An easier way of solving a problem about the number of roots of a square equation on an interval

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am trying to solve the following problem: I need to find out the number of roots on the interval $[-1; 3)$ of the equation $(4-a)x^2-6ax+3=0$ depending from $a$. I know a solution, but it is too difficult to calculate. I thought I could solve that problem with the help of quadratic trinomial roots position theorem. In the end, I got a lot of inequalities and I got confused. Is there an easier way to solve this problem?







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I am trying to solve the following problem: I need to find out the number of roots on the interval $[-1; 3)$ of the equation $(4-a)x^2-6ax+3=0$ depending from $a$. I know a solution, but it is too difficult to calculate. I thought I could solve that problem with the help of quadratic trinomial roots position theorem. In the end, I got a lot of inequalities and I got confused. Is there an easier way to solve this problem?







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I am trying to solve the following problem: I need to find out the number of roots on the interval $[-1; 3)$ of the equation $(4-a)x^2-6ax+3=0$ depending from $a$. I know a solution, but it is too difficult to calculate. I thought I could solve that problem with the help of quadratic trinomial roots position theorem. In the end, I got a lot of inequalities and I got confused. Is there an easier way to solve this problem?







      share|cite|improve this question













      I am trying to solve the following problem: I need to find out the number of roots on the interval $[-1; 3)$ of the equation $(4-a)x^2-6ax+3=0$ depending from $a$. I know a solution, but it is too difficult to calculate. I thought I could solve that problem with the help of quadratic trinomial roots position theorem. In the end, I got a lot of inequalities and I got confused. Is there an easier way to solve this problem?









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 18 at 18:02









      Robert Frost

      3,8821036




      3,8821036









      asked Jul 18 at 17:49









      student28

      13611




      13611




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          The quadratic formula yields
          $$x=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a). $$
          Let us set this as two functions of $a:$
          $$f_pm(a)=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a).$$
          These functions are undefined for $a=4.$ To find the exact domain, we factor what is under the square root:
          $$36a^2+12a-48=12(a-1)(3a+4).$$
          This is a parabola opening up, and therefore it is negative in-between the two roots of $-4/3$ and $1$. So the domain of $f_pm$ is $(-infty,-4/3]cup[1,4)cup(4,infty). $



          It remains to find the range of $f_pm,$ which is what we really care about. This will be different depending on whether we are looking at $f_+$ or $f_-.$ For $f_+,$ a simple plot reveals that $f_pm(-4/3)=-3/4,; f_pm(a)=1,$ that $$lim_ato-inftyf_+(a)=0, quad lim_ato-inftyf_-(a)=-6. $$
          We can piece together the graphs of these functions on the range $[-1,3),$ draw vertical lines, and see how many times we intersect a function. From this we gather that for $ain(-infty,-7/5),$ there is only one root. For $ain[-7/5,-4/3),$ there are two. For $a=-4/3,$ there is only one. For $ain(-4/3,1),$ there are none. For $a=1,$ there is one. For $ain(1,13/9],$ there are two. And finally, for $ain(13/9,infty),$ there is only one.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • I am sorry, but how did you piece these graphs together? Unfortunately, I didn't understand the range part.
            – student28
            Jul 18 at 20:04










          • @student28: The range of $f_pm$ tells us where $x$ lies, because I defined $x=f_pm(a).$ As for finding values like $-7/5$ and $13/9,$ I simply "cheated" and used Mathematica, via Wolfram Dev Platform, to solve for those values. I also used the Dev Platform to do plotting.
            – Adrian Keister
            Jul 18 at 20:09

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Try using the quadratic formula. This will give $x = frac3a pm sqrt9a^2+3a-124-a$.

          Now you want to find values of $x in [-1,3)$. So try setting $x=-1$ and $x=3$ and solve for $a$.

          You can get a bound on $a$ because you are looking for real roots, and the discriminant must be nonnegative ($9a^2+3a-12 geq 0$)

          Using the above, you should be able to determine a range of values for $a$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855832%2fan-easier-way-of-solving-a-problem-about-the-number-of-roots-of-a-square-equatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            The quadratic formula yields
            $$x=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a). $$
            Let us set this as two functions of $a:$
            $$f_pm(a)=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a).$$
            These functions are undefined for $a=4.$ To find the exact domain, we factor what is under the square root:
            $$36a^2+12a-48=12(a-1)(3a+4).$$
            This is a parabola opening up, and therefore it is negative in-between the two roots of $-4/3$ and $1$. So the domain of $f_pm$ is $(-infty,-4/3]cup[1,4)cup(4,infty). $



