Find the dimension of the Eigen-space corresponding to the Eigen value $ lambda $ with respect to $ vec v $

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2












Let $ V $ be a finite dimensional vector space over the field $ mathbbC $ and $ T: V to V $ be a linear transformation.



Suppose $ lambda $ is a Eigenvalue of $ T $.



Let the characteristics polynomial and minimal polynomial of $ T $ be respectively given by $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ and $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ .



If $ vec v $ be the Jordan basis of $ T $ , then find $ dim E(lambda , vec v) $ or the dimension of the Eigen-space corresponding to the Eigen value $ lambda $ with respect to $ vec v $.



Also find the Jordan matrix $ mathcalM (T) $



Answer:



Since the characteristic polynomial of $ T $ is $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ , we have $ dim (V)=m $ ,



Now the algebraic multiplicity of $ lambda $ is $ m $.



Since the minimal polynomial of $ T $ is $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ , the geometric multiplicity of $ lambda $ is also $ m $.



Thus the dimension of the Eigen space $ E(lambda) $ of $ lambda $ is given by



$ dim E(lambda)=m $



Am I right so far?



So there is a jordan block of size $ m $ as follows:



$$ mathcalM(T)=beginpmatrix lambda & 0 & 0 & cdots & 0 \ 0 & lambda & 0 & cdots & 0 \ vdots & vdots & & & vdots \ 0 & 0 & & cdots & lambda endpmatrix $$



Am I right so far?







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    If the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, by definition $T-lambda I=0$. Therefore $T=lambda I$. Which means that all vectors are eigenvectors corresponding to the eigevalue $lambda$. All the remaining information is not needed: The characteristic polynomial, the finite-dimensionality of $V$, even that $T$ is linear is not needed. Everything follows from knowing that the minimal polynomial is that simple.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 1:56











  • @LB_O "that $T$ is linear is not needed." How do you define the minimal polynomial of a non-linear transformation?
    – user539887
    Jun 29 at 6:57










  • Can someone answer the question ?
    – yourmath
    Jun 29 at 7:57










  • @user539887 Just lookup the definition of minimal polynomial and change nothing. All you need is a function $f:Vto V$ where $V$ is a vector space, or even less, a module over the ring of coefficients of the polynomial.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:51






  • 2




    @yourmath I already answered the question: Since the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, then $T$ is equal to multiplication by $lambda$. Therefore, all vectors are eigenvectors, the dimension of the eigenspace for $lambda$ is the dimension of $V$, and in any basis the matrix of $T$ is diagonal with $lambda$ in the diagonal. In particular, that is its Jordan form.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:54














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2












Let $ V $ be a finite dimensional vector space over the field $ mathbbC $ and $ T: V to V $ be a linear transformation.



Suppose $ lambda $ is a Eigenvalue of $ T $.



Let the characteristics polynomial and minimal polynomial of $ T $ be respectively given by $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ and $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ .



If $ vec v $ be the Jordan basis of $ T $ , then find $ dim E(lambda , vec v) $ or the dimension of the Eigen-space corresponding to the Eigen value $ lambda $ with respect to $ vec v $.



Also find the Jordan matrix $ mathcalM (T) $



Answer:



Since the characteristic polynomial of $ T $ is $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ , we have $ dim (V)=m $ ,



Now the algebraic multiplicity of $ lambda $ is $ m $.



Since the minimal polynomial of $ T $ is $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ , the geometric multiplicity of $ lambda $ is also $ m $.



Thus the dimension of the Eigen space $ E(lambda) $ of $ lambda $ is given by



$ dim E(lambda)=m $



Am I right so far?



So there is a jordan block of size $ m $ as follows:



$$ mathcalM(T)=beginpmatrix lambda & 0 & 0 & cdots & 0 \ 0 & lambda & 0 & cdots & 0 \ vdots & vdots & & & vdots \ 0 & 0 & & cdots & lambda endpmatrix $$



Am I right so far?







