Is there a rational function $f(x,a)$ such that $int_0^1 f(x,a) dx = fracln(a)a$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was wondering if a rational function (quotient between polynomials) $f(x,a)$ exists such that $int_0^1 f(x,a) dx = fracln(a)a.$
For example, I could find, while playing with wolfram, a not rational $f(x,a) =frac ln(ax)+1a$ that integrated on $x$ from $0$ to $1$ yelds $fracln aa$. But the function not being rational does not really help me. How to proceed on a problem like this?
calculus integration definite-integrals
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was wondering if a rational function (quotient between polynomials) $f(x,a)$ exists such that $int_0^1 f(x,a) dx = fracln(a)a.$
For example, I could find, while playing with wolfram, a not rational $f(x,a) =frac ln(ax)+1a$ that integrated on $x$ from $0$ to $1$ yelds $fracln aa$. But the function not being rational does not really help me. How to proceed on a problem like this?
calculus integration definite-integrals
This is equivalent to finding an $F(x, a)$ such that $F(1,a) - F(0,a) = ln(a)/a$. Where F' is rational.
â Kaynex
Jul 15 at 1:46
@Kaynex What does "$F'$ rational" mean in this multivariable case? $fracpartial Fpartial x$?
â Randall
Jul 15 at 2:08
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was wondering if a rational function (quotient between polynomials) $f(x,a)$ exists such that $int_0^1 f(x,a) dx = fracln(a)a.$
For example, I could find, while playing with wolfram, a not rational $f(x,a) =frac ln(ax)+1a$ that integrated on $x$ from $0$ to $1$ yelds $fracln aa$. But the function not being rational does not really help me. How to proceed on a problem like this?
calculus integration definite-integrals
I was wondering if a rational function (quotient between polynomials) $f(x,a)$ exists such that $int_0^1 f(x,a) dx = fracln(a)a.$
For example, I could find, while playing with wolfram, a not rational $f(x,a) =frac ln(ax)+1a$ that integrated on $x$ from $0$ to $1$ yelds $fracln aa$. But the function not being rational does not really help me. How to proceed on a problem like this?
calculus integration definite-integrals
asked Jul 15 at 1:27
Pinteco
446110
446110
This is equivalent to finding an $F(x, a)$ such that $F(1,a) - F(0,a) = ln(a)/a$. Where F' is rational.
â Kaynex
Jul 15 at 1:46
@Kaynex What does "$F'$ rational" mean in this multivariable case? $fracpartial Fpartial x$?
â Randall
Jul 15 at 2:08
add a comment |Â
This is equivalent to finding an $F(x, a)$ such that $F(1,a) - F(0,a) = ln(a)/a$. Where F' is rational.
â Kaynex
Jul 15 at 1:46
@Kaynex What does "$F'$ rational" mean in this multivariable case? $fracpartial Fpartial x$?
â Randall
Jul 15 at 2:08
This is equivalent to finding an $F(x, a)$ such that $F(1,a) - F(0,a) = ln(a)/a$. Where F' is rational.
â Kaynex
Jul 15 at 1:46
This is equivalent to finding an $F(x, a)$ such that $F(1,a) - F(0,a) = ln(a)/a$. Where F' is rational.
â Kaynex
Jul 15 at 1:46
@Kaynex What does "$F'$ rational" mean in this multivariable case? $fracpartial Fpartial x$?
â Randall
Jul 15 at 2:08
@Kaynex What does "$F'$ rational" mean in this multivariable case? $fracpartial Fpartial x$?
â Randall
Jul 15 at 2:08
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Doesn't $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ work? Assume $a >0$ throughout (otherwise your log term makes no sense).
Let $g(x)= (a-1)x+1$. This is clearly monotone increasing or decreasing as long as $a neq 1$. As $g(0)=1$ and $g(1) = a$, $g(x)$ is never $0$ on $[0,1]$ by the IVT. If $a=1$ then $g(x) equiv 1$ and again $g$ is never $0$. So, either way, $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ has no discontinuities w/r/t $x$ over $[0,1]$.
You can now check---unless I did something really wrong---that $$fraca-1a int_0^1 frac1(a-1)x+1 dx = fracln aa.$$
To answer your question how to proceed on a problem like this?, I don't know. I just experimented and made adjustments as I went, starting with $int_1^a frac1x dx = ln (a)$, then dividing by $a$, then scooting the interval down to $[0,1]$, etc. Nothing clever.
1
Look right. Wolfy agrees. Good work.
â marty cohen
Jul 15 at 3:51
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Doesn't $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ work? Assume $a >0$ throughout (otherwise your log term makes no sense).
