Finding limit of $m(1-frac1m+1)^m^2-m-1$ as $mrightarrow infty$
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Intuitively I feel like the limit is going to 0. But while proving if I take log then it is coming infinity. Please solve the problem.
calculus limits
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Intuitively I feel like the limit is going to 0. But while proving if I take log then it is coming infinity. Please solve the problem.
calculus limits
Why would you think the limit should be $0$?
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:25
@Suzet Wolfram alpha ahah!
– Davide Morgante
Aug 6 at 11:27
Because $m^2$ grows much faster than $m$ and hence $(1-frac1m+1)^m^2-m-1$ will go to $0$ much faster than $m$ goes to $infty$. Hence the whole limit should go to $0$.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 11:28
What about writing the expression as the exp of a log, factorizing and using a limited development of log in 0 ?
– Pjonin
Aug 6 at 11:28
Oh right, of course, I feel a little rusty now
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:29
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Intuitively I feel like the limit is going to 0. But while proving if I take log then it is coming infinity. Please solve the problem.
calculus limits
Intuitively I feel like the limit is going to 0. But while proving if I take log then it is coming infinity. Please solve the problem.
calculus limits
asked Aug 6 at 11:22
Ani
61
61
Why would you think the limit should be $0$?
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:25
@Suzet Wolfram alpha ahah!
– Davide Morgante
Aug 6 at 11:27
Because $m^2$ grows much faster than $m$ and hence $(1-frac1m+1)^m^2-m-1$ will go to $0$ much faster than $m$ goes to $infty$. Hence the whole limit should go to $0$.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 11:28
What about writing the expression as the exp of a log, factorizing and using a limited development of log in 0 ?
– Pjonin
Aug 6 at 11:28
Oh right, of course, I feel a little rusty now
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:29
 |Â
show 1 more comment
Why would you think the limit should be $0$?
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:25
@Suzet Wolfram alpha ahah!
– Davide Morgante
Aug 6 at 11:27
Because $m^2$ grows much faster than $m$ and hence $(1-frac1m+1)^m^2-m-1$ will go to $0$ much faster than $m$ goes to $infty$. Hence the whole limit should go to $0$.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 11:28
What about writing the expression as the exp of a log, factorizing and using a limited development of log in 0 ?
– Pjonin
Aug 6 at 11:28
Oh right, of course, I feel a little rusty now
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:29
Why would you think the limit should be $0$?
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:25
Why would you think the limit should be $0$?
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:25
@Suzet Wolfram alpha ahah!
– Davide Morgante
Aug 6 at 11:27
@Suzet Wolfram alpha ahah!
– Davide Morgante
Aug 6 at 11:27
Because $m^2$ grows much faster than $m$ and hence $(1-frac1m+1)^m^2-m-1$ will go to $0$ much faster than $m$ goes to $infty$. Hence the whole limit should go to $0$.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 11:28
Because $m^2$ grows much faster than $m$ and hence $(1-frac1m+1)^m^2-m-1$ will go to $0$ much faster than $m$ goes to $infty$. Hence the whole limit should go to $0$.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 11:28
What about writing the expression as the exp of a log, factorizing and using a limited development of log in 0 ?
– Pjonin
Aug 6 at 11:28
What about writing the expression as the exp of a log, factorizing and using a limited development of log in 0 ?
– Pjonin
Aug 6 at 11:28
Oh right, of course, I feel a little rusty now
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:29
Oh right, of course, I feel a little rusty now
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:29
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
By root test we have
$$sqrt[m]a_m=sqrt[m]mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1mto 1cdot frac1e=frac1e<1$$
indeed
$$sqrt[m]m=e^fraclog mmto e^0=1$$
and
$$left(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1m=left[left(1-frac1m+1right)^m+1right]^fracm^2-m-1m(m+1)to frac1e$$
therefore
$$a_m=mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^m^2-m-1to 0$$
Thanks a lot. Never crossed my mind. Was thinking in the direction of finding the limit rigorously.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 12:01
@Ani Root test in this case is a very effective way.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:02
But isn't root test is for the test of convergence of a series?
– Ani
Aug 7 at 3:59
@Ani Even if not always clearly pointed out it is of course valid also for sequences. Moreover note that if €$(a_n)^1/nto L <1$ the series $sum a_n$ converges but then $a_n to 0$.
– gimusi
Aug 7 at 5:03
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
By root test we have
$$sqrt[m]a_m=sqrt[m]mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1mto 1cdot frac1e=frac1e<1$$
indeed
$$sqrt[m]m=e^fraclog mmto e^0=1$$
and
$$left(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1m=left[left(1-frac1m+1right)^m+1right]^fracm^2-m-1m(m+1)to frac1e$$
therefore
$$a_m=mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^m^2-m-1to 0$$
Thanks a lot. Never crossed my mind. Was thinking in the direction of finding the limit rigorously.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 12:01
@Ani Root test in this case is a very effective way.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:02
But isn't root test is for the test of convergence of a series?