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    If the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, by definition $T-lambda I=0$. Therefore $T=lambda I$. Which means that all vectors are eigenvectors corresponding to the eigevalue $lambda$. All the remaining information is not needed: The characteristic polynomial, the finite-dimensionality of $V$, even that $T$ is linear is not needed. Everything follows from knowing that the minimal polynomial is that simple.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 1:56











  • @LB_O "that $T$ is linear is not needed." How do you define the minimal polynomial of a non-linear transformation?
    – user539887
    Jun 29 at 6:57










  • Can someone answer the question ?
    – yourmath
    Jun 29 at 7:57










  • @user539887 Just lookup the definition of minimal polynomial and change nothing. All you need is a function $f:Vto V$ where $V$ is a vector space, or even less, a module over the ring of coefficients of the polynomial.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:51






  • 2




    @yourmath I already answered the question: Since the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, then $T$ is equal to multiplication by $lambda$. Therefore, all vectors are eigenvectors, the dimension of the eigenspace for $lambda$ is the dimension of $V$, and in any basis the matrix of $T$ is diagonal with $lambda$ in the diagonal. In particular, that is its Jordan form.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:54












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
2






2





Let $ V $ be a finite dimensional vector space over the field $ mathbbC $ and $ T: V to V $ be a linear transformation.



Suppose $ lambda $ is a Eigenvalue of $ T $.



Let the characteristics polynomial and minimal polynomial of $ T $ be respectively given by $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ and $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ .



If $ vec v $ be the Jordan basis of $ T $ , then find $ dim E(lambda , vec v) $ or the dimension of the Eigen-space corresponding to the Eigen value $ lambda $ with respect to $ vec v $.



Also find the Jordan matrix $ mathcalM (T) $



Answer:



Since the characteristic polynomial of $ T $ is $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ , we have $ dim (V)=m $ ,



Now the algebraic multiplicity of $ lambda $ is $ m $.



Since the minimal polynomial of $ T $ is $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ , the geometric multiplicity of $ lambda $ is also $ m $.



Thus the dimension of the Eigen space $ E(lambda) $ of $ lambda $ is given by



$ dim E(lambda)=m $



Am I right so far?



So there is a jordan block of size $ m $ as follows:



$$ mathcalM(T)=beginpmatrix lambda & 0 & 0 & cdots & 0 \ 0 & lambda & 0 & cdots & 0 \ vdots & vdots & & & vdots \ 0 & 0 & & cdots & lambda endpmatrix $$



Am I right so far?







share|cite|improve this question











Let $ V $ be a finite dimensional vector space over the field $ mathbbC $ and $ T: V to V $ be a linear transformation.



Suppose $ lambda $ is a Eigenvalue of $ T $.



Let the characteristics polynomial and minimal polynomial of $ T $ be respectively given by $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ and $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ .



If $ vec v $ be the Jordan basis of $ T $ , then find $ dim E(lambda , vec v) $ or the dimension of the Eigen-space corresponding to the Eigen value $ lambda $ with respect to $ vec v $.



Also find the Jordan matrix $ mathcalM (T) $



Answer:



Since the characteristic polynomial of $ T $ is $ chi(lambda)=(z-lambda)^m $ , we have $ dim (V)=m $ ,



Now the algebraic multiplicity of $ lambda $ is $ m $.



Since the minimal polynomial of $ T $ is $ m(lambda)=z-lambda $ , the geometric multiplicity of $ lambda $ is also $ m $.



Thus the dimension of the Eigen space $ E(lambda) $ of $ lambda $ is given by



$ dim E(lambda)=m $



Am I right so far?



So there is a jordan block of size $ m $ as follows:



$$ mathcalM(T)=beginpmatrix lambda & 0 & 0 & cdots & 0 \ 0 & lambda & 0 & cdots & 0 \ vdots & vdots & & & vdots \ 0 & 0 & & cdots & lambda endpmatrix $$



Am I right so far?









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jun 29 at 0:45









yourmath

1,8021617




1,8021617







  • 1




    If the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, by definition $T-lambda I=0$. Therefore $T=lambda I$. Which means that all vectors are eigenvectors corresponding to the eigevalue $lambda$. All the remaining information is not needed: The characteristic polynomial, the finite-dimensionality of $V$, even that $T$ is linear is not needed. Everything follows from knowing that the minimal polynomial is that simple.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 1:56











  • @LB_O "that $T$ is linear is not needed." How do you define the minimal polynomial of a non-linear transformation?
    – user539887
    Jun 29 at 6:57










  • Can someone answer the question ?
    – yourmath
    Jun 29 at 7:57










  • @user539887 Just lookup the definition of minimal polynomial and change nothing. All you need is a function $f:Vto V$ where $V$ is a vector space, or even less, a module over the ring of coefficients of the polynomial.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:51






  • 2




    @yourmath I already answered the question: Since the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, then $T$ is equal to multiplication by $lambda$. Therefore, all vectors are eigenvectors, the dimension of the eigenspace for $lambda$ is the dimension of $V$, and in any basis the matrix of $T$ is diagonal with $lambda$ in the diagonal. In particular, that is its Jordan form.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:54












