Evaluate $int_=3fracdzz^3(z^10-2)$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1













$$int_zfracdzz^3(z^10-2)$$




There are singularities at $z=0$ and $z^10=2iff z=sqrt[10]2e^fracipi k5 text where k=0,1,...9$ so we need to find $10$ residues? or have I got it wrong?







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1













    $$int_zfracdzz^3(z^10-2)$$




    There are singularities at $z=0$ and $z^10=2iff z=sqrt[10]2e^fracipi k5 text where k=0,1,...9$ so we need to find $10$ residues? or have I got it wrong?







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1






      $$int_zfracdzz^3(z^10-2)$$




      There are singularities at $z=0$ and $z^10=2iff z=sqrt[10]2e^fracipi k5 text where k=0,1,...9$ so we need to find $10$ residues? or have I got it wrong?







      share|cite|improve this question














      $$int_zfracdzz^3(z^10-2)$$




      There are singularities at $z=0$ and $z^10=2iff z=sqrt[10]2e^fracipi k5 text where k=0,1,...9$ so we need to find $10$ residues? or have I got it wrong?









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 15 at 16:33









      José Carlos Santos

      114k1698177




      114k1698177









      asked Jul 15 at 16:19









      gbox

      5,30851841




      5,30851841




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Since there are no singularities outside $|z|=2^1/10$, the Cauchy Integral Theorem says that
          $$
          int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
          =int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
          $$
          for all $rgt2^1/10$. As $rtoinfty$, the integral on the right obviously vanishes.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Why can’t we do the same with $f(z)=fracdzz^2+1$ at $|z|=2$
            – gbox
            Jul 15 at 17:27










          • @gbox: We can. Why do you think we can't?
            – robjohn♦
            Jul 15 at 18:18










          • So $int_=2fracdxz^2+1=0$ and not $2pi i (res(f,i)+res(f,-i))$?
            – gbox
            Jul 15 at 18:34










          • the residue of $frac1z^2+1$ at $i$ is $-frac i2$. The residue at $-i$ is $frac i2$, so the sum of the residues is $0$.
            – robjohn♦
            Jul 15 at 19:17






          • 1




            @gbox If you calculate those residues and that doesn't make you wish you'd calculated them before making that comment then you calculated them wrong.
            – David C. Ullrich
            Jul 15 at 19:17

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          This is easy by symmetry, without calculating any residues.



          Say $f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and let $omega=e^2pi i/10$. Note that
          $$f(omega z)=omega^-3f(z).$$It follows that the integral is $0$.



          Hint regarding the relevant calculations: Say the integral is $I$. Writing slightly informally, $$I=int_zf(omega z),d(omega z)
          =int_zomega^-3f(z)omega,dz=omega^-2I;$$since $omega^-2ne1$ this shows $I=0$.



          (The "informal" part is the first equality above. To justify it, note that if $tmapstogamma(t)$ is a parametrization of $|z|=3$ then $tmapstoomegagamma(t)$ is also a parametrization.)






          share|cite|improve this answer






























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Hint : Sum of the residues at all singularities including infinity is equal to zero. So it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$, where $displaystyle f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and then apply Cauchy's Residue Theorem.




            First line says that, If $f$ has poles at $z=a_i(i=1,2,cdots ,n)$ then $displaystyle sum_i=1^n textRes(f;a_i) +textRes(f;infty)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Why "it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$" is there a theorem about it?
              – gbox
              Jul 15 at 16:28






            • 1




              Read the previous line again
              – Empty
              Jul 15 at 16:29










            • @gbox See the edited answer.
              – Empty
              Jul 15 at 16:35

















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Actually, that would mean $11$ residues, but since $operatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),0right)=0$…



            On the other hand, if $z_k=sqrt[10]2e^frackpi i5$ ($kin0,1,ldots,9$), thenbeginalignoperatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),z_kright)&=frac1z_k^310z_k^9\&=frac110z_k^12\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12kpi i5right)\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12pi i5right)^k.endalignSo, what you have to sum is a gemetric progression.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );








               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852657%2fevaluate-int-z-3-fracdzz3z10-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              4
              down vote













              Since there are no singularities outside $|z|=2^1/10$, the Cauchy Integral Theorem says that
              $$
              int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              =int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              $$
              for all $rgt2^1/10$. As $rtoinfty$, the integral on the right obviously vanishes.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Why can’t we do the same with $f(z)=fracdzz^2+1$ at $|z|=2$
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 17:27










              • @gbox: We can. Why do you think we can't?
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 18:18










              • So $int_=2fracdxz^2+1=0$ and not $2pi i (res(f,i)+res(f,-i))$?
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 18:34










              • the residue of $frac1z^2+1$ at $i$ is $-frac i2$. The residue at $-i$ is $frac i2$, so the sum of the residues is $0$.
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 19:17






              • 1




                @gbox If you calculate those residues and that doesn't make you wish you'd calculated them before making that comment then you calculated them wrong.
                – David C. Ullrich
                Jul 15 at 19:17














              up vote
              4
              down vote













              Since there are no singularities outside $|z|=2^1/10$, the Cauchy Integral Theorem says that
              $$
              int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              =int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              $$
              for all $rgt2^1/10$. As $rtoinfty$, the integral on the right obviously vanishes.






              share|cite|improve this answer





















              • Why can’t we do the same with $f(z)=fracdzz^2+1$ at $|z|=2$
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 17:27










              • @gbox: We can. Why do you think we can't?
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 18:18










              • So $int_=2fracdxz^2+1=0$ and not $2pi i (res(f,i)+res(f,-i))$?
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 18:34










              • the residue of $frac1z^2+1$ at $i$ is $-frac i2$. The residue at $-i$ is $frac i2$, so the sum of the residues is $0$.
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 19:17






              • 1




                @gbox If you calculate those residues and that doesn't make you wish you'd calculated them before making that comment then you calculated them wrong.
                – David C. Ullrich
                Jul 15 at 19:17












              up vote
              4
              down vote










              up vote
              4
              down vote









              Since there are no singularities outside $|z|=2^1/10$, the Cauchy Integral Theorem says that
              $$
              int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              =int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              $$
              for all $rgt2^1/10$. As $rtoinfty$, the integral on the right obviously vanishes.






              share|cite|improve this answer













              Since there are no singularities outside $|z|=2^1/10$, the Cauchy Integral Theorem says that
              $$
              int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              =int_zfracmathrmdzz^3(z^10-2)
              $$
              for all $rgt2^1/10$. As $rtoinfty$, the integral on the right obviously vanishes.







              share|cite|improve this answer













              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer











              answered Jul 15 at 17:13









              robjohn♦

              258k26297612




              258k26297612











              • Why can’t we do the same with $f(z)=fracdzz^2+1$ at $|z|=2$
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 17:27










              • @gbox: We can. Why do you think we can't?
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 18:18










              • So $int_=2fracdxz^2+1=0$ and not $2pi i (res(f,i)+res(f,-i))$?
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 18:34










              • the residue of $frac1z^2+1$ at $i$ is $-frac i2$. The residue at $-i$ is $frac i2$, so the sum of the residues is $0$.
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 19:17






              • 1




                @gbox If you calculate those residues and that doesn't make you wish you'd calculated them before making that comment then you calculated them wrong.
                – David C. Ullrich
                Jul 15 at 19:17
















              • Why can’t we do the same with $f(z)=fracdzz^2+1$ at $|z|=2$
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 17:27










              • @gbox: We can. Why do you think we can't?
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 18:18










              • So $int_=2fracdxz^2+1=0$ and not $2pi i (res(f,i)+res(f,-i))$?
                – gbox
                Jul 15 at 18:34










              • the residue of $frac1z^2+1$ at $i$ is $-frac i2$. The residue at $-i$ is $frac i2$, so the sum of the residues is $0$.
                – robjohn♦
                Jul 15 at 19:17






              • 1




                @gbox If you calculate those residues and that doesn't make you wish you'd calculated them before making that comment then you calculated them wrong.
                – David C. Ullrich
                Jul 15 at 19:17















              Why can’t we do the same with $f(z)=fracdzz^2+1$ at $|z|=2$
              – gbox
              Jul 15 at 17:27




              Why can’t we do the same with $f(z)=fracdzz^2+1$ at $|z|=2$
              – gbox
              Jul 15 at 17:27












              @gbox: We can. Why do you think we can't?
              – robjohn♦
              Jul 15 at 18:18




              @gbox: We can. Why do you think we can't?
              – robjohn♦
              Jul 15 at 18:18












              So $int_=2fracdxz^2+1=0$ and not $2pi i (res(f,i)+res(f,-i))$?
              – gbox
              Jul 15 at 18:34




