Can someone please explain to me why cotangent graphs look the way they do?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












Can someone please explain to me why cotangent graphs look the way they do? I want to know why they basically look like mirror reflected tangent graphs. I get that if $tantheta=y/x$, then $cottheta=x/y$. But why would this lead to a graph that looks like a tangent graph that was reflected over?



Can you please try to keep the answers at the level of a high school pre-calc student?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    Not sure how helpful this is (especially because of how it's inverted) but the cotangent function can be thought of as recording the x value of the intersection of the line $y=1$ and the line that travels through origin to a point on the unit circle. Here is a visual of this: desmos.com/calculator/qbdj61u2t9
    – Mason
    Aug 3 at 4:16















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2












Can someone please explain to me why cotangent graphs look the way they do? I want to know why they basically look like mirror reflected tangent graphs. I get that if $tantheta=y/x$, then $cottheta=x/y$. But why would this lead to a graph that looks like a tangent graph that was reflected over?



Can you please try to keep the answers at the level of a high school pre-calc student?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    Not sure how helpful this is (especially because of how it's inverted) but the cotangent function can be thought of as recording the x value of the intersection of the line $y=1$ and the line that travels through origin to a point on the unit circle. Here is a visual of this: desmos.com/calculator/qbdj61u2t9
    – Mason
    Aug 3 at 4:16













up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
2






2





Can someone please explain to me why cotangent graphs look the way they do? I want to know why they basically look like mirror reflected tangent graphs. I get that if $tantheta=y/x$, then $cottheta=x/y$. But why would this lead to a graph that looks like a tangent graph that was reflected over?



Can you please try to keep the answers at the level of a high school pre-calc student?







share|cite|improve this question













Can someone please explain to me why cotangent graphs look the way they do? I want to know why they basically look like mirror reflected tangent graphs. I get that if $tantheta=y/x$, then $cottheta=x/y$. But why would this lead to a graph that looks like a tangent graph that was reflected over?



Can you please try to keep the answers at the level of a high school pre-calc student?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 3 at 3:58









N. F. Taussig

37.9k93053




37.9k93053









asked Aug 3 at 3:53









Ethan Chan

591322




591322







  • 1




    Not sure how helpful this is (especially because of how it's inverted) but the cotangent function can be thought of as recording the x value of the intersection of the line $y=1$ and the line that travels through origin to a point on the unit circle. Here is a visual of this: desmos.com/calculator/qbdj61u2t9
    – Mason
    Aug 3 at 4:16













  • 1




    Not sure how helpful this is (especially because of how it's inverted) but the cotangent function can be thought of as recording the x value of the intersection of the line $y=1$ and the line that travels through origin to a point on the unit circle. Here is a visual of this: desmos.com/calculator/qbdj61u2t9
    – Mason
    Aug 3 at 4:16








1




1




Not sure how helpful this is (especially because of how it's inverted) but the cotangent function can be thought of as recording the x value of the intersection of the line $y=1$ and the line that travels through origin to a point on the unit circle. Here is a visual of this: desmos.com/calculator/qbdj61u2t9
– Mason
Aug 3 at 4:16





Not sure how helpful this is (especially because of how it's inverted) but the cotangent function can be thought of as recording the x value of the intersection of the line $y=1$ and the line that travels through origin to a point on the unit circle. Here is a visual of this: desmos.com/calculator/qbdj61u2t9
– Mason
Aug 3 at 4:16











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
19
down vote



accepted










We have $$ cot(x) = fraccos(x)sin(x) = fracsin(pi/2-x)cos(pi/2-x) = tan(pi/2-x)$$



so it is reflected and shifted by $pi/2.$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • But how do we know this till holds when theta, or x in this case, is greater than pi/2? For instance, what if x was 3pi/4? How would this still hold? Can you prove it me please?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 4:07






  • 6




    @EthanChan Do you know what the graphs of $sin$ and $cos$ look like for all $x$?
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Aug 3 at 4:17






  • 8




    Note: "it is reflected and shifted by $π/2$" holds for every trigonometric function when you change function to cofunction or the other way around. Quite useful. The answer uses this formula with $cos$ and $sin$ to obtain it for $cot$.
    – Kamil Maciorowski
    Aug 3 at 6:50







