 days ago
@SullyChen: I would be curious to know how the Taylor series of $cos$ were used for describing the behaviour of $cos$ over the integers, but anyway I am pleased you found this useful.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
1
Markov spectrum and transcendence of pi give us $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac13q_n^2$ (I don't have time to read the proof so I hope I didn't miss something) so we should get $e^-pi^2/18approx 0.5579$
– i9Fn
2 days ago
 |Â
show 5 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let us consider the continued fraction of $pi$:
$$ pi = [3; 7, 15, 1, 292, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 14,ldots]$$
together with its convergents $fracp_1q_1=frac227,fracp_2q_2=frac333106,fracp_3q_3=frac355113$ etcetera.
The sequence $p_n_ngeq 1$ provides a set of natural numbers where the cosine function attains values estremely close to $pm 1$. By the properties of continued fractions we have $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac1q_n^2$, hence $left|p_n-pi q_nright|leq frac1q_napproxfracpip_n$ and by the Lipshitz-continuity of $sin$
$$left|cos(p_n)right|^p_n^2=left(1-sin^2 p_nright)^p_n^2/2 approx left(1-fracpi^2p_n^2right)^p_n^2/2to e^-pi^2/colorred2geq frac1140$$
so the wanted $limsup$ is at least as large as $frac1140$. On the other hand, if we assume that the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded, the constant $2$ above can be replaced by any larger constant and the wanted $limsup$ is just one. The pity is we do not actually know if the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded or not. For sure, if we consider $n=710$ the value of $left|cos nright|^n^2$ is very close to $1$, being equal to $approx 0.999084$. Additionally, since $pinotinmathbbQ(sqrt5)$, infinite terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are $geq 2$, from which we have WimC's claim
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cos(n)right|^n^2geq e^-pi^2/8>frac2379.$$
Following the same lines we have
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cosfracpi neright|^n^2=1$$
since the terms of the continued fraction of $e$ are unbounded, due to
$$ e=[2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,1,1,10,ldots].$$
At least terms $geq 2$ must occur infinitely often. That's where my denominator $8$ came from.
– WimC
2 days ago
@WimC: agreed (otherwise $pi$ would be algebraic with degree $2$ over $mathbbQ$, precisely of the form $a+bsqrt5$). If you like it, feel free to improve the answer.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
Ah yes, I have proved the same result, but with a different method: by using the 2nd degree Taylor expansion of $cos$. Fascinating proof using with denominator 8 though!
– Sully Chen
2 days ago
@SullyChen: I would be curious to know how the Taylor series of $cos$ were used for describing the behaviour of $cos$ over the integers, but anyway I am pleased you found this useful.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
1
Markov spectrum and transcendence of pi give us $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac13q_n^2$ (I don't have time to read the proof so I hope I didn't miss something) so we should get $e^-pi^2/18approx 0.5579$
– i9Fn
2 days ago
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let us consider the continued fraction of $pi$:
$$ pi = [3; 7, 15, 1, 292, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 14,ldots]$$
together with its convergents $fracp_1q_1=frac227,fracp_2q_2=frac333106,fracp_3q_3=frac355113$ etcetera.
The sequence $p_n_ngeq 1$ provides a set of natural numbers where the cosine function attains values estremely close to $pm 1$. By the properties of continued fractions we have $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac1q_n^2$, hence $left|p_n-pi q_nright|leq frac1q_napproxfracpip_n$ and by the Lipshitz-continuity of $sin$
$$left|cos(p_n)right|^p_n^2=left(1-sin^2 p_nright)^p_n^2/2 approx left(1-fracpi^2p_n^2right)^p_n^2/2to e^-pi^2/colorred2geq frac1140$$
so the wanted $limsup$ is at least as large as $frac1140$. On the other hand, if we assume that the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded, the constant $2$ above can be replaced by any larger constant and the wanted $limsup$ is just one. The pity is we do not actually know if the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded or not. For sure, if we consider $n=710$ the value of $left|cos nright|^n^2$ is very close to $1$, being equal to $approx 0.999084$. Additionally, since $pinotinmathbbQ(sqrt5)$, infinite terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are $geq 2$, from which we have WimC's claim
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cos(n)right|^n^2geq e^-pi^2/8>frac2379.$$
Following the same lines we have
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cosfracpi neright|^n^2=1$$
since the terms of the continued fraction of $e$ are unbounded, due to
$$ e=[2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,1,1,10,ldots].$$
At least terms $geq 2$ must occur infinitely often. That's where my denominator $8$ came from.
