Image under covering map of Hausdorff space is Hausdorff?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $overlineX rightarrow X$ be a covering space, where $overlineX$ is a Hausdorff space. Does $X$ have to be Hausdorff?



I assume there is a counterexample, but I couldn't find one yet.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Try $X$ nonHausdorff and let the cover be a product with a discrete space.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:00







  • 1




    Why is $bar X$ Hausdorff then?
    – Fan Zheng
    Jul 14 at 21:02










  • You’re right that doesn’t work. Never mind.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:27






  • 1




    Example here.
    – user574380
    Jul 14 at 21:33






  • 1




    It is true if the fibres $p^-1(x), x in X$ are finite. See math.stackexchange.com/q/396989.
    – Paul Frost
    Jul 14 at 21:39















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $overlineX rightarrow X$ be a covering space, where $overlineX$ is a Hausdorff space. Does $X$ have to be Hausdorff?



I assume there is a counterexample, but I couldn't find one yet.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Try $X$ nonHausdorff and let the cover be a product with a discrete space.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:00







  • 1




    Why is $bar X$ Hausdorff then?
    – Fan Zheng
    Jul 14 at 21:02










  • You’re right that doesn’t work. Never mind.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:27






  • 1




    Example here.
    – user574380
    Jul 14 at 21:33






  • 1




    It is true if the fibres $p^-1(x), x in X$ are finite. See math.stackexchange.com/q/396989.
    – Paul Frost
    Jul 14 at 21:39













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Let $overlineX rightarrow X$ be a covering space, where $overlineX$ is a Hausdorff space. Does $X$ have to be Hausdorff?



I assume there is a counterexample, but I couldn't find one yet.







share|cite|improve this question













Let $overlineX rightarrow X$ be a covering space, where $overlineX$ is a Hausdorff space. Does $X$ have to be Hausdorff?



I assume there is a counterexample, but I couldn't find one yet.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 14 at 22:00









Eric Wofsey

163k12189301




163k12189301









asked Jul 14 at 20:34









L. Gitin

584




584











  • Try $X$ nonHausdorff and let the cover be a product with a discrete space.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:00







  • 1




    Why is $bar X$ Hausdorff then?
    – Fan Zheng
    Jul 14 at 21:02










  • You’re right that doesn’t work. Never mind.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:27






  • 1




    Example here.
    – user574380
    Jul 14 at 21:33






  • 1




    It is true if the fibres $p^-1(x), x in X$ are finite. See math.stackexchange.com/q/396989.
    – Paul Frost
    Jul 14 at 21:39

















  • Try $X$ nonHausdorff and let the cover be a product with a discrete space.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:00







  • 1




    Why is $bar X$ Hausdorff then?
    – Fan Zheng
    Jul 14 at 21:02










  • You’re right that doesn’t work. Never mind.
    – Randall
    Jul 14 at 21:27






  • 1




    Example here.
    – user574380
    Jul 14 at 21:33






  • 1




    It is true if the fibres $p^-1(x), x in X$ are finite. See math.stackexchange.com/q/396989.
    – Paul Frost
    Jul 14 at 21:39
















Try $X$ nonHausdorff and let the cover be a product with a discrete space.
– Randall
Jul 14 at 21:00





Try $X$ nonHausdorff and let the cover be a product with a discrete space.
– Randall
Jul 14 at 21:00





1




1




Why is $bar X$ Hausdorff then?
– Fan Zheng
Jul 14 at 21:02




Why is $bar X$ Hausdorff then?
– Fan Zheng
Jul 14 at 21:02












You’re right that doesn’t work. Never mind.
– Randall
Jul 14 at 21:27




You’re right that doesn’t work. Never mind.
– Randall
Jul 14 at 21:27




1




1




Example here.
– user574380
Jul 14 at 21:33




Example here.
– user574380
Jul 14 at 21:33




1




1




It is true if the fibres $p^-1(x), x in X$ are finite. See math.stackexchange.com/q/396989.
– Paul Frost
Jul 14 at 21:39





It is true if the fibres $p^-1(x), x in X$ are finite. See math.stackexchange.com/q/396989.
– Paul Frost
Jul 14 at 21:39