Let $g(x)= (a-1)x+1$. This is clearly monotone increasing or decreasing as long as $a neq 1$. As $g(0)=1$ and $g(1) = a$, $g(x)$ is never $0$ on $[0,1]$ by the IVT. If $a=1$ then $g(x) equiv 1$ and again $g$ is never $0$. So, either way, $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ has no discontinuities w/r/t $x$ over $[0,1]$.
You can now check---unless I did something really wrong---that $$fraca-1a int_0^1 frac1(a-1)x+1 dx = fracln aa.$$
To answer your question how to proceed on a problem like this?, I don't know. I just experimented and made adjustments as I went, starting with $int_1^a frac1x dx = ln (a)$, then dividing by $a$, then scooting the interval down to $[0,1]$, etc. Nothing clever.
1
Look right. Wolfy agrees. Good work.
â marty cohen
Jul 15 at 3:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Doesn't $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ work? Assume $a >0$ throughout (otherwise your log term makes no sense).
Let $g(x)= (a-1)x+1$. This is clearly monotone increasing or decreasing as long as $a neq 1$. As $g(0)=1$ and $g(1) = a$, $g(x)$ is never $0$ on $[0,1]$ by the IVT. If $a=1$ then $g(x) equiv 1$ and again $g$ is never $0$. So, either way, $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ has no discontinuities w/r/t $x$ over $[0,1]$.
You can now check---unless I did something really wrong---that $$fraca-1a int_0^1 frac1(a-1)x+1 dx = fracln aa.$$
To answer your question how to proceed on a problem like this?, I don't know. I just experimented and made adjustments as I went, starting with $int_1^a frac1x dx = ln (a)$, then dividing by $a$, then scooting the interval down to $[0,1]$, etc. Nothing clever.
1
Look right. Wolfy agrees. Good work.
â marty cohen
Jul 15 at 3:51
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Doesn't $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ work? Assume $a >0$ throughout (otherwise your log term makes no sense).
Let $g(x)= (a-1)x+1$. This is clearly monotone increasing or decreasing as long as $a neq 1$. As $g(0)=1$ and $g(1) = a$, $g(x)$ is never $0$ on $[0,1]$ by the IVT. If $a=1$ then $g(x) equiv 1$ and again $g$ is never $0$. So, either way, $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ has no discontinuities w/r/t $x$ over $[0,1]$.
You can now check---unless I did something really wrong---that $$fraca-1a int_0^1 frac1(a-1)x+1 dx = fracln aa.$$
To answer your question how to proceed on a problem like this?, I don't know. I just experimented and made adjustments as I went, starting with $int_1^a frac1x dx = ln (a)$, then dividing by $a$, then scooting the interval down to $[0,1]$, etc. Nothing clever.
Doesn't $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ work? Assume $a >0$ throughout (otherwise your log term makes no sense).
Let $g(x)= (a-1)x+1$. This is clearly monotone increasing or decreasing as long as $a neq 1$. As $g(0)=1$ and $g(1) = a$, $g(x)$ is never $0$ on $[0,1]$ by the IVT. If $a=1$ then $g(x) equiv 1$ and again $g$ is never $0$. So, either way, $f(x,a) = fraca-1a frac1(a-1)x+1$ has no discontinuities w/r/t $x$ over $[0,1]$.
You can now check---unless I did something really wrong---that $$fraca-1a int_0^1 frac1(a-1)x+1 dx = fracln aa.$$
To answer your question how to proceed on a problem like this?, I don't know. I just experimented and made adjustments as I went, starting with $int_1^a frac1x dx = ln (a)$, then dividing by $a$, then scooting the interval down to $[0,1]$, etc. Nothing clever.
edited Jul 15 at 2:27
answered Jul 15 at 2:17
Randall
7,2471825
7,2471825
1
Look right. Wolfy agrees. Good work.
â marty cohen
Jul 15 at 3:51
add a comment |Â
1
Look right. Wolfy agrees. Good work.
â marty cohen
Jul 15 at 3:51
1
1
Look right. Wolfy agrees. Good work.
â marty cohen
Jul 15 at 3:51
Look right. Wolfy agrees. Good work.
â marty cohen
Jul 15 at 3:51
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852106%2fis-there-a-rational-function-fx-a-such-that-int-01-fx-a-dx-frac-ln%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
This is equivalent to finding an $F(x, a)$ such that $F(1,a) - F(0,a) = ln(a)/a$. Where F' is rational.
â Kaynex
Jul 15 at 1:46
@Kaynex What does "$F'$ rational" mean in this multivariable case? $fracpartial Fpartial x$?
â Randall
Jul 15 at 2:08