  • 3




    @EthanChan: In case you were taught the definition of $sin,cos$ in terms of the right-angle triangle, here is the correct way to extend it to other angles. Consider the unit circle $C$ in the $x,y$-plane (centred at origin with radius $1$). For angle $t$, draw a ray $R$ through the origin that is the result of rotating the $x$-axis by $t$ anti-clockwise. Let $P$ be the intersection of $R$ and $C$. Then define $cos(x),sin(x)$ as the $x,y$ coordinates of $P$. Equivalently, $P$ is the result of starting from $(1,0)$ and moving anti-clockwise along $C$ by a distance (arc-length) of $t$.
    – user21820
    Aug 3 at 11:59






  • 2




    @EthanChan: Then observe that if you change the angle from $t$ to $π/2-t$ it is equivalent to reflecting $P$ across the line $x=y$. This is the geometric reason why $cos(t) = sin(π/2-t)$ and $sin(t) = cos(π/2-t)$, because the $x,y$-coordinates are swapped in such a reflection.
    – user21820
    Aug 3 at 12:02

















up vote
4
down vote













$$cottheta = fraccosthetasintheta = fracsin(fracpi2-theta)cos(fracpi2-theta) = tanBig(fracpi2-thetaBig)$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Okay. Last thing, how does this work for values of theta greater than 90 degrees?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 3:58










  • These identities are always true, as long as $sinthetaneq0$.
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 3:59










  • But can you prove why they will always be true?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 4:08






  • 1




    That depends on your definitions of the trig functions. Cotangent is always cosine over sine, and tangent is always sine over cosine. All that remains is whether $costheta = sin(pi/2-theta)$ (which is equivalent to the same with $cos$ and $sin$ swapped; try $theta=pi/2-phi$).
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 4:10











  • If you're using the unit circle, defining $costheta=x$ and $sintheta=y$, then swapping $sintheta$ and $costheta$ is the same as reflecting across the line $y=x$. This reflects the angle relative to $pi/4$. $$theta'-fracpi4=-Big(theta-fracpi4Big)$$ $$theta'=fracpi2-theta$$ $$costheta=sintheta'=sin(pi/2-theta)$$
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 4:23


















up vote
4
down vote













Just as a visual complement for the answers you already have, notice the following animation.



Green angle: $theta$, yellow angle: $pi/2 - theta$ and $cot(x)$ is the red curve.



enter image description here



For more details regarding these types of constructions, see this question.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870721%2fcan-someone-please-explain-to-me-why-cotangent-graphs-look-the-way-they-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    19
    down vote



    accepted










    We have $$ cot(x) = fraccos(x)sin(x) = fracsin(pi/2-x)cos(pi/2-x) = tan(pi/2-x)$$



    so it is reflected and shifted by $pi/2.$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • But how do we know this till holds when theta, or x in this case, is greater than pi/2? For instance, what if x was 3pi/4? How would this still hold? Can you prove it me please?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:07






    • 6




      @EthanChan Do you know what the graphs of $sin$ and $cos$ look like for all $x$?
      – spaceisdarkgreen
      Aug 3 at 4:17






    • 8




      Note: "it is reflected and shifted by $π/2$" holds for every trigonometric function when you change function to cofunction or the other way around. Quite useful. The answer uses this formula with $cos$ and $sin$ to obtain it for $cot$.
      – Kamil Maciorowski
      Aug 3 at 6:50







    • 3




      @EthanChan: In case you were taught the definition of $sin,cos$ in terms of the right-angle triangle, here is the correct way to extend it to other angles. Consider the unit circle $C$ in the $x,y$-plane (centred at origin with radius $1$). For angle $t$, draw a ray $R$ through the origin that is the result of rotating the $x$-axis by $t$ anti-clockwise. Let $P$ be the intersection of $R$ and $C$. Then define $cos(x),sin(x)$ as the $x,y$ coordinates of $P$. Equivalently, $P$ is the result of starting from $(1,0)$ and moving anti-clockwise along $C$ by a distance (arc-length) of $t$.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 11:59






    • 2




      @EthanChan: Then observe that if you change the angle from $t$ to $π/2-t$ it is equivalent to reflecting $P$ across the line $x=y$. This is the geometric reason why $cos(t) = sin(π/2-t)$ and $sin(t) = cos(π/2-t)$, because the $x,y$-coordinates are swapped in such a reflection.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 12:02














    up vote
    19
    down vote



    accepted










    We have $$ cot(x) = fraccos(x)sin(x) = fracsin(pi/2-x)cos(pi/2-x) = tan(pi/2-x)$$



    so it is reflected and shifted by $pi/2.$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • But how do we know this till holds when theta, or x in this case, is greater than pi/2? For instance, what if x was 3pi/4? How would this still hold? Can you prove it me please?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:07






    • 6




      @EthanChan Do you know what the graphs of $sin$ and $cos$ look like for all $x$?
      – spaceisdarkgreen
      Aug 3 at 4:17






    • 8




      Note: "it is reflected and shifted by $π/2$" holds for every trigonometric function when you change function to cofunction or the other way around. Quite useful. The answer uses this formula with $cos$ and $sin$ to obtain it for $cot$.
      – Kamil Maciorowski
      Aug 3 at 6:50







    • 3




      @EthanChan: In case you were taught the definition of $sin,cos$ in terms of the right-angle triangle, here is the correct way to extend it to other angles. Consider the unit circle $C$ in the $x,y$-plane (centred at origin with radius $1$). For angle $t$, draw a ray $R$ through the origin that is the result of rotating the $x$-axis by $t$ anti-clockwise. Let $P$ be the intersection of $R$ and $C$. Then define $cos(x),sin(x)$ as the $x,y$ coordinates of $P$. Equivalently, $P$ is the result of starting from $(1,0)$ and moving anti-clockwise along $C$ by a distance (arc-length) of $t$.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 11:59






    • 2




      @EthanChan: Then observe that if you change the angle from $t$ to $π/2-t$ it is equivalent to reflecting $P$ across the line $x=y$. This is the geometric reason why $cos(t) = sin(π/2-t)$ and $sin(t) = cos(π/2-t)$, because the $x,y$-coordinates are swapped in such a reflection.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 12:02












    up vote
    19
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    19
    down vote



    accepted






    We have $$ cot(x) = fraccos(x)sin(x) = fracsin(pi/2-x)cos(pi/2-x) = tan(pi/2-x)$$



    so it is reflected and shifted by $pi/2.$






    share|cite|improve this answer













    We have $$ cot(x) = fraccos(x)sin(x) = fracsin(pi/2-x)cos(pi/2-x) = tan(pi/2-x)$$



    so it is reflected and shifted by $pi/2.$







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer











    answered Aug 3 at 3:57









    spaceisdarkgreen

    27.1k21546




    27.1k21546











    • But how do we know this till holds when theta, or x in this case, is greater than pi/2? For instance, what if x was 3pi/4? How would this still hold? Can you prove it me please?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:07






    • 6




      @EthanChan Do you know what the graphs of $sin$ and $cos$ look like for all $x$?
      – spaceisdarkgreen
      Aug 3 at 4:17






    • 8




      Note: "it is reflected and shifted by $π/2$" holds for every trigonometric function when you change function to cofunction or the other way around. Quite useful. The answer uses this formula with $cos$ and $sin$ to obtain it for $cot$.
      – Kamil Maciorowski
      Aug 3 at 6:50







    • 3




      @EthanChan: In case you were taught the definition of $sin,cos$ in terms of the right-angle triangle, here is the correct way to extend it to other angles. Consider the unit circle $C$ in the $x,y$-plane (centred at origin with radius $1$). For angle $t$, draw a ray $R$ through the origin that is the result of rotating the $x$-axis by $t$ anti-clockwise. Let $P$ be the intersection of $R$ and $C$. Then define $cos(x),sin(x)$ as the $x,y$ coordinates of $P$. Equivalently, $P$ is the result of starting from $(1,0)$ and moving anti-clockwise along $C$ by a distance (arc-length) of $t$.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 11:59






    • 2




      @EthanChan: Then observe that if you change the angle from $t$ to $π/2-t$ it is equivalent to reflecting $P$ across the line $x=y$. This is the geometric reason why $cos(t) = sin(π/2-t)$ and $sin(t) = cos(π/2-t)$, because the $x,y$-coordinates are swapped in such a reflection.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 12:02
















    • But how do we know this till holds when theta, or x in this case, is greater than pi/2? For instance, what if x was 3pi/4? How would this still hold? Can you prove it me please?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:07






    • 6




      @EthanChan Do you know what the graphs of $sin$ and $cos$ look like for all $x$?
      – spaceisdarkgreen
      Aug 3 at 4:17






    • 8




      Note: "it is reflected and shifted by $π/2$" holds for every trigonometric function when you change function to cofunction or the other way around. Quite useful. The answer uses this formula with $cos$ and $sin$ to obtain it for $cot$.
      – Kamil Maciorowski
      Aug 3 at 6:50







    • 3




      @EthanChan: In case you were taught the definition of $sin,cos$ in terms of the right-angle triangle, here is the correct way to extend it to other angles. Consider the unit circle $C$ in the $x,y$-plane (centred at origin with radius $1$). For angle $t$, draw a ray $R$ through the origin that is the result of rotating the $x$-axis by $t$ anti-clockwise. Let $P$ be the intersection of $R$ and $C$. Then define $cos(x),sin(x)$ as the $x,y$ coordinates of $P$. Equivalently, $P$ is the result of starting from $(1,0)$ and moving anti-clockwise along $C$ by a distance (arc-length) of $t$.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 11:59






    • 2




      @EthanChan: Then observe that if you change the angle from $t$ to $π/2-t$ it is equivalent to reflecting $P$ across the line $x=y$. This is the geometric reason why $cos(t) = sin(π/2-t)$ and $sin(t) = cos(π/2-t)$, because the $x,y$-coordinates are swapped in such a reflection.
      – user21820
      Aug 3 at 12:02















    But how do we know this till holds when theta, or x in this case, is greater than pi/2? For instance, what if x was 3pi/4? How would this still hold? Can you prove it me please?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 4:07




    But how do we know this till holds when theta, or x in this case, is greater than pi/2? For instance, what if x was 3pi/4? How would this still hold? Can you prove it me please?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 4:07




    6




    6




    @EthanChan Do you know what the graphs of $sin$ and $cos$ look like for all $x$?
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Aug 3 at 4:17




    @EthanChan Do you know what the graphs of $sin$ and $cos$ look like for all $x$?
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Aug 3 at 4:17




    8




    8




    Note: "it is reflected and shifted by $π/2$" holds for every trigonometric function when you change function to cofunction or the other way around. Quite useful. The answer uses this formula with $cos$ and $sin$ to obtain it for $cot$.
    – Kamil Maciorowski
    Aug 3 at 6:50





    Note: "it is reflected and shifted by $π/2$" holds for every trigonometric function when you change function to cofunction or the other way around. Quite useful. The answer uses this formula with $cos$ and $sin$ to obtain it for $cot$.
    – Kamil Maciorowski
    Aug 3 at 6:50





    3




    3




    @EthanChan: In case you were taught the definition of $sin,cos$ in terms of the right-angle triangle, here is the correct way to extend it to other angles. Consider the unit circle $C$ in the $x,y$-plane (centred at origin with radius $1$). For angle $t$, draw a ray $R$ through the origin that is the result of rotating the $x$-axis by $t$ anti-clockwise. Let $P$ be the intersection of $R$ and $C$. Then define $cos(x),sin(x)$ as the $x,y$ coordinates of $P$. Equivalently, $P$ is the result of starting from $(1,0)$ and moving anti-clockwise along $C$ by a distance (arc-length) of $t$.
    – user21820
    Aug 3 at 11:59




    @EthanChan: In case you were taught the definition of $sin,cos$ in terms of the right-angle triangle, here is the correct way to extend it to other angles. Consider the unit circle $C$ in the $x,y$-plane (centred at origin with radius $1$). For angle $t$, draw a ray $R$ through the origin that is the result of rotating the $x$-axis by $t$ anti-clockwise. Let $P$ be the intersection of $R$ and $C$. Then define $cos(x),sin(x)$ as the $x,y$ coordinates of $P$. Equivalently, $P$ is the result of starting from $(1,0)$ and moving anti-clockwise along $C$ by a distance (arc-length) of $t$.
    – user21820
    Aug 3 at 11:59




