An integral I just cannot do

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-3
down vote

favorite












$$intsum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$
I tried doing this
$$sum_n=-infty^infty int e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ and then
$$sum_n=-infty^infty -pin^2 ln(x) e^(-pin^2/ x) +1over (-pin^2/ x) +1 dx $$ and now I'm not sure what to do..how do I sum this up and if I take the definite integral do I sum it up first or evaluate at $0$ and $infty$



$$int_0^infty sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ Does this integral diverge? If so,

What about this one
$$int_0^infty frac 1 sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • No closed form antiderivative for $e^-a/x$. The definite integral diverges.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jul 28 at 22:25











  • what about the second one?
    – Jibran Iqbal
    Jul 29 at 8:49














up vote
-3
down vote

favorite












$$intsum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$
I tried doing this
$$sum_n=-infty^infty int e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ and then
$$sum_n=-infty^infty -pin^2 ln(x) e^(-pin^2/ x) +1over (-pin^2/ x) +1 dx $$ and now I'm not sure what to do..how do I sum this up and if I take the definite integral do I sum it up first or evaluate at $0$ and $infty$



$$int_0^infty sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ Does this integral diverge? If so,

What about this one
$$int_0^infty frac 1 sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • No closed form antiderivative for $e^-a/x$. The definite integral diverges.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jul 28 at 22:25











  • what about the second one?
    – Jibran Iqbal
    Jul 29 at 8:49












up vote
-3
down vote

favorite









up vote
-3
down vote

favorite











$$intsum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$
I tried doing this
$$sum_n=-infty^infty int e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ and then
$$sum_n=-infty^infty -pin^2 ln(x) e^(-pin^2/ x) +1over (-pin^2/ x) +1 dx $$ and now I'm not sure what to do..how do I sum this up and if I take the definite integral do I sum it up first or evaluate at $0$ and $infty$



$$int_0^infty sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ Does this integral diverge? If so,

What about this one
$$int_0^infty frac 1 sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$







share|cite|improve this question













$$intsum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$
I tried doing this
$$sum_n=-infty^infty int e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ and then
$$sum_n=-infty^infty -pin^2 ln(x) e^(-pin^2/ x) +1over (-pin^2/ x) +1 dx $$ and now I'm not sure what to do..how do I sum this up and if I take the definite integral do I sum it up first or evaluate at $0$ and $infty$



$$int_0^infty sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$ Does this integral diverge? If so,

What about this one
$$int_0^infty frac 1 sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pin^2/ x dx $$









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 29 at 9:12
























asked Jul 28 at 22:19









Jibran Iqbal

176




176











  • No closed form antiderivative for $e^-a/x$. The definite integral diverges.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jul 28 at 22:25











  • what about the second one?
    – Jibran Iqbal
    Jul 29 at 8:49
















  • No closed form antiderivative for $e^-a/x$. The definite integral diverges.
    – Yves Daoust
    Jul 28 at 22:25











  • what about the second one?
    – Jibran Iqbal
    Jul 29 at 8:49















No closed form antiderivative for $e^-a/x$. The definite integral diverges.
– Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 22:25





No closed form antiderivative for $e^-a/x$. The definite integral diverges.
– Yves Daoust
Jul 28 at 22:25













what about the second one?
– Jibran Iqbal
Jul 29 at 8:49




what about the second one?
– Jibran Iqbal
Jul 29 at 8:49










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













The inner sum can be represented by a theta function:
$$sum_n=-infty^infty q^n^2 = mathcaltheta_3(0,q).$$



See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/JacobiThetaFunctions.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theta_function for documentation.



So
$$sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pi n^2/x = mathcaltheta_3(0,e^-pi/x).$$



The first definite integral you write definitely diverges. This can be seen from the arguments of the other commenters (it's worth noting that they are switching the order of the sum and integral, which is allowed by Tonelli's theorem because all terms of the series are positive). It can also be seen by a quick look at the shape of the function on Wolfram Alpha. I'm not, however, so sure about the second integral.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Note that when $x$ is small and negative the argument of the exponential is huge and positive. We can pick one of the terms in the sum, say $n=1$ and feed it to Alpha to be told it does not converge. The integral from $0$ to $infty$ also does not converge because the integrand goes to $1$.
    enter image description here






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • The definite integral is in the positives.
      – Yves Daoust
      Jul 28 at 22:29

















    up vote
    0
    down vote













    $$x>epsilonimplies e^-n^2pi/x>e^-n^2pi/epsilon$$



    This is sufficient for every term of the summation to cause divergence.






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865613%2fan-integral-i-just-cannot-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      1
      down vote













      The inner sum can be represented by a theta function:
      $$sum_n=-infty^infty q^n^2 = mathcaltheta_3(0,q).$$



      See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/JacobiThetaFunctions.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theta_function for documentation.



