Can a finitely generated discrete group $Gammasubset I(mathbbH^n)$ contain infinitely many elliptic elements with common fixed point?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $Gammasubset I(mathbbH^n)$ be a finitely generated discrete group of isometries of the hyperbolic $n$-space.



Let $Gamma_infty$ be the stabilizer of $infty$, and assume it contains only elliptic and parabolic elements.



Let $Asubset Gamma$ be the set of elliptic elements of $Gamma$.



My question is whether or not can the generated subgroup $B=langle AcapGamma_inftyrangle$ be infinite.




My intuition says it cannot. In some manner that would imply that there are too many elliptic elements in $Gamma$, which would contradict the Selberg lemma. But I'm not sure if it is true, and how to formalize it. I guess the Selberg lemma shows that if $B$ is infinite it must contain a parabolic element. Question is if it is a contradiction or not.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $Gammasubset I(mathbbH^n)$ be a finitely generated discrete group of isometries of the hyperbolic $n$-space.



    Let $Gamma_infty$ be the stabilizer of $infty$, and assume it contains only elliptic and parabolic elements.



    Let $Asubset Gamma$ be the set of elliptic elements of $Gamma$.



    My question is whether or not can the generated subgroup $B=langle AcapGamma_inftyrangle$ be infinite.




    My intuition says it cannot. In some manner that would imply that there are too many elliptic elements in $Gamma$, which would contradict the Selberg lemma. But I'm not sure if it is true, and how to formalize it. I guess the Selberg lemma shows that if $B$ is infinite it must contain a parabolic element. Question is if it is a contradiction or not.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $Gammasubset I(mathbbH^n)$ be a finitely generated discrete group of isometries of the hyperbolic $n$-space.



      Let $Gamma_infty$ be the stabilizer of $infty$, and assume it contains only elliptic and parabolic elements.



      Let $Asubset Gamma$ be the set of elliptic elements of $Gamma$.



      My question is whether or not can the generated subgroup $B=langle AcapGamma_inftyrangle$ be infinite.




      My intuition says it cannot. In some manner that would imply that there are too many elliptic elements in $Gamma$, which would contradict the Selberg lemma. But I'm not sure if it is true, and how to formalize it. I guess the Selberg lemma shows that if $B$ is infinite it must contain a parabolic element. Question is if it is a contradiction or not.







      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $Gammasubset I(mathbbH^n)$ be a finitely generated discrete group of isometries of the hyperbolic $n$-space.



      Let $Gamma_infty$ be the stabilizer of $infty$, and assume it contains only elliptic and parabolic elements.



      Let $Asubset Gamma$ be the set of elliptic elements of $Gamma$.



      My question is whether or not can the generated subgroup $B=langle AcapGamma_inftyrangle$ be infinite.




      My intuition says it cannot. In some manner that would imply that there are too many elliptic elements in $Gamma$, which would contradict the Selberg lemma. But I'm not sure if it is true, and how to formalize it. I guess the Selberg lemma shows that if $B$ is infinite it must contain a parabolic element. Question is if it is a contradiction or not.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 21 at 12:04
























      asked Jul 21 at 2:17









      The way of life

      709216




      709216




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          There's one restricted case in which this is true, namely if you assume that $n=2$ and that $Gamma$ consists only of orientation preserving isometries. In that case, every nontrivial finite order element of $Gamma$ is a rotation of some rational angle $2pi k/n$ around some point of $mathbb H^2$, and hence has no fixed points on the circle at infinite, so $A cap Gamma_infty$ consists solely of the identity.



          However, even when $n=2$ there are counterexamples if you allow elements of $Gamma$ to reverse orientation. For instance, the infinite dihedral group $D_infty = langle a,b mid a^2 = b^2 = abrangle$ acts on $mathbb H$ by the formula $a cdot (x+iy) = -x+iy$, $b cdot (x+iy) = 1-x+iy$. Under this action, the point $infty$ is fixed by every element, and all of the infinitely many conjugates of $a$ and $b$ are reflection isometries each of which has a whole line of fixed points. For example, $a$ fixes every point on the imaginary axis $x=0$, and more generally $b^k a b^-k$ fixes every point on the line $x=k$.



          In higher dimensions there are orientation preserving counterexamples as well. The general idea is that if you use the "upper half space" model $mathbb H^n = mathbb R^n-1 times mathbb R_+$ then the action of the group of Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^n-1$ extends to an isometric action on $mathbb H^n$ that fixes $infty$. Its easy to produce infinite groups of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries having infinitely many torsion elements.



          For a specific example acting on $mathbb H^3$, start with the infinite dihedral group of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^2$ generated by the rotations $a(x,y) = (-x,-y)$ and $b(x,y) = (1-x,-y)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858176%2fcan-a-finitely-generated-discrete-group-gamma-subset-i-mathbbhn-contai%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            There's one restricted case in which this is true, namely if you assume that $n=2$ and that $Gamma$ consists only of orientation preserving isometries. In that case, every nontrivial finite order element of $Gamma$ is a rotation of some rational angle $2pi k/n$ around some point of $mathbb H^2$, and hence has no fixed points on the circle at infinite, so $A cap Gamma_infty$ consists solely of the identity.



            However, even when $n=2$ there are counterexamples if you allow elements of $Gamma$ to reverse orientation. For instance, the infinite dihedral group $D_infty = langle a,b mid a^2 = b^2 = abrangle$ acts on $mathbb H$ by the formula $a cdot (x+iy) = -x+iy$, $b cdot (x+iy) = 1-x+iy$. Under this action, the point $infty$ is fixed by every element, and all of the infinitely many conjugates of $a$ and $b$ are reflection isometries each of which has a whole line of fixed points. For example, $a$ fixes every point on the imaginary axis $x=0$, and more generally $b^k a b^-k$ fixes every point on the line $x=k$.



