If a single integer power kills every element of abelian group $G$, then $G$ is finite (UPDATE after shown false)

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is it true that for any abelian group $G$, if there is some integer $k$ satisfying $g^k = e$ for every $g in G$, then $G$ is finite?



This is true if $G$ is finitely generated.



I believe that it is true in the general case but am struggling to prove this. Any help is appreciated.



EDIT: Alan Wang points out a simple counterexample to the proposition.



My original idea for this question came from Keith Conrad's algebra notes, which has the following exercise.




Show a finitely generated $A$-module $M$ is a torsion module if and only if there is some $a ne 0$ in $A$ such that $aM = 0$. (This is false without a hypothesis of finite generatedness even for $A = mathbbZ$, since infinite torsion abelian groups exist.)




It's the parenthetical which now has me confused. How is an infinite torsion abelian group an automatic counterexample?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 4




    What about infinite direct product of $BbbZ_2$?
    – Alan Wang
    Jul 21 at 6:43






  • 1




    It is false, take $C_p^mathbbN$ for example.
    – jgon
    Jul 21 at 6:43










  • Why couldn't the group have an infinite number of elements all of finite order?
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:44










  • "This is true if G is finitely generated." And it'd be false if it where infinitely generated. So the question is: is it possible to have an infinitely generated group where every element has a finite order? And ... why the heck not? As Alan Wang suggests why not $mathbb Z_2^mathbb N$ or, more generally, $ times_iin mathbb N mathbb Z_k_i$
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:49







  • 1




    For nonabelian groups you might want to explore the Burnside Problem. It is now known that there are infinite groups which are finitely generated and in which all the elements have bounded order.
    – Mark Bennet
    Jul 21 at 7:03














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is it true that for any abelian group $G$, if there is some integer $k$ satisfying $g^k = e$ for every $g in G$, then $G$ is finite?



This is true if $G$ is finitely generated.



I believe that it is true in the general case but am struggling to prove this. Any help is appreciated.



EDIT: Alan Wang points out a simple counterexample to the proposition.



My original idea for this question came from Keith Conrad's algebra notes, which has the following exercise.




Show a finitely generated $A$-module $M$ is a torsion module if and only if there is some $a ne 0$ in $A$ such that $aM = 0$. (This is false without a hypothesis of finite generatedness even for $A = mathbbZ$, since infinite torsion abelian groups exist.)




It's the parenthetical which now has me confused. How is an infinite torsion abelian group an automatic counterexample?







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 4




    What about infinite direct product of $BbbZ_2$?
    – Alan Wang
    Jul 21 at 6:43






  • 1




    It is false, take $C_p^mathbbN$ for example.
    – jgon
    Jul 21 at 6:43










  • Why couldn't the group have an infinite number of elements all of finite order?
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:44










  • "This is true if G is finitely generated." And it'd be false if it where infinitely generated. So the question is: is it possible to have an infinitely generated group where every element has a finite order? And ... why the heck not? As Alan Wang suggests why not $mathbb Z_2^mathbb N$ or, more generally, $ times_iin mathbb N mathbb Z_k_i$
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:49







  • 1




    For nonabelian groups you might want to explore the Burnside Problem. It is now known that there are infinite groups which are finitely generated and in which all the elements have bounded order.
    – Mark Bennet
    Jul 21 at 7:03












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Is it true that for any abelian group $G$, if there is some integer $k$ satisfying $g^k = e$ for every $g in G$, then $G$ is finite?



This is true if $G$ is finitely generated.



I believe that it is true in the general case but am struggling to prove this. Any help is appreciated.



EDIT: Alan Wang points out a simple counterexample to the proposition.



My original idea for this question came from Keith Conrad's algebra notes, which has the following exercise.




Show a finitely generated $A$-module $M$ is a torsion module if and only if there is some $a ne 0$ in $A$ such that $aM = 0$. (This is false without a hypothesis of finite generatedness even for $A = mathbbZ$, since infinite torsion abelian groups exist.)




It's the parenthetical which now has me confused. How is an infinite torsion abelian group an automatic counterexample?







share|cite|improve this question













Is it true that for any abelian group $G$, if there is some integer $k$ satisfying $g^k = e$ for every $g in G$, then $G$ is finite?



This is true if $G$ is finitely generated.



I believe that it is true in the general case but am struggling to prove this. Any help is appreciated.



EDIT: Alan Wang points out a simple counterexample to the proposition.



My original idea for this question came from Keith Conrad's algebra notes, which has the following exercise.




Show a finitely generated $A$-module $M$ is a torsion module if and only if there is some $a ne 0$ in $A$ such that $aM = 0$. (This is false without a hypothesis of finite generatedness even for $A = mathbbZ$, since infinite torsion abelian groups exist.)




