Why is $d(x,0)$ not a norm?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












If $|x|$ is a norm, then we can define $d(x,y):=|x-y|$ and it will be a metric. Now, if $d$ is a metric, why is $|x|:= d(x,0)$ not a norm? I think it fail for the sub-linearity, but I don't see how.







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    If $|x|$ is a norm, then we can define $d(x,y):=|x-y|$ and it will be a metric. Now, if $d$ is a metric, why is $|x|:= d(x,0)$ not a norm? I think it fail for the sub-linearity, but I don't see how.







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      If $|x|$ is a norm, then we can define $d(x,y):=|x-y|$ and it will be a metric. Now, if $d$ is a metric, why is $|x|:= d(x,0)$ not a norm? I think it fail for the sub-linearity, but I don't see how.







      share|cite|improve this question













      If $|x|$ is a norm, then we can define $d(x,y):=|x-y|$ and it will be a metric. Now, if $d$ is a metric, why is $|x|:= d(x,0)$ not a norm? I think it fail for the sub-linearity, but I don't see how.









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 15 at 17:56









      Shaun

      7,41492972




      7,41492972









      asked Jul 15 at 15:52









      Peter

      358112




      358112




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          Consider $$d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert^3.$$ You can prove that this is a metric. However, if you define $lVert xrVert:=d(x,0),$ then in general, for $xneq 0,$ we will have $$lVertalpha xrVertneqlvertalpharvertlVert xrVert,$$ with a few exceptions.






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Homogeneity is not verified for the discrete metric for example. You can check the answer at here






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Take for example $d$ as the discrete distance, then for $xnot=0$ and $|lambda|not=0,1$, we
              $$1=d(lambda x,0)=|lambda x|not=|lambda||x|=|lambda|d(x,0)=|lambda|$$
              and the absolute homogeneity property does not hold.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                Your Answer




                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
                StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
                StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
                );
                );
                , "mathjax-editing");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "69"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: false,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );








                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852635%2fwhy-is-dx-0-not-a-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest






























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                5
                down vote



                accepted










                Consider $$d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert^3.$$ You can prove that this is a metric. However, if you define $lVert xrVert:=d(x,0),$ then in general, for $xneq 0,$ we will have $$lVertalpha xrVertneqlvertalpharvertlVert xrVert,$$ with a few exceptions.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote



                  accepted










                  Consider $$d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert^3.$$ You can prove that this is a metric. However, if you define $lVert xrVert:=d(x,0),$ then in general, for $xneq 0,$ we will have $$lVertalpha xrVertneqlvertalpharvertlVert xrVert,$$ with a few exceptions.






                  share|cite|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    5
                    down vote



                    accepted







                    up vote
                    5
                    down vote



                    accepted






                    Consider $$d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert^3.$$ You can prove that this is a metric. However, if you define $lVert xrVert:=d(x,0),$ then in general, for $xneq 0,$ we will have $$lVertalpha xrVertneqlvertalpharvertlVert xrVert,$$ with a few exceptions.






                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    Consider $$d(x,y)=lvert x-yrvert^3.$$ You can prove that this is a metric. However, if you define $lVert xrVert:=d(x,0),$ then in general, for $xneq 0,$ we will have $$lVertalpha xrVertneqlvertalpharvertlVert xrVert,$$ with a few exceptions.







                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    answered Jul 15 at 15:57









                    Cameron Buie

                    83.5k771153




                    83.5k771153




















                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        Homogeneity is not verified for the discrete metric for example. You can check the answer at here






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Homogeneity is not verified for the discrete metric for example. You can check the answer at here






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote









                            Homogeneity is not verified for the discrete metric for example. You can check the answer at here






                            share|cite|improve this answer













                            Homogeneity is not verified for the discrete metric for example. You can check the answer at here







                            share|cite|improve this answer













                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            answered Jul 15 at 15:55









                            ippiki-ookami

                            350217




                            350217




















                                up vote
                                1
                                down vote













                                Take for example $d$ as the discrete distance, then for $xnot=0$ and $|lambda|not=0,1$, we
                                $$1=d(lambda x,0)=|lambda x|not=|lambda||x|=|lambda|d(x,0)=|lambda|$$
                                and the absolute homogeneity property does not hold.






                                share|cite|improve this answer



























                                  up vote
                                  1
                                  down vote













                                  Take for example $d$ as the discrete distance, then for $xnot=0$ and $|lambda|not=0,1$, we
                                  $$1=d(lambda x,0)=|lambda x|not=|lambda||x|=|lambda|d(x,0)=|lambda|$$
                                  and the absolute homogeneity property does not hold.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote









                                    Take for example $d$ as the discrete distance, then for $xnot=0$ and $|lambda|not=0,1$, we
                                    $$1=d(lambda x,0)=|lambda x|not=|lambda||x|=|lambda|d(x,0)=|lambda|$$
                                    and the absolute homogeneity property does not hold.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer















                                    Take for example $d$ as the discrete distance, then for $xnot=0$ and $|lambda|not=0,1$, we
                                    $$1=d(lambda x,0)=|lambda x|not=|lambda||x|=|lambda|d(x,0)=|lambda|$$
                                    and the absolute homogeneity property does not hold.







                                    share|cite|improve this answer















                                    share|cite|improve this answer



                                    share|cite|improve this answer








                                    edited Jul 15 at 16:06


























                                    answered Jul 15 at 15:58









                                    Robert Z

                                    84.2k955123




                                    84.2k955123






















                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded


























                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2852635%2fwhy-is-dx-0-not-a-norm%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest













































































                                        Comments

                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                                        Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                                        Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?