            In higher dimensions there are orientation preserving counterexamples as well. The general idea is that if you use the "upper half space" model $mathbb H^n = mathbb R^n-1 times mathbb R_+$ then the action of the group of Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^n-1$ extends to an isometric action on $mathbb H^n$ that fixes $infty$. Its easy to produce infinite groups of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries having infinitely many torsion elements.



            For a specific example acting on $mathbb H^3$, start with the infinite dihedral group of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^2$ generated by the rotations $a(x,y) = (-x,-y)$ and $b(x,y) = (1-x,-y)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              There's one restricted case in which this is true, namely if you assume that $n=2$ and that $Gamma$ consists only of orientation preserving isometries. In that case, every nontrivial finite order element of $Gamma$ is a rotation of some rational angle $2pi k/n$ around some point of $mathbb H^2$, and hence has no fixed points on the circle at infinite, so $A cap Gamma_infty$ consists solely of the identity.



              However, even when $n=2$ there are counterexamples if you allow elements of $Gamma$ to reverse orientation. For instance, the infinite dihedral group $D_infty = langle a,b mid a^2 = b^2 = abrangle$ acts on $mathbb H$ by the formula $a cdot (x+iy) = -x+iy$, $b cdot (x+iy) = 1-x+iy$. Under this action, the point $infty$ is fixed by every element, and all of the infinitely many conjugates of $a$ and $b$ are reflection isometries each of which has a whole line of fixed points. For example, $a$ fixes every point on the imaginary axis $x=0$, and more generally $b^k a b^-k$ fixes every point on the line $x=k$.



              In higher dimensions there are orientation preserving counterexamples as well. The general idea is that if you use the "upper half space" model $mathbb H^n = mathbb R^n-1 times mathbb R_+$ then the action of the group of Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^n-1$ extends to an isometric action on $mathbb H^n$ that fixes $infty$. Its easy to produce infinite groups of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries having infinitely many torsion elements.



              For a specific example acting on $mathbb H^3$, start with the infinite dihedral group of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^2$ generated by the rotations $a(x,y) = (-x,-y)$ and $b(x,y) = (1-x,-y)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                There's one restricted case in which this is true, namely if you assume that $n=2$ and that $Gamma$ consists only of orientation preserving isometries. In that case, every nontrivial finite order element of $Gamma$ is a rotation of some rational angle $2pi k/n$ around some point of $mathbb H^2$, and hence has no fixed points on the circle at infinite, so $A cap Gamma_infty$ consists solely of the identity.



                However, even when $n=2$ there are counterexamples if you allow elements of $Gamma$ to reverse orientation. For instance, the infinite dihedral group $D_infty = langle a,b mid a^2 = b^2 = abrangle$ acts on $mathbb H$ by the formula $a cdot (x+iy) = -x+iy$, $b cdot (x+iy) = 1-x+iy$. Under this action, the point $infty$ is fixed by every element, and all of the infinitely many conjugates of $a$ and $b$ are reflection isometries each of which has a whole line of fixed points. For example, $a$ fixes every point on the imaginary axis $x=0$, and more generally $b^k a b^-k$ fixes every point on the line $x=k$.



                In higher dimensions there are orientation preserving counterexamples as well. The general idea is that if you use the "upper half space" model $mathbb H^n = mathbb R^n-1 times mathbb R_+$ then the action of the group of Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^n-1$ extends to an isometric action on $mathbb H^n$ that fixes $infty$. Its easy to produce infinite groups of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries having infinitely many torsion elements.



                For a specific example acting on $mathbb H^3$, start with the infinite dihedral group of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^2$ generated by the rotations $a(x,y) = (-x,-y)$ and $b(x,y) = (1-x,-y)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                There's one restricted case in which this is true, namely if you assume that $n=2$ and that $Gamma$ consists only of orientation preserving isometries. In that case, every nontrivial finite order element of $Gamma$ is a rotation of some rational angle $2pi k/n$ around some point of $mathbb H^2$, and hence has no fixed points on the circle at infinite, so $A cap Gamma_infty$ consists solely of the identity.



                However, even when $n=2$ there are counterexamples if you allow elements of $Gamma$ to reverse orientation. For instance, the infinite dihedral group $D_infty = langle a,b mid a^2 = b^2 = abrangle$ acts on $mathbb H$ by the formula $a cdot (x+iy) = -x+iy$, $b cdot (x+iy) = 1-x+iy$. Under this action, the point $infty$ is fixed by every element, and all of the infinitely many conjugates of $a$ and $b$ are reflection isometries each of which has a whole line of fixed points. For example, $a$ fixes every point on the imaginary axis $x=0$, and more generally $b^k a b^-k$ fixes every point on the line $x=k$.



                In higher dimensions there are orientation preserving counterexamples as well. The general idea is that if you use the "upper half space" model $mathbb H^n = mathbb R^n-1 times mathbb R_+$ then the action of the group of Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^n-1$ extends to an isometric action on $mathbb H^n$ that fixes $infty$. Its easy to produce infinite groups of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries having infinitely many torsion elements.



                For a specific example acting on $mathbb H^3$, start with the infinite dihedral group of orientation preserving Euclidean isometries of $mathbb R^2$ generated by the rotations $a(x,y) = (-x,-y)$ and $b(x,y) = (1-x,-y)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 21 at 13:42









                Lee Mosher

                45.6k33478




                45.6k33478






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858176%2fcan-a-finitely-generated-discrete-group-gamma-subset-i-mathbbhn-contai%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?