(Un)boundedness of real-valued homomorphism on some lattice.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:
Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?
The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.
For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:
Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1,ÃÂ dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra combinatorics group-homomorphism
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:
Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?
The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.
For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:
Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1,ÃÂ dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra combinatorics group-homomorphism
Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26
@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
â noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42
It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23
@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34
No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:
Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?
The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.
For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:
Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1,ÃÂ dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra combinatorics group-homomorphism
Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:
Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?
The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.
For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:
Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1,ÃÂ dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.
linear-algebra abstract-algebra combinatorics group-homomorphism
asked Jul 18 at 11:59
noctusraid
8381626
8381626
Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26
@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
â noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42
It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23
@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34
No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24
add a comment |Â
Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26
@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
â noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42
It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23
@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34
No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24
Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26
Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26
@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
â noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42
@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
â noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42
It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23
It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23
@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34
@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34
No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24
No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.
Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$
Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.
Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.
very nice, thanks alot!
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.
Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$
Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.
Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.
very nice, thanks alot!
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.
Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$
Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.
Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.
very nice, thanks alot!
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.
Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$
Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.
Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.
I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.
Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$
Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.
Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.
answered Jul 19 at 23:13
Paul Sinclair
18.5k21439
18.5k21439
very nice, thanks alot!
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17
add a comment |Â
very nice, thanks alot!
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17
very nice, thanks alot!
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17
very nice, thanks alot!
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855509%2funboundedness-of-real-valued-homomorphism-on-some-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26
@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
â noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42
It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23
@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
â noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34
No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
â Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24