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










Here's a counterexample. Let $X=mathbbNcupinfty,infty'$ where a set is open iff it is either contained in $mathbbN$ or cofinite. Let $overlineX=XtimesmathbbZ$ with the following topology (not the product topology). A set $UsubseteqoverlineX$ is open iff it satisfies the following two properties:



  • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty,n)in U$, $(m,n+m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

  • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty',n)in U$, $(m,n-m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

I now claim that the projection map $p:overlineXto X$ is a covering map. First, it is easy to check that $p$ is continuous. Any $minmathbbN$ has an evenly covered neighborhood, namely $m$ (since $p^-1(m)=mtimesmathbbZ$ is discrete in $overlineX$). Finally, I claim $infty$ and $infty'$ have evenly covered neighborhoods. Indeed, if $V=Xsetminusinfty'$, then $p^-1(V)$ is homeomorphic to $VtimesmathbbZ$ (with the product topology) via the map sending $(m,n)$ to $(m,n-m)$ and $(infty,n)$ to $(infty,n)$, so $V$ is an evenly covered neighborhood of $infty$. Similarly, $W=Xsetminusinfty$ is evenly covered since $p^-1(W)cong Wtimes mathbbZ$ by mapping $(m,n)$ to $(m,n+m)$.



Finally, $X$ is not Hausdorff ($infty$ and $infty'$ cannot be separated by open sets) but $overlineX$ is Hausdorff (we can get disjoint neighborhoods of $(infty,n)$ and $(infty',n')$ since the collections of points of the form $(m,n+m)$ and $(m,n'-m)$ only intersect at at most one point).






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2851938%2fimage-under-covering-map-of-hausdorff-space-is-hausdorff%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    Here's a counterexample. Let $X=mathbbNcupinfty,infty'$ where a set is open iff it is either contained in $mathbbN$ or cofinite. Let $overlineX=XtimesmathbbZ$ with the following topology (not the product topology). A set $UsubseteqoverlineX$ is open iff it satisfies the following two properties:



    • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty,n)in U$, $(m,n+m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

    • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty',n)in U$, $(m,n-m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

    I now claim that the projection map $p:overlineXto X$ is a covering map. First, it is easy to check that $p$ is continuous. Any $minmathbbN$ has an evenly covered neighborhood, namely $m$ (since $p^-1(m)=mtimesmathbbZ$ is discrete in $overlineX$). Finally, I claim $infty$ and $infty'$ have evenly covered neighborhoods. Indeed, if $V=Xsetminusinfty'$, then $p^-1(V)$ is homeomorphic to $VtimesmathbbZ$ (with the product topology) via the map sending $(m,n)$ to $(m,n-m)$ and $(infty,n)$ to $(infty,n)$, so $V$ is an evenly covered neighborhood of $infty$. Similarly, $W=Xsetminusinfty$ is evenly covered since $p^-1(W)cong Wtimes mathbbZ$ by mapping $(m,n)$ to $(m,n+m)$.



    Finally, $X$ is not Hausdorff ($infty$ and $infty'$ cannot be separated by open sets) but $overlineX$ is Hausdorff (we can get disjoint neighborhoods of $(infty,n)$ and $(infty',n')$ since the collections of points of the form $(m,n+m)$ and $(m,n'-m)$ only intersect at at most one point).






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      Here's a counterexample. Let $X=mathbbNcupinfty,infty'$ where a set is open iff it is either contained in $mathbbN$ or cofinite. Let $overlineX=XtimesmathbbZ$ with the following topology (not the product topology). A set $UsubseteqoverlineX$ is open iff it satisfies the following two properties:



      • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty,n)in U$, $(m,n+m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

      • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty',n)in U$, $(m,n-m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

      I now claim that the projection map $p:overlineXto X$ is a covering map. First, it is easy to check that $p$ is continuous. Any $minmathbbN$ has an evenly covered neighborhood, namely $m$ (since $p^-1(m)=mtimesmathbbZ$ is discrete in $overlineX$). Finally, I claim $infty$ and $infty'$ have evenly covered neighborhoods. Indeed, if $V=Xsetminusinfty'$, then $p^-1(V)$ is homeomorphic to $VtimesmathbbZ$ (with the product topology) via the map sending $(m,n)$ to $(m,n-m)$ and $(infty,n)$ to $(infty,n)$, so $V$ is an evenly covered neighborhood of $infty$. Similarly, $W=Xsetminusinfty$ is evenly covered since $p^-1(W)cong Wtimes mathbbZ$ by mapping $(m,n)$ to $(m,n+m)$.



