Can a non-PID noetherian integral domain have all PID localizations?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?
Thank you for your help.
ring-theory commutative-algebra principal-ideal-domains localization noetherian
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?
Thank you for your help.
ring-theory commutative-algebra principal-ideal-domains localization noetherian
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?
Thank you for your help.
ring-theory commutative-algebra principal-ideal-domains localization noetherian
If a noetherian integral domain R has all its localizations by maximal ideals being PIDs, does it imply that R itself is a PID?
Thank you for your help.
ring-theory commutative-algebra principal-ideal-domains localization noetherian
asked Jul 15 at 14:34
UnrealVillager
256
256
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.
Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:
Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!
Long Version:
If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:
Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;
- $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;
- Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.
- There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.
In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).
Now we define a Dedekind domain:
Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;
- Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;
A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.
A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)
Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.
This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.
Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
– UnrealVillager
Jul 15 at 18:36
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.
Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:
Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!
Long Version:
If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:
Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;
- $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;
- Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.
- There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.
In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).
Now we define a Dedekind domain:
Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;
- Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;
A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.
A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)
Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.
This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.
Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
– UnrealVillager
Jul 15 at 18:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.
Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:
Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!
Long Version:
If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:
Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;
- $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;
- Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.
- There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.
In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).
Now we define a Dedekind domain:
Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;
- Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;
A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.
A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)
Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.
This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.
Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
– UnrealVillager
Jul 15 at 18:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
up vote
0
down vote
accepted
Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.
Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:
Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!
Long Version:
If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:
Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;
- $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;
- Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.
- There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.
In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).
Now we define a Dedekind domain:
Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;
- Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;
A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.
A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)
Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.
This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.
Short Version: No, an example would be the ring $R=mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$. I'll explain in the long version, why this example was chosen and why it does not satisfy your criteria.
Motivation: The idea is to first give a name to a Noetherian domain $A$ of Krull dimension one (if localization at every maximal is a PID, then the dimension is necessarily one), such that localization at every prime (not just maximal) ideal is a PID. This, as we will see, is a Dedekind domain. It is also known that if a Dedekind domain is a UFD, this it is a PID. So I have translated (a stronger version of) your question into:
Q: Does there exists a Dedekind domain that is not a UFD? A: Yes!
Long Version:
If you consult Atiyah & MacDonald, chapter 9 (Valuation Rings), you will see the following statements:
Proposition 9.2: Let $A$ be a Noetherian local domain of [Krull] dimension one, $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal, $k=A/mathfrakm$
its residue field. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is a discrete valuation ring;
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- $mathfrakm$ is a principal ideal;
- $dim mathfrakm/mathfrakm^2=1$;
- Every non-zero ideal is a power of $mathfrakm$.
- There exists $xin A$ such that every non-zero ideal is of the form $(x^k)$, $kgeq 0$.
In particular, if a Noetherian local domain of dimension one $A$ is a PID then $A$ is a DVR (by $3to 1$) and conversely, if $A$ is a DVR then $A$ is a PID (by $1to 6$).
Now we define a Dedekind domain:
Proposition 9.3: Let $A$ be a Noetherian domain of [Krull] dimension one. Then the following are equivalent:
- $A$ is integrally closed;
- Every primary ideal in $A$ is a prime power;
- Every local ring $A_mathfrakp$ ($mathfrakpneq 0$) is a DVR;
A ring satisfying any (so all) of these conditions is called a Dedekind domain.
A very famous example of Dedekind domains are the following group (for a proof see here, proposition 13.5)
Let $mathbbQsubset K$ be a finite field extension [This is called a number field], and let $R$ be the integral closure of $mathbbZ$ in $K$. Then $R$ is a Dedekind domain.
This is how the example in the short version is made. I'll leave it to you to show $mathbbZ[sqrt5i]$ is not a UFD.
answered Jul 15 at 18:04
Hamed
4,421421
4,421421
Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
– UnrealVillager
Jul 15 at 18:36
add a comment |Â
Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
– UnrealVillager
Jul 15 at 18:36
Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
– UnrealVillager
Jul 15 at 18:36
Hamed, thanks a lot for such an extensive reply.
– UnrealVillager
Jul 15 at 18:36
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852580%2fcan-a-non-pid-noetherian-integral-domain-have-all-pid-localizations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password