              So $int_=2fracdxz^2+1=0$ and not $2pi i (res(f,i)+res(f,-i))$?
              – gbox
              Jul 15 at 18:34












              the residue of $frac1z^2+1$ at $i$ is $-frac i2$. The residue at $-i$ is $frac i2$, so the sum of the residues is $0$.
              – robjohn♦
              Jul 15 at 19:17




              the residue of $frac1z^2+1$ at $i$ is $-frac i2$. The residue at $-i$ is $frac i2$, so the sum of the residues is $0$.
              – robjohn♦
              Jul 15 at 19:17




              1




              1




              @gbox If you calculate those residues and that doesn't make you wish you'd calculated them before making that comment then you calculated them wrong.
              – David C. Ullrich
              Jul 15 at 19:17




              @gbox If you calculate those residues and that doesn't make you wish you'd calculated them before making that comment then you calculated them wrong.
              – David C. Ullrich
              Jul 15 at 19:17










              up vote
              3
              down vote













              This is easy by symmetry, without calculating any residues.



              Say $f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and let $omega=e^2pi i/10$. Note that
              $$f(omega z)=omega^-3f(z).$$It follows that the integral is $0$.



              Hint regarding the relevant calculations: Say the integral is $I$. Writing slightly informally, $$I=int_zf(omega z),d(omega z)
              =int_zomega^-3f(z)omega,dz=omega^-2I;$$since $omega^-2ne1$ this shows $I=0$.



              (The "informal" part is the first equality above. To justify it, note that if $tmapstogamma(t)$ is a parametrization of $|z|=3$ then $tmapstoomegagamma(t)$ is also a parametrization.)






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                This is easy by symmetry, without calculating any residues.



                Say $f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and let $omega=e^2pi i/10$. Note that
                $$f(omega z)=omega^-3f(z).$$It follows that the integral is $0$.



                Hint regarding the relevant calculations: Say the integral is $I$. Writing slightly informally, $$I=int_zf(omega z),d(omega z)
                =int_zomega^-3f(z)omega,dz=omega^-2I;$$since $omega^-2ne1$ this shows $I=0$.



                (The "informal" part is the first equality above. To justify it, note that if $tmapstogamma(t)$ is a parametrization of $|z|=3$ then $tmapstoomegagamma(t)$ is also a parametrization.)






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  This is easy by symmetry, without calculating any residues.



                  Say $f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and let $omega=e^2pi i/10$. Note that
                  $$f(omega z)=omega^-3f(z).$$It follows that the integral is $0$.



                  Hint regarding the relevant calculations: Say the integral is $I$. Writing slightly informally, $$I=int_zf(omega z),d(omega z)
                  =int_zomega^-3f(z)omega,dz=omega^-2I;$$since $omega^-2ne1$ this shows $I=0$.



                  (The "informal" part is the first equality above. To justify it, note that if $tmapstogamma(t)$ is a parametrization of $|z|=3$ then $tmapstoomegagamma(t)$ is also a parametrization.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  This is easy by symmetry, without calculating any residues.



                  Say $f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and let $omega=e^2pi i/10$. Note that
                  $$f(omega z)=omega^-3f(z).$$It follows that the integral is $0$.



                  Hint regarding the relevant calculations: Say the integral is $I$. Writing slightly informally, $$I=int_zf(omega z),d(omega z)
                  =int_zomega^-3f(z)omega,dz=omega^-2I;$$since $omega^-2ne1$ this shows $I=0$.



                  (The "informal" part is the first equality above. To justify it, note that if $tmapstogamma(t)$ is a parametrization of $|z|=3$ then $tmapstoomegagamma(t)$ is also a parametrization.)







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 15 at 17:30


























                  answered Jul 15 at 17:16









                  David C. Ullrich

                  54.4k33583




                  54.4k33583




















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Hint : Sum of the residues at all singularities including infinity is equal to zero. So it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$, where $displaystyle f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and then apply Cauchy's Residue Theorem.




                      First line says that, If $f$ has poles at $z=a_i(i=1,2,cdots ,n)$ then $displaystyle sum_i=1^n textRes(f;a_i) +textRes(f;infty)=0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • Why "it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$" is there a theorem about it?
                        – gbox
                        Jul 15 at 16:28






                      • 1




                        Read the previous line again
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:29










                      • @gbox See the edited answer.
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:35














                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      Hint : Sum of the residues at all singularities including infinity is equal to zero. So it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$, where $displaystyle f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and then apply Cauchy's Residue Theorem.