    2




    2




    @EthanChan: Then observe that if you change the angle from $t$ to $π/2-t$ it is equivalent to reflecting $P$ across the line $x=y$. This is the geometric reason why $cos(t) = sin(π/2-t)$ and $sin(t) = cos(π/2-t)$, because the $x,y$-coordinates are swapped in such a reflection.
    – user21820
    Aug 3 at 12:02




    @EthanChan: Then observe that if you change the angle from $t$ to $π/2-t$ it is equivalent to reflecting $P$ across the line $x=y$. This is the geometric reason why $cos(t) = sin(π/2-t)$ and $sin(t) = cos(π/2-t)$, because the $x,y$-coordinates are swapped in such a reflection.
    – user21820
    Aug 3 at 12:02










    up vote
    4
    down vote













    $$cottheta = fraccosthetasintheta = fracsin(fracpi2-theta)cos(fracpi2-theta) = tanBig(fracpi2-thetaBig)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Okay. Last thing, how does this work for values of theta greater than 90 degrees?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 3:58










    • These identities are always true, as long as $sinthetaneq0$.
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 3:59










    • But can you prove why they will always be true?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:08






    • 1




      That depends on your definitions of the trig functions. Cotangent is always cosine over sine, and tangent is always sine over cosine. All that remains is whether $costheta = sin(pi/2-theta)$ (which is equivalent to the same with $cos$ and $sin$ swapped; try $theta=pi/2-phi$).
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:10











    • If you're using the unit circle, defining $costheta=x$ and $sintheta=y$, then swapping $sintheta$ and $costheta$ is the same as reflecting across the line $y=x$. This reflects the angle relative to $pi/4$. $$theta'-fracpi4=-Big(theta-fracpi4Big)$$ $$theta'=fracpi2-theta$$ $$costheta=sintheta'=sin(pi/2-theta)$$
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:23















    up vote
    4
    down vote













    $$cottheta = fraccosthetasintheta = fracsin(fracpi2-theta)cos(fracpi2-theta) = tanBig(fracpi2-thetaBig)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Okay. Last thing, how does this work for values of theta greater than 90 degrees?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 3:58










    • These identities are always true, as long as $sinthetaneq0$.
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 3:59










    • But can you prove why they will always be true?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:08






    • 1




      That depends on your definitions of the trig functions. Cotangent is always cosine over sine, and tangent is always sine over cosine. All that remains is whether $costheta = sin(pi/2-theta)$ (which is equivalent to the same with $cos$ and $sin$ swapped; try $theta=pi/2-phi$).
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:10











    • If you're using the unit circle, defining $costheta=x$ and $sintheta=y$, then swapping $sintheta$ and $costheta$ is the same as reflecting across the line $y=x$. This reflects the angle relative to $pi/4$. $$theta'-fracpi4=-Big(theta-fracpi4Big)$$ $$theta'=fracpi2-theta$$ $$costheta=sintheta'=sin(pi/2-theta)$$
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:23













    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    $$cottheta = fraccosthetasintheta = fracsin(fracpi2-theta)cos(fracpi2-theta) = tanBig(fracpi2-thetaBig)$$






    share|cite|improve this answer













    $$cottheta = fraccosthetasintheta = fracsin(fracpi2-theta)cos(fracpi2-theta) = tanBig(fracpi2-thetaBig)$$







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer











    answered Aug 3 at 3:57









    mr_e_man

    843119




    843119











    • Okay. Last thing, how does this work for values of theta greater than 90 degrees?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 3:58










    • These identities are always true, as long as $sinthetaneq0$.
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 3:59










    • But can you prove why they will always be true?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:08






    • 1




      That depends on your definitions of the trig functions. Cotangent is always cosine over sine, and tangent is always sine over cosine. All that remains is whether $costheta = sin(pi/2-theta)$ (which is equivalent to the same with $cos$ and $sin$ swapped; try $theta=pi/2-phi$).
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:10











    • If you're using the unit circle, defining $costheta=x$ and $sintheta=y$, then swapping $sintheta$ and $costheta$ is the same as reflecting across the line $y=x$. This reflects the angle relative to $pi/4$. $$theta'-fracpi4=-Big(theta-fracpi4Big)$$ $$theta'=fracpi2-theta$$ $$costheta=sintheta'=sin(pi/2-theta)$$
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:23

















