When do we know a quotient of the polynomial ring over a local ring is torsion free

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.



Question:



  1. What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)

  2. How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?






share|cite|improve this question





















  • Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
    – hardmath
    Jul 15 at 14:24










  • I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 14:37






  • 1




    If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
    – Badam Baplan
    Jul 15 at 16:26










  • @BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 17:08















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.



Question:



  1. What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)

  2. How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?






share|cite|improve this question





















  • Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
    – hardmath
    Jul 15 at 14:24










  • I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 14:37






  • 1




    If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
    – Badam Baplan
    Jul 15 at 16:26










  • @BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 17:08













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.



Question:



  1. What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)

  2. How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?






share|cite|improve this question













Let $R$ be a local ring (e.g. the discrete valuation ring $mathbb C[[T]]$) and $mathfrakm$ its maximal ideal. Consider the polynomial ring $R[X_1,dots, X_n]$ in $n$ variables and a finitely generated ideal $I=(f_1,dots,f_l)$.



Question:



  1. What conditions can guarantee $A=R[X_1,dots,X_n]/I$ is torsion free (i.e. if $mathfrakm^N x=0$ for some positive integer $N$ and $xin A$ then $x=0$)? (it would be better if there is no Noetherian condition)

  2. How about the ring of formal power series, $R[[X_1,dots,X_n]]/I$ ?








share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 15 at 14:55
























asked Jul 15 at 14:18









Hang

395214




395214











  • Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
    – hardmath
    Jul 15 at 14:24










  • I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 14:37






  • 1




    If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
    – Badam Baplan
    Jul 15 at 16:26










  • @BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 17:08

















  • Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
    – hardmath
    Jul 15 at 14:24










  • I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 14:37






  • 1




    If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
    – Badam Baplan
    Jul 15 at 16:26










  • @BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
    – Hang
    Jul 15 at 17:08
















Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24




Have you worked through a simple case? Say one variable and the localization of $mathbb Z$ at a prime?
– hardmath
Jul 15 at 14:24












I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37




I considered the case $R=mathbb C[[T]]$ and $mathfrakm=(T)$, which I prefer.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 14:37




1




1




If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26




If you're looking at valuation rings, then torsion free is equivalent to flat. And in that case, I think this paper of Jack Ohm will be your friend ams.org/journals/tran/1972-171-00/S0002-9947-1972-0306176-6/…
– Badam Baplan
Jul 15 at 16:26












@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08





@BadamBaplan Thanks. It seems that our notions of torsion-free are slightly different. Here we'd better to say adic torsion free.
– Hang
Jul 15 at 17:08
















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852572%2fwhen-do-we-know-a-quotient-of-the-polynomial-ring-over-a-local-ring-is-torsion-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852572%2fwhen-do-we-know-a-quotient-of-the-polynomial-ring-over-a-local-ring-is-torsion-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?