What is the association between two separate rates of change in finding the derivative of the volume of a sphere?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Imagine a balloon being inflated. The balloon has a volume $V$ and a radius $r$, which are both functions of time $t$. Finally, suppose $fracdVdt$ is constant.



Is the following fact true, and if so why? (Or why not?)



$$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdVdrbigg)$$



I understand how $fracdVdr$ represents the rate of change of $V$ with respect to $r$, but not how both quantities, as functions of time, can be multiplied in that manner to produce $fracdVdr$.



Thank you.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Imagine a balloon being inflated. The balloon has a volume $V$ and a radius $r$, which are both functions of time $t$. Finally, suppose $fracdVdt$ is constant.



    Is the following fact true, and if so why? (Or why not?)



    $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdVdrbigg)$$



    I understand how $fracdVdr$ represents the rate of change of $V$ with respect to $r$, but not how both quantities, as functions of time, can be multiplied in that manner to produce $fracdVdr$.



    Thank you.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Imagine a balloon being inflated. The balloon has a volume $V$ and a radius $r$, which are both functions of time $t$. Finally, suppose $fracdVdt$ is constant.



      Is the following fact true, and if so why? (Or why not?)



      $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdVdrbigg)$$



      I understand how $fracdVdr$ represents the rate of change of $V$ with respect to $r$, but not how both quantities, as functions of time, can be multiplied in that manner to produce $fracdVdr$.



      Thank you.







      share|cite|improve this question











      Imagine a balloon being inflated. The balloon has a volume $V$ and a radius $r$, which are both functions of time $t$. Finally, suppose $fracdVdt$ is constant.



      Is the following fact true, and if so why? (Or why not?)



      $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdVdrbigg)$$



      I understand how $fracdVdr$ represents the rate of change of $V$ with respect to $r$, but not how both quantities, as functions of time, can be multiplied in that manner to produce $fracdVdr$.



      Thank you.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 29 at 20:42









      Jamie Corkhill

      1158




      1158




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I think what you're confused about is the idea that a seemingly uninvolved intermediary variable can be used to determine a relationship between two other variables. The following example may help clear things up:




          Suppose that Bob sells apples for $5$ dollars each. Bob also loves to eat cookies, and suppose a cookie costs $1$ dollar. Then, for each apple Bob sells, he makes $5$ dollars. For each dollar Bob earns, he can buy one cookie. If the number of apples sold is $A$, the number of dollars Bob earns is $D$, and the number of cookies Bob can buy is $C$, then:$$text5 Cookies per Apple=fracdCdA=fracdCdDcdotfracdDdA=text($1$ Cookie per Dollar)$cdot$($5$ Dollars per Apple)$$




          Now, let's see what this means in the context of your problem. $V$ is the volume of the balloon, and $r$ is the radius, so $t$ is our "intermediary variable" (much like how "Dollars=$D$" was in the example). Then, $fracdVdr$ is "volume per radius"—in other words, "how much space the balloon takes up based on its radius". $fracdVdt$ is the "volume per time"— in other words, how fast the balloon is growing per time unit (e.g. cubic meters per second). Lastly, $fracdtdr$ is "seconds per radius"— in other words, if the radius grows by $R$ length units, then we have been inflating the balloon for $T$ time units. Bringing it all together, we have
          $$fracdVdr=fracdVdtcdotfracdtdr$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            By chain rule we have



            $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdtdrbigg)$$



            indeed recall that



            $$V=frac43 pi r^3 implies fracdVdr =4pi r^2$$



            and



            $$fracdVdt =4pi r^2fracdrdt$$






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Thanks. I still have a little bit of trouble understanding how the derivative of two quantities, with respect to different variables, yields the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius.
              – Jamie Corkhill
              Jul 29 at 20:55






            • 1




              @JamieCorkhill In other words we have $$fracdVdt = fracdVdrfracdrdt implies fracdVdr = fracdVdtfracdtdr$$ try with some concrete example.
              – gimusi
              Jul 29 at 20:58











            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866422%2fwhat-is-the-association-between-two-separate-rates-of-change-in-finding-the-deri%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            I think what you're confused about is the idea that a seemingly uninvolved intermediary variable can be used to determine a relationship between two other variables. The following example may help clear things up:




            Suppose that Bob sells apples for $5$ dollars each. Bob also loves to eat cookies, and suppose a cookie costs $1$ dollar. Then, for each apple Bob sells, he makes $5$ dollars. For each dollar Bob earns, he can buy one cookie. If the number of apples sold is $A$, the number of dollars Bob earns is $D$, and the number of cookies Bob can buy is $C$, then:$$text5 Cookies per Apple=fracdCdA=fracdCdDcdotfracdDdA=text($1$ Cookie per Dollar)$cdot$($5$ Dollars per Apple)$$




