Minimality of group action on compact topological space implies that finite orbit of any non-empty open set covers the space

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have that X is a compact topological space and G is a group that acts on X minimally in the sense that $forall$ x $in$X, $overlinecup_gin G (g.x)$ = X.



I want to show that given any non-empty open subset U of X, I can find finitely many elements g$_1$, g$_2$, ... , g$_n$ of G such that $cup_i=1^n$ (g.U) = X.



It seems to me that since orbit of any element comes arbitrarily close to any other element, somehow orbit of any open set should come arbitrarily close to any open set. If I could show that orbit of open set U actually forms an open set (may be around every point), then I could invoke compactness. However, that seems as if I am trying to draw a stronger conclusion, in which case, I have no idea how to approach this problem.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 3




    Can you see how $gcdot U$ is open ? Can you conclude if you know that $X=Gcdot U$ ? Can you prove that $X=Gcdot U$ ?
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 18:46










  • to conclude that g.U is open for every open U is like saying that group acts continuously i.e. for any g $in$ Gthe map from X $rightarrow$ X given by x mapping to g.x is continuous. However, I don't have stuff like that given.
    – HumbleStudent
    Jul 14 at 18:59







  • 1




    You probably do actually; either it's implicit, or it's written somewhere. Otherwise it's probably false
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 20:04














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I have that X is a compact topological space and G is a group that acts on X minimally in the sense that $forall$ x $in$X, $overlinecup_gin G (g.x)$ = X.



I want to show that given any non-empty open subset U of X, I can find finitely many elements g$_1$, g$_2$, ... , g$_n$ of G such that $cup_i=1^n$ (g.U) = X.



It seems to me that since orbit of any element comes arbitrarily close to any other element, somehow orbit of any open set should come arbitrarily close to any open set. If I could show that orbit of open set U actually forms an open set (may be around every point), then I could invoke compactness. However, that seems as if I am trying to draw a stronger conclusion, in which case, I have no idea how to approach this problem.







share|cite|improve this question















  • 3




    Can you see how $gcdot U$ is open ? Can you conclude if you know that $X=Gcdot U$ ? Can you prove that $X=Gcdot U$ ?
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 18:46










  • to conclude that g.U is open for every open U is like saying that group acts continuously i.e. for any g $in$ Gthe map from X $rightarrow$ X given by x mapping to g.x is continuous. However, I don't have stuff like that given.
    – HumbleStudent
    Jul 14 at 18:59







  • 1




    You probably do actually; either it's implicit, or it's written somewhere. Otherwise it's probably false
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 20:04












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I have that X is a compact topological space and G is a group that acts on X minimally in the sense that $forall$ x $in$X, $overlinecup_gin G (g.x)$ = X.



I want to show that given any non-empty open subset U of X, I can find finitely many elements g$_1$, g$_2$, ... , g$_n$ of G such that $cup_i=1^n$ (g.U) = X.



It seems to me that since orbit of any element comes arbitrarily close to any other element, somehow orbit of any open set should come arbitrarily close to any open set. If I could show that orbit of open set U actually forms an open set (may be around every point), then I could invoke compactness. However, that seems as if I am trying to draw a stronger conclusion, in which case, I have no idea how to approach this problem.







share|cite|improve this question











I have that X is a compact topological space and G is a group that acts on X minimally in the sense that $forall$ x $in$X, $overlinecup_gin G (g.x)$ = X.



I want to show that given any non-empty open subset U of X, I can find finitely many elements g$_1$, g$_2$, ... , g$_n$ of G such that $cup_i=1^n$ (g.U) = X.



It seems to me that since orbit of any element comes arbitrarily close to any other element, somehow orbit of any open set should come arbitrarily close to any open set. If I could show that orbit of open set U actually forms an open set (may be around every point), then I could invoke compactness. However, that seems as if I am trying to draw a stronger conclusion, in which case, I have no idea how to approach this problem.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 14 at 18:41









HumbleStudent

643311




643311







  • 3




    Can you see how $gcdot U$ is open ? Can you conclude if you know that $X=Gcdot U$ ? Can you prove that $X=Gcdot U$ ?
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 18:46










  • to conclude that g.U is open for every open U is like saying that group acts continuously i.e. for any g $in$ Gthe map from X $rightarrow$ X given by x mapping to g.x is continuous. However, I don't have stuff like that given.
    – HumbleStudent
    Jul 14 at 18:59







  • 1




    You probably do actually; either it's implicit, or it's written somewhere. Otherwise it's probably false
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 20:04












  • 3




    Can you see how $gcdot U$ is open ? Can you conclude if you know that $X=Gcdot U$ ? Can you prove that $X=Gcdot U$ ?
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 18:46










  • to conclude that g.U is open for every open U is like saying that group acts continuously i.e. for any g $in$ Gthe map from X $rightarrow$ X given by x mapping to g.x is continuous. However, I don't have stuff like that given.
    – HumbleStudent
    Jul 14 at 18:59







  • 1




    You probably do actually; either it's implicit, or it's written somewhere. Otherwise it's probably false
    – Max
    Jul 14 at 20:04







3




3




Can you see how $gcdot U$ is open ? Can you conclude if you know that $X=Gcdot U$ ? Can you prove that $X=Gcdot U$ ?
– Max
Jul 14 at 18:46




Can you see how $gcdot U$ is open ? Can you conclude if you know that $X=Gcdot U$ ? Can you prove that $X=Gcdot U$ ?
– Max
Jul 14 at 18:46












to conclude that g.U is open for every open U is like saying that group acts continuously i.e. for any g $in$ Gthe map from X $rightarrow$ X given by x mapping to g.x is continuous. However, I don't have stuff like that given.
– HumbleStudent
Jul 14 at 18:59





to conclude that g.U is open for every open U is like saying that group acts continuously i.e. for any g $in$ Gthe map from X $rightarrow$ X given by x mapping to g.x is continuous. However, I don't have stuff like that given.
– HumbleStudent
Jul 14 at 18:59





1




1




You probably do actually; either it's implicit, or it's written somewhere. Otherwise it's probably false
– Max
Jul 14 at 20:04




You probably do actually; either it's implicit, or it's written somewhere. Otherwise it's probably false
– Max
Jul 14 at 20:04















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2851852%2fminimality-of-group-action-on-compact-topological-space-implies-that-finite-orbi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2851852%2fminimality-of-group-action-on-compact-topological-space-implies-that-finite-orbi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?