Embedding of torsion free module

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If R is any commutative ring with 1 and M be any finitely generated torsion free R-module. Can we embed M into free R-module of finite rank?



As we know that it can be embedded if R is a domain. Since we can then take the tensor product of M with K(quotient field of R) and find suitable basis so that we can embed. But I don’t know whether it is true for any commutative ring or not?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • What definition are you using for torsion-freeness for a non-domain?
    – Mohan
    2 days ago










  • m is said to be torsion if rm = 0 for some non zero r.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago










  • got it..it means that R must be domain.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If R is any commutative ring with 1 and M be any finitely generated torsion free R-module. Can we embed M into free R-module of finite rank?



As we know that it can be embedded if R is a domain. Since we can then take the tensor product of M with K(quotient field of R) and find suitable basis so that we can embed. But I don’t know whether it is true for any commutative ring or not?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • What definition are you using for torsion-freeness for a non-domain?
    – Mohan
    2 days ago










  • m is said to be torsion if rm = 0 for some non zero r.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago










  • got it..it means that R must be domain.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











If R is any commutative ring with 1 and M be any finitely generated torsion free R-module. Can we embed M into free R-module of finite rank?



As we know that it can be embedded if R is a domain. Since we can then take the tensor product of M with K(quotient field of R) and find suitable basis so that we can embed. But I don’t know whether it is true for any commutative ring or not?







share|cite|improve this question











If R is any commutative ring with 1 and M be any finitely generated torsion free R-module. Can we embed M into free R-module of finite rank?



As we know that it can be embedded if R is a domain. Since we can then take the tensor product of M with K(quotient field of R) and find suitable basis so that we can embed. But I don’t know whether it is true for any commutative ring or not?









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked 2 days ago









Sunny Rathore

49327




49327











  • What definition are you using for torsion-freeness for a non-domain?
    – Mohan
    2 days ago










  • m is said to be torsion if rm = 0 for some non zero r.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago










  • got it..it means that R must be domain.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago
















  • What definition are you using for torsion-freeness for a non-domain?
    – Mohan
    2 days ago










  • m is said to be torsion if rm = 0 for some non zero r.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago










  • got it..it means that R must be domain.
    – Sunny Rathore
    2 days ago















What definition are you using for torsion-freeness for a non-domain?
– Mohan
2 days ago




What definition are you using for torsion-freeness for a non-domain?
– Mohan
2 days ago












m is said to be torsion if rm = 0 for some non zero r.
– Sunny Rathore
2 days ago




m is said to be torsion if rm = 0 for some non zero r.
– Sunny Rathore
2 days ago












got it..it means that R must be domain.
– Sunny Rathore
2 days ago




got it..it means that R must be domain.
– Sunny Rathore
2 days ago















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871971%2fembedding-of-torsion-free-module%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2871971%2fembedding-of-torsion-free-module%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon