APDE Help: Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers: Lesson 7 Question 3

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












can someone help by checking my working and perhaps explain where i'm going wrong?




solve the following problem with insulated boundaries
$$textPDE: ~u_t=u_xx$$
$$ textBCs: ~u_x(0,1) = 0~&~ u_x(1,t)=0$$
$$ textIC: ~u(x,0)=x$$




we start with solving the PDE by substituting
$$u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)$$
into the above
this gives
$$u(x,t) = sum_n=1^infty A_n e^(-npi)^2tcosnpi x$$
where $$A_n = 2 int_0^1 xcosnpi x$$



then i make $$A_n = 2* left[ fracxsinn pi xn pi|_0^1 - fraccosn pi xn^2 pi^2 |_0^1right] = -fraccosn pi - 1n^2 pi^2 = frac1-(-1)^nn^2 pi^2$$
which alternates between 0 and 2 so letting $n = 2k+1$
$$A_k = frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2$$
substituting back in and changing the index gives
$$u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_k=1^infty frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2 e^(-(2k+1)pi)^2tcos(2k+1)pi x$$
$$u(x,t) = frac4pi^2 + frac4pi^2sum_k=1^infty frace^-((2k+1)pi)^2t(2k+1)^2cos(2k+1)pi x $$



which is different from their solution of



$$u(x,t) = frac12 - frac4pi^2 sum_n=1^infty frac1n^2e^-(npi)^2t cosnpi x$$



any ideas where i went wrong? cheers







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    can someone help by checking my working and perhaps explain where i'm going wrong?




    solve the following problem with insulated boundaries
    $$textPDE: ~u_t=u_xx$$
    $$ textBCs: ~u_x(0,1) = 0~&~ u_x(1,t)=0$$
    $$ textIC: ~u(x,0)=x$$




    we start with solving the PDE by substituting
    $$u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)$$
    into the above
    this gives
    $$u(x,t) = sum_n=1^infty A_n e^(-npi)^2tcosnpi x$$
    where $$A_n = 2 int_0^1 xcosnpi x$$



    then i make $$A_n = 2* left[ fracxsinn pi xn pi|_0^1 - fraccosn pi xn^2 pi^2 |_0^1right] = -fraccosn pi - 1n^2 pi^2 = frac1-(-1)^nn^2 pi^2$$
    which alternates between 0 and 2 so letting $n = 2k+1$
    $$A_k = frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2$$
    substituting back in and changing the index gives
    $$u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_k=1^infty frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2 e^(-(2k+1)pi)^2tcos(2k+1)pi x$$
    $$u(x,t) = frac4pi^2 + frac4pi^2sum_k=1^infty frace^-((2k+1)pi)^2t(2k+1)^2cos(2k+1)pi x $$



    which is different from their solution of



    $$u(x,t) = frac12 - frac4pi^2 sum_n=1^infty frac1n^2e^-(npi)^2t cosnpi x$$



    any ideas where i went wrong? cheers







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      can someone help by checking my working and perhaps explain where i'm going wrong?




      solve the following problem with insulated boundaries
      $$textPDE: ~u_t=u_xx$$
      $$ textBCs: ~u_x(0,1) = 0~&~ u_x(1,t)=0$$
      $$ textIC: ~u(x,0)=x$$




      we start with solving the PDE by substituting
      $$u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)$$
      into the above
      this gives
      $$u(x,t) = sum_n=1^infty A_n e^(-npi)^2tcosnpi x$$
      where $$A_n = 2 int_0^1 xcosnpi x$$



      then i make $$A_n = 2* left[ fracxsinn pi xn pi|_0^1 - fraccosn pi xn^2 pi^2 |_0^1right] = -fraccosn pi - 1n^2 pi^2 = frac1-(-1)^nn^2 pi^2$$
      which alternates between 0 and 2 so letting $n = 2k+1$
      $$A_k = frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2$$
      substituting back in and changing the index gives
      $$u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_k=1^infty frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2 e^(-(2k+1)pi)^2tcos(2k+1)pi x$$
      $$u(x,t) = frac4pi^2 + frac4pi^2sum_k=1^infty frace^-((2k+1)pi)^2t(2k+1)^2cos(2k+1)pi x $$



      which is different from their solution of



      $$u(x,t) = frac12 - frac4pi^2 sum_n=1^infty frac1n^2e^-(npi)^2t cosnpi x$$



      any ideas where i went wrong? cheers







      share|cite|improve this question











      can someone help by checking my working and perhaps explain where i'm going wrong?




