Property of prime divisors in group theory

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose you have a group of order $ms$ and it is $m leq p$ for every prime factor of $s$. We want to show that a subgroup $H$ with $(G:H)=m$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.



So let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ with $vert Hvert=s$ and $K$ be another subgroup of $G$ of order $s$. Then we have



$$ vert HKvert= fracvert H vert vert K vertvert H cap K vert=fracs^2vert H cap K vert leq ms Longleftrightarrow fracsvert H cap Kvert leq m.$$



Suppose now that $fracsvert H cap Kvert>1$. Is it always true that in this case $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of the group order? I read this in another post, but I don't see an argument for this.



My attempt:



$vert H cap K vert$ is a divisor of $s$ (how to show?). Then $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of $fracs^2vert H cap Kvert$. But how do we get to the order of $G$ in this case?



Maybe there is an easier way to prove this statement...







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Yes if $|G:H|=p$ is the smallest prime dividing $|G|$, then $H$ is normal in $G$.
    – Alan Wang
    16 hours ago










  • @AlanWang I know, but why is in the upper case $m$ the smallest prime divisor of $vert Gvert=ms$? With the explanation of this the given statement follows immediately.
    – Jan
    16 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Suppose you have a group of order $ms$ and it is $m leq p$ for every prime factor of $s$. We want to show that a subgroup $H$ with $(G:H)=m$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.



So let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ with $vert Hvert=s$ and $K$ be another subgroup of $G$ of order $s$. Then we have



$$ vert HKvert= fracvert H vert vert K vertvert H cap K vert=fracs^2vert H cap K vert leq ms Longleftrightarrow fracsvert H cap Kvert leq m.$$



Suppose now that $fracsvert H cap Kvert>1$. Is it always true that in this case $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of the group order? I read this in another post, but I don't see an argument for this.



My attempt:



$vert H cap K vert$ is a divisor of $s$ (how to show?). Then $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of $fracs^2vert H cap Kvert$. But how do we get to the order of $G$ in this case?



Maybe there is an easier way to prove this statement...







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Yes if $|G:H|=p$ is the smallest prime dividing $|G|$, then $H$ is normal in $G$.
    – Alan Wang
    16 hours ago










  • @AlanWang I know, but why is in the upper case $m$ the smallest prime divisor of $vert Gvert=ms$? With the explanation of this the given statement follows immediately.
    – Jan
    16 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Suppose you have a group of order $ms$ and it is $m leq p$ for every prime factor of $s$. We want to show that a subgroup $H$ with $(G:H)=m$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.



So let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ with $vert Hvert=s$ and $K$ be another subgroup of $G$ of order $s$. Then we have



$$ vert HKvert= fracvert H vert vert K vertvert H cap K vert=fracs^2vert H cap K vert leq ms Longleftrightarrow fracsvert H cap Kvert leq m.$$



Suppose now that $fracsvert H cap Kvert>1$. Is it always true that in this case $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of the group order? I read this in another post, but I don't see an argument for this.



My attempt:



$vert H cap K vert$ is a divisor of $s$ (how to show?). Then $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of $fracs^2vert H cap Kvert$. But how do we get to the order of $G$ in this case?



Maybe there is an easier way to prove this statement...







share|cite|improve this question











Suppose you have a group of order $ms$ and it is $m leq p$ for every prime factor of $s$. We want to show that a subgroup $H$ with $(G:H)=m$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.



So let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$ with $vert Hvert=s$ and $K$ be another subgroup of $G$ of order $s$. Then we have



$$ vert HKvert= fracvert H vert vert K vertvert H cap K vert=fracs^2vert H cap K vert leq ms Longleftrightarrow fracsvert H cap Kvert leq m.$$



Suppose now that $fracsvert H cap Kvert>1$. Is it always true that in this case $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of the group order? I read this in another post, but I don't see an argument for this.



My attempt:



$vert H cap K vert$ is a divisor of $s$ (how to show?). Then $m$ is the smallest prime divisor of $fracs^2vert H cap Kvert$. But how do we get to the order of $G$ in this case?



Maybe there is an easier way to prove this statement...









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked 16 hours ago









Jan

116111




116111











  • Yes if $|G:H|=p$ is the smallest prime dividing $|G|$, then $H$ is normal in $G$.
    – Alan Wang
    16 hours ago










  • @AlanWang I know, but why is in the upper case $m$ the smallest prime divisor of $vert Gvert=ms$? With the explanation of this the given statement follows immediately.
    – Jan
    16 hours ago
















  • Yes if $|G:H|=p$ is the smallest prime dividing $|G|$, then $H$ is normal in $G$.
    – Alan Wang
    16 hours ago










  • @AlanWang I know, but why is in the upper case $m$ the smallest prime divisor of $vert Gvert=ms$? With the explanation of this the given statement follows immediately.
    – Jan
    16 hours ago















Yes if $|G:H|=p$ is the smallest prime dividing $|G|$, then $H$ is normal in $G$.
– Alan Wang
16 hours ago




Yes if $|G:H|=p$ is the smallest prime dividing $|G|$, then $H$ is normal in $G$.
– Alan Wang
16 hours ago












@AlanWang I know, but why is in the upper case $m$ the smallest prime divisor of $vert Gvert=ms$? With the explanation of this the given statement follows immediately.
– Jan
16 hours ago




@AlanWang I know, but why is in the upper case $m$ the smallest prime divisor of $vert Gvert=ms$? With the explanation of this the given statement follows immediately.
– Jan
16 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873028%2fproperty-of-prime-divisors-in-group-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873028%2fproperty-of-prime-divisors-in-group-theory%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?