(Un)boundedness of real-valued homomorphism on some lattice.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:




Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?




The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.



For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:



Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1, dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 18 at 23:26










  • @PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 18 at 23:42











  • It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 12:23










  • @PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 17:34










  • No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 19:24















up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:




Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?




The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.



For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:



Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1, dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 18 at 23:26










  • @PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 18 at 23:42











  • It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 12:23










  • @PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 17:34










  • No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 19:24













up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2






2





Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:




Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?




The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.



For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:



Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1, dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.







share|cite|improve this question











Let $mathbbZ^k$ denote the finitely-generated free abelian group on $k$ generators and consider an injective homomorphism $$chi colon (mathbbZ^k,+) to (mathbbR,+).$$ Now let $(a_n)$ be a sequence of pairwise distinct elements in $mathbbZ^k$. My question is:




Does there exist a subsequence of $(a_n)$ such that $vert chi(a_n) vert$ tends to $+infty$?




The answer for $k=1$ is yes as then $chi$ corresponds to a non-zero multiplication and one can extract a subsequence of $(a_n) subseteq mathbbZ$ either going towards $+ infty$ of $-infty$.



For $k>1$ this seems more subtle and I'm not sure anymore whether the answer to the question is affermative. Maybe the following bit might be helpful:



Observe that $chi$ can be viewed as a vector $(chi_1, dots, chi_k) in mathbbR^k$ such that $$chi(b^1,dots b^k)=langle (chi_1, dots,chi_k),(b^1,dots,b^k) rangle=sum_i=1^k chi_i cdot b^i.$$ Injectivity of $chi$ then implies that the $(chi_i)_i=1^k subseteq mathbbR$ are linearly independent over $mathbbQ$.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 18 at 11:59









noctusraid

8381626




8381626











  • Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 18 at 23:26










  • @PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 18 at 23:42











  • It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 12:23










  • @PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 17:34










  • No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 19:24

















  • Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 18 at 23:26










  • @PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 18 at 23:42











  • It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 12:23










  • @PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 17:34










  • No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
    – Paul Sinclair
    Jul 19 at 19:24
















Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
– Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26




Can your figure out how to prove that there exist integer sequences $(p_n), (q_n)$ such that $p_n - q_npi to 0$ as $n to infty$?
– Paul Sinclair
Jul 18 at 23:26












@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
– noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42





@PaulSinclair yeah, there exists such a sequence as $mathbbQ subseteq mathbbR$ is dense! Got it, thanks!
– noctusraid
Jul 18 at 23:42













It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
– Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23




It's a little stronger than just density of $Bbb Q$. Instead of $pi$, it would be easier to prove for an irrational number such as $$sum_n 2^-2^n$$.
– Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 12:23












@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
– noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34




@PaulSinclair Don't we just need that if $fracp_nq_n to pi$ (with positive integers $p_n,q_n$), then $p_n$ and $q_n$ tend to $+ infty$?
– noctusraid
Jul 19 at 17:34












No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
– Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24





No, because $q_n$ can grow faster than $fracp_nq_n - pi$ shrinks, in which case $p_n - q_npi$ would also grow. By carefully choosing the two sequences, you probably can avoid this when using $pi$. But it is practically obvious that you can avoid it for the other irrational number.
– Paul Sinclair
Jul 19 at 19:24











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.



Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$



Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.



Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • very nice, thanks alot!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 23:17










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855509%2funboundedness-of-real-valued-homomorphism-on-some-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.



Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$



Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.



Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • very nice, thanks alot!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 23:17














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.



Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$



Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.



Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • very nice, thanks alot!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 23:17












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.



Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$



Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.



Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.






share|cite|improve this answer













I originally just left a comment since I only had a general concept and didn't have the time to work out the details. But since comments are ephemeral, and I've since put more thought into it, I am giving a proper answer.



Let $$eta = sum_k=0^infty 2^-2^k$$



Since its binary expansion does not repeat, $eta$ must be irrational. for all $nge 0$, let $$q_n = 2^2^n,quad p_n = lfloor q_neta rfloor$$
Then $$0 le q_neta - p_n = 2^2^nsum_k=n+1^infty 2^-2^k < 2^2^nsum_l=2^n+1^infty 2^-l = 2^2^n2^1-2^n+1 = 2^1-2^n to 0$$
as $n to infty$.



Therefore the map $chi : Bbb Z^2 to Bbb R : (n, m) mapsto n + meta$ is an injective homorphism of additive groups, and there exists a sequence $(a_n) = (-p_n) times (q_n)$ such that $chi(a_n) to 0$ as $n to infty$, and therefore the same is true of all subsequences. The pairwise distinct criterion follows from $q_n = 2^2^n$.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 19 at 23:13









Paul Sinclair

18.5k21439




18.5k21439











  • very nice, thanks alot!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 23:17
















  • very nice, thanks alot!
    – noctusraid
    Jul 19 at 23:17















very nice, thanks alot!
– noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17




very nice, thanks alot!
– noctusraid
Jul 19 at 23:17












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855509%2funboundedness-of-real-valued-homomorphism-on-some-lattice%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon