Is there any plane in a quintic threefold?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Sorry to bother if this question is trivial: For a general smooth quintic threefold $V$ in $mathbbP^4$ over an algebraic closed field $k$ of characteristic $0$. Is there a plane in $V$?
If Yes, how do I find it(them)? If no, under what condition there is a plane?
Thanks for any hints and comments.
geometry algebraic-geometry
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Sorry to bother if this question is trivial: For a general smooth quintic threefold $V$ in $mathbbP^4$ over an algebraic closed field $k$ of characteristic $0$. Is there a plane in $V$?
If Yes, how do I find it(them)? If no, under what condition there is a plane?
Thanks for any hints and comments.
geometry algebraic-geometry
Any smooth hypersurface in $mathbbP^n, ngeq 4$, the Picard group is $mathbbZ$, genertaed by the hyperplane section. So, there can not be any plane in $V$ as in your case (no generality assumption is necessary).
– Mohan
Jul 21 at 23:51
Thanks @Mohan, just want to make sure, is that because of the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem?
– Leo D
Jul 22 at 0:43
Yes, or Grothendieck-Lefshetz for arbitrary characteristic.
– Mohan
Jul 22 at 1:06
Also, if you know of the $2875$ lines on a general quintic threefold, there'd be lines without bound if a plane was in there. Not a proof, just a mnemonic.
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Jul 22 at 14:10
Thanks @Jan-MagnusØkland, it's a good point.
– Leo D
Jul 23 at 17:28
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
Sorry to bother if this question is trivial: For a general smooth quintic threefold $V$ in $mathbbP^4$ over an algebraic closed field $k$ of characteristic $0$. Is there a plane in $V$?
If Yes, how do I find it(them)? If no, under what condition there is a plane?
Thanks for any hints and comments.
geometry algebraic-geometry
Sorry to bother if this question is trivial: For a general smooth quintic threefold $V$ in $mathbbP^4$ over an algebraic closed field $k$ of characteristic $0$. Is there a plane in $V$?
If Yes, how do I find it(them)? If no, under what condition there is a plane?
Thanks for any hints and comments.
geometry algebraic-geometry
asked Jul 21 at 23:32


Leo D
686
686
Any smooth hypersurface in $mathbbP^n, ngeq 4$, the Picard group is $mathbbZ$, genertaed by the hyperplane section. So, there can not be any plane in $V$ as in your case (no generality assumption is necessary).
– Mohan
Jul 21 at 23:51
Thanks @Mohan, just want to make sure, is that because of the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem?
– Leo D
Jul 22 at 0:43
Yes, or Grothendieck-Lefshetz for arbitrary characteristic.
– Mohan
Jul 22 at 1:06
Also, if you know of the $2875$ lines on a general quintic threefold, there'd be lines without bound if a plane was in there. Not a proof, just a mnemonic.
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Jul 22 at 14:10
Thanks @Jan-MagnusØkland, it's a good point.
– Leo D
Jul 23 at 17:28
add a comment |Â
Any smooth hypersurface in $mathbbP^n, ngeq 4$, the Picard group is $mathbbZ$, genertaed by the hyperplane section. So, there can not be any plane in $V$ as in your case (no generality assumption is necessary).
– Mohan
Jul 21 at 23:51
Thanks @Mohan, just want to make sure, is that because of the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem?
– Leo D
Jul 22 at 0:43
Yes, or Grothendieck-Lefshetz for arbitrary characteristic.
– Mohan
Jul 22 at 1:06
Also, if you know of the $2875$ lines on a general quintic threefold, there'd be lines without bound if a plane was in there. Not a proof, just a mnemonic.
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Jul 22 at 14:10
Thanks @Jan-MagnusØkland, it's a good point.
– Leo D
Jul 23 at 17:28
Any smooth hypersurface in $mathbbP^n, ngeq 4$, the Picard group is $mathbbZ$, genertaed by the hyperplane section. So, there can not be any plane in $V$ as in your case (no generality assumption is necessary).
– Mohan
Jul 21 at 23:51
Any smooth hypersurface in $mathbbP^n, ngeq 4$, the Picard group is $mathbbZ$, genertaed by the hyperplane section. So, there can not be any plane in $V$ as in your case (no generality assumption is necessary).
– Mohan
Jul 21 at 23:51
Thanks @Mohan, just want to make sure, is that because of the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem?
– Leo D
Jul 22 at 0:43
Thanks @Mohan, just want to make sure, is that because of the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem?
– Leo D
Jul 22 at 0:43
Yes, or Grothendieck-Lefshetz for arbitrary characteristic.
– Mohan
Jul 22 at 1:06
Yes, or Grothendieck-Lefshetz for arbitrary characteristic.
– Mohan
Jul 22 at 1:06
Also, if you know of the $2875$ lines on a general quintic threefold, there'd be lines without bound if a plane was in there. Not a proof, just a mnemonic.
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Jul 22 at 14:10
Also, if you know of the $2875$ lines on a general quintic threefold, there'd be lines without bound if a plane was in there. Not a proof, just a mnemonic.
