Non smooth topological vector bundle of rank 3 base 1?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Does there exist a topological (not necessarily trivial) vector bundle $pi: Eto M$, with $dim(M)=1$ and $dimbig(pi^-1(x)big) =3$, that has no $C^1$ (or $C^2,C^infty$) structure?



I know that every topological manifold up to dimension 3 has a unique smooth structure and there are 4-manifolds with no smooth structure. So the question here is that can such a non-smooth 4-manifold be a rank 3 base 1 vector bundle? I am guessing that the local triviality should forbid the existence of such bundles but I do not know for sure.



$textbfAddition:$ It would also be sufficient to prove that a general topological vector bundle $pi:Eto M$ is automatically a $C^k$(or $C^infty$) bundle if the base manifold $M$ is $C^k$(or $C^infty$). In other words, to prove that it would be possible to construct an atlas of $E$ with bundle charts that are not only continuous but also has the same regularity of the charts of $M$.



Any references are warmly welcome. Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    The answer is no and it does not depend on dimension of either the base manifold or the vector bundle! (Well, you can achieve the same regularity as on the base manifold; more regularity doesn't make sense.) But every topological vector bundle over a smooth manifold has a unique structure as a smooth vector bundle up to isomorphism.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 21 at 23:32










  • @MikeMiller So this smooth structure is induced from the local triviality, i.e. bundle charts. Is this right?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:38










  • Yes, but you need to make sure the transition maps are smooth for the resulting vector bundle to naturally inherit the structure of a smooth manifold. This is the slightly delicate bit: you could try smoothing the maps $rho_alpha beta: U_alpha cap U_beta to GL(n)$, but you would probably lose the cocycle condition $rho_alpha beta rho_beta gamma = rho_alpha gamma$.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47







  • 1




    The easiest proof of the desired result is probably that on a compact manifold $M$, every rank $n$ vector bundle is given as the pullback of the tautological vector bundle over $textGr_n(Bbb R^n+k)$ for some sufficiently large $k$, which is a smooth manifold. The map $f: M to textGr$ is going to be continuous, but then you use the fact that any continuous map of smooth manifolds is homotopic to a smooth map (by an arbitrarily small homotopy).
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47










  • @MikeMiller Can you give me a reference for the proof?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:53














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Does there exist a topological (not necessarily trivial) vector bundle $pi: Eto M$, with $dim(M)=1$ and $dimbig(pi^-1(x)big) =3$, that has no $C^1$ (or $C^2,C^infty$) structure?



I know that every topological manifold up to dimension 3 has a unique smooth structure and there are 4-manifolds with no smooth structure. So the question here is that can such a non-smooth 4-manifold be a rank 3 base 1 vector bundle? I am guessing that the local triviality should forbid the existence of such bundles but I do not know for sure.



$textbfAddition:$ It would also be sufficient to prove that a general topological vector bundle $pi:Eto M$ is automatically a $C^k$(or $C^infty$) bundle if the base manifold $M$ is $C^k$(or $C^infty$). In other words, to prove that it would be possible to construct an atlas of $E$ with bundle charts that are not only continuous but also has the same regularity of the charts of $M$.



Any references are warmly welcome. Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 2




    The answer is no and it does not depend on dimension of either the base manifold or the vector bundle! (Well, you can achieve the same regularity as on the base manifold; more regularity doesn't make sense.) But every topological vector bundle over a smooth manifold has a unique structure as a smooth vector bundle up to isomorphism.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 21 at 23:32










  • @MikeMiller So this smooth structure is induced from the local triviality, i.e. bundle charts. Is this right?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:38










  • Yes, but you need to make sure the transition maps are smooth for the resulting vector bundle to naturally inherit the structure of a smooth manifold. This is the slightly delicate bit: you could try smoothing the maps $rho_alpha beta: U_alpha cap U_beta to GL(n)$, but you would probably lose the cocycle condition $rho_alpha beta rho_beta gamma = rho_alpha gamma$.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47