      So
      $$sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pi n^2/x = mathcaltheta_3(0,e^-pi/x).$$



      The first definite integral you write definitely diverges. This can be seen from the arguments of the other commenters (it's worth noting that they are switching the order of the sum and integral, which is allowed by Tonelli's theorem because all terms of the series are positive). It can also be seen by a quick look at the shape of the function on Wolfram Alpha. I'm not, however, so sure about the second integral.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote













        The inner sum can be represented by a theta function:
        $$sum_n=-infty^infty q^n^2 = mathcaltheta_3(0,q).$$



        See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/JacobiThetaFunctions.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theta_function for documentation.



        So
        $$sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pi n^2/x = mathcaltheta_3(0,e^-pi/x).$$



        The first definite integral you write definitely diverges. This can be seen from the arguments of the other commenters (it's worth noting that they are switching the order of the sum and integral, which is allowed by Tonelli's theorem because all terms of the series are positive). It can also be seen by a quick look at the shape of the function on Wolfram Alpha. I'm not, however, so sure about the second integral.






        share|cite|improve this answer























          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          The inner sum can be represented by a theta function:
          $$sum_n=-infty^infty q^n^2 = mathcaltheta_3(0,q).$$



          See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/JacobiThetaFunctions.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theta_function for documentation.



          So
          $$sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pi n^2/x = mathcaltheta_3(0,e^-pi/x).$$



          The first definite integral you write definitely diverges. This can be seen from the arguments of the other commenters (it's worth noting that they are switching the order of the sum and integral, which is allowed by Tonelli's theorem because all terms of the series are positive). It can also be seen by a quick look at the shape of the function on Wolfram Alpha. I'm not, however, so sure about the second integral.






          share|cite|improve this answer













          The inner sum can be represented by a theta function:
          $$sum_n=-infty^infty q^n^2 = mathcaltheta_3(0,q).$$



          See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/JacobiThetaFunctions.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theta_function for documentation.



          So
          $$sum_n=-infty^infty e^-pi n^2/x = mathcaltheta_3(0,e^-pi/x).$$



          The first definite integral you write definitely diverges. This can be seen from the arguments of the other commenters (it's worth noting that they are switching the order of the sum and integral, which is allowed by Tonelli's theorem because all terms of the series are positive). It can also be seen by a quick look at the shape of the function on Wolfram Alpha. I'm not, however, so sure about the second integral.







          share|cite|improve this answer













          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer











          answered Jul 28 at 23:18









          Taylor M

          1564




          1564




















              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Note that when $x$ is small and negative the argument of the exponential is huge and positive. We can pick one of the terms in the sum, say $n=1$ and feed it to Alpha to be told it does not converge. The integral from $0$ to $infty$ also does not converge because the integrand goes to $1$.
              enter image description here






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • The definite integral is in the positives.
                – Yves Daoust
                Jul 28 at 22:29














              up vote
              0
              down vote













              Note that when $x$ is small and negative the argument of the exponential is huge and positive. We can pick one of the terms in the sum, say $n=1$ and feed it to Alpha to be told it does not converge. The integral from $0$ to $infty$ also does not converge because the integrand goes to $1$.
              enter image description here






              share|cite|improve this answer























              • The definite integral is in the positives.
                – Yves Daoust
                Jul 28 at 22:29












              up vote
              0
              down vote










              up vote
              0
              down vote









              Note that when $x$ is small and negative the argument of the exponential is huge and positive. We can pick one of the terms in the sum, say $n=1$ and feed it to Alpha to be told it does not converge. The integral from $0$ to $infty$ also does not converge because the integrand goes to $1$.
              enter image description here






              share|cite|improve this answer















              Note that when $x$ is small and negative the argument of the exponential is huge and positive. We can pick one of the terms in the sum, say $n=1$ and feed it to Alpha to be told it does not converge. The integral from $0$ to $infty$ also does not converge because the integrand goes to $1$.
              enter image description here







              share|cite|improve this answer















              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jul 28 at 22:30


























              answered Jul 28 at 22:28









              Ross Millikan

              275k21185351




              275k21185351











              • The definite integral is in the positives.
                – Yves Daoust
                Jul 28 at 22:29
















              • The definite integral is in the positives.
                – Yves Daoust
                Jul 28 at 22:29















              The definite integral is in the positives.
              – Yves Daoust
              Jul 28 at 22:29




              The definite integral is in the positives.
              – Yves Daoust
              Jul 28 at 22:29










              up vote
              0
              down vote













              $$x>epsilonimplies e^-n^2pi/x>e^-n^2pi/epsilon$$



              This is sufficient for every term of the summation to cause divergence.






              share|cite|improve this answer



























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                $$x>epsilonimplies e^-n^2pi/x>e^-n^2pi/epsilon$$



                This is sufficient for every term of the summation to cause divergence.






                share|cite|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote









                  $$x>epsilonimplies e^-n^2pi/x>e^-n^2pi/epsilon$$



                  This is sufficient for every term of the summation to cause divergence.






                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  $$x>epsilonimplies e^-n^2pi/x>e^-n^2pi/epsilon$$



                  This is sufficient for every term of the summation to cause divergence.







                  share|cite|improve this answer















                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jul 28 at 22:37


























                  answered Jul 28 at 22:31









                  Yves Daoust

                  110k665203




                  110k665203






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865613%2fan-integral-i-just-cannot-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Comments

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                      Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                      Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?