Solve for $fracpartial upartial x$, where $f(x,y,u,v)$ using implicit function theorem

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I have pasted the problem and part of the solution below. This question is from Marsdens vector calculus in the section on the implicit function theorem. They did the first part by computing the determinant where each row of the matric contained in the component functions, and each column computed the partial derivative of that component function, first with respect to $u$ then with $v$.



My Question



To find $dfracpartial upartial x$ why did they implicitly differentiate each component function at $x$, $u$, and $v$? Differentiating at $x$ then implictly differentiating $u$ with respect to $x$, is what I would've done, so I'm not sure why they also implicity differentiated $v$ with respect to $x$?



Thanks



enter image description here



Solution



enter image description here




real-analysis proof-explanation vector-analysis




share|cite|improve this question



















  • Please start formatting your entire posts in mathjax. You clearly know how to use it. Uploaded images may not last; and when there is no added value in adding an image (e.g., in a geometry problem), you should be using strictly mathjax. I know this has been told to you countless times now.
    – amWhy
    yesterday










  • Is there something I can do to make sure the images last? When I paste an image it's because formatting will take more time.
    – john fowles
    yesterday














up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












I have pasted the problem and part of the solution below. This question is from Marsdens vector calculus in the section on the implicit function theorem. They did the first part by computing the determinant where each row of the matric contained in the component functions, and each column computed the partial derivative of that component function, first with respect to $u$ then with $v$.



My Question



To find $dfracpartial upartial x$ why did they implicitly differentiate each component function at $x$, $u$, and $v$? Differentiating at $x$ then implictly differentiating $u$ with respect to $x$, is what I would've done, so I'm not sure why they also implicity differentiated $v$ with respect to $x$?



Thanks



enter image description here



Solution



enter image description here




real-analysis proof-explanation vector-analysis




share|cite|improve this question



















  • Please start formatting your entire posts in mathjax. You clearly know how to use it. Uploaded images may not last; and when there is no added value in adding an image (e.g., in a geometry problem), you should be using strictly mathjax. I know this has been told to you countless times now.
    – amWhy
    yesterday










  • Is there something I can do to make sure the images last? When I paste an image it's because formatting will take more time.
    – john fowles
    yesterday












up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have pasted the problem and part of the solution below. This question is from Marsdens vector calculus in the section on the implicit function theorem. They did the first part by computing the determinant where each row of the matric contained in the component functions, and each column computed the partial derivative of that component function, first with respect to $u$ then with $v$.



My Question



To find $dfracpartial upartial x$ why did they implicitly differentiate each component function at $x$, $u$, and $v$? Differentiating at $x$ then implictly differentiating $u$ with respect to $x$, is what I would've done, so I'm not sure why they also implicity differentiated $v$ with respect to $x$?



Thanks



enter image description here



Solution



enter image description here




real-analysis proof-explanation vector-analysis




share|cite|improve this question











I have pasted the problem and part of the solution below. This question is from Marsdens vector calculus in the section on the implicit function theorem. They did the first part by computing the determinant where each row of the matric contained in the component functions, and each column computed the partial derivative of that component function, first with respect to $u$ then with $v$.



My Question



To find $dfracpartial upartial x$ why did they implicitly differentiate each component function at $x$, $u$, and $v$? Differentiating at $x$ then implictly differentiating $u$ with respect to $x$, is what I would've done, so I'm not sure why they also implicity differentiated $v$ with respect to $x$?



Thanks



enter image description here



Solution



enter image description here





real-analysis proof-explanation vector-analysis





share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked yesterday









john fowles

1,052716




1,052716











  • Please start formatting your entire posts in mathjax. You clearly know how to use it. Uploaded images may not last; and when there is no added value in adding an image (e.g., in a geometry problem), you should be using strictly mathjax. I know this has been told to you countless times now.
    – amWhy
    yesterday










  • Is there something I can do to make sure the images last? When I paste an image it's because formatting will take more time.
    – john fowles
    yesterday
















  • Please start formatting your entire posts in mathjax. You clearly know how to use it. Uploaded images may not last; and when there is no added value in adding an image (e.g., in a geometry problem), you should be using strictly mathjax. I know this has been told to you countless times now.
    – amWhy
    yesterday










  • Is there something I can do to make sure the images last? When I paste an image it's because formatting will take more time.
    – john fowles
    yesterday















Please start formatting your entire posts in mathjax. You clearly know how to use it. Uploaded images may not last; and when there is no added value in adding an image (e.g., in a geometry problem), you should be using strictly mathjax. I know this has been told to you countless times now.
– amWhy
yesterday




Please start formatting your entire posts in mathjax. You clearly know how to use it. Uploaded images may not last; and when there is no added value in adding an image (e.g., in a geometry problem), you should be using strictly mathjax. I know this has been told to you countless times now.
– amWhy
yesterday












Is there something I can do to make sure the images last? When I paste an image it's because formatting will take more time.
– john fowles
yesterday




Is there something I can do to make sure the images last? When I paste an image it's because formatting will take more time.
– john fowles
yesterday










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










The assumption is that both $u$ and $v$ are functions of $x$ and $y$



Here $x$ and $y$ are independent variables while $u$ and $v$ are dependent variables.