      solve the following problem with insulated boundaries
      $$textPDE: ~u_t=u_xx$$
      $$ textBCs: ~u_x(0,1) = 0~&~ u_x(1,t)=0$$
      $$ textIC: ~u(x,0)=x$$




      we start with solving the PDE by substituting
      $$u(x,t)=X(x)T(t)$$
      into the above
      this gives
      $$u(x,t) = sum_n=1^infty A_n e^(-npi)^2tcosnpi x$$
      where $$A_n = 2 int_0^1 xcosnpi x$$



      then i make $$A_n = 2* left[ fracxsinn pi xn pi|_0^1 - fraccosn pi xn^2 pi^2 |_0^1right] = -fraccosn pi - 1n^2 pi^2 = frac1-(-1)^nn^2 pi^2$$
      which alternates between 0 and 2 so letting $n = 2k+1$
      $$A_k = frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2$$
      substituting back in and changing the index gives
      $$u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_k=1^infty frac4(2k+1)^2 pi^2 e^(-(2k+1)pi)^2tcos(2k+1)pi x$$
      $$u(x,t) = frac4pi^2 + frac4pi^2sum_k=1^infty frace^-((2k+1)pi)^2t(2k+1)^2cos(2k+1)pi x $$



      which is different from their solution of



      $$u(x,t) = frac12 - frac4pi^2 sum_n=1^infty frac1n^2e^-(npi)^2t cosnpi x$$



      any ideas where i went wrong? cheers









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 29 at 8:45









      Vaas

      335213




      335213




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          First of all, you're missing the constant eigen-function, so the full solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_n=1^infty A_n e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The constant is given by



          $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 1^2 dx = frac12 $$



          For the remaining coefficients



          $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 x cos(npi x) dxint_0^1 cos^2(npi x) dx = 2int_0^1xcos(npi x) dx $$



          You made a small sign error at this point. Integration by parts gives



          beginalign A_n &= frac2xsin(npi x)npiBigg|_0^1 - int_0^1 frac2sin(npi x)npi dx \
          &= frac2cos(npi x)n^2pi^2Bigg|_0^1 \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2(cos(npi)-1) \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2((-1)^n-1)
          endalign



          which equals $0$ when $n$ is even and $-frac4n^2pi^2$ when $n$ is odd, so the final solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = frac12 - sum_n=2k+1,k=0^inftyfrac4n^2pi^2 e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The answer key probably forgot to say that $n$ needs to be odd.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • hmmm, looks like a couple of silly mistakes on my behalf. thank you! for the constant eiganfunction, (which im guessing i know as the steady state solution) your answer makes it look like its the integral of the IC's over the integral of the length squared. am i right in assuming that? or is it more along the lines of the interpolation between two constants undefined by the question (but must be there given the flux is zero at the boundary conditions)?
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 7:28










          • Nothing to do with that. The constant function is just part of the eigenfunction set, i.e. solving $X′′+λ2X=0$ when $λ=0$. For convenience, we set the constant equal to $1$. The same steps are taken as the other $A_n$, except with $n$ set to $0$, which results in a different integral and a different normalization. We need this constant function to complete the function space for the initial condition.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 9:36










          • my keyboard has taken this opportunity to break so my apologies so we solve $$X''+2 lambda X =0$$ solving and setting $lambda = 0$ gives $X=A$ where A is a constant. then from before we have $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 cos(0) dx = frac12 $$ am i on the right track ??
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 11:06










          • The initial function is given by $g(x) = sum_n=0^infty A_nX_n(x)$, where $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 g(x)X_n(x) dxint_0^1 (X_n(x))^2 dx $$, where $X_0 = 1$ and $X_n>0 = cos(npi x)$.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 16:05











