General random walk expected first exit time via martingale

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












$x_t$ is a random walk with nonnegative integer time $t$ on the integer set $mathbf Z$ with transition probability $P(x_t+1mid x_t)=pmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=1)+qmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=-1)$, $p>0,,q>0$, $p+q=1$ and $pne q$. I know $y_t := big(frac qpbig)^x_t$ is a martingale. Given $x_0=0$, $tau:=mint:x_t=a>0,vee x_t=-b$ where $a,bin mathbf N$.



Can anyone remind me of the martingales that give the expected value and the variance of the first exit time $tau$, perhaps utilizing $y_t$? What is the relationship between the martingales and the probability generating function of the first exit time?







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    $x_t$ is a random walk with nonnegative integer time $t$ on the integer set $mathbf Z$ with transition probability $P(x_t+1mid x_t)=pmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=1)+qmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=-1)$, $p>0,,q>0$, $p+q=1$ and $pne q$. I know $y_t := big(frac qpbig)^x_t$ is a martingale. Given $x_0=0$, $tau:=mint:x_t=a>0,vee x_t=-b$ where $a,bin mathbf N$.



    Can anyone remind me of the martingales that give the expected value and the variance of the first exit time $tau$, perhaps utilizing $y_t$? What is the relationship between the martingales and the probability generating function of the first exit time?







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      $x_t$ is a random walk with nonnegative integer time $t$ on the integer set $mathbf Z$ with transition probability $P(x_t+1mid x_t)=pmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=1)+qmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=-1)$, $p>0,,q>0$, $p+q=1$ and $pne q$. I know $y_t := big(frac qpbig)^x_t$ is a martingale. Given $x_0=0$, $tau:=mint:x_t=a>0,vee x_t=-b$ where $a,bin mathbf N$.



      Can anyone remind me of the martingales that give the expected value and the variance of the first exit time $tau$, perhaps utilizing $y_t$? What is the relationship between the martingales and the probability generating function of the first exit time?







      share|cite|improve this question













      $x_t$ is a random walk with nonnegative integer time $t$ on the integer set $mathbf Z$ with transition probability $P(x_t+1mid x_t)=pmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=1)+qmathbf 1(x_t+1-x_t=-1)$, $p>0,,q>0$, $p+q=1$ and $pne q$. I know $y_t := big(frac qpbig)^x_t$ is a martingale. Given $x_0=0$, $tau:=mint:x_t=a>0,vee x_t=-b$ where $a,bin mathbf N$.



      Can anyone remind me of the martingales that give the expected value and the variance of the first exit time $tau$, perhaps utilizing $y_t$? What is the relationship between the martingales and the probability generating function of the first exit time?









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 15 at 19:04
























      asked Jul 14 at 23:25









      Hans

      4,12821028




      4,12821028




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          It is so very simple. The extra martingale is merely the natural "speed function" $z_t:=x_t-t(p-q)$. It is obvious that $z_t$ is a martingale. Now let $tau:=inft: x_tge a,wedge, x_tle -b $. By Doob's optional stopping theorem, $big(frac pqbig)^x_0=mathbf E[y_tau]=Pbig(frac pqbig)^a+Qbig(frac pqbig)^-b$, where $P=textProb(x_tau=a)$ and $P+Q=1$. We can solve for $P$ and $Q$. Applying again Doob's optional stopping theorem $x_0=mathbf E[z_tau]=aP-bQ-(p-q)mathbf E[tau]$. We can now solve for $mathbf E[tau]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852047%2fgeneral-random-walk-expected-first-exit-time-via-martingale%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            It is so very simple. The extra martingale is merely the natural "speed function" $z_t:=x_t-t(p-q)$. It is obvious that $z_t$ is a martingale. Now let $tau:=inft: x_tge a,wedge, x_tle -b $. By Doob's optional stopping theorem, $big(frac pqbig)^x_0=mathbf E[y_tau]=Pbig(frac pqbig)^a+Qbig(frac pqbig)^-b$, where $P=textProb(x_tau=a)$ and $P+Q=1$. We can solve for $P$ and $Q$. Applying again Doob's optional stopping theorem $x_0=mathbf E[z_tau]=aP-bQ-(p-q)mathbf E[tau]$. We can now solve for $mathbf E[tau]$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              It is so very simple. The extra martingale is merely the natural "speed function" $z_t:=x_t-t(p-q)$. It is obvious that $z_t$ is a martingale. Now let $tau:=inft: x_tge a,wedge, x_tle -b $. By Doob's optional stopping theorem, $big(frac pqbig)^x_0=mathbf E[y_tau]=Pbig(frac pqbig)^a+Qbig(frac pqbig)^-b$, where $P=textProb(x_tau=a)$ and $P+Q=1$. We can solve for $P$ and $Q$. Applying again Doob's optional stopping theorem $x_0=mathbf E[z_tau]=aP-bQ-(p-q)mathbf E[tau]$. We can now solve for $mathbf E[tau]$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                It is so very simple. The extra martingale is merely the natural "speed function" $z_t:=x_t-t(p-q)$. It is obvious that $z_t$ is a martingale. Now let $tau:=inft: x_tge a,wedge, x_tle -b $. By Doob's optional stopping theorem, $big(frac pqbig)^x_0=mathbf E[y_tau]=Pbig(frac pqbig)^a+Qbig(frac pqbig)^-b$, where $P=textProb(x_tau=a)$ and $P+Q=1$. We can solve for $P$ and $Q$. Applying again Doob's optional stopping theorem $x_0=mathbf E[z_tau]=aP-bQ-(p-q)mathbf E[tau]$. We can now solve for $mathbf E[tau]$.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                It is so very simple. The extra martingale is merely the natural "speed function" $z_t:=x_t-t(p-q)$. It is obvious that $z_t$ is a martingale. Now let $tau:=inft: x_tge a,wedge, x_tle -b $. By Doob's optional stopping theorem, $big(frac pqbig)^x_0=mathbf E[y_tau]=Pbig(frac pqbig)^a+Qbig(frac pqbig)^-b$, where $P=textProb(x_tau=a)$ and $P+Q=1$. We can solve for $P$ and $Q$. Applying again Doob's optional stopping theorem $x_0=mathbf E[z_tau]=aP-bQ-(p-q)mathbf E[tau]$. We can now solve for $mathbf E[tau]$.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 20 at 5:20









                Hans

                4,12821028




                4,12821028






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852047%2fgeneral-random-walk-expected-first-exit-time-via-martingale%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?