When do we know a quotient of the polynomial ring over a local ring is torsion free
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.
Question:
- What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)
- How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?
abstract-algebra polynomials commutative-algebra formal-power-series torsion-groups
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.
Question:
- What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)
- How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?
abstract-algebra polynomials commutative-algebra formal-power-series torsion-groups
Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24
I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37
1
If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26
@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.
Question:
- What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)
- How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?
abstract-algebra polynomials commutative-algebra formal-power-series torsion-groups
Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.
Question:
- What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)
- How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?
abstract-algebra polynomials commutative-algebra formal-power-series torsion-groups
edited Jul 15 at 14:55
asked Jul 15 at 14:18
Hang
395214
395214
Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24
I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37
1
If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26
@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08
add a comment |Â
Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24
I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37
1
If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26
@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08
Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24
Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24
I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37
I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37
1
1
If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26
If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26
@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08
@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852572%2fwhen-do-we-know-a-quotient-of-the-polynomial-ring-over-a-local-ring-is-torsion-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24
I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37
1
If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26
@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08