            Now, let's see what this means in the context of your problem. $V$ is the volume of the balloon, and $r$ is the radius, so $t$ is our "intermediary variable" (much like how "Dollars=$D$" was in the example). Then, $fracdVdr$ is "volume per radius"—in other words, "how much space the balloon takes up based on its radius". $fracdVdt$ is the "volume per time"— in other words, how fast the balloon is growing per time unit (e.g. cubic meters per second). Lastly, $fracdtdr$ is "seconds per radius"— in other words, if the radius grows by $R$ length units, then we have been inflating the balloon for $T$ time units. Bringing it all together, we have
            $$fracdVdr=fracdVdtcdotfracdtdr$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              I think what you're confused about is the idea that a seemingly uninvolved intermediary variable can be used to determine a relationship between two other variables. The following example may help clear things up:




              Suppose that Bob sells apples for $5$ dollars each. Bob also loves to eat cookies, and suppose a cookie costs $1$ dollar. Then, for each apple Bob sells, he makes $5$ dollars. For each dollar Bob earns, he can buy one cookie. If the number of apples sold is $A$, the number of dollars Bob earns is $D$, and the number of cookies Bob can buy is $C$, then:$$text5 Cookies per Apple=fracdCdA=fracdCdDcdotfracdDdA=text($1$ Cookie per Dollar)$cdot$($5$ Dollars per Apple)$$




              Now, let's see what this means in the context of your problem. $V$ is the volume of the balloon, and $r$ is the radius, so $t$ is our "intermediary variable" (much like how "Dollars=$D$" was in the example). Then, $fracdVdr$ is "volume per radius"—in other words, "how much space the balloon takes up based on its radius". $fracdVdt$ is the "volume per time"— in other words, how fast the balloon is growing per time unit (e.g. cubic meters per second). Lastly, $fracdtdr$ is "seconds per radius"— in other words, if the radius grows by $R$ length units, then we have been inflating the balloon for $T$ time units. Bringing it all together, we have
              $$fracdVdr=fracdVdtcdotfracdtdr$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                I think what you're confused about is the idea that a seemingly uninvolved intermediary variable can be used to determine a relationship between two other variables. The following example may help clear things up:




                Suppose that Bob sells apples for $5$ dollars each. Bob also loves to eat cookies, and suppose a cookie costs $1$ dollar. Then, for each apple Bob sells, he makes $5$ dollars. For each dollar Bob earns, he can buy one cookie. If the number of apples sold is $A$, the number of dollars Bob earns is $D$, and the number of cookies Bob can buy is $C$, then:$$text5 Cookies per Apple=fracdCdA=fracdCdDcdotfracdDdA=text($1$ Cookie per Dollar)$cdot$($5$ Dollars per Apple)$$




                Now, let's see what this means in the context of your problem. $V$ is the volume of the balloon, and $r$ is the radius, so $t$ is our "intermediary variable" (much like how "Dollars=$D$" was in the example). Then, $fracdVdr$ is "volume per radius"—in other words, "how much space the balloon takes up based on its radius". $fracdVdt$ is the "volume per time"— in other words, how fast the balloon is growing per time unit (e.g. cubic meters per second). Lastly, $fracdtdr$ is "seconds per radius"— in other words, if the radius grows by $R$ length units, then we have been inflating the balloon for $T$ time units. Bringing it all together, we have
                $$fracdVdr=fracdVdtcdotfracdtdr$$






                share|cite|improve this answer













                I think what you're confused about is the idea that a seemingly uninvolved intermediary variable can be used to determine a relationship between two other variables. The following example may help clear things up:




                Suppose that Bob sells apples for $5$ dollars each. Bob also loves to eat cookies, and suppose a cookie costs $1$ dollar. Then, for each apple Bob sells, he makes $5$ dollars. For each dollar Bob earns, he can buy one cookie. If the number of apples sold is $A$, the number of dollars Bob earns is $D$, and the number of cookies Bob can buy is $C$, then:$$text5 Cookies per Apple=fracdCdA=fracdCdDcdotfracdDdA=text($1$ Cookie per Dollar)$cdot$($5$ Dollars per Apple)$$