  • 1




    If the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, by definition $T-lambda I=0$. Therefore $T=lambda I$. Which means that all vectors are eigenvectors corresponding to the eigevalue $lambda$. All the remaining information is not needed: The characteristic polynomial, the finite-dimensionality of $V$, even that $T$ is linear is not needed. Everything follows from knowing that the minimal polynomial is that simple.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 1:56











  • @LB_O "that $T$ is linear is not needed." How do you define the minimal polynomial of a non-linear transformation?
    – user539887
    Jun 29 at 6:57










  • Can someone answer the question ?
    – yourmath
    Jun 29 at 7:57










  • @user539887 Just lookup the definition of minimal polynomial and change nothing. All you need is a function $f:Vto V$ where $V$ is a vector space, or even less, a module over the ring of coefficients of the polynomial.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:51






  • 2




    @yourmath I already answered the question: Since the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, then $T$ is equal to multiplication by $lambda$. Therefore, all vectors are eigenvectors, the dimension of the eigenspace for $lambda$ is the dimension of $V$, and in any basis the matrix of $T$ is diagonal with $lambda$ in the diagonal. In particular, that is its Jordan form.
    – user569098
    Jun 29 at 10:54







1




1




If the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, by definition $T-lambda I=0$. Therefore $T=lambda I$. Which means that all vectors are eigenvectors corresponding to the eigevalue $lambda$. All the remaining information is not needed: The characteristic polynomial, the finite-dimensionality of $V$, even that $T$ is linear is not needed. Everything follows from knowing that the minimal polynomial is that simple.
– user569098
Jun 29 at 1:56





If the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, by definition $T-lambda I=0$. Therefore $T=lambda I$. Which means that all vectors are eigenvectors corresponding to the eigevalue $lambda$. All the remaining information is not needed: The characteristic polynomial, the finite-dimensionality of $V$, even that $T$ is linear is not needed. Everything follows from knowing that the minimal polynomial is that simple.
– user569098
Jun 29 at 1:56













@LB_O "that $T$ is linear is not needed." How do you define the minimal polynomial of a non-linear transformation?
– user539887
Jun 29 at 6:57




@LB_O "that $T$ is linear is not needed." How do you define the minimal polynomial of a non-linear transformation?
– user539887
Jun 29 at 6:57












Can someone answer the question ?
– yourmath
Jun 29 at 7:57




Can someone answer the question ?
– yourmath
Jun 29 at 7:57












@user539887 Just lookup the definition of minimal polynomial and change nothing. All you need is a function $f:Vto V$ where $V$ is a vector space, or even less, a module over the ring of coefficients of the polynomial.
– user569098
Jun 29 at 10:51




@user539887 Just lookup the definition of minimal polynomial and change nothing. All you need is a function $f:Vto V$ where $V$ is a vector space, or even less, a module over the ring of coefficients of the polynomial.
– user569098
Jun 29 at 10:51




2




2




@yourmath I already answered the question: Since the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, then $T$ is equal to multiplication by $lambda$. Therefore, all vectors are eigenvectors, the dimension of the eigenspace for $lambda$ is the dimension of $V$, and in any basis the matrix of $T$ is diagonal with $lambda$ in the diagonal. In particular, that is its Jordan form.
– user569098
Jun 29 at 10:54




@yourmath I already answered the question: Since the minimal polynomial is $z-lambda$, then $T$ is equal to multiplication by $lambda$. Therefore, all vectors are eigenvectors, the dimension of the eigenspace for $lambda$ is the dimension of $V$, and in any basis the matrix of $T$ is diagonal with $lambda$ in the diagonal. In particular, that is its Jordan form.
– user569098
Jun 29 at 10:54










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Yes, you are right. For justification, see Wikipedia subtopic "Complex matrices" in the "Jordan normal form" article.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2835338%2ffind-the-dimension-of-the-eigen-space-corresponding-to-the-eigen-value-lamb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Yes, you are right. For justification, see Wikipedia subtopic "Complex matrices" in the "Jordan normal form" article.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Yes, you are right. For justification, see Wikipedia subtopic "Complex matrices" in the "Jordan normal form" article.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Yes, you are right. For justification, see Wikipedia subtopic "Complex matrices" in the "Jordan normal form" article.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Yes, you are right. For justification, see Wikipedia subtopic "Complex matrices" in the "Jordan normal form" article.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Aug 6 at 16:55









        Maurice P

        1,1501630




        1,1501630






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2835338%2ffind-the-dimension-of-the-eigen-space-corresponding-to-the-eigen-value-lamb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?