Why binomial expansion approximation works?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So I have got the expansion of $$ (4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2 $$
I am told to use $ x = 1/10 $ to find an approximation of $ sqrt2 $. I can do this, giving $ 181/128 $, however the last part asks: "Explain why substituting $ x = 1/10 $ into this binomial expansion leads to a valid approximation. "



The answer is said to be because $ |x| < 4/5 $. Why?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Do you know about radius of convergence ? This is the key.
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jul 18 at 10:30














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












So I have got the expansion of $$ (4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2 $$
I am told to use $ x = 1/10 $ to find an approximation of $ sqrt2 $. I can do this, giving $ 181/128 $, however the last part asks: "Explain why substituting $ x = 1/10 $ into this binomial expansion leads to a valid approximation. "



The answer is said to be because $ |x| < 4/5 $. Why?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • Do you know about radius of convergence ? This is the key.
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jul 18 at 10:30












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











So I have got the expansion of $$ (4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2 $$
I am told to use $ x = 1/10 $ to find an approximation of $ sqrt2 $. I can do this, giving $ 181/128 $, however the last part asks: "Explain why substituting $ x = 1/10 $ into this binomial expansion leads to a valid approximation. "



The answer is said to be because $ |x| < 4/5 $. Why?







share|cite|improve this question











So I have got the expansion of $$ (4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2 $$
I am told to use $ x = 1/10 $ to find an approximation of $ sqrt2 $. I can do this, giving $ 181/128 $, however the last part asks: "Explain why substituting $ x = 1/10 $ into this binomial expansion leads to a valid approximation. "



The answer is said to be because $ |x| < 4/5 $. Why?









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 18 at 10:16









Rudra Mutalik

156




156











  • Do you know about radius of convergence ? This is the key.
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jul 18 at 10:30
















  • Do you know about radius of convergence ? This is the key.
    – Claude Leibovici
    Jul 18 at 10:30















Do you know about radius of convergence ? This is the key.
– Claude Leibovici
Jul 18 at 10:30




Do you know about radius of convergence ? This is the key.
– Claude Leibovici
Jul 18 at 10:30










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote



accepted










The actual explanation has something to do with the convergence of Taylor (or Maclaurin) series but it involves quite a high-level calculus.



A not-so-satisfying answer is that you have to put the LHS into the form $k(1+ax)$ and the approximation is valid for $lvert ax rvert <1$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I am only at A level so i guess the not-so-satisfying answer will have to do for now, thanks
    – Rudra Mutalik
    Jul 18 at 10:57

















up vote
0
down vote













$$(4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2+....$$



You are using a few terms of an infinite series to approximate $sqrt 2$



$$(4-5x)^.5 =2(1-5/4 x)^.5$$



The Newton binomial series $$(1+x)^alpha$$ converges where $|x|<1$ which in this case translates in $|5/4 x|<1$ which is satisfied with $x=1/10.$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855439%2fwhy-binomial-expansion-approximation-works%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The actual explanation has something to do with the convergence of Taylor (or Maclaurin) series but it involves quite a high-level calculus.



    A not-so-satisfying answer is that you have to put the LHS into the form $k(1+ax)$ and the approximation is valid for $lvert ax rvert <1$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • I am only at A level so i guess the not-so-satisfying answer will have to do for now, thanks
      – Rudra Mutalik
      Jul 18 at 10:57














    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted










    The actual explanation has something to do with the convergence of Taylor (or Maclaurin) series but it involves quite a high-level calculus.



    A not-so-satisfying answer is that you have to put the LHS into the form $k(1+ax)$ and the approximation is valid for $lvert ax rvert <1$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • I am only at A level so i guess the not-so-satisfying answer will have to do for now, thanks
      – Rudra Mutalik
      Jul 18 at 10:57












    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    0
    down vote



    accepted






    The actual explanation has something to do with the convergence of Taylor (or Maclaurin) series but it involves quite a high-level calculus.



    A not-so-satisfying answer is that you have to put the LHS into the form $k(1+ax)$ and the approximation is valid for $lvert ax rvert <1$






    share|cite|improve this answer













    The actual explanation has something to do with the convergence of Taylor (or Maclaurin) series but it involves quite a high-level calculus.



    A not-so-satisfying answer is that you have to put the LHS into the form $k(1+ax)$ and the approximation is valid for $lvert ax rvert <1$







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer











    answered Jul 18 at 10:24









    Karn Watcharasupat

    3,8192426




    3,8192426











    • I am only at A level so i guess the not-so-satisfying answer will have to do for now, thanks
      – Rudra Mutalik
      Jul 18 at 10:57
















    • I am only at A level so i guess the not-so-satisfying answer will have to do for now, thanks
      – Rudra Mutalik
      Jul 18 at 10:57















    I am only at A level so i guess the not-so-satisfying answer will have to do for now, thanks
    – Rudra Mutalik
    Jul 18 at 10:57




    I am only at A level so i guess the not-so-satisfying answer will have to do for now, thanks
    – Rudra Mutalik
    Jul 18 at 10:57










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    $$(4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2+....$$



    You are using a few terms of an infinite series to approximate $sqrt 2$



    $$(4-5x)^.5 =2(1-5/4 x)^.5$$



    The Newton binomial series $$(1+x)^alpha$$ converges where $|x|<1$ which in this case translates in $|5/4 x|<1$ which is satisfied with $x=1/10.$






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      $$(4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2+....$$



      You are using a few terms of an infinite series to approximate $sqrt 2$



      $$(4-5x)^.5 =2(1-5/4 x)^.5$$



      The Newton binomial series $$(1+x)^alpha$$ converges where $|x|<1$ which in this case translates in $|5/4 x|<1$ which is satisfied with $x=1/10.$






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        $$(4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2+....$$



        You are using a few terms of an infinite series to approximate $sqrt 2$



        $$(4-5x)^.5 =2(1-5/4 x)^.5$$



        The Newton binomial series $$(1+x)^alpha$$ converges where $|x|<1$ which in this case translates in $|5/4 x|<1$ which is satisfied with $x=1/10.$






        share|cite|improve this answer













        $$(4-5x)^.5 = 2 + (5/4)x + (25/64)x^2+....$$



        You are using a few terms of an infinite series to approximate $sqrt 2$



        $$(4-5x)^.5 =2(1-5/4 x)^.5$$



        The Newton binomial series $$(1+x)^alpha$$ converges where $|x|<1$ which in this case translates in $|5/4 x|<1$ which is satisfied with $x=1/10.$







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 18 at 11:04









        Mohammad Riazi-Kermani

        27.5k41852




        27.5k41852






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855439%2fwhy-binomial-expansion-approximation-works%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?