      Finally, $X$ is not Hausdorff ($infty$ and $infty'$ cannot be separated by open sets) but $overlineX$ is Hausdorff (we can get disjoint neighborhoods of $(infty,n)$ and $(infty',n')$ since the collections of points of the form $(m,n+m)$ and $(m,n'-m)$ only intersect at at most one point).






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted






        Here's a counterexample. Let $X=mathbbNcupinfty,infty'$ where a set is open iff it is either contained in $mathbbN$ or cofinite. Let $overlineX=XtimesmathbbZ$ with the following topology (not the product topology). A set $UsubseteqoverlineX$ is open iff it satisfies the following two properties:



        • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty,n)in U$, $(m,n+m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

        • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty',n)in U$, $(m,n-m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

        I now claim that the projection map $p:overlineXto X$ is a covering map. First, it is easy to check that $p$ is continuous. Any $minmathbbN$ has an evenly covered neighborhood, namely $m$ (since $p^-1(m)=mtimesmathbbZ$ is discrete in $overlineX$). Finally, I claim $infty$ and $infty'$ have evenly covered neighborhoods. Indeed, if $V=Xsetminusinfty'$, then $p^-1(V)$ is homeomorphic to $VtimesmathbbZ$ (with the product topology) via the map sending $(m,n)$ to $(m,n-m)$ and $(infty,n)$ to $(infty,n)$, so $V$ is an evenly covered neighborhood of $infty$. Similarly, $W=Xsetminusinfty$ is evenly covered since $p^-1(W)cong Wtimes mathbbZ$ by mapping $(m,n)$ to $(m,n+m)$.



        Finally, $X$ is not Hausdorff ($infty$ and $infty'$ cannot be separated by open sets) but $overlineX$ is Hausdorff (we can get disjoint neighborhoods of $(infty,n)$ and $(infty',n')$ since the collections of points of the form $(m,n+m)$ and $(m,n'-m)$ only intersect at at most one point).






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Here's a counterexample. Let $X=mathbbNcupinfty,infty'$ where a set is open iff it is either contained in $mathbbN$ or cofinite. Let $overlineX=XtimesmathbbZ$ with the following topology (not the product topology). A set $UsubseteqoverlineX$ is open iff it satisfies the following two properties:



        • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty,n)in U$, $(m,n+m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

        • For all $ninmathbbZ$ such that $(infty',n)in U$, $(m,n-m)in U$ for all but finitely many $minmathbbN$.

        I now claim that the projection map $p:overlineXto X$ is a covering map. First, it is easy to check that $p$ is continuous. Any $minmathbbN$ has an evenly covered neighborhood, namely $m$ (since $p^-1(m)=mtimesmathbbZ$ is discrete in $overlineX$). Finally, I claim $infty$ and $infty'$ have evenly covered neighborhoods. Indeed, if $V=Xsetminusinfty'$, then $p^-1(V)$ is homeomorphic to $VtimesmathbbZ$ (with the product topology) via the map sending $(m,n)$ to $(m,n-m)$ and $(infty,n)$ to $(infty,n)$, so $V$ is an evenly covered neighborhood of $infty$. Similarly, $W=Xsetminusinfty$ is evenly covered since $p^-1(W)cong Wtimes mathbbZ$ by mapping $(m,n)$ to $(m,n+m)$.



        Finally, $X$ is not Hausdorff ($infty$ and $infty'$ cannot be separated by open sets) but $overlineX$ is Hausdorff (we can get disjoint neighborhoods of $(infty,n)$ and $(infty',n')$ since the collections of points of the form $(m,n+m)$ and $(m,n'-m)$ only intersect at at most one point).







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 14 at 21:39









        Eric Wofsey

        163k12189301




        163k12189301






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2851938%2fimage-under-covering-map-of-hausdorff-space-is-hausdorff%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?