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865900%2fapde-help-partial-differential-equations-for-scientists-and-engineers-lesson-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          First of all, you're missing the constant eigen-function, so the full solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_n=1^infty A_n e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The constant is given by



          $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 1^2 dx = frac12 $$



          For the remaining coefficients



          $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 x cos(npi x) dxint_0^1 cos^2(npi x) dx = 2int_0^1xcos(npi x) dx $$



          You made a small sign error at this point. Integration by parts gives



          beginalign A_n &= frac2xsin(npi x)npiBigg|_0^1 - int_0^1 frac2sin(npi x)npi dx \
          &= frac2cos(npi x)n^2pi^2Bigg|_0^1 \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2(cos(npi)-1) \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2((-1)^n-1)
          endalign



          which equals $0$ when $n$ is even and $-frac4n^2pi^2$ when $n$ is odd, so the final solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = frac12 - sum_n=2k+1,k=0^inftyfrac4n^2pi^2 e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The answer key probably forgot to say that $n$ needs to be odd.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • hmmm, looks like a couple of silly mistakes on my behalf. thank you! for the constant eiganfunction, (which im guessing i know as the steady state solution) your answer makes it look like its the integral of the IC's over the integral of the length squared. am i right in assuming that? or is it more along the lines of the interpolation between two constants undefined by the question (but must be there given the flux is zero at the boundary conditions)?
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 7:28










          • Nothing to do with that. The constant function is just part of the eigenfunction set, i.e. solving $X′′+λ2X=0$ when $λ=0$. For convenience, we set the constant equal to $1$. The same steps are taken as the other $A_n$, except with $n$ set to $0$, which results in a different integral and a different normalization. We need this constant function to complete the function space for the initial condition.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 9:36










          • my keyboard has taken this opportunity to break so my apologies so we solve $$X''+2 lambda X =0$$ solving and setting $lambda = 0$ gives $X=A$ where A is a constant. then from before we have $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 cos(0) dx = frac12 $$ am i on the right track ??
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 11:06










          • The initial function is given by $g(x) = sum_n=0^infty A_nX_n(x)$, where $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 g(x)X_n(x) dxint_0^1 (X_n(x))^2 dx $$, where $X_0 = 1$ and $X_n>0 = cos(npi x)$.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 16:05















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          First of all, you're missing the constant eigen-function, so the full solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_n=1^infty A_n e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The constant is given by



          $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 1^2 dx = frac12 $$



          For the remaining coefficients



          $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 x cos(npi x) dxint_0^1 cos^2(npi x) dx = 2int_0^1xcos(npi x) dx $$



          You made a small sign error at this point. Integration by parts gives



          beginalign A_n &= frac2xsin(npi x)npiBigg|_0^1 - int_0^1 frac2sin(npi x)npi dx \
          &= frac2cos(npi x)n^2pi^2Bigg|_0^1 \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2(cos(npi)-1) \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2((-1)^n-1)
          endalign



          which equals $0$ when $n$ is even and $-frac4n^2pi^2$ when $n$ is odd, so the final solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = frac12 - sum_n=2k+1,k=0^inftyfrac4n^2pi^2 e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The answer key probably forgot to say that $n$ needs to be odd.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • hmmm, looks like a couple of silly mistakes on my behalf. thank you! for the constant eiganfunction, (which im guessing i know as the steady state solution) your answer makes it look like its the integral of the IC's over the integral of the length squared. am i right in assuming that? or is it more along the lines of the interpolation between two constants undefined by the question (but must be there given the flux is zero at the boundary conditions)?
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 7:28










          • Nothing to do with that. The constant function is just part of the eigenfunction set, i.e. solving $X′′+λ2X=0$ when $λ=0$. For convenience, we set the constant equal to $1$. The same steps are taken as the other $A_n$, except with $n$ set to $0$, which results in a different integral and a different normalization. We need this constant function to complete the function space for the initial condition.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 9:36