– Ani
Aug 7 at 3:59
@Ani Even if not always clearly pointed out it is of course valid also for sequences. Moreover note that if €$(a_n)^1/nto L <1$ the series $sum a_n$ converges but then $a_n to 0$.
– gimusi
Aug 7 at 5:03
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
By root test we have
$$sqrt[m]a_m=sqrt[m]mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1mto 1cdot frac1e=frac1e<1$$
indeed
$$sqrt[m]m=e^fraclog mmto e^0=1$$
and
$$left(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1m=left[left(1-frac1m+1right)^m+1right]^fracm^2-m-1m(m+1)to frac1e$$
therefore
$$a_m=mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^m^2-m-1to 0$$
Thanks a lot. Never crossed my mind. Was thinking in the direction of finding the limit rigorously.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 12:01
@Ani Root test in this case is a very effective way.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:02
But isn't root test is for the test of convergence of a series?
– Ani
Aug 7 at 3:59
@Ani Even if not always clearly pointed out it is of course valid also for sequences. Moreover note that if €$(a_n)^1/nto L <1$ the series $sum a_n$ converges but then $a_n to 0$.
– gimusi
Aug 7 at 5:03
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
By root test we have
$$sqrt[m]a_m=sqrt[m]mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1mto 1cdot frac1e=frac1e<1$$
indeed
$$sqrt[m]m=e^fraclog mmto e^0=1$$
and
$$left(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1m=left[left(1-frac1m+1right)^m+1right]^fracm^2-m-1m(m+1)to frac1e$$
therefore
$$a_m=mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^m^2-m-1to 0$$
By root test we have
$$sqrt[m]a_m=sqrt[m]mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1mto 1cdot frac1e=frac1e<1$$
indeed
$$sqrt[m]m=e^fraclog mmto e^0=1$$
and
$$left(1-frac1m+1right)^fracm^2-m-1m=left[left(1-frac1m+1right)^m+1right]^fracm^2-m-1m(m+1)to frac1e$$
therefore
$$a_m=mleft(1-frac1m+1right)^m^2-m-1to 0$$
answered Aug 6 at 11:57
gimusi
65.4k73684
65.4k73684
Thanks a lot. Never crossed my mind. Was thinking in the direction of finding the limit rigorously.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 12:01
@Ani Root test in this case is a very effective way.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:02
But isn't root test is for the test of convergence of a series?
– Ani
Aug 7 at 3:59
@Ani Even if not always clearly pointed out it is of course valid also for sequences. Moreover note that if €$(a_n)^1/nto L <1$ the series $sum a_n$ converges but then $a_n to 0$.
– gimusi
Aug 7 at 5:03
add a comment |Â
Thanks a lot. Never crossed my mind. Was thinking in the direction of finding the limit rigorously.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 12:01
@Ani Root test in this case is a very effective way.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:02
But isn't root test is for the test of convergence of a series?
– Ani
Aug 7 at 3:59
@Ani Even if not always clearly pointed out it is of course valid also for sequences. Moreover note that if €$(a_n)^1/nto L <1$ the series $sum a_n$ converges but then $a_n to 0$.
– gimusi
Aug 7 at 5:03
Thanks a lot. Never crossed my mind. Was thinking in the direction of finding the limit rigorously.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 12:01
Thanks a lot. Never crossed my mind. Was thinking in the direction of finding the limit rigorously.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 12:01
@Ani Root test in this case is a very effective way.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:02
@Ani Root test in this case is a very effective way.
– gimusi
Aug 6 at 12:02
But isn't root test is for the test of convergence of a series?
– Ani
Aug 7 at 3:59
But isn't root test is for the test of convergence of a series?
– Ani
Aug 7 at 3:59
@Ani Even if not always clearly pointed out it is of course valid also for sequences. Moreover note that if €$(a_n)^1/nto L <1$ the series $sum a_n$ converges but then $a_n to 0$.
– gimusi
Aug 7 at 5:03
@Ani Even if not always clearly pointed out it is of course valid also for sequences. Moreover note that if €$(a_n)^1/nto L <1$ the series $sum a_n$ converges but then $a_n to 0$.
– gimusi
Aug 7 at 5:03
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2873787%2ffinding-limit-of-m1-frac1m1m2-m-1-as-m-rightarrow-infty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Why would you think the limit should be $0$?
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:25
@Suzet Wolfram alpha ahah!
– Davide Morgante
Aug 6 at 11:27
Because $m^2$ grows much faster than $m$ and hence $(1-frac1m+1)^m^2-m-1$ will go to $0$ much faster than $m$ goes to $infty$. Hence the whole limit should go to $0$.
– Ani
Aug 6 at 11:28
What about writing the expression as the exp of a log, factorizing and using a limited development of log in 0 ?
– Pjonin
Aug 6 at 11:28
Oh right, of course, I feel a little rusty now
– Suzet
Aug 6 at 11:29