It's the parenthetical which now has me confused. How is an infinite torsion abelian group an automatic counterexample?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 21 at 7:02
























asked Jul 21 at 6:41









CuriousKid7

1,438517




1,438517







  • 4




    What about infinite direct product of $BbbZ_2$?
    – Alan Wang
    Jul 21 at 6:43






  • 1




    It is false, take $C_p^mathbbN$ for example.
    – jgon
    Jul 21 at 6:43










  • Why couldn't the group have an infinite number of elements all of finite order?
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:44










  • "This is true if G is finitely generated." And it'd be false if it where infinitely generated. So the question is: is it possible to have an infinitely generated group where every element has a finite order? And ... why the heck not? As Alan Wang suggests why not $mathbb Z_2^mathbb N$ or, more generally, $ times_iin mathbb N mathbb Z_k_i$
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:49







  • 1




    For nonabelian groups you might want to explore the Burnside Problem. It is now known that there are infinite groups which are finitely generated and in which all the elements have bounded order.
    – Mark Bennet
    Jul 21 at 7:03












  • 4




    What about infinite direct product of $BbbZ_2$?
    – Alan Wang
    Jul 21 at 6:43






  • 1




    It is false, take $C_p^mathbbN$ for example.
    – jgon
    Jul 21 at 6:43










  • Why couldn't the group have an infinite number of elements all of finite order?
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:44










  • "This is true if G is finitely generated." And it'd be false if it where infinitely generated. So the question is: is it possible to have an infinitely generated group where every element has a finite order? And ... why the heck not? As Alan Wang suggests why not $mathbb Z_2^mathbb N$ or, more generally, $ times_iin mathbb N mathbb Z_k_i$
    – fleablood
    Jul 21 at 6:49







  • 1




    For nonabelian groups you might want to explore the Burnside Problem. It is now known that there are infinite groups which are finitely generated and in which all the elements have bounded order.
    – Mark Bennet
    Jul 21 at 7:03







4




4




What about infinite direct product of $BbbZ_2$?
– Alan Wang
Jul 21 at 6:43




What about infinite direct product of $BbbZ_2$?
– Alan Wang
Jul 21 at 6:43




1




1




It is false, take $C_p^mathbbN$ for example.
– jgon
Jul 21 at 6:43




It is false, take $C_p^mathbbN$ for example.
– jgon
Jul 21 at 6:43












Why couldn't the group have an infinite number of elements all of finite order?
– fleablood
Jul 21 at 6:44




Why couldn't the group have an infinite number of elements all of finite order?
– fleablood
Jul 21 at 6:44












"This is true if G is finitely generated." And it'd be false if it where infinitely generated. So the question is: is it possible to have an infinitely generated group where every element has a finite order? And ... why the heck not? As Alan Wang suggests why not $mathbb Z_2^mathbb N$ or, more generally, $ times_iin mathbb N mathbb Z_k_i$
– fleablood
Jul 21 at 6:49





"This is true if G is finitely generated." And it'd be false if it where infinitely generated. So the question is: is it possible to have an infinitely generated group where every element has a finite order? And ... why the heck not? As Alan Wang suggests why not $mathbb Z_2^mathbb N$ or, more generally, $ times_iin mathbb N mathbb Z_k_i$
– fleablood
Jul 21 at 6:49





1




1




For nonabelian groups you might want to explore the Burnside Problem. It is now known that there are infinite groups which are finitely generated and in which all the elements have bounded order.
– Mark Bennet
Jul 21 at 7:03




For nonabelian groups you might want to explore the Burnside Problem. It is now known that there are infinite groups which are finitely generated and in which all the elements have bounded order.
– Mark Bennet
Jul 21 at 7:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










Existence of an infinite torsion group in itself does not necessarily provide a counterexample for the (parenthesised part of the) proposition.



However, consider e.g. $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$. Here each element $a/b$ is killed by an integer ($b$), but no integer kills the whole group.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858287%2fif-a-single-integer-power-kills-every-element-of-abelian-group-g-then-g-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote



    accepted










    Existence of an infinite torsion group in itself does not necessarily provide a counterexample for the (parenthesised part of the) proposition.



    However, consider e.g. $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$. Here each element $a/b$ is killed by an integer ($b$), but no integer kills the whole group.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      2
      down vote



      accepted










      Existence of an infinite torsion group in itself does not necessarily provide a counterexample for the (parenthesised part of the) proposition.



      However, consider e.g. $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$. Here each element $a/b$ is killed by an integer ($b$), but no integer kills the whole group.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        2
        down vote



        accepted






        Existence of an infinite torsion group in itself does not necessarily provide a counterexample for the (parenthesised part of the) proposition.



        However, consider e.g. $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$. Here each element $a/b$ is killed by an integer ($b$), but no integer kills the whole group.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Existence of an infinite torsion group in itself does not necessarily provide a counterexample for the (parenthesised part of the) proposition.



        However, consider e.g. $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$. Here each element $a/b$ is killed by an integer ($b$), but no integer kills the whole group.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 21 at 8:19









        Berci

        56.4k23570




        56.4k23570






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858287%2fif-a-single-integer-power-kills-every-element-of-abelian-group-g-then-g-is%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?