If $r(a) < 1$, does $sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n$ necessarily converge?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












In Murphy, exercise 2.6:




Let $A$ be a unital C$^*$-algebra. If $r(a) < 1$ and $b = (sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n)^1/2$, show that $b geq 1$ and $lVert bab^-1rVert < 1$....




where $r(a)$ denotes the spectral radius of $a$. Is the convergence of $sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n$ an assumption of the problem, or does it follow from $r(a) < 1$? If it does not follow from $r(a) < 1$, is there a counter example? I can't seem to make any progress in either direction.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    In Murphy, exercise 2.6:




    Let $A$ be a unital C$^*$-algebra. If $r(a) < 1$ and $b = (sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n)^1/2$, show that $b geq 1$ and $lVert bab^-1rVert < 1$....




    where $r(a)$ denotes the spectral radius of $a$. Is the convergence of $sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n$ an assumption of the problem, or does it follow from $r(a) < 1$? If it does not follow from $r(a) < 1$, is there a counter example? I can't seem to make any progress in either direction.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      In Murphy, exercise 2.6:




      Let $A$ be a unital C$^*$-algebra. If $r(a) < 1$ and $b = (sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n)^1/2$, show that $b geq 1$ and $lVert bab^-1rVert < 1$....




      where $r(a)$ denotes the spectral radius of $a$. Is the convergence of $sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n$ an assumption of the problem, or does it follow from $r(a) < 1$? If it does not follow from $r(a) < 1$, is there a counter example? I can't seem to make any progress in either direction.







      share|cite|improve this question













      In Murphy, exercise 2.6:




      Let $A$ be a unital C$^*$-algebra. If $r(a) < 1$ and $b = (sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n)^1/2$, show that $b geq 1$ and $lVert bab^-1rVert < 1$....




      where $r(a)$ denotes the spectral radius of $a$. Is the convergence of $sum_n=0^infty a^*na^n$ an assumption of the problem, or does it follow from $r(a) < 1$? If it does not follow from $r(a) < 1$, is there a counter example? I can't seem to make any progress in either direction.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 28 at 19:43
























      asked Jul 28 at 19:15









      AGF

      204




      204




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Since $r(a)<1$, from
          $$
          r(a)=lim_n|a^n|^1/n=lim_n|a^*na^n|^1/2n
          $$
          it follows that there exist $c<1$ such that for all $n$ big enough, $$|a^*na^n|leq c^2n.$$ So the series always converges.



          For a little more detail, given $varepsilon>0$ with $c=r(a)+varepsilon < 1$, there exists $n_0$ such that for all $ngeq n_0$ we have $$ |r(a)-|a^*na^n|^1/2n|<varepsilon.$$ In particular,
          $$
          |a^*na^n|^1/2n<r(a)+varepsilon = c,
          $$
          which gives
          $$
          |a^*na^n|leq c^2n.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865507%2fif-ra-1-does-sum-n-0-infty-anan-necessarily-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Since $r(a)<1$, from
            $$
            r(a)=lim_n|a^n|^1/n=lim_n|a^*na^n|^1/2n
            $$
            it follows that there exist $c<1$ such that for all $n$ big enough, $$|a^*na^n|leq c^2n.$$ So the series always converges.



            For a little more detail, given $varepsilon>0$ with $c=r(a)+varepsilon < 1$, there exists $n_0$ such that for all $ngeq n_0$ we have $$ |r(a)-|a^*na^n|^1/2n|<varepsilon.$$ In particular,
            $$
            |a^*na^n|^1/2n<r(a)+varepsilon = c,
            $$
            which gives
            $$
            |a^*na^n|leq c^2n.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              Since $r(a)<1$, from
              $$
              r(a)=lim_n|a^n|^1/n=lim_n|a^*na^n|^1/2n
              $$
              it follows that there exist $c<1$ such that for all $n$ big enough, $$|a^*na^n|leq c^2n.$$ So the series always converges.



              For a little more detail, given $varepsilon>0$ with $c=r(a)+varepsilon < 1$, there exists $n_0$ such that for all $ngeq n_0$ we have $$ |r(a)-|a^*na^n|^1/2n|<varepsilon.$$ In particular,
              $$
              |a^*na^n|^1/2n<r(a)+varepsilon = c,
              $$
              which gives
              $$
              |a^*na^n|leq c^2n.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                Since $r(a)<1$, from
                $$
                r(a)=lim_n|a^n|^1/n=lim_n|a^*na^n|^1/2n
                $$
                it follows that there exist $c<1$ such that for all $n$ big enough, $$|a^*na^n|leq c^2n.$$ So the series always converges.



                For a little more detail, given $varepsilon>0$ with $c=r(a)+varepsilon < 1$, there exists $n_0$ such that for all $ngeq n_0$ we have $$ |r(a)-|a^*na^n|^1/2n|<varepsilon.$$ In particular,
                $$
                |a^*na^n|^1/2n<r(a)+varepsilon = c,
                $$
                which gives
                $$
                |a^*na^n|leq c^2n.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer















                Since $r(a)<1$, from
                $$
                r(a)=lim_n|a^n|^1/n=lim_n|a^*na^n|^1/2n
                $$
                it follows that there exist $c<1$ such that for all $n$ big enough, $$|a^*na^n|leq c^2n.$$ So the series always converges.



                For a little more detail, given $varepsilon>0$ with $c=r(a)+varepsilon < 1$, there exists $n_0$ such that for all $ngeq n_0$ we have $$ |r(a)-|a^*na^n|^1/2n|<varepsilon.$$ In particular,
                $$
                |a^*na^n|^1/2n<r(a)+varepsilon = c,
                $$
                which gives
                $$
                |a^*na^n|leq c^2n.
                $$







                share|cite|improve this answer















                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jul 29 at 4:40


























                answered Jul 28 at 19:58









                Martin Argerami

                115k1071164




                115k1071164






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865507%2fif-ra-1-does-sum-n-0-infty-anan-necessarily-converge%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?