– WimC
2 days ago
@WimC: agreed (otherwise $pi$ would be algebraic with degree $2$ over $mathbbQ$, precisely of the form $a+bsqrt5$). If you like it, feel free to improve the answer.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
Ah yes, I have proved the same result, but with a different method: by using the 2nd degree Taylor expansion of $cos$. Fascinating proof using with denominator 8 though!
– Sully Chen
2 days ago
@SullyChen: I would be curious to know how the Taylor series of $cos$ were used for describing the behaviour of $cos$ over the integers, but anyway I am pleased you found this useful.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
1
Markov spectrum and transcendence of pi give us $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac13q_n^2$ (I don't have time to read the proof so I hope I didn't miss something) so we should get $e^-pi^2/18approx 0.5579$
– i9Fn
2 days ago
 |Â
show 5 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
Let us consider the continued fraction of $pi$:
$$ pi = [3; 7, 15, 1, 292, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 14,ldots]$$
together with its convergents $fracp_1q_1=frac227,fracp_2q_2=frac333106,fracp_3q_3=frac355113$ etcetera.
The sequence $p_n_ngeq 1$ provides a set of natural numbers where the cosine function attains values estremely close to $pm 1$. By the properties of continued fractions we have $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac1q_n^2$, hence $left|p_n-pi q_nright|leq frac1q_napproxfracpip_n$ and by the Lipshitz-continuity of $sin$
$$left|cos(p_n)right|^p_n^2=left(1-sin^2 p_nright)^p_n^2/2 approx left(1-fracpi^2p_n^2right)^p_n^2/2to e^-pi^2/colorred2geq frac1140$$
so the wanted $limsup$ is at least as large as $frac1140$. On the other hand, if we assume that the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded, the constant $2$ above can be replaced by any larger constant and the wanted $limsup$ is just one. The pity is we do not actually know if the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded or not. For sure, if we consider $n=710$ the value of $left|cos nright|^n^2$ is very close to $1$, being equal to $approx 0.999084$. Additionally, since $pinotinmathbbQ(sqrt5)$, infinite terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are $geq 2$, from which we have WimC's claim
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cos(n)right|^n^2geq e^-pi^2/8>frac2379.$$
Following the same lines we have
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cosfracpi neright|^n^2=1$$
since the terms of the continued fraction of $e$ are unbounded, due to
$$ e=[2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,1,1,10,ldots].$$
Let us consider the continued fraction of $pi$:
$$ pi = [3; 7, 15, 1, 292, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 14,ldots]$$
together with its convergents $fracp_1q_1=frac227,fracp_2q_2=frac333106,fracp_3q_3=frac355113$ etcetera.
The sequence $p_n_ngeq 1$ provides a set of natural numbers where the cosine function attains values estremely close to $pm 1$. By the properties of continued fractions we have $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac1q_n^2$, hence $left|p_n-pi q_nright|leq frac1q_napproxfracpip_n$ and by the Lipshitz-continuity of $sin$
$$left|cos(p_n)right|^p_n^2=left(1-sin^2 p_nright)^p_n^2/2 approx left(1-fracpi^2p_n^2right)^p_n^2/2to e^-pi^2/colorred2geq frac1140$$
so the wanted $limsup$ is at least as large as $frac1140$. On the other hand, if we assume that the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded, the constant $2$ above can be replaced by any larger constant and the wanted $limsup$ is just one. The pity is we do not actually know if the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are unbounded or not. For sure, if we consider $n=710$ the value of $left|cos nright|^n^2$ is very close to $1$, being equal to $approx 0.999084$. Additionally, since $pinotinmathbbQ(sqrt5)$, infinite terms of the continued fraction of $pi$ are $geq 2$, from which we have WimC's claim
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cos(n)right|^n^2geq e^-pi^2/8>frac2379.$$
Following the same lines we have
$$ limsup_ninmathbbNleft|cosfracpi neright|^n^2=1$$
since the terms of the continued fraction of $e$ are unbounded, due to
$$ e=[2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,1,1,8,1,1,10,ldots].$$
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago


Jack D'Aurizio♦
268k30261623
268k30261623
At least terms $geq 2$ must occur infinitely often. That's where my denominator $8$ came from.
– WimC
2 days ago
@WimC: agreed (otherwise $pi$ would be algebraic with degree $2$ over $mathbbQ$, precisely of the form $a+bsqrt5$). If you like it, feel free to improve the answer.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
Ah yes, I have proved the same result, but with a different method: by using the 2nd degree Taylor expansion of $cos$. Fascinating proof using with denominator 8 though!
– Sully Chen
2 days ago
@SullyChen: I would be curious to know how the Taylor series of $cos$ were used for describing the behaviour of $cos$ over the integers, but anyway I am pleased you found this useful.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
1
Markov spectrum and transcendence of pi give us $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac13q_n^2$ (I don't have time to read the proof so I hope I didn't miss something) so we should get $e^-pi^2/18approx 0.5579$
– i9Fn
2 days ago
 |Â
show 5 more comments
At least terms $geq 2$ must occur infinitely often. That's where my denominator $8$ came from.
– WimC
2 days ago
@WimC: agreed (otherwise $pi$ would be algebraic with degree $2$ over $mathbbQ$, precisely of the form $a+bsqrt5$). If you like it, feel free to improve the answer.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
Ah yes, I have proved the same result, but with a different method: by using the 2nd degree Taylor expansion of $cos$. Fascinating proof using with denominator 8 though!
– Sully Chen
2 days ago
@SullyChen: I would be curious to know how the Taylor series of $cos$ were used for describing the behaviour of $cos$ over the integers, but anyway I am pleased you found this useful.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
1
Markov spectrum and transcendence of pi give us $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac13q_n^2$ (I don't have time to read the proof so I hope I didn't miss something) so we should get $e^-pi^2/18approx 0.5579$
– i9Fn
2 days ago
At least terms $geq 2$ must occur infinitely often. That's where my denominator $8$ came from.
– WimC
2 days ago
At least terms $geq 2$ must occur infinitely often. That's where my denominator $8$ came from.
– WimC
2 days ago
@WimC: agreed (otherwise $pi$ would be algebraic with degree $2$ over $mathbbQ$, precisely of the form $a+bsqrt5$). If you like it, feel free to improve the answer.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
@WimC: agreed (otherwise $pi$ would be algebraic with degree $2$ over $mathbbQ$, precisely of the form $a+bsqrt5$). If you like it, feel free to improve the answer.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
Ah yes, I have proved the same result, but with a different method: by using the 2nd degree Taylor expansion of $cos$. Fascinating proof using with denominator 8 though!
– Sully Chen
2 days ago
Ah yes, I have proved the same result, but with a different method: by using the 2nd degree Taylor expansion of $cos$. Fascinating proof using with denominator 8 though!
– Sully Chen
2 days ago
@SullyChen: I would be curious to know how the Taylor series of $cos$ were used for describing the behaviour of $cos$ over the integers, but anyway I am pleased you found this useful.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
@SullyChen: I would be curious to know how the Taylor series of $cos$ were used for describing the behaviour of $cos$ over the integers, but anyway I am pleased you found this useful.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago
1
1
Markov spectrum and transcendence of pi give us $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac13q_n^2$ (I don't have time to read the proof so I hope I didn't miss something) so we should get $e^-pi^2/18approx 0.5579$
– i9Fn
2 days ago
Markov spectrum and transcendence of pi give us $left|fracp_nq_n-piright|leq frac13q_n^2$ (I don't have time to read the proof so I hope I didn't miss something) so we should get $e^-pi^2/18approx 0.5579$
– i9Fn
2 days ago
 |Â
show 5 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871833%2fany-suggestions-on-how-to-compute-limsup-cos-nn2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Would you like to share your thought on the problem? It is easy to show this limsup is non-zero.
– pisco
2 days ago
1
Based on the continued fraction approximations of $pi$ I'd expect it to be at least $exp(-pi^2/8)$.
– WimC
2 days ago
And the given problem is equivalent to finding the $limsup$ of the terms of the continued fraction of $pi$. This still is an open problem.
– Jack D'Aurizio♦
2 days ago