Show that the ideal is finitely generated.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose $R$ is a commutative ring with unity $1_R$. Let $X= f_i$ where I is some index set and $f_i in R$. I want to show that if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is actually finitely generated.



My attempt: If I could show that $1_R$ is represented by finitely many elements of $X$, then we're done. If $I$ is finite, then this is trivial. Otherwise, in the infinite case, when we consider an element $r$ is in a so-called "span" of a set, then it is a finite linear combination of these elements- hence set $r = 1_R$. However, this seems a little gimmicky and not a rigorous proof.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Do you mean to say "if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is finite", as opposed to finitely generated? $X$ is just a set, right?
    – Matt
    Jul 28 at 22:42










  • I'm not sure I understand the question. Not every commutative ring with unity is finitely generated; take $R=k[t]$ with your favourite field $k$. Is this what you're trying to do?
    – Dave
    Jul 28 at 22:43










  • I might be interpreting the question incorrectly, it's #2 in the link math.tamu.edu/graduate/phd/quals/nalgebra/j12.pdf
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:46






  • 2




    Your idea is the right one. If the ideal $I$ generated by $X$ is $R$, then by definition, $1_R$ belongs to $I$, and so must be a finite $R$-linear combination of elements of $X$. (Remember what the definition of the ideal generated by $X$ is - it is the set of all $R$-linear combinations of elements of $X$, where all but finitely many of the coefficients are $0$!) These finitely many elements generating $1$ will be your generators of $I$.
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jul 28 at 22:50











  • Exactly what I was thinking Alex! Thank you
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:56














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Suppose $R$ is a commutative ring with unity $1_R$. Let $X= f_i$ where I is some index set and $f_i in R$. I want to show that if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is actually finitely generated.



My attempt: If I could show that $1_R$ is represented by finitely many elements of $X$, then we're done. If $I$ is finite, then this is trivial. Otherwise, in the infinite case, when we consider an element $r$ is in a so-called "span" of a set, then it is a finite linear combination of these elements- hence set $r = 1_R$. However, this seems a little gimmicky and not a rigorous proof.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Do you mean to say "if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is finite", as opposed to finitely generated? $X$ is just a set, right?
    – Matt
    Jul 28 at 22:42










  • I'm not sure I understand the question. Not every commutative ring with unity is finitely generated; take $R=k[t]$ with your favourite field $k$. Is this what you're trying to do?
    – Dave
    Jul 28 at 22:43










  • I might be interpreting the question incorrectly, it's #2 in the link math.tamu.edu/graduate/phd/quals/nalgebra/j12.pdf
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:46






  • 2




    Your idea is the right one. If the ideal $I$ generated by $X$ is $R$, then by definition, $1_R$ belongs to $I$, and so must be a finite $R$-linear combination of elements of $X$. (Remember what the definition of the ideal generated by $X$ is - it is the set of all $R$-linear combinations of elements of $X$, where all but finitely many of the coefficients are $0$!) These finitely many elements generating $1$ will be your generators of $I$.
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jul 28 at 22:50











  • Exactly what I was thinking Alex! Thank you
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:56












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Suppose $R$ is a commutative ring with unity $1_R$. Let $X= f_i$ where I is some index set and $f_i in R$. I want to show that if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is actually finitely generated.



My attempt: If I could show that $1_R$ is represented by finitely many elements of $X$, then we're done. If $I$ is finite, then this is trivial. Otherwise, in the infinite case, when we consider an element $r$ is in a so-called "span" of a set, then it is a finite linear combination of these elements- hence set $r = 1_R$. However, this seems a little gimmicky and not a rigorous proof.







share|cite|improve this question











Suppose $R$ is a commutative ring with unity $1_R$. Let $X= f_i$ where I is some index set and $f_i in R$. I want to show that if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is actually finitely generated.



