Can a non-PID noetherian integral domain have all PID localizations?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?



Thank you for your help.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?



    Thank you for your help.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?



      Thank you for your help.







      share|cite|improve this question











      If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?



      Thank you for your help.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 15 at 14:34









      UnrealVillager

      256




      256




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.



          Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:




          Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!




          Long Version:
          If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:




          Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
          its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;

          2. $A$ is integrally closed;

          3. $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;

          4. $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;

          5. Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.

          6. There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.



          In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).



          Now we define a Dedekind domain:




          Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is integrally closed;

          2. Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;

          3. Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;

          A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.




          A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)




          Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.




          This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
            – UnrealVillager
            Jul 15 at 18:36










          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852580%2fcan-a-non-pid-noetherian-integral-domain-have-all-pid-localizations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.



          Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:




          Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!




          Long Version:
          If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:




          Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
          its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;

          2. $A$ is integrally closed;

          3. $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;

          4. $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;

          5. Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.

          6. There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.



          In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).



          Now we define a Dedekind domain:




          Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is integrally closed;

          2. Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;

          3. Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;

          A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.




          A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)




          Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.




          This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
            – UnrealVillager
            Jul 15 at 18:36














          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted










          Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.



          Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:




          Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!




          Long Version:
          If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:




          Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
          its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;

          2. $A$ is integrally closed;

          3. $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;

          4. $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;

          5. Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.

          6. There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.



          In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).



          Now we define a Dedekind domain:




          Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is integrally closed;

          2. Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;

          3. Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;

          A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.




          A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)




          Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.




          This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
            – UnrealVillager
            Jul 15 at 18:36












          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          0
          down vote



          accepted






          Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.



          Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:




          Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!




          Long Version:
          If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:




          Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
          its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;

          2. $A$ is integrally closed;

          3. $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;

          4. $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;

          5. Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.

          6. There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.



          In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).



          Now we define a Dedekind domain:




          Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is integrally closed;

          2. Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;

          3. Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;

          A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.




          A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)




          Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.




          This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.



          Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:




          Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!




          Long Version:
          If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:




          Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
          its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;

          2. $A$ is integrally closed;

          3. $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;

          4. $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;

          5. Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.

          6. There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.



          In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).



          Now we define a Dedekind domain:




          Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:



          1. $A$ is integrally closed;

          2. Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;

          3. Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;

          A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.




          A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)




          Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.




          This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 15 at 18:04









          Hamed

          4,421421




          4,421421











          • Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
            – UnrealVillager
            Jul 15 at 18:36
















          • Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
            – UnrealVillager
            Jul 15 at 18:36















          Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
          – UnrealVillager
          Jul 15 at 18:36




          Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
          – UnrealVillager
          Jul 15 at 18:36












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852580%2fcan-a-non-pid-noetherian-integral-domain-have-all-pid-localizations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?