Subgroup generated by subset of group

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I had come across following term 'subgroup generated by subset' in Herstein Excercise.

Given any group G and subset U ,$barU$ be smallest subgroup containg that.

I thought that can be given by $barU$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$ where $G_i$ is subgroup in G .Is there in other defination exist for $barU$.



Next question says to prove that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1in U $ $forall gin G$

To prove that this I have to show that $gbarUg^-1=barU$

By defination above $gcap_Uin G_iG_i g^-1$=$cap_Uin G_igG_ig^-1$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$




I had not concrete argument to write last thing .$G_i$ is subgroup containg U.
Please help me to find correct argument to write that .








share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I had come across following term 'subgroup generated by subset' in Herstein Excercise.

    Given any group G and subset U ,$barU$ be smallest subgroup containg that.

    I thought that can be given by $barU$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$ where $G_i$ is subgroup in G .Is there in other defination exist for $barU$.



    Next question says to prove that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1in U $ $forall gin G$

    To prove that this I have to show that $gbarUg^-1=barU$

    By defination above $gcap_Uin G_iG_i g^-1$=$cap_Uin G_igG_ig^-1$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$




    I had not concrete argument to write last thing .$G_i$ is subgroup containg U.
    Please help me to find correct argument to write that .








    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I had come across following term 'subgroup generated by subset' in Herstein Excercise.

      Given any group G and subset U ,$barU$ be smallest subgroup containg that.

      I thought that can be given by $barU$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$ where $G_i$ is subgroup in G .Is there in other defination exist for $barU$.



      Next question says to prove that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1in U $ $forall gin G$

      To prove that this I have to show that $gbarUg^-1=barU$

      By defination above $gcap_Uin G_iG_i g^-1$=$cap_Uin G_igG_ig^-1$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$




      I had not concrete argument to write last thing .$G_i$ is subgroup containg U.
      Please help me to find correct argument to write that .








      share|cite|improve this question











      I had come across following term 'subgroup generated by subset' in Herstein Excercise.

      Given any group G and subset U ,$barU$ be smallest subgroup containg that.

      I thought that can be given by $barU$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$ where $G_i$ is subgroup in G .Is there in other defination exist for $barU$.



      Next question says to prove that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1in U $ $forall gin G$

      To prove that this I have to show that $gbarUg^-1=barU$

      By defination above $gcap_Uin G_iG_i g^-1$=$cap_Uin G_igG_ig^-1$=$cap_Uin G_iG_i$




      I had not concrete argument to write last thing .$G_i$ is subgroup containg U.
      Please help me to find correct argument to write that .










      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked 2 days ago









      SRJ

      984216




      984216




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          The definition $barU = cap_U in G_i G_i$ is the standard definition for the subgroup generated by the subset $U$. Another way to define it is to construct it explicitly. You can definite $barU$ as the subset of all finite products of the type $u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$, where $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. However you have to show that this is a subgroup, which shouldn't be hard using the standard method.



          You can use the explicit construction for the last part. For any $baru in barU$ we have that $baru = u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$ for some. $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. Then we have:



          $$gbarug^-1 = gu_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_rg^-1 = (gu_1g^-1)^k_1(gu_2g^-1)^k_2cdots (gu_rg^-1)^k_r = v_1^k_1v_2^k_2cdots v_r^k_r in barU$$



          Hence the proof that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1 in U$ for every $g in G, u in U$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871865%2fsubgroup-generated-by-subset-of-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            The definition $barU = cap_U in G_i G_i$ is the standard definition for the subgroup generated by the subset $U$. Another way to define it is to construct it explicitly. You can definite $barU$ as the subset of all finite products of the type $u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$, where $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. However you have to show that this is a subgroup, which shouldn't be hard using the standard method.



            You can use the explicit construction for the last part. For any $baru in barU$ we have that $baru = u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$ for some. $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. Then we have:



            $$gbarug^-1 = gu_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_rg^-1 = (gu_1g^-1)^k_1(gu_2g^-1)^k_2cdots (gu_rg^-1)^k_r = v_1^k_1v_2^k_2cdots v_r^k_r in barU$$



            Hence the proof that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1 in U$ for every $g in G, u in U$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              The definition $barU = cap_U in G_i G_i$ is the standard definition for the subgroup generated by the subset $U$. Another way to define it is to construct it explicitly. You can definite $barU$ as the subset of all finite products of the type $u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$, where $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. However you have to show that this is a subgroup, which shouldn't be hard using the standard method.



              You can use the explicit construction for the last part. For any $baru in barU$ we have that $baru = u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$ for some. $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. Then we have:



              $$gbarug^-1 = gu_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_rg^-1 = (gu_1g^-1)^k_1(gu_2g^-1)^k_2cdots (gu_rg^-1)^k_r = v_1^k_1v_2^k_2cdots v_r^k_r in barU$$



              Hence the proof that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1 in U$ for every $g in G, u in U$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                The definition $barU = cap_U in G_i G_i$ is the standard definition for the subgroup generated by the subset $U$. Another way to define it is to construct it explicitly. You can definite $barU$ as the subset of all finite products of the type $u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$, where $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. However you have to show that this is a subgroup, which shouldn't be hard using the standard method.



                You can use the explicit construction for the last part. For any $baru in barU$ we have that $baru = u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$ for some. $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. Then we have:



                $$gbarug^-1 = gu_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_rg^-1 = (gu_1g^-1)^k_1(gu_2g^-1)^k_2cdots (gu_rg^-1)^k_r = v_1^k_1v_2^k_2cdots v_r^k_r in barU$$



                Hence the proof that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1 in U$ for every $g in G, u in U$






                share|cite|improve this answer













                The definition $barU = cap_U in G_i G_i$ is the standard definition for the subgroup generated by the subset $U$. Another way to define it is to construct it explicitly. You can definite $barU$ as the subset of all finite products of the type $u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$, where $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. However you have to show that this is a subgroup, which shouldn't be hard using the standard method.



                You can use the explicit construction for the last part. For any $baru in barU$ we have that $baru = u_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_r$ for some. $u_i in U, k_i in mathbbZ$. Then we have:



                $$gbarug^-1 = gu_1^k_1u_2^k_2cdots u_r^k_rg^-1 = (gu_1g^-1)^k_1(gu_2g^-1)^k_2cdots (gu_rg^-1)^k_r = v_1^k_1v_2^k_2cdots v_r^k_r in barU$$



                Hence the proof that $barU$ is normal if $gug^-1 in U$ for every $g in G, u in U$







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered 2 days ago









                Stefan4024

                27.7k52974




                27.7k52974






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871865%2fsubgroup-generated-by-subset-of-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?