Is it possible to fourier analyze a hill function?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In mathematical models of genetic transcriptional circuits, you get a lot of differential equations of the form:



$$ fracdp(t)dt = k frac a(t) 1 + a(t)$$



Is there any way to fourier analyze this differential equation in $a(t)$ and $p(t)$ - without linearizing? I'd like to examine $P(omega)$ as a response of $A(omega)$.



There doesn't seem to be a way.



$$ frac12pi int_-infty^infty iomega P(omega)e^iomega t domega = k fracfrac12piint_-infty^infty A(omega)e^iomega t domega1 + frac12pi int_-infty^inftyA(omega) e^iomega t domega $$



Is there some kind of Fourier Analysis chain rule I could use?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • You seem to believe that the Fourier transform of $a/(1+a)$ is $A/(1+A)$. This is wrong.
    – Julián Aguirre
    Jul 24 at 16:39











  • Well there is a difference between $A/(1 + A)$ and $int A e^iomega d omega/ left [ 2pi + int A e^iomega t d omega right ]$ right? I'm trying to substitute in the inverse Fourier transform. Though I agree that the forward direction is probably better.
    – Mike Flynn
    Jul 24 at 18:31















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












In mathematical models of genetic transcriptional circuits, you get a lot of differential equations of the form:



$$ fracdp(t)dt = k frac a(t) 1 + a(t)$$



Is there any way to fourier analyze this differential equation in $a(t)$ and $p(t)$ - without linearizing? I'd like to examine $P(omega)$ as a response of $A(omega)$.



There doesn't seem to be a way.



$$ frac12pi int_-infty^infty iomega P(omega)e^iomega t domega = k fracfrac12piint_-infty^infty A(omega)e^iomega t domega1 + frac12pi int_-infty^inftyA(omega) e^iomega t domega $$



Is there some kind of Fourier Analysis chain rule I could use?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • You seem to believe that the Fourier transform of $a/(1+a)$ is $A/(1+A)$. This is wrong.
    – Julián Aguirre
    Jul 24 at 16:39











  • Well there is a difference between $A/(1 + A)$ and $int A e^iomega d omega/ left [ 2pi + int A e^iomega t d omega right ]$ right? I'm trying to substitute in the inverse Fourier transform. Though I agree that the forward direction is probably better.
    – Mike Flynn
    Jul 24 at 18:31













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











In mathematical models of genetic transcriptional circuits, you get a lot of differential equations of the form:



$$ fracdp(t)dt = k frac a(t) 1 + a(t)$$



Is there any way to fourier analyze this differential equation in $a(t)$ and $p(t)$ - without linearizing? I'd like to examine $P(omega)$ as a response of $A(omega)$.



There doesn't seem to be a way.



$$ frac12pi int_-infty^infty iomega P(omega)e^iomega t domega = k fracfrac12piint_-infty^infty A(omega)e^iomega t domega1 + frac12pi int_-infty^inftyA(omega) e^iomega t domega $$



Is there some kind of Fourier Analysis chain rule I could use?







share|cite|improve this question











In mathematical models of genetic transcriptional circuits, you get a lot of differential equations of the form:



$$ fracdp(t)dt = k frac a(t) 1 + a(t)$$



Is there any way to fourier analyze this differential equation in $a(t)$ and $p(t)$ - without linearizing? I'd like to examine $P(omega)$ as a response of $A(omega)$.



There doesn't seem to be a way.



$$ frac12pi int_-infty^infty iomega P(omega)e^iomega t domega = k fracfrac12piint_-infty^infty A(omega)e^iomega t domega1 + frac12pi int_-infty^inftyA(omega) e^iomega t domega $$



Is there some kind of Fourier Analysis chain rule I could use?









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 20 at 20:40









Mike Flynn

5611517




5611517











  • You seem to believe that the Fourier transform of $a/(1+a)$ is $A/(1+A)$. This is wrong.
    – Julián Aguirre
    Jul 24 at 16:39











  • Well there is a difference between $A/(1 + A)$ and $int A e^iomega d omega/ left [ 2pi + int A e^iomega t d omega right ]$ right? I'm trying to substitute in the inverse Fourier transform. Though I agree that the forward direction is probably better.
    – Mike Flynn
    Jul 24 at 18:31

















  • You seem to believe that the Fourier transform of $a/(1+a)$ is $A/(1+A)$. This is wrong.
    – Julián Aguirre
    Jul 24 at 16:39











  • Well there is a difference between $A/(1 + A)$ and $int A e^iomega d omega/ left [ 2pi + int A e^iomega t d omega right ]$ right? I'm trying to substitute in the inverse Fourier transform. Though I agree that the forward direction is probably better.
    – Mike Flynn
    Jul 24 at 18:31
















You seem to believe that the Fourier transform of $a/(1+a)$ is $A/(1+A)$. This is wrong.
– Julián Aguirre
Jul 24 at 16:39





You seem to believe that the Fourier transform of $a/(1+a)$ is $A/(1+A)$. This is wrong.
– Julián Aguirre
Jul 24 at 16:39













Well there is a difference between $A/(1 + A)$ and $int A e^iomega d omega/ left [ 2pi + int A e^iomega t d omega right ]$ right? I'm trying to substitute in the inverse Fourier transform. Though I agree that the forward direction is probably better.
– Mike Flynn
Jul 24 at 18:31





Well there is a difference between $A/(1 + A)$ and $int A e^iomega d omega/ left [ 2pi + int A e^iomega t d omega right ]$ right? I'm trying to substitute in the inverse Fourier transform. Though I agree that the forward direction is probably better.
– Mike Flynn
Jul 24 at 18:31
















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858008%2fis-it-possible-to-fourier-analyze-a-hill-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858008%2fis-it-possible-to-fourier-analyze-a-hill-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?