My attempt: If I could show that $1_R$ is represented by finitely many elements of $X$, then we're done. If $I$ is finite, then this is trivial. Otherwise, in the infinite case, when we consider an element $r$ is in a so-called "span" of a set, then it is a finite linear combination of these elements- hence set $r = 1_R$. However, this seems a little gimmicky and not a rigorous proof.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 28 at 22:39









Sean Nemetz

12418




12418











  • Do you mean to say "if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is finite", as opposed to finitely generated? $X$ is just a set, right?
    – Matt
    Jul 28 at 22:42










  • I'm not sure I understand the question. Not every commutative ring with unity is finitely generated; take $R=k[t]$ with your favourite field $k$. Is this what you're trying to do?
    – Dave
    Jul 28 at 22:43










  • I might be interpreting the question incorrectly, it's #2 in the link math.tamu.edu/graduate/phd/quals/nalgebra/j12.pdf
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:46






  • 2




    Your idea is the right one. If the ideal $I$ generated by $X$ is $R$, then by definition, $1_R$ belongs to $I$, and so must be a finite $R$-linear combination of elements of $X$. (Remember what the definition of the ideal generated by $X$ is - it is the set of all $R$-linear combinations of elements of $X$, where all but finitely many of the coefficients are $0$!) These finitely many elements generating $1$ will be your generators of $I$.
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jul 28 at 22:50











  • Exactly what I was thinking Alex! Thank you
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:56
















  • Do you mean to say "if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is finite", as opposed to finitely generated? $X$ is just a set, right?
    – Matt
    Jul 28 at 22:42










  • I'm not sure I understand the question. Not every commutative ring with unity is finitely generated; take $R=k[t]$ with your favourite field $k$. Is this what you're trying to do?
    – Dave
    Jul 28 at 22:43










  • I might be interpreting the question incorrectly, it's #2 in the link math.tamu.edu/graduate/phd/quals/nalgebra/j12.pdf
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:46






  • 2




    Your idea is the right one. If the ideal $I$ generated by $X$ is $R$, then by definition, $1_R$ belongs to $I$, and so must be a finite $R$-linear combination of elements of $X$. (Remember what the definition of the ideal generated by $X$ is - it is the set of all $R$-linear combinations of elements of $X$, where all but finitely many of the coefficients are $0$!) These finitely many elements generating $1$ will be your generators of $I$.
    – Alex Wertheim
    Jul 28 at 22:50











  • Exactly what I was thinking Alex! Thank you
    – Sean Nemetz
    Jul 28 at 22:56















Do you mean to say "if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is finite", as opposed to finitely generated? $X$ is just a set, right?
– Matt
Jul 28 at 22:42




Do you mean to say "if the ideal generated by $X$ is all of $R$, then $X$ is finite", as opposed to finitely generated? $X$ is just a set, right?
– Matt
Jul 28 at 22:42












I'm not sure I understand the question. Not every commutative ring with unity is finitely generated; take $R=k[t]$ with your favourite field $k$. Is this what you're trying to do?
– Dave
Jul 28 at 22:43




I'm not sure I understand the question. Not every commutative ring with unity is finitely generated; take $R=k[t]$ with your favourite field $k$. Is this what you're trying to do?
– Dave
Jul 28 at 22:43












I might be interpreting the question incorrectly, it's #2 in the link math.tamu.edu/graduate/phd/quals/nalgebra/j12.pdf
– Sean Nemetz
Jul 28 at 22:46




I might be interpreting the question incorrectly, it's #2 in the link math.tamu.edu/graduate/phd/quals/nalgebra/j12.pdf
– Sean Nemetz
Jul 28 at 22:46




2




2




Your idea is the right one. If the ideal $I$ generated by $X$ is $R$, then by definition, $1_R$ belongs to $I$, and so must be a finite $R$-linear combination of elements of $X$. (Remember what the definition of the ideal generated by $X$ is - it is the set of all $R$-linear combinations of elements of $X$, where all but finitely many of the coefficients are $0$!) These finitely many elements generating $1$ will be your generators of $I$.
– Alex Wertheim
Jul 28 at 22:50





Your idea is the right one. If the ideal $I$ generated by $X$ is $R$, then by definition, $1_R$ belongs to $I$, and so must be a finite $R$-linear combination of elements of $X$. (Remember what the definition of the ideal generated by $X$ is - it is the set of all $R$-linear combinations of elements of $X$, where all but finitely many of the coefficients are $0$!) These finitely many elements generating $1$ will be your generators of $I$.
– Alex Wertheim
Jul 28 at 22:50













Exactly what I was thinking Alex! Thank you
– Sean Nemetz
Jul 28 at 22:56




Exactly what I was thinking Alex! Thank you
– Sean Nemetz
Jul 28 at 22:56















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865635%2fshow-that-the-ideal-is-finitely-generated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865635%2fshow-that-the-ideal-is-finitely-generated%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?