  • 1




    The easiest proof of the desired result is probably that on a compact manifold $M$, every rank $n$ vector bundle is given as the pullback of the tautological vector bundle over $textGr_n(Bbb R^n+k)$ for some sufficiently large $k$, which is a smooth manifold. The map $f: M to textGr$ is going to be continuous, but then you use the fact that any continuous map of smooth manifolds is homotopic to a smooth map (by an arbitrarily small homotopy).
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47










  • @MikeMiller Can you give me a reference for the proof?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:53












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Does there exist a topological (not necessarily trivial) vector bundle $pi: Eto M$, with $dim(M)=1$ and $dimbig(pi^-1(x)big) =3$, that has no $C^1$ (or $C^2,C^infty$) structure?



I know that every topological manifold up to dimension 3 has a unique smooth structure and there are 4-manifolds with no smooth structure. So the question here is that can such a non-smooth 4-manifold be a rank 3 base 1 vector bundle? I am guessing that the local triviality should forbid the existence of such bundles but I do not know for sure.



$textbfAddition:$ It would also be sufficient to prove that a general topological vector bundle $pi:Eto M$ is automatically a $C^k$(or $C^infty$) bundle if the base manifold $M$ is $C^k$(or $C^infty$). In other words, to prove that it would be possible to construct an atlas of $E$ with bundle charts that are not only continuous but also has the same regularity of the charts of $M$.



Any references are warmly welcome. Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question













Does there exist a topological (not necessarily trivial) vector bundle $pi: Eto M$, with $dim(M)=1$ and $dimbig(pi^-1(x)big) =3$, that has no $C^1$ (or $C^2,C^infty$) structure?



I know that every topological manifold up to dimension 3 has a unique smooth structure and there are 4-manifolds with no smooth structure. So the question here is that can such a non-smooth 4-manifold be a rank 3 base 1 vector bundle? I am guessing that the local triviality should forbid the existence of such bundles but I do not know for sure.



$textbfAddition:$ It would also be sufficient to prove that a general topological vector bundle $pi:Eto M$ is automatically a $C^k$(or $C^infty$) bundle if the base manifold $M$ is $C^k$(or $C^infty$). In other words, to prove that it would be possible to construct an atlas of $E$ with bundle charts that are not only continuous but also has the same regularity of the charts of $M$.



Any references are warmly welcome. Thanks.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 25 at 0:33
























asked Jul 21 at 22:52









smiley06

2,5001323




2,5001323







  • 2




    The answer is no and it does not depend on dimension of either the base manifold or the vector bundle! (Well, you can achieve the same regularity as on the base manifold; more regularity doesn't make sense.) But every topological vector bundle over a smooth manifold has a unique structure as a smooth vector bundle up to isomorphism.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 21 at 23:32










  • @MikeMiller So this smooth structure is induced from the local triviality, i.e. bundle charts. Is this right?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:38










  • Yes, but you need to make sure the transition maps are smooth for the resulting vector bundle to naturally inherit the structure of a smooth manifold. This is the slightly delicate bit: you could try smoothing the maps $rho_alpha beta: U_alpha cap U_beta to GL(n)$, but you would probably lose the cocycle condition $rho_alpha beta rho_beta gamma = rho_alpha gamma$.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47







  • 1




    The easiest proof of the desired result is probably that on a compact manifold $M$, every rank $n$ vector bundle is given as the pullback of the tautological vector bundle over $textGr_n(Bbb R^n+k)$ for some sufficiently large $k$, which is a smooth manifold. The map $f: M to textGr$ is going to be continuous, but then you use the fact that any continuous map of smooth manifolds is homotopic to a smooth map (by an arbitrarily small homotopy).
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47










  • @MikeMiller Can you give me a reference for the proof?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:53












  • 2




    The answer is no and it does not depend on dimension of either the base manifold or the vector bundle! (Well, you can achieve the same regularity as on the base manifold; more regularity doesn't make sense.) But every topological vector bundle over a smooth manifold has a unique structure as a smooth vector bundle up to isomorphism.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 21 at 23:32










  • @MikeMiller So this smooth structure is induced from the local triviality, i.e. bundle charts. Is this right?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:38










