Show that this Artinian ring is also Noetherian.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












I'm working on the following problem and I'm stuck. Any hints or solutions would be appreciated




Let $R$ be a left Artinian ring with Jacobson radical $J(R)$. If $R neq J(R)$.
show that $R$ is a left Noetherian ring.




Here are my thoughts: I think we have to use the ascending/descending chain definitions for artinian and noetherian since I dont see how we can show that all ideals are finitely generated. Besides that, maybe we can somehow use the condition that $J(R)neq R$ by considering an element in $R$ that is not in $J(R)$... but I'm not sure how that's useful.



Source: Spring 1996







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    I'm working on the following problem and I'm stuck. Any hints or solutions would be appreciated




    Let $R$ be a left Artinian ring with Jacobson radical $J(R)$. If $R neq J(R)$.
    show that $R$ is a left Noetherian ring.




    Here are my thoughts: I think we have to use the ascending/descending chain definitions for artinian and noetherian since I dont see how we can show that all ideals are finitely generated. Besides that, maybe we can somehow use the condition that $J(R)neq R$ by considering an element in $R$ that is not in $J(R)$... but I'm not sure how that's useful.



    Source: Spring 1996







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      I'm working on the following problem and I'm stuck. Any hints or solutions would be appreciated




      Let $R$ be a left Artinian ring with Jacobson radical $J(R)$. If $R neq J(R)$.
      show that $R$ is a left Noetherian ring.




      Here are my thoughts: I think we have to use the ascending/descending chain definitions for artinian and noetherian since I dont see how we can show that all ideals are finitely generated. Besides that, maybe we can somehow use the condition that $J(R)neq R$ by considering an element in $R$ that is not in $J(R)$... but I'm not sure how that's useful.



      Source: Spring 1996







      share|cite|improve this question













      I'm working on the following problem and I'm stuck. Any hints or solutions would be appreciated




      Let $R$ be a left Artinian ring with Jacobson radical $J(R)$. If $R neq J(R)$.
      show that $R$ is a left Noetherian ring.




      Here are my thoughts: I think we have to use the ascending/descending chain definitions for artinian and noetherian since I dont see how we can show that all ideals are finitely generated. Besides that, maybe we can somehow use the condition that $J(R)neq R$ by considering an element in $R$ that is not in $J(R)$... but I'm not sure how that's useful.



      Source: Spring 1996









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 22 at 11:38









      Pierre-Yves Gaillard

      12.7k23179




      12.7k23179









      asked Jul 21 at 23:38









      iYOA

      60549




      60549




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          The ring $R/J(R)$ is semisimple Artinian. Thus every Artinian left module over $R/J(R)$ is Noetherian and the same is true for every Artinian left $R$-module $M$ such that $JM=0$.



          Since $J^n$ is Artinian as a left $R$-module, we can conclude that $J^n/J^n+1$ is Noetherian.



          It remains to show that $J=J(R)$ is nilpotent, say $J^m=0$, because then we can consider the chain
          $$
          0=J^msubseteq J^m-1subseteq dots subseteq J^2subseteq Jsubseteq R
          $$
          where each factor is Noetherian.



          Since $R$ is Artinian, there is $m$ such that $J^k=J^m$, for every $kge m$. Suppose $J^mne0$. There is a left ideal $I$ such that $J^mIne0$, namely $I=J$. So we can pick $I_0$ minimal such that $J^mI_0ne0$. Let $xin I_0$ with $J^mxne0$; then $J^m(J^mx)=J^2mx=J^mxne0$. Thus we conclude $J^mx=I_0$, by minimality. In particular, there exists $yin J^m$ with $yx=x$. However, $yin J$, so $-y$ is left-quasi regular: there exists $z$ with $zy=z+y$, hence
          $$
          zx=zyx=zx+yx
          $$
          from which $yx=0$: a contradiction. (The proof is from Kaplansy’s “Fields and Rings”.)






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858970%2fshow-that-this-artinian-ring-is-also-noetherian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            The ring $R/J(R)$ is semisimple Artinian. Thus every Artinian left module over $R/J(R)$ is Noetherian and the same is true for every Artinian left $R$-module $M$ such that $JM=0$.



            Since $J^n$ is Artinian as a left $R$-module, we can conclude that $J^n/J^n+1$ is Noetherian.



            It remains to show that $J=J(R)$ is nilpotent, say $J^m=0$, because then we can consider the chain
            $$
            0=J^msubseteq J^m-1subseteq dots subseteq J^2subseteq Jsubseteq R
            $$
            where each factor is Noetherian.