          • my keyboard has taken this opportunity to break so my apologies so we solve $$X''+2 lambda X =0$$ solving and setting $lambda = 0$ gives $X=A$ where A is a constant. then from before we have $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 cos(0) dx = frac12 $$ am i on the right track ??
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 11:06










          • The initial function is given by $g(x) = sum_n=0^infty A_nX_n(x)$, where $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 g(x)X_n(x) dxint_0^1 (X_n(x))^2 dx $$, where $X_0 = 1$ and $X_n>0 = cos(npi x)$.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 16:05













          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted






          First of all, you're missing the constant eigen-function, so the full solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_n=1^infty A_n e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The constant is given by



          $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 1^2 dx = frac12 $$



          For the remaining coefficients



          $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 x cos(npi x) dxint_0^1 cos^2(npi x) dx = 2int_0^1xcos(npi x) dx $$



          You made a small sign error at this point. Integration by parts gives



          beginalign A_n &= frac2xsin(npi x)npiBigg|_0^1 - int_0^1 frac2sin(npi x)npi dx \
          &= frac2cos(npi x)n^2pi^2Bigg|_0^1 \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2(cos(npi)-1) \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2((-1)^n-1)
          endalign



          which equals $0$ when $n$ is even and $-frac4n^2pi^2$ when $n$ is odd, so the final solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = frac12 - sum_n=2k+1,k=0^inftyfrac4n^2pi^2 e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The answer key probably forgot to say that $n$ needs to be odd.






          share|cite|improve this answer















          First of all, you're missing the constant eigen-function, so the full solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = A_0 + sum_n=1^infty A_n e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The constant is given by



          $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 1^2 dx = frac12 $$



          For the remaining coefficients



          $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 x cos(npi x) dxint_0^1 cos^2(npi x) dx = 2int_0^1xcos(npi x) dx $$



          You made a small sign error at this point. Integration by parts gives



          beginalign A_n &= frac2xsin(npi x)npiBigg|_0^1 - int_0^1 frac2sin(npi x)npi dx \
          &= frac2cos(npi x)n^2pi^2Bigg|_0^1 \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2(cos(npi)-1) \
          &= frac2n^2pi^2((-1)^n-1)
          endalign



          which equals $0$ when $n$ is even and $-frac4n^2pi^2$ when $n$ is odd, so the final solution is



          $$ u(x,t) = frac12 - sum_n=2k+1,k=0^inftyfrac4n^2pi^2 e^-n^2pi^2tcos(npi x) $$



          The answer key probably forgot to say that $n$ needs to be odd.







          share|cite|improve this answer















          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jul 30 at 9:18


























          answered Jul 29 at 15:13









          Dylan

          11.4k31026




          11.4k31026











          • hmmm, looks like a couple of silly mistakes on my behalf. thank you! for the constant eiganfunction, (which im guessing i know as the steady state solution) your answer makes it look like its the integral of the IC's over the integral of the length squared. am i right in assuming that? or is it more along the lines of the interpolation between two constants undefined by the question (but must be there given the flux is zero at the boundary conditions)?
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 7:28










          • Nothing to do with that. The constant function is just part of the eigenfunction set, i.e. solving $X′′+λ2X=0$ when $λ=0$. For convenience, we set the constant equal to $1$. The same steps are taken as the other $A_n$, except with $n$ set to $0$, which results in a different integral and a different normalization. We need this constant function to complete the function space for the initial condition.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 9:36










          • my keyboard has taken this opportunity to break so my apologies so we solve $$X''+2 lambda X =0$$ solving and setting $lambda = 0$ gives $X=A$ where A is a constant. then from before we have $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 cos(0) dx = frac12 $$ am i on the right track ??
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 11:06










          • The initial function is given by $g(x) = sum_n=0^infty A_nX_n(x)$, where $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 g(x)X_n(x) dxint_0^1 (X_n(x))^2 dx $$, where $X_0 = 1$ and $X_n>0 = cos(npi x)$.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 16:05

















          • hmmm, looks like a couple of silly mistakes on my behalf. thank you! for the constant eiganfunction, (which im guessing i know as the steady state solution) your answer makes it look like its the integral of the IC's over the integral of the length squared. am i right in assuming that? or is it more along the lines of the interpolation between two constants undefined by the question (but must be there given the flux is zero at the boundary conditions)?
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 7:28










