A Question of integration based on partial fraction but my question is why does it work?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Integrate
$$
frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)
$$
Now in this problem we divide it into
$$
fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6+1
$$
My question is: even if we do not consider $+1$ the values of A B and C comes the same so what does that mean? Why does this happen?
integration
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Integrate
$$
frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)
$$
Now in this problem we divide it into
$$
fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6+1
$$
My question is: even if we do not consider $+1$ the values of A B and C comes the same so what does that mean? Why does this happen?
integration
add a comment |Â
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
up vote
-2
down vote
favorite
Integrate
$$
frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)
$$
Now in this problem we divide it into
$$
fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6+1
$$
My question is: even if we do not consider $+1$ the values of A B and C comes the same so what does that mean? Why does this happen?
integration
Integrate
$$
frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)
$$
Now in this problem we divide it into
$$
fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6+1
$$
My question is: even if we do not consider $+1$ the values of A B and C comes the same so what does that mean? Why does this happen?
integration
edited Jul 15 at 6:52
enzotib
5,72321430
5,72321430
asked Jul 15 at 6:30
bhaveshgoel07
1
1
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If you have
$$fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6tag*$$
it will simplify to something of the form
$$fracRx^2+Sx+T(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)$$
with a quadratic in the numerator. But your
integrand has a cubic in the numerator, so cannot be written
in the form (*).
+1 ensures coefficient of x in the denominator matches with that of the numerator.
â Eval
Jul 15 at 6:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
$$frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)=A/(x-4)+B/(x-5)+C/(x-6)+1$$
is the correct form. Note that the degree of both top and bottom is the same so we first divide to get a $1$ as the quotient.
If you do not include a $+1$ on the RHS then as $x$ approached infinity, the right side approaches $0$ while the left side approaches $1$
Note that with the wrong form you may still find A, B, C but the answer is wrong.
add a comment |Â
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
If you have
$$fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6tag*$$
it will simplify to something of the form
$$fracRx^2+Sx+T(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)$$
with a quadratic in the numerator. But your
integrand has a cubic in the numerator, so cannot be written
in the form (*).
+1 ensures coefficient of x in the denominator matches with that of the numerator.
â Eval
Jul 15 at 6:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
If you have
$$fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6tag*$$
it will simplify to something of the form
$$fracRx^2+Sx+T(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)$$
with a quadratic in the numerator. But your
integrand has a cubic in the numerator, so cannot be written
in the form (*).
+1 ensures coefficient of x in the denominator matches with that of the numerator.
â Eval
Jul 15 at 6:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If you have
$$fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6tag*$$
it will simplify to something of the form
$$fracRx^2+Sx+T(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)$$
with a quadratic in the numerator. But your
integrand has a cubic in the numerator, so cannot be written
in the form (*).
If you have
$$fracAx-4+fracBx-5+fracCx-6tag*$$
it will simplify to something of the form
$$fracRx^2+Sx+T(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)$$
with a quadratic in the numerator. But your
integrand has a cubic in the numerator, so cannot be written
in the form (*).
answered Jul 15 at 6:34
Lord Shark the Unknown
85.8k951112
85.8k951112
+1 ensures coefficient of x in the denominator matches with that of the numerator.
â Eval
Jul 15 at 6:46
add a comment |Â
+1 ensures coefficient of x in the denominator matches with that of the numerator.
â Eval
Jul 15 at 6:46
+1 ensures coefficient of x in the denominator matches with that of the numerator.
â Eval
Jul 15 at 6:46
+1 ensures coefficient of x in the denominator matches with that of the numerator.
â Eval
Jul 15 at 6:46
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
$$frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)=A/(x-4)+B/(x-5)+C/(x-6)+1$$
is the correct form. Note that the degree of both top and bottom is the same so we first divide to get a $1$ as the quotient.
If you do not include a $+1$ on the RHS then as $x$ approached infinity, the right side approaches $0$ while the left side approaches $1$
Note that with the wrong form you may still find A, B, C but the answer is wrong.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
$$frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)=A/(x-4)+B/(x-5)+C/(x-6)+1$$
is the correct form. Note that the degree of both top and bottom is the same so we first divide to get a $1$ as the quotient.
If you do not include a $+1$ on the RHS then as $x$ approached infinity, the right side approaches $0$ while the left side approaches $1$
Note that with the wrong form you may still find A, B, C but the answer is wrong.
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
$$frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)=A/(x-4)+B/(x-5)+C/(x-6)+1$$
is the correct form. Note that the degree of both top and bottom is the same so we first divide to get a $1$ as the quotient.
If you do not include a $+1$ on the RHS then as $x$ approached infinity, the right side approaches $0$ while the left side approaches $1$
Note that with the wrong form you may still find A, B, C but the answer is wrong.
$$frac(x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)(x-6)=A/(x-4)+B/(x-5)+C/(x-6)+1$$
is the correct form. Note that the degree of both top and bottom is the same so we first divide to get a $1$ as the quotient.
If you do not include a $+1$ on the RHS then as $x$ approached infinity, the right side approaches $0$ while the left side approaches $1$
Note that with the wrong form you may still find A, B, C but the answer is wrong.
answered Jul 15 at 6:45
Mohammad Riazi-Kermani
27.6k41852
27.6k41852
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852232%2fa-question-of-integration-based-on-partial-fraction-but-my-question-is-why-does%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password