Mixed operation of divergence and gradient

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












When I calculus the term $ucdot nabla u$, where $u$ is a vector, I get two different results by calculus in different ways i.e.



$((ucdot nabla) u)_i=sumlimits_k=1^n(u_knabla_k)u_i$ and $(ucdot (nabla u))_i=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla u)_ki=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla_iu_k)$.



Which one is right?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    When I calculus the term $ucdot nabla u$, where $u$ is a vector, I get two different results by calculus in different ways i.e.



    $((ucdot nabla) u)_i=sumlimits_k=1^n(u_knabla_k)u_i$ and $(ucdot (nabla u))_i=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla u)_ki=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla_iu_k)$.



    Which one is right?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      When I calculus the term $ucdot nabla u$, where $u$ is a vector, I get two different results by calculus in different ways i.e.



      $((ucdot nabla) u)_i=sumlimits_k=1^n(u_knabla_k)u_i$ and $(ucdot (nabla u))_i=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla u)_ki=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla_iu_k)$.



      Which one is right?







      share|cite|improve this question











      When I calculus the term $ucdot nabla u$, where $u$ is a vector, I get two different results by calculus in different ways i.e.



      $((ucdot nabla) u)_i=sumlimits_k=1^n(u_knabla_k)u_i$ and $(ucdot (nabla u))_i=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla u)_ki=sumlimits_k=1^nu_k(nabla_iu_k)$.



      Which one is right?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 15 at 8:51









      UAne

      102




      102




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          That's for you to decide in defining the notation you use, or to clarify by using parentheses.



          I personally would tend to take $ucdotnabla u$ to mean $(ucdotnabla)u$, because I studied physics and that construction is more common there than the other one. Also, a dot is much more usual for the scalar product of two vectors (the first interpretation) than for the product of a vector and a matrix (the second interpretation). But still it's somewhat ambiguous, and if you can't expect your readers to know which one you mean, parentheses seem advisable.



          Anyway, $nabla u$ is a bad (though common) notation for the gradient of a vector field, since it doesn't fit with the usual rules for matrices and vectors. The “right” way to write it would be $(nabla u^top)^top$, and then there would be no confusion, since $(ucdotnabla)uneq ucdot(nabla u^top)^top$ and the only consistent way to interptet $ucdotnabla u$ would be $(ucdotnabla)u$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852313%2fmixed-operation-of-divergence-and-gradient%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            That's for you to decide in defining the notation you use, or to clarify by using parentheses.



            I personally would tend to take $ucdotnabla u$ to mean $(ucdotnabla)u$, because I studied physics and that construction is more common there than the other one. Also, a dot is much more usual for the scalar product of two vectors (the first interpretation) than for the product of a vector and a matrix (the second interpretation). But still it's somewhat ambiguous, and if you can't expect your readers to know which one you mean, parentheses seem advisable.



            Anyway, $nabla u$ is a bad (though common) notation for the gradient of a vector field, since it doesn't fit with the usual rules for matrices and vectors. The “right” way to write it would be $(nabla u^top)^top$, and then there would be no confusion, since $(ucdotnabla)uneq ucdot(nabla u^top)^top$ and the only consistent way to interptet $ucdotnabla u$ would be $(ucdotnabla)u$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              That's for you to decide in defining the notation you use, or to clarify by using parentheses.



              I personally would tend to take $ucdotnabla u$ to mean $(ucdotnabla)u$, because I studied physics and that construction is more common there than the other one. Also, a dot is much more usual for the scalar product of two vectors (the first interpretation) than for the product of a vector and a matrix (the second interpretation). But still it's somewhat ambiguous, and if you can't expect your readers to know which one you mean, parentheses seem advisable.



              Anyway, $nabla u$ is a bad (though common) notation for the gradient of a vector field, since it doesn't fit with the usual rules for matrices and vectors. The “right” way to write it would be $(nabla u^top)^top$, and then there would be no confusion, since $(ucdotnabla)uneq ucdot(nabla u^top)^top$ and the only consistent way to interptet $ucdotnabla u$ would be $(ucdotnabla)u$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                That's for you to decide in defining the notation you use, or to clarify by using parentheses.



                I personally would tend to take $ucdotnabla u$ to mean $(ucdotnabla)u$, because I studied physics and that construction is more common there than the other one. Also, a dot is much more usual for the scalar product of two vectors (the first interpretation) than for the product of a vector and a matrix (the second interpretation). But still it's somewhat ambiguous, and if you can't expect your readers to know which one you mean, parentheses seem advisable.



                Anyway, $nabla u$ is a bad (though common) notation for the gradient of a vector field, since it doesn't fit with the usual rules for matrices and vectors. The “right” way to write it would be $(nabla u^top)^top$, and then there would be no confusion, since $(ucdotnabla)uneq ucdot(nabla u^top)^top$ and the only consistent way to interptet $ucdotnabla u$ would be $(ucdotnabla)u$.






                share|cite|improve this answer















                That's for you to decide in defining the notation you use, or to clarify by using parentheses.



                I personally would tend to take $ucdotnabla u$ to mean $(ucdotnabla)u$, because I studied physics and that construction is more common there than the other one. Also, a dot is much more usual for the scalar product of two vectors (the first interpretation) than for the product of a vector and a matrix (the second interpretation). But still it's somewhat ambiguous, and if you can't expect your readers to know which one you mean, parentheses seem advisable.



                Anyway, $nabla u$ is a bad (though common) notation for the gradient of a vector field, since it doesn't fit with the usual rules for matrices and vectors. The “right” way to write it would be $(nabla u^top)^top$, and then there would be no confusion, since $(ucdotnabla)uneq ucdot(nabla u^top)^top$ and the only consistent way to interptet $ucdotnabla u$ would be $(ucdotnabla)u$.







                share|cite|improve this answer















                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Jul 15 at 9:17


























                answered Jul 15 at 9:01









                joriki

                165k10180328




                165k10180328






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852313%2fmixed-operation-of-divergence-and-gradient%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?