  • Yes, but you need to make sure the transition maps are smooth for the resulting vector bundle to naturally inherit the structure of a smooth manifold. This is the slightly delicate bit: you could try smoothing the maps $rho_alpha beta: U_alpha cap U_beta to GL(n)$, but you would probably lose the cocycle condition $rho_alpha beta rho_beta gamma = rho_alpha gamma$.
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47







  • 1




    The easiest proof of the desired result is probably that on a compact manifold $M$, every rank $n$ vector bundle is given as the pullback of the tautological vector bundle over $textGr_n(Bbb R^n+k)$ for some sufficiently large $k$, which is a smooth manifold. The map $f: M to textGr$ is going to be continuous, but then you use the fact that any continuous map of smooth manifolds is homotopic to a smooth map (by an arbitrarily small homotopy).
    – Mike Miller
    Jul 22 at 14:47










  • @MikeMiller Can you give me a reference for the proof?
    – smiley06
    Jul 22 at 14:53







2




2




The answer is no and it does not depend on dimension of either the base manifold or the vector bundle! (Well, you can achieve the same regularity as on the base manifold; more regularity doesn't make sense.) But every topological vector bundle over a smooth manifold has a unique structure as a smooth vector bundle up to isomorphism.
– Mike Miller
Jul 21 at 23:32




The answer is no and it does not depend on dimension of either the base manifold or the vector bundle! (Well, you can achieve the same regularity as on the base manifold; more regularity doesn't make sense.) But every topological vector bundle over a smooth manifold has a unique structure as a smooth vector bundle up to isomorphism.
– Mike Miller
Jul 21 at 23:32












@MikeMiller So this smooth structure is induced from the local triviality, i.e. bundle charts. Is this right?
– smiley06
Jul 22 at 14:38




@MikeMiller So this smooth structure is induced from the local triviality, i.e. bundle charts. Is this right?
– smiley06
Jul 22 at 14:38












Yes, but you need to make sure the transition maps are smooth for the resulting vector bundle to naturally inherit the structure of a smooth manifold. This is the slightly delicate bit: you could try smoothing the maps $rho_alpha beta: U_alpha cap U_beta to GL(n)$, but you would probably lose the cocycle condition $rho_alpha beta rho_beta gamma = rho_alpha gamma$.
– Mike Miller
Jul 22 at 14:47





Yes, but you need to make sure the transition maps are smooth for the resulting vector bundle to naturally inherit the structure of a smooth manifold. This is the slightly delicate bit: you could try smoothing the maps $rho_alpha beta: U_alpha cap U_beta to GL(n)$, but you would probably lose the cocycle condition $rho_alpha beta rho_beta gamma = rho_alpha gamma$.
– Mike Miller
Jul 22 at 14:47





1




1




The easiest proof of the desired result is probably that on a compact manifold $M$, every rank $n$ vector bundle is given as the pullback of the tautological vector bundle over $textGr_n(Bbb R^n+k)$ for some sufficiently large $k$, which is a smooth manifold. The map $f: M to textGr$ is going to be continuous, but then you use the fact that any continuous map of smooth manifolds is homotopic to a smooth map (by an arbitrarily small homotopy).
– Mike Miller
Jul 22 at 14:47




The easiest proof of the desired result is probably that on a compact manifold $M$, every rank $n$ vector bundle is given as the pullback of the tautological vector bundle over $textGr_n(Bbb R^n+k)$ for some sufficiently large $k$, which is a smooth manifold. The map $f: M to textGr$ is going to be continuous, but then you use the fact that any continuous map of smooth manifolds is homotopic to a smooth map (by an arbitrarily small homotopy).
– Mike Miller
Jul 22 at 14:47












@MikeMiller Can you give me a reference for the proof?
– smiley06
Jul 22 at 14:53




@MikeMiller Can you give me a reference for the proof?
– smiley06
Jul 22 at 14:53















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858950%2fnon-smooth-topological-vector-bundle-of-rank-3-base-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858950%2fnon-smooth-topological-vector-bundle-of-rank-3-base-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?