                Now, let's see what this means in the context of your problem. $V$ is the volume of the balloon, and $r$ is the radius, so $t$ is our "intermediary variable" (much like how "Dollars=$D$" was in the example). Then, $fracdVdr$ is "volume per radius"—in other words, "how much space the balloon takes up based on its radius". $fracdVdt$ is the "volume per time"— in other words, how fast the balloon is growing per time unit (e.g. cubic meters per second). Lastly, $fracdtdr$ is "seconds per radius"— in other words, if the radius grows by $R$ length units, then we have been inflating the balloon for $T$ time units. Bringing it all together, we have
                $$fracdVdr=fracdVdtcdotfracdtdr$$







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 29 at 22:01









                高田航

                1,116318




                1,116318




















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    By chain rule we have



                    $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdtdrbigg)$$



                    indeed recall that



                    $$V=frac43 pi r^3 implies fracdVdr =4pi r^2$$



                    and



                    $$fracdVdt =4pi r^2fracdrdt$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Thanks. I still have a little bit of trouble understanding how the derivative of two quantities, with respect to different variables, yields the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius.
                      – Jamie Corkhill
                      Jul 29 at 20:55






                    • 1




                      @JamieCorkhill In other words we have $$fracdVdt = fracdVdrfracdrdt implies fracdVdr = fracdVdtfracdtdr$$ try with some concrete example.
                      – gimusi
                      Jul 29 at 20:58















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    By chain rule we have



                    $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdtdrbigg)$$



                    indeed recall that



                    $$V=frac43 pi r^3 implies fracdVdr =4pi r^2$$



                    and



                    $$fracdVdt =4pi r^2fracdrdt$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                    • Thanks. I still have a little bit of trouble understanding how the derivative of two quantities, with respect to different variables, yields the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius.
                      – Jamie Corkhill
                      Jul 29 at 20:55






                    • 1




                      @JamieCorkhill In other words we have $$fracdVdt = fracdVdrfracdrdt implies fracdVdr = fracdVdtfracdtdr$$ try with some concrete example.
                      – gimusi
                      Jul 29 at 20:58













                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    By chain rule we have



                    $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdtdrbigg)$$



                    indeed recall that



                    $$V=frac43 pi r^3 implies fracdVdr =4pi r^2$$



                    and



                    $$fracdVdt =4pi r^2fracdrdt$$






                    share|cite|improve this answer















                    By chain rule we have



                    $$fracdVdr = bigg(fracdVdtbigg)bigg(fracdtdrbigg)$$



                    indeed recall that



                    $$V=frac43 pi r^3 implies fracdVdr =4pi r^2$$



                    and



                    $$fracdVdt =4pi r^2fracdrdt$$







                    share|cite|improve this answer















                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Jul 29 at 20:50


























                    answered Jul 29 at 20:44









                    gimusi

                    64.5k73482




                    64.5k73482











                    • Thanks. I still have a little bit of trouble understanding how the derivative of two quantities, with respect to different variables, yields the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius.
                      – Jamie Corkhill
                      Jul 29 at 20:55






                    • 1




                      @JamieCorkhill In other words we have $$fracdVdt = fracdVdrfracdrdt implies fracdVdr = fracdVdtfracdtdr$$ try with some concrete example.
                      – gimusi
                      Jul 29 at 20:58

















                    • Thanks. I still have a little bit of trouble understanding how the derivative of two quantities, with respect to different variables, yields the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius.
                      – Jamie Corkhill
                      Jul 29 at 20:55






                    • 1




                      @JamieCorkhill In other words we have $$fracdVdt = fracdVdrfracdrdt implies fracdVdr = fracdVdtfracdtdr$$ try with some concrete example.
                      – gimusi
                      Jul 29 at 20:58
















                    Thanks. I still have a little bit of trouble understanding how the derivative of two quantities, with respect to different variables, yields the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius.
                    – Jamie Corkhill
                    Jul 29 at 20:55




                    Thanks. I still have a little bit of trouble understanding how the derivative of two quantities, with respect to different variables, yields the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius.
                    – Jamie Corkhill
                    Jul 29 at 20:55




                    1




                    1




                    @JamieCorkhill In other words we have $$fracdVdt = fracdVdrfracdrdt implies fracdVdr = fracdVdtfracdtdr$$ try with some concrete example.
                    – gimusi
                    Jul 29 at 20:58





                    @JamieCorkhill In other words we have $$fracdVdt = fracdVdrfracdrdt implies fracdVdr = fracdVdtfracdtdr$$ try with some concrete example.
                    – gimusi
                    Jul 29 at 20:58













                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2866422%2fwhat-is-the-association-between-two-separate-rates-of-change-in-finding-the-deri%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?