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Jul 22 at 14:10
Thanks @Jan-MagnusØkland, it's a good point.
– Leo D
Jul 23 at 17:28
Thanks @Jan-MagnusØkland, it's a good point.
– Leo D
Jul 23 at 17:28
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
There is also an elementary argument (I first saw it in http://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~jstarr/papers/appendix3.pdf):
Let $X=V(F)$ and suppose $X$ contains $P=X_0=X_1=0subsetmathbbP^4$. Then, we can write
$$F=F_0X_0+F_1X_1,$$
as $Fin langle X_0,X_1rangle$ by definition. Now,
beginalign*
partial_0 F|_P &= F_0\
partial_1 F|_P &= F_1\
partial_2 F|_P &= 0\
partial_3 F|_P &= 0.
endalign*
Now, we notice that $F_0,F_1$ have a common zero when restricted to $P$, so $X=V(F)$ is not smooth.
In general, this shows we cannot have any planes in a hypersurface exceeding half the dimension of the hypersurface.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
There is also an elementary argument (I first saw it in http://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~jstarr/papers/appendix3.pdf):
Let $X=V(F)$ and suppose $X$ contains $P=X_0=X_1=0subsetmathbbP^4$. Then, we can write
$$F=F_0X_0+F_1X_1,$$
as $Fin langle X_0,X_1rangle$ by definition. Now,
beginalign*
partial_0 F|_P &= F_0\
partial_1 F|_P &= F_1\
partial_2 F|_P &= 0\
partial_3 F|_P &= 0.
endalign*
Now, we notice that $F_0,F_1$ have a common zero when restricted to $P$, so $X=V(F)$ is not smooth.
In general, this shows we cannot have any planes in a hypersurface exceeding half the dimension of the hypersurface.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
There is also an elementary argument (I first saw it in http://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~jstarr/papers/appendix3.pdf):
Let $X=V(F)$ and suppose $X$ contains $P=X_0=X_1=0subsetmathbbP^4$. Then, we can write
$$F=F_0X_0+F_1X_1,$$
as $Fin langle X_0,X_1rangle$ by definition. Now,
beginalign*
partial_0 F|_P &= F_0\
partial_1 F|_P &= F_1\
partial_2 F|_P &= 0\
partial_3 F|_P &= 0.
endalign*
Now, we notice that $F_0,F_1$ have a common zero when restricted to $P$, so $X=V(F)$ is not smooth.
In general, this shows we cannot have any planes in a hypersurface exceeding half the dimension of the hypersurface.
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
There is also an elementary argument (I first saw it in http://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~jstarr/papers/appendix3.pdf):
Let $X=V(F)$ and suppose $X$ contains $P=X_0=X_1=0subsetmathbbP^4$. Then, we can write
$$F=F_0X_0+F_1X_1,$$
as $Fin langle X_0,X_1rangle$ by definition. Now,
beginalign*
partial_0 F|_P &= F_0\
partial_1 F|_P &= F_1\
partial_2 F|_P &= 0\
partial_3 F|_P &= 0.
endalign*
Now, we notice that $F_0,F_1$ have a common zero when restricted to $P$, so $X=V(F)$ is not smooth.
In general, this shows we cannot have any planes in a hypersurface exceeding half the dimension of the hypersurface.
There is also an elementary argument (I first saw it in http://www.math.stonybrook.edu/~jstarr/papers/appendix3.pdf):
Let $X=V(F)$ and suppose $X$ contains $P=X_0=X_1=0subsetmathbbP^4$. Then, we can write
$$F=F_0X_0+F_1X_1,$$
as $Fin langle X_0,X_1rangle$ by definition. Now,
beginalign*
partial_0 F|_P &= F_0\
partial_1 F|_P &= F_1\
partial_2 F|_P &= 0\
partial_3 F|_P &= 0.
endalign*
Now, we notice that $F_0,F_1$ have a common zero when restricted to $P$, so $X=V(F)$ is not smooth.
In general, this shows we cannot have any planes in a hypersurface exceeding half the dimension of the hypersurface.
answered Jul 22 at 2:17


Munchlax
1314
1314
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858964%2fis-there-any-plane-in-a-quintic-threefold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Any smooth hypersurface in $mathbbP^n, ngeq 4$, the Picard group is $mathbbZ$, genertaed by the hyperplane section. So, there can not be any plane in $V$ as in your case (no generality assumption is necessary).
– Mohan
Jul 21 at 23:51
Thanks @Mohan, just want to make sure, is that because of the Lefschetz hyperplane theorem?
– Leo D
Jul 22 at 0:43
Yes, or Grothendieck-Lefshetz for arbitrary characteristic.
– Mohan
Jul 22 at 1:06
Also, if you know of the $2875$ lines on a general quintic threefold, there'd be lines without bound if a plane was in there. Not a proof, just a mnemonic.
– Jan-Magnus Økland
Jul 22 at 14:10
Thanks @Jan-MagnusØkland, it's a good point.
– Leo D
Jul 23 at 17:28