            It remains to find the range of $f_pm,$ which is what we really care about. This will be different depending on whether we are looking at $f_+$ or $f_-.$ For $f_+,$ a simple plot reveals that $f_pm(-4/3)=-3/4,; f_pm(a)=1,$ that $$lim_ato-inftyf_+(a)=0, quad lim_ato-inftyf_-(a)=-6. $$
            We can piece together the graphs of these functions on the range $[-1,3),$ draw vertical lines, and see how many times we intersect a function. From this we gather that for $ain(-infty,-7/5),$ there is only one root. For $ain[-7/5,-4/3),$ there are two. For $a=-4/3,$ there is only one. For $ain(-4/3,1),$ there are none. For $a=1,$ there is one. For $ain(1,13/9],$ there are two. And finally, for $ain(13/9,infty),$ there is only one.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I am sorry, but how did you piece these graphs together? Unfortunately, I didn't understand the range part.
              – student28
              Jul 18 at 20:04










            • @student28: The range of $f_pm$ tells us where $x$ lies, because I defined $x=f_pm(a).$ As for finding values like $-7/5$ and $13/9,$ I simply "cheated" and used Mathematica, via Wolfram Dev Platform, to solve for those values. I also used the Dev Platform to do plotting.
              – Adrian Keister
              Jul 18 at 20:09














            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            The quadratic formula yields
            $$x=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a). $$
            Let us set this as two functions of $a:$
            $$f_pm(a)=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a).$$
            These functions are undefined for $a=4.$ To find the exact domain, we factor what is under the square root:
            $$36a^2+12a-48=12(a-1)(3a+4).$$
            This is a parabola opening up, and therefore it is negative in-between the two roots of $-4/3$ and $1$. So the domain of $f_pm$ is $(-infty,-4/3]cup[1,4)cup(4,infty). $



            It remains to find the range of $f_pm,$ which is what we really care about. This will be different depending on whether we are looking at $f_+$ or $f_-.$ For $f_+,$ a simple plot reveals that $f_pm(-4/3)=-3/4,; f_pm(a)=1,$ that $$lim_ato-inftyf_+(a)=0, quad lim_ato-inftyf_-(a)=-6. $$
            We can piece together the graphs of these functions on the range $[-1,3),$ draw vertical lines, and see how many times we intersect a function. From this we gather that for $ain(-infty,-7/5),$ there is only one root. For $ain[-7/5,-4/3),$ there are two. For $a=-4/3,$ there is only one. For $ain(-4/3,1),$ there are none. For $a=1,$ there is one. For $ain(1,13/9],$ there are two. And finally, for $ain(13/9,infty),$ there is only one.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I am sorry, but how did you piece these graphs together? Unfortunately, I didn't understand the range part.
              – student28
              Jul 18 at 20:04










            • @student28: The range of $f_pm$ tells us where $x$ lies, because I defined $x=f_pm(a).$ As for finding values like $-7/5$ and $13/9,$ I simply "cheated" and used Mathematica, via Wolfram Dev Platform, to solve for those values. I also used the Dev Platform to do plotting.
              – Adrian Keister
              Jul 18 at 20:09












            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted






            The quadratic formula yields
            $$x=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a). $$
            Let us set this as two functions of $a:$
            $$f_pm(a)=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a).$$
            These functions are undefined for $a=4.$ To find the exact domain, we factor what is under the square root:
            $$36a^2+12a-48=12(a-1)(3a+4).$$
            This is a parabola opening up, and therefore it is negative in-between the two roots of $-4/3$ and $1$. So the domain of $f_pm$ is $(-infty,-4/3]cup[1,4)cup(4,infty). $



            It remains to find the range of $f_pm,$ which is what we really care about. This will be different depending on whether we are looking at $f_+$ or $f_-.$ For $f_+,$ a simple plot reveals that $f_pm(-4/3)=-3/4,; f_pm(a)=1,$ that $$lim_ato-inftyf_+(a)=0, quad lim_ato-inftyf_-(a)=-6. $$
            We can piece together the graphs of these functions on the range $[-1,3),$ draw vertical lines, and see how many times we intersect a function. From this we gather that for $ain(-infty,-7/5),$ there is only one root. For $ain[-7/5,-4/3),$ there are two. For $a=-4/3,$ there is only one. For $ain(-4/3,1),$ there are none. For $a=1,$ there is one. For $ain(1,13/9],$ there are two. And finally, for $ain(13/9,infty),$ there is only one.






            share|cite|improve this answer













            The quadratic formula yields
            $$x=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a). $$
            Let us set this as two functions of $a:$
            $$f_pm(a)=frac6apmsqrt36a^2-12(4-a)2(4-a).$$
            These functions are undefined for $a=4.$ To find the exact domain, we factor what is under the square root:
            $$36a^2+12a-48=12(a-1)(3a+4).$$
            This is a parabola opening up, and therefore it is negative in-between the two roots of $-4/3$ and $1$. So the domain of $f_pm$ is $(-infty,-4/3]cup[1,4)cup(4,infty). $



            It remains to find the range of $f_pm,$ which is what we really care about. This will be different depending on whether we are looking at $f_+$ or $f_-.$ For $f_+,$ a simple plot reveals that $f_pm(-4/3)=-3/4,; f_pm(a)=1,$ that $$lim_ato-inftyf_+(a)=0, quad lim_ato-inftyf_-(a)=-6. $$
            We can piece together the graphs of these functions on the range $[-1,3),$ draw vertical lines, and see how many times we intersect a function. From this we gather that for $ain(-infty,-7/5),$ there is only one root. For $ain[-7/5,-4/3),$ there are two. For $a=-4/3,$ there is only one. For $ain(-4/3,1),$ there are none. For $a=1,$ there is one. For $ain(1,13/9],$ there are two. And finally, for $ain(13/9,infty),$ there is only one.







            share|cite|improve this answer













            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer











            answered Jul 18 at 18:18









            Adrian Keister

            3,61721533




            3,61721533











            • I am sorry, but how did you piece these graphs together? Unfortunately, I didn't understand the range part.
              – student28
              Jul 18 at 20:04










            • @student28: The range of $f_pm$ tells us where $x$ lies, because I defined $x=f_pm(a).$ As for finding values like $-7/5$ and $13/9,$ I simply "cheated" and used Mathematica, via Wolfram Dev Platform, to solve for those values. I also used the Dev Platform to do plotting.
              – Adrian Keister
              Jul 18 at 20:09
















            • I am sorry, but how did you piece these graphs together? Unfortunately, I didn't understand the range part.
              – student28
              Jul 18 at 20:04










            • @student28: The range of $f_pm$ tells us where $x$ lies, because I defined $x=f_pm(a).$ As for finding values like $-7/5$ and $13/9,$ I simply "cheated" and used Mathematica, via Wolfram Dev Platform, to solve for those values. I also used the Dev Platform to do plotting.
              – Adrian Keister
              Jul 18 at 20:09















            I am sorry, but how did you piece these graphs together? Unfortunately, I didn't understand the range part.
            – student28
            Jul 18 at 20:04




            I am sorry, but how did you piece these graphs together? Unfortunately, I didn't understand the range part.
            – student28
            Jul 18 at 20:04












            @student28: The range of $f_pm$ tells us where $x$ lies, because I defined $x=f_pm(a).$ As for finding values like $-7/5$ and $13/9,$ I simply "cheated" and used Mathematica, via Wolfram Dev Platform, to solve for those values. I also used the Dev Platform to do plotting.
            – Adrian Keister
            Jul 18 at 20:09




            @student28: The range of $f_pm$ tells us where $x$ lies, because I defined $x=f_pm(a).$ As for finding values like $-7/5$ and $13/9,$ I simply "cheated" and used Mathematica, via Wolfram Dev Platform, to solve for those values. I also used the Dev Platform to do plotting.
            – Adrian Keister
            Jul 18 at 20:09










            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Try using the quadratic formula. This will give $x = frac3a pm sqrt9a^2+3a-124-a$.

            Now you want to find values of $x in [-1,3)$. So try setting $x=-1$ and $x=3$ and solve for $a$.

            You can get a bound on $a$ because you are looking for real roots, and the discriminant must be nonnegative ($9a^2+3a-12 geq 0$)

            Using the above, you should be able to determine a range of values for $a$.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Try using the quadratic formula. This will give $x = frac3a pm sqrt9a^2+3a-124-a$.

              Now you want to find values of $x in [-1,3)$. So try setting $x=-1$ and $x=3$ and solve for $a$.

              You can get a bound on $a$ because you are looking for real roots, and the discriminant must be nonnegative ($9a^2+3a-12 geq 0$)

              Using the above, you should be able to determine a range of values for $a$.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                Try using the quadratic formula. This will give $x = frac3a pm sqrt9a^2+3a-124-a$.

                Now you want to find values of $x in [-1,3)$. So try setting $x=-1$ and $x=3$ and solve for $a$.

                You can get a bound on $a$ because you are looking for real roots, and the discriminant must be nonnegative ($9a^2+3a-12 geq 0$)

                Using the above, you should be able to determine a range of values for $a$.






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Try using the quadratic formula. This will give $x = frac3a pm sqrt9a^2+3a-124-a$.

                Now you want to find values of $x in [-1,3)$. So try setting $x=-1$ and $x=3$ and solve for $a$.

                You can get a bound on $a$ because you are looking for real roots, and the discriminant must be nonnegative ($9a^2+3a-12 geq 0$)

                Using the above, you should be able to determine a range of values for $a$.







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 18 at 18:13









                gd1035

                29319




                29319






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855832%2fan-easier-way-of-solving-a-problem-about-the-number-of-roots-of-a-square-equatio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?