          • Nothing to do with that. The constant function is just part of the eigenfunction set, i.e. solving $X′′+λ2X=0$ when $λ=0$. For convenience, we set the constant equal to $1$. The same steps are taken as the other $A_n$, except with $n$ set to $0$, which results in a different integral and a different normalization. We need this constant function to complete the function space for the initial condition.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 9:36










          • my keyboard has taken this opportunity to break so my apologies so we solve $$X''+2 lambda X =0$$ solving and setting $lambda = 0$ gives $X=A$ where A is a constant. then from before we have $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 cos(0) dx = frac12 $$ am i on the right track ??
            – Vaas
            Jul 30 at 11:06










          • The initial function is given by $g(x) = sum_n=0^infty A_nX_n(x)$, where $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 g(x)X_n(x) dxint_0^1 (X_n(x))^2 dx $$, where $X_0 = 1$ and $X_n>0 = cos(npi x)$.
            – Dylan
            Jul 30 at 16:05
















          hmmm, looks like a couple of silly mistakes on my behalf. thank you! for the constant eiganfunction, (which im guessing i know as the steady state solution) your answer makes it look like its the integral of the IC's over the integral of the length squared. am i right in assuming that? or is it more along the lines of the interpolation between two constants undefined by the question (but must be there given the flux is zero at the boundary conditions)?
          – Vaas
          Jul 30 at 7:28




          hmmm, looks like a couple of silly mistakes on my behalf. thank you! for the constant eiganfunction, (which im guessing i know as the steady state solution) your answer makes it look like its the integral of the IC's over the integral of the length squared. am i right in assuming that? or is it more along the lines of the interpolation between two constants undefined by the question (but must be there given the flux is zero at the boundary conditions)?
          – Vaas
          Jul 30 at 7:28












          Nothing to do with that. The constant function is just part of the eigenfunction set, i.e. solving $X′′+λ2X=0$ when $λ=0$. For convenience, we set the constant equal to $1$. The same steps are taken as the other $A_n$, except with $n$ set to $0$, which results in a different integral and a different normalization. We need this constant function to complete the function space for the initial condition.
          – Dylan
          Jul 30 at 9:36




          Nothing to do with that. The constant function is just part of the eigenfunction set, i.e. solving $X′′+λ2X=0$ when $λ=0$. For convenience, we set the constant equal to $1$. The same steps are taken as the other $A_n$, except with $n$ set to $0$, which results in a different integral and a different normalization. We need this constant function to complete the function space for the initial condition.
          – Dylan
          Jul 30 at 9:36












          my keyboard has taken this opportunity to break so my apologies so we solve $$X''+2 lambda X =0$$ solving and setting $lambda = 0$ gives $X=A$ where A is a constant. then from before we have $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 cos(0) dx = frac12 $$ am i on the right track ??
          – Vaas
          Jul 30 at 11:06




          my keyboard has taken this opportunity to break so my apologies so we solve $$X''+2 lambda X =0$$ solving and setting $lambda = 0$ gives $X=A$ where A is a constant. then from before we have $$ A_0 = fracint_0^1 x dxint_0^1 cos(0) dx = frac12 $$ am i on the right track ??
          – Vaas
          Jul 30 at 11:06












          The initial function is given by $g(x) = sum_n=0^infty A_nX_n(x)$, where $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 g(x)X_n(x) dxint_0^1 (X_n(x))^2 dx $$, where $X_0 = 1$ and $X_n>0 = cos(npi x)$.
          – Dylan
          Jul 30 at 16:05





          The initial function is given by $g(x) = sum_n=0^infty A_nX_n(x)$, where $$ A_n = fracint_0^1 g(x)X_n(x) dxint_0^1 (X_n(x))^2 dx $$, where $X_0 = 1$ and $X_n>0 = cos(npi x)$.
          – Dylan
          Jul 30 at 16:05













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865900%2fapde-help-partial-differential-equations-for-scientists-and-engineers-lesson-7%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?