Let $C in mathbbR^n$ be a Jordan mensurable set of measure zero. Show that $int_A chi_C = 0$, for every closed rectangle $A supset C$.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $C in mathbbR^n$ be a Jordan mensurable set of measure zero. Show that $int_A chi_C = 0$, for every closed rectangle $A supset C$.



A subset $A$ of $mathbbR^n$ has measure 0 if for every $epsilon > 0$ there is a cover $U_1, U_2,... $ of A by closed rectangles such that $sum_i=1^inftyv(U_i) < epsilon.$



A bounded set C is called Jordan-measurable if for every closed rectangle A such that $C subset A$ we have that $chi_C: A to mathbbR$ (given by $chi_C(x) = 1$ if $x in C$, and $chi_C(x) = 0$ if $x in A-C$) is integrable. In this case $v(C) = int_A chi_C$




The only thing I know is that by hypothesis we have that $int_A chi_C = v(C)$. I am really bad in analysis.



Any help would be great.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Let $C in mathbbR^n$ be a Jordan mensurable set of measure zero. Show that $int_A chi_C = 0$, for every closed rectangle $A supset C$.



    A subset $A$ of $mathbbR^n$ has measure 0 if for every $epsilon > 0$ there is a cover $U_1, U_2,... $ of A by closed rectangles such that $sum_i=1^inftyv(U_i) < epsilon.$



    A bounded set C is called Jordan-measurable if for every closed rectangle A such that $C subset A$ we have that $chi_C: A to mathbbR$ (given by $chi_C(x) = 1$ if $x in C$, and $chi_C(x) = 0$ if $x in A-C$) is integrable. In this case $v(C) = int_A chi_C$




    The only thing I know is that by hypothesis we have that $int_A chi_C = v(C)$. I am really bad in analysis.



    Any help would be great.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Let $C in mathbbR^n$ be a Jordan mensurable set of measure zero. Show that $int_A chi_C = 0$, for every closed rectangle $A supset C$.



      A subset $A$ of $mathbbR^n$ has measure 0 if for every $epsilon > 0$ there is a cover $U_1, U_2,... $ of A by closed rectangles such that $sum_i=1^inftyv(U_i) < epsilon.$



      A bounded set C is called Jordan-measurable if for every closed rectangle A such that $C subset A$ we have that $chi_C: A to mathbbR$ (given by $chi_C(x) = 1$ if $x in C$, and $chi_C(x) = 0$ if $x in A-C$) is integrable. In this case $v(C) = int_A chi_C$




      The only thing I know is that by hypothesis we have that $int_A chi_C = v(C)$. I am really bad in analysis.



      Any help would be great.







      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $C in mathbbR^n$ be a Jordan mensurable set of measure zero. Show that $int_A chi_C = 0$, for every closed rectangle $A supset C$.



      A subset $A$ of $mathbbR^n$ has measure 0 if for every $epsilon > 0$ there is a cover $U_1, U_2,... $ of A by closed rectangles such that $sum_i=1^inftyv(U_i) < epsilon.$



      A bounded set C is called Jordan-measurable if for every closed rectangle A such that $C subset A$ we have that $chi_C: A to mathbbR$ (given by $chi_C(x) = 1$ if $x in C$, and $chi_C(x) = 0$ if $x in A-C$) is integrable. In this case $v(C) = int_A chi_C$




      The only thing I know is that by hypothesis we have that $int_A chi_C = v(C)$. I am really bad in analysis.



      Any help would be great.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 15 at 2:48
























      asked Jul 15 at 2:23









      P.G

      15910




      15910




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          We can write A as $Ccup (A - C)$ and we can express the integral as $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C + int_A-Cchi_C$.



          By the definition of $chi_C$, we have that $chi_C=0$ on $A-C$, so the second integral of the sum is zero. Then $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C = v(C)$. Which is zero because C has measure zero (or alternatively we can show by the definition that $v(C)$ is less than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon > 0$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852132%2flet-c-in-mathbbrn-be-a-jordan-mensurable-set-of-measure-zero-show-that%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            We can write A as $Ccup (A - C)$ and we can express the integral as $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C + int_A-Cchi_C$.



            By the definition of $chi_C$, we have that $chi_C=0$ on $A-C$, so the second integral of the sum is zero. Then $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C = v(C)$. Which is zero because C has measure zero (or alternatively we can show by the definition that $v(C)$ is less than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon > 0$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              We can write A as $Ccup (A - C)$ and we can express the integral as $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C + int_A-Cchi_C$.



              By the definition of $chi_C$, we have that $chi_C=0$ on $A-C$, so the second integral of the sum is zero. Then $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C = v(C)$. Which is zero because C has measure zero (or alternatively we can show by the definition that $v(C)$ is less than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon > 0$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                We can write A as $Ccup (A - C)$ and we can express the integral as $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C + int_A-Cchi_C$.



                By the definition of $chi_C$, we have that $chi_C=0$ on $A-C$, so the second integral of the sum is zero. Then $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C = v(C)$. Which is zero because C has measure zero (or alternatively we can show by the definition that $v(C)$ is less than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon > 0$






                share|cite|improve this answer













                We can write A as $Ccup (A - C)$ and we can express the integral as $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C + int_A-Cchi_C$.



                By the definition of $chi_C$, we have that $chi_C=0$ on $A-C$, so the second integral of the sum is zero. Then $int_A chi_C = int_C chi_C = v(C)$. Which is zero because C has measure zero (or alternatively we can show by the definition that $v(C)$ is less than $epsilon$ for every $epsilon > 0$







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 15 at 4:21









                ricardorr

                364




                364






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852132%2flet-c-in-mathbbrn-be-a-jordan-mensurable-set-of-measure-zero-show-that%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?