    • Okay. Last thing, how does this work for values of theta greater than 90 degrees?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 3:58










    • These identities are always true, as long as $sinthetaneq0$.
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 3:59










    • But can you prove why they will always be true?
      – Ethan Chan
      Aug 3 at 4:08






    • 1




      That depends on your definitions of the trig functions. Cotangent is always cosine over sine, and tangent is always sine over cosine. All that remains is whether $costheta = sin(pi/2-theta)$ (which is equivalent to the same with $cos$ and $sin$ swapped; try $theta=pi/2-phi$).
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:10











    • If you're using the unit circle, defining $costheta=x$ and $sintheta=y$, then swapping $sintheta$ and $costheta$ is the same as reflecting across the line $y=x$. This reflects the angle relative to $pi/4$. $$theta'-fracpi4=-Big(theta-fracpi4Big)$$ $$theta'=fracpi2-theta$$ $$costheta=sintheta'=sin(pi/2-theta)$$
      – mr_e_man
      Aug 3 at 4:23
















    Okay. Last thing, how does this work for values of theta greater than 90 degrees?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 3:58




    Okay. Last thing, how does this work for values of theta greater than 90 degrees?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 3:58












    These identities are always true, as long as $sinthetaneq0$.
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 3:59




    These identities are always true, as long as $sinthetaneq0$.
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 3:59












    But can you prove why they will always be true?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 4:08




    But can you prove why they will always be true?
    – Ethan Chan
    Aug 3 at 4:08




    1




    1




    That depends on your definitions of the trig functions. Cotangent is always cosine over sine, and tangent is always sine over cosine. All that remains is whether $costheta = sin(pi/2-theta)$ (which is equivalent to the same with $cos$ and $sin$ swapped; try $theta=pi/2-phi$).
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 4:10





    That depends on your definitions of the trig functions. Cotangent is always cosine over sine, and tangent is always sine over cosine. All that remains is whether $costheta = sin(pi/2-theta)$ (which is equivalent to the same with $cos$ and $sin$ swapped; try $theta=pi/2-phi$).
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 4:10













    If you're using the unit circle, defining $costheta=x$ and $sintheta=y$, then swapping $sintheta$ and $costheta$ is the same as reflecting across the line $y=x$. This reflects the angle relative to $pi/4$. $$theta'-fracpi4=-Big(theta-fracpi4Big)$$ $$theta'=fracpi2-theta$$ $$costheta=sintheta'=sin(pi/2-theta)$$
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 4:23





    If you're using the unit circle, defining $costheta=x$ and $sintheta=y$, then swapping $sintheta$ and $costheta$ is the same as reflecting across the line $y=x$. This reflects the angle relative to $pi/4$. $$theta'-fracpi4=-Big(theta-fracpi4Big)$$ $$theta'=fracpi2-theta$$ $$costheta=sintheta'=sin(pi/2-theta)$$
    – mr_e_man
    Aug 3 at 4:23











    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Just as a visual complement for the answers you already have, notice the following animation.



    Green angle: $theta$, yellow angle: $pi/2 - theta$ and $cot(x)$ is the red curve.



    enter image description here



    For more details regarding these types of constructions, see this question.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Just as a visual complement for the answers you already have, notice the following animation.



      Green angle: $theta$, yellow angle: $pi/2 - theta$ and $cot(x)$ is the red curve.



      enter image description here



      For more details regarding these types of constructions, see this question.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        Just as a visual complement for the answers you already have, notice the following animation.



        Green angle: $theta$, yellow angle: $pi/2 - theta$ and $cot(x)$ is the red curve.



        enter image description here



        For more details regarding these types of constructions, see this question.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Just as a visual complement for the answers you already have, notice the following animation.



        Green angle: $theta$, yellow angle: $pi/2 - theta$ and $cot(x)$ is the red curve.



        enter image description here



        For more details regarding these types of constructions, see this question.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Aug 3 at 14:59









        A. Arredondo

        656




        656






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2870721%2fcan-someone-please-explain-to-me-why-cotangent-graphs-look-the-way-they-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?