                      First line says that, If $f$ has poles at $z=a_i(i=1,2,cdots ,n)$ then $displaystyle sum_i=1^n textRes(f;a_i) +textRes(f;infty)=0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer























                      • Why "it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$" is there a theorem about it?
                        – gbox
                        Jul 15 at 16:28






                      • 1




                        Read the previous line again
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:29










                      • @gbox See the edited answer.
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:35












                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      Hint : Sum of the residues at all singularities including infinity is equal to zero. So it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$, where $displaystyle f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and then apply Cauchy's Residue Theorem.




                      First line says that, If $f$ has poles at $z=a_i(i=1,2,cdots ,n)$ then $displaystyle sum_i=1^n textRes(f;a_i) +textRes(f;infty)=0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer















                      Hint : Sum of the residues at all singularities including infinity is equal to zero. So it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$, where $displaystyle f(z)=frac1z^3(z^10-2)$ and then apply Cauchy's Residue Theorem.




                      First line says that, If $f$ has poles at $z=a_i(i=1,2,cdots ,n)$ then $displaystyle sum_i=1^n textRes(f;a_i) +textRes(f;infty)=0$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer















                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Jul 25 at 15:35


























                      answered Jul 15 at 16:24









                      Empty

                      7,81942154




                      7,81942154











                      • Why "it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$" is there a theorem about it?
                        – gbox
                        Jul 15 at 16:28






                      • 1




                        Read the previous line again
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:29










                      • @gbox See the edited answer.
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:35
















                      • Why "it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$" is there a theorem about it?
                        – gbox
                        Jul 15 at 16:28






                      • 1




                        Read the previous line again
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:29










                      • @gbox See the edited answer.
                        – Empty
                        Jul 15 at 16:35















                      Why "it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$" is there a theorem about it?
                      – gbox
                      Jul 15 at 16:28




                      Why "it is sufficient to evaluate the singularity of $f$ at $z=infty$" is there a theorem about it?
                      – gbox
                      Jul 15 at 16:28




                      1




                      1




                      Read the previous line again
                      – Empty
                      Jul 15 at 16:29




                      Read the previous line again
                      – Empty
                      Jul 15 at 16:29












                      @gbox See the edited answer.
                      – Empty
                      Jul 15 at 16:35




                      @gbox See the edited answer.
                      – Empty
                      Jul 15 at 16:35










                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Actually, that would mean $11$ residues, but since $operatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),0right)=0$…



                      On the other hand, if $z_k=sqrt[10]2e^frackpi i5$ ($kin0,1,ldots,9$), thenbeginalignoperatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),z_kright)&=frac1z_k^310z_k^9\&=frac110z_k^12\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12kpi i5right)\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12pi i5right)^k.endalignSo, what you have to sum is a gemetric progression.






                      share|cite|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Actually, that would mean $11$ residues, but since $operatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),0right)=0$…



                        On the other hand, if $z_k=sqrt[10]2e^frackpi i5$ ($kin0,1,ldots,9$), thenbeginalignoperatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),z_kright)&=frac1z_k^310z_k^9\&=frac110z_k^12\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12kpi i5right)\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12pi i5right)^k.endalignSo, what you have to sum is a gemetric progression.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          Actually, that would mean $11$ residues, but since $operatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),0right)=0$…



                          On the other hand, if $z_k=sqrt[10]2e^frackpi i5$ ($kin0,1,ldots,9$), thenbeginalignoperatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),z_kright)&=frac1z_k^310z_k^9\&=frac110z_k^12\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12kpi i5right)\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12pi i5right)^k.endalignSo, what you have to sum is a gemetric progression.






                          share|cite|improve this answer













                          Actually, that would mean $11$ residues, but since $operatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),0right)=0$…



                          On the other hand, if $z_k=sqrt[10]2e^frackpi i5$ ($kin0,1,ldots,9$), thenbeginalignoperatornameResleft(frac1z^3(z^10-2),z_kright)&=frac1z_k^310z_k^9\&=frac110z_k^12\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12kpi i5right)\&=fracsqrt[10]2^-1210expleft(-frac12pi i5right)^k.endalignSo, what you have to sum is a gemetric progression.







                          share|cite|improve this answer













                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          answered Jul 15 at 16:33









                          José Carlos Santos

                          114k1698177




                          114k1698177






















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


























                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852657%2fevaluate-int-z-3-fracdzz3z10-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Comments

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                              Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                              Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?