Coercivity and PS condition implies global minimizer

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am unable to get any intution to prove the following statement.
Any $f:XtomathbbR$ which is coercive and satisfies PS condition has a global minimizer, provided $X$ is a reflexive Banach space.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    Plese define " PS condition".
    – MathOverview
    20 hours ago










  • Palais–Smale compactness condition? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    – Mark L. Stone
    18 hours ago











  • No such explanation I have found there. I tried to prove by definition but unable.
    – Mathlover
    16 hours ago










  • My link was not intended to provide a solution to your problem, I was asking whether that is the PS condition being referred to in your question. Readers don't even know what your question (PS condition) is.
    – Mark L. Stone
    12 hours ago











  • The strong formulation defined in your wiki link is the PS condition in my question. Thanks
    – Mathlover
    3 hours ago














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am unable to get any intution to prove the following statement.
Any $f:XtomathbbR$ which is coercive and satisfies PS condition has a global minimizer, provided $X$ is a reflexive Banach space.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 1




    Plese define " PS condition".
    – MathOverview
    20 hours ago










  • Palais–Smale compactness condition? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    – Mark L. Stone
    18 hours ago











  • No such explanation I have found there. I tried to prove by definition but unable.
    – Mathlover
    16 hours ago










  • My link was not intended to provide a solution to your problem, I was asking whether that is the PS condition being referred to in your question. Readers don't even know what your question (PS condition) is.
    – Mark L. Stone
    12 hours ago











  • The strong formulation defined in your wiki link is the PS condition in my question. Thanks
    – Mathlover
    3 hours ago












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I am unable to get any intution to prove the following statement.
Any $f:XtomathbbR$ which is coercive and satisfies PS condition has a global minimizer, provided $X$ is a reflexive Banach space.







share|cite|improve this question











I am unable to get any intution to prove the following statement.
Any $f:XtomathbbR$ which is coercive and satisfies PS condition has a global minimizer, provided $X$ is a reflexive Banach space.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked 20 hours ago









Mathlover

595




595







  • 1




    Plese define " PS condition".
    – MathOverview
    20 hours ago










  • Palais–Smale compactness condition? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    – Mark L. Stone
    18 hours ago











  • No such explanation I have found there. I tried to prove by definition but unable.
    – Mathlover
    16 hours ago










  • My link was not intended to provide a solution to your problem, I was asking whether that is the PS condition being referred to in your question. Readers don't even know what your question (PS condition) is.
    – Mark L. Stone
    12 hours ago











  • The strong formulation defined in your wiki link is the PS condition in my question. Thanks
    – Mathlover
    3 hours ago












  • 1




    Plese define " PS condition".
    – MathOverview
    20 hours ago










  • Palais–Smale compactness condition? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
    – Mark L. Stone
    18 hours ago











  • No such explanation I have found there. I tried to prove by definition but unable.
    – Mathlover
    16 hours ago










  • My link was not intended to provide a solution to your problem, I was asking whether that is the PS condition being referred to in your question. Readers don't even know what your question (PS condition) is.
    – Mark L. Stone
    12 hours ago











  • The strong formulation defined in your wiki link is the PS condition in my question. Thanks
    – Mathlover
    3 hours ago







1




1




Plese define " PS condition".
– MathOverview
20 hours ago




Plese define " PS condition".
– MathOverview
20 hours ago












Palais–Smale compactness condition? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Mark L. Stone
18 hours ago





Palais–Smale compactness condition? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
– Mark L. Stone
18 hours ago













No such explanation I have found there. I tried to prove by definition but unable.
– Mathlover
16 hours ago




No such explanation I have found there. I tried to prove by definition but unable.
– Mathlover
16 hours ago












My link was not intended to provide a solution to your problem, I was asking whether that is the PS condition being referred to in your question. Readers don't even know what your question (PS condition) is.
– Mark L. Stone
12 hours ago





My link was not intended to provide a solution to your problem, I was asking whether that is the PS condition being referred to in your question. Readers don't even know what your question (PS condition) is.
– Mark L. Stone
12 hours ago













The strong formulation defined in your wiki link is the PS condition in my question. Thanks
– Mathlover
3 hours ago




The strong formulation defined in your wiki link is the PS condition in my question. Thanks
– Mathlover
3 hours ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872912%2fcoercivity-and-ps-condition-implies-global-minimizer%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2872912%2fcoercivity-and-ps-condition-implies-global-minimizer%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?