When you differentiate the equation involving both $u$ and $v$ with respect to $x$ we have to differentiate each and every term.



For example from $$ u+v=2x+y$$ we get $$frac partial upartial x + frac partial vpartial x =2$$



Even though we are only interested in $frac partial upartial x$ we still have to count $frac partial vpartial x$ in the equation.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872368%2fsolve-for-frac-partial-u-partial-x-where-fx-y-u-v-using-implicit-fun%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    The assumption is that both $u$ and $v$ are functions of $x$ and $y$



    Here $x$ and $y$ are independent variables while $u$ and $v$ are dependent variables.



    When you differentiate the equation involving both $u$ and $v$ with respect to $x$ we have to differentiate each and every term.



    For example from $$ u+v=2x+y$$ we get $$frac partial upartial x + frac partial vpartial x =2$$



    Even though we are only interested in $frac partial upartial x$ we still have to count $frac partial vpartial x$ in the equation.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      The assumption is that both $u$ and $v$ are functions of $x$ and $y$



      Here $x$ and $y$ are independent variables while $u$ and $v$ are dependent variables.



      When you differentiate the equation involving both $u$ and $v$ with respect to $x$ we have to differentiate each and every term.



      For example from $$ u+v=2x+y$$ we get $$frac partial upartial x + frac partial vpartial x =2$$



      Even though we are only interested in $frac partial upartial x$ we still have to count $frac partial vpartial x$ in the equation.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        The assumption is that both $u$ and $v$ are functions of $x$ and $y$



        Here $x$ and $y$ are independent variables while $u$ and $v$ are dependent variables.



        When you differentiate the equation involving both $u$ and $v$ with respect to $x$ we have to differentiate each and every term.



        For example from $$ u+v=2x+y$$ we get $$frac partial upartial x + frac partial vpartial x =2$$



        Even though we are only interested in $frac partial upartial x$ we still have to count $frac partial vpartial x$ in the equation.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        The assumption is that both $u$ and $v$ are functions of $x$ and $y$



        Here $x$ and $y$ are independent variables while $u$ and $v$ are dependent variables.



        When you differentiate the equation involving both $u$ and $v$ with respect to $x$ we have to differentiate each and every term.



        For example from $$ u+v=2x+y$$ we get $$frac partial upartial x + frac partial vpartial x =2$$



        Even though we are only interested in $frac partial upartial x$ we still have to count $frac partial vpartial x$ in the equation.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered yesterday









        Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

        26.9k41849




        26.9k41849






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872368%2fsolve-for-frac-partial-u-partial-x-where-fx-y-u-v-using-implicit-fun%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            Comments

            Post a Comment

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalized tilt? I've noticed that in most equations given to represent a cone, there is no parameter which defines the tilt of the cone in 3D space and that most of them have their point at the origin $(0,0,0)$ - I was wondering if anyone could give me a more generalized cone equation for a cone in any position in 3D space 3d share | cite | improve this question edited Jul 25 '16 at 0:05 ervx 9,425 3 13 36 asked Jul 24 '16 at 15:38 Charlene 11 2 2 Welcome to Math.SE! Could you please explain a few things to help people give an answer useful to you: 1. What do you mean by "generalized tilt"? 2. Are you asking about a right circular cone? Does the angle at the vertex matter? 3. What form of answer (implicit, parametric...?) are you looking for? 4. If this is homework, what tools do you have available, an...
            Read more

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 5 down vote favorite 1 Here is the problem: For what $n$ is it possible to color the edges and diagonals of an $n$-side regular polygon with $dfracbinomn23$ colors, such that you use every color exactly three times and for every color the three segments (edges or diagonals) with that color form a triangle? Trivially $nequiv 0 text or 1 pmod3$. I can also prove that if the statement is true for $k$ than it is true for $3k$ as well. How to finish? Please help! Thanks combinatorial-geometry share | cite | improve this question edited Aug 6 at 21:57 alcana 118 4 asked Aug 6 at 21:15 Leo Gardner 356 11 Even assuming "polyhpn" in the title is a typo for polygon , it is unclear what you mean by "the edges and sides". Aren't the side of a regular polygon the same as the edges? A regular $n$-sided polygon has $n$ edges. – hardmath Aug 6 at 21:20 3 $n$ ne...
            Read more

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite We are studying adjoints in class, and I was curious if there is a relationship between the determinant of matrix A, and the determinant of the adjoint of matrix A? I assume there would be a relationship because finding the adjoint requires creating a cofactor matrix and then transposing it. linear-algebra determinant adjoint-operators share | cite | improve this question asked Nov 17 '17 at 17:32 CluelessCoder 32 5 For a square matrix $A$ of order $n$, we have $A(operatornameadj A)=(operatornameadj A)A=|A|I_n$ where $I_n$ is the identity matrix of order $n$. This should tell you about the determinant of the adjoint in terms of that of $A$ (use multiplicative property and other elementary properties of determinants). – Prasun Biswas Nov 17 '17 at 17:35 1 @CluelessCoder: see here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/516127/…...
            Read more