            Since $R$ is Artinian, there is $m$ such that $J^k=J^m$, for every $kge m$. Suppose $J^mne0$. There is a left ideal $I$ such that $J^mIne0$, namely $I=J$. So we can pick $I_0$ minimal such that $J^mI_0ne0$. Let $xin I_0$ with $J^mxne0$; then $J^m(J^mx)=J^2mx=J^mxne0$. Thus we conclude $J^mx=I_0$, by minimality. In particular, there exists $yin J^m$ with $yx=x$. However, $yin J$, so $-y$ is left-quasi regular: there exists $z$ with $zy=z+y$, hence
            $$
            zx=zyx=zx+yx
            $$
            from which $yx=0$: a contradiction. (The proof is from Kaplansy’s “Fields and Rings”.)






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              The ring $R/J(R)$ is semisimple Artinian. Thus every Artinian left module over $R/J(R)$ is Noetherian and the same is true for every Artinian left $R$-module $M$ such that $JM=0$.



              Since $J^n$ is Artinian as a left $R$-module, we can conclude that $J^n/J^n+1$ is Noetherian.



              It remains to show that $J=J(R)$ is nilpotent, say $J^m=0$, because then we can consider the chain
              $$
              0=J^msubseteq J^m-1subseteq dots subseteq J^2subseteq Jsubseteq R
              $$
              where each factor is Noetherian.



              Since $R$ is Artinian, there is $m$ such that $J^k=J^m$, for every $kge m$. Suppose $J^mne0$. There is a left ideal $I$ such that $J^mIne0$, namely $I=J$. So we can pick $I_0$ minimal such that $J^mI_0ne0$. Let $xin I_0$ with $J^mxne0$; then $J^m(J^mx)=J^2mx=J^mxne0$. Thus we conclude $J^mx=I_0$, by minimality. In particular, there exists $yin J^m$ with $yx=x$. However, $yin J$, so $-y$ is left-quasi regular: there exists $z$ with $zy=z+y$, hence
              $$
              zx=zyx=zx+yx
              $$
              from which $yx=0$: a contradiction. (The proof is from Kaplansy’s “Fields and Rings”.)






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                The ring $R/J(R)$ is semisimple Artinian. Thus every Artinian left module over $R/J(R)$ is Noetherian and the same is true for every Artinian left $R$-module $M$ such that $JM=0$.



                Since $J^n$ is Artinian as a left $R$-module, we can conclude that $J^n/J^n+1$ is Noetherian.



                It remains to show that $J=J(R)$ is nilpotent, say $J^m=0$, because then we can consider the chain
                $$
                0=J^msubseteq J^m-1subseteq dots subseteq J^2subseteq Jsubseteq R
                $$
                where each factor is Noetherian.



                Since $R$ is Artinian, there is $m$ such that $J^k=J^m$, for every $kge m$. Suppose $J^mne0$. There is a left ideal $I$ such that $J^mIne0$, namely $I=J$. So we can pick $I_0$ minimal such that $J^mI_0ne0$. Let $xin I_0$ with $J^mxne0$; then $J^m(J^mx)=J^2mx=J^mxne0$. Thus we conclude $J^mx=I_0$, by minimality. In particular, there exists $yin J^m$ with $yx=x$. However, $yin J$, so $-y$ is left-quasi regular: there exists $z$ with $zy=z+y$, hence
                $$
                zx=zyx=zx+yx
                $$
                from which $yx=0$: a contradiction. (The proof is from Kaplansy’s “Fields and Rings”.)






                share|cite|improve this answer













                The ring $R/J(R)$ is semisimple Artinian. Thus every Artinian left module over $R/J(R)$ is Noetherian and the same is true for every Artinian left $R$-module $M$ such that $JM=0$.



                Since $J^n$ is Artinian as a left $R$-module, we can conclude that $J^n/J^n+1$ is Noetherian.



                It remains to show that $J=J(R)$ is nilpotent, say $J^m=0$, because then we can consider the chain
                $$
                0=J^msubseteq J^m-1subseteq dots subseteq J^2subseteq Jsubseteq R
                $$
                where each factor is Noetherian.



                Since $R$ is Artinian, there is $m$ such that $J^k=J^m$, for every $kge m$. Suppose $J^mne0$. There is a left ideal $I$ such that $J^mIne0$, namely $I=J$. So we can pick $I_0$ minimal such that $J^mI_0ne0$. Let $xin I_0$ with $J^mxne0$; then $J^m(J^mx)=J^2mx=J^mxne0$. Thus we conclude $J^mx=I_0$, by minimality. In particular, there exists $yin J^m$ with $yx=x$. However, $yin J$, so $-y$ is left-quasi regular: there exists $z$ with $zy=z+y$, hence
                $$
                zx=zyx=zx+yx
                $$
                from which $yx=0$: a contradiction. (The proof is from Kaplansy’s “Fields and Rings”.)







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 22 at 20:12









                egreg

                164k1180187




                164k1180187






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2858970%2fshow-that-this-artinian-ring-is-also-noetherian%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?