Computing Cohomology of $S^2/sim$, not Hausdorff

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Fix the north and south poles $N, S$ of $S^2$. Given $G$, I want to compute the singular cohomology of $S^2/sim$, where $xsim y$ iff they lie on the same meridian between $N$ and $S$. We are then left with a space $X$ whose open sets are $X, Xbackslash N = U_S,Xbackslash S = U_N,$ and the open sets of $U_Ncap U_S simeq S^1$.



To calculate the cohomology I use Mayer-Vietoris:
$$
0 rightarrow H^0(X,G_X) simeq G rightarrow H^0(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^0(U_S,G_U_S) simeq G oplus G rightarrow H^0(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^1(X,G_X) rightarrow H^1(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^1(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^1(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^2(X,G_X) rightarrow H^2(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^2(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^2(S^1, G_S^1) simeq 0
$$



I still need to show that the middle terms are all zero, i.e. that $ forall i>0, H^i(U_N,G_U_N) = H^i(U_S,G_U_S) = 0$.



Any hints? It doesn't seem obvious to me that $U_N$ is contractible.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What's $G$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown an abelian group
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:24










  • What's $G_U_N$ then?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:26










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I suppose I actually don't want the subscripts, but it doesn't make any difference since I found that $X$ is contractible, hence sheaf cohomology = singular cohomology.
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:31














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












Fix the north and south poles $N, S$ of $S^2$. Given $G$, I want to compute the singular cohomology of $S^2/sim$, where $xsim y$ iff they lie on the same meridian between $N$ and $S$. We are then left with a space $X$ whose open sets are $X, Xbackslash N = U_S,Xbackslash S = U_N,$ and the open sets of $U_Ncap U_S simeq S^1$.



To calculate the cohomology I use Mayer-Vietoris:
$$
0 rightarrow H^0(X,G_X) simeq G rightarrow H^0(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^0(U_S,G_U_S) simeq G oplus G rightarrow H^0(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^1(X,G_X) rightarrow H^1(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^1(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^1(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^2(X,G_X) rightarrow H^2(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^2(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^2(S^1, G_S^1) simeq 0
$$



I still need to show that the middle terms are all zero, i.e. that $ forall i>0, H^i(U_N,G_U_N) = H^i(U_S,G_U_S) = 0$.



Any hints? It doesn't seem obvious to me that $U_N$ is contractible.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • What's $G$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown an abelian group
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:24










  • What's $G_U_N$ then?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:26










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I suppose I actually don't want the subscripts, but it doesn't make any difference since I found that $X$ is contractible, hence sheaf cohomology = singular cohomology.
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:31












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





Fix the north and south poles $N, S$ of $S^2$. Given $G$, I want to compute the singular cohomology of $S^2/sim$, where $xsim y$ iff they lie on the same meridian between $N$ and $S$. We are then left with a space $X$ whose open sets are $X, Xbackslash N = U_S,Xbackslash S = U_N,$ and the open sets of $U_Ncap U_S simeq S^1$.



To calculate the cohomology I use Mayer-Vietoris:
$$
0 rightarrow H^0(X,G_X) simeq G rightarrow H^0(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^0(U_S,G_U_S) simeq G oplus G rightarrow H^0(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^1(X,G_X) rightarrow H^1(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^1(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^1(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^2(X,G_X) rightarrow H^2(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^2(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^2(S^1, G_S^1) simeq 0
$$



I still need to show that the middle terms are all zero, i.e. that $ forall i>0, H^i(U_N,G_U_N) = H^i(U_S,G_U_S) = 0$.



Any hints? It doesn't seem obvious to me that $U_N$ is contractible.







share|cite|improve this question













Fix the north and south poles $N, S$ of $S^2$. Given $G$, I want to compute the singular cohomology of $S^2/sim$, where $xsim y$ iff they lie on the same meridian between $N$ and $S$. We are then left with a space $X$ whose open sets are $X, Xbackslash N = U_S,Xbackslash S = U_N,$ and the open sets of $U_Ncap U_S simeq S^1$.



To calculate the cohomology I use Mayer-Vietoris:
$$
0 rightarrow H^0(X,G_X) simeq G rightarrow H^0(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^0(U_S,G_U_S) simeq G oplus G rightarrow H^0(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^1(X,G_X) rightarrow H^1(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^1(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^1(S^1, G_S^1) simeq G \
rightarrow H^2(X,G_X) rightarrow H^2(U_N,G_U_N) oplus H^2(U_S,G_U_S) rightarrow H^2(S^1, G_S^1) simeq 0
$$



I still need to show that the middle terms are all zero, i.e. that $ forall i>0, H^i(U_N,G_U_N) = H^i(U_S,G_U_S) = 0$.



Any hints? It doesn't seem obvious to me that $U_N$ is contractible.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 29 at 6:58
























asked Jul 29 at 6:44









foaly

447414




447414











  • What's $G$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown an abelian group
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:24










  • What's $G_U_N$ then?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:26










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I suppose I actually don't want the subscripts, but it doesn't make any difference since I found that $X$ is contractible, hence sheaf cohomology = singular cohomology.
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:31
















  • What's $G$?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:19










  • @LordSharktheUnknown an abelian group
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:24










  • What's $G_U_N$ then?
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Jul 29 at 7:26










  • @LordSharktheUnknown I suppose I actually don't want the subscripts, but it doesn't make any difference since I found that $X$ is contractible, hence sheaf cohomology = singular cohomology.
    – foaly
    Jul 29 at 7:31















What's $G$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 29 at 7:19




What's $G$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 29 at 7:19












@LordSharktheUnknown an abelian group
– foaly
Jul 29 at 7:24




@LordSharktheUnknown an abelian group
– foaly
Jul 29 at 7:24












What's $G_U_N$ then?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 29 at 7:26




What's $G_U_N$ then?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jul 29 at 7:26












@LordSharktheUnknown I suppose I actually don't want the subscripts, but it doesn't make any difference since I found that $X$ is contractible, hence sheaf cohomology = singular cohomology.
– foaly
Jul 29 at 7:31




@LordSharktheUnknown I suppose I actually don't want the subscripts, but it doesn't make any difference since I found that $X$ is contractible, hence sheaf cohomology = singular cohomology.
– foaly
Jul 29 at 7:31










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










NVM -- induced by the null-homotopy on Euclidean space we have a null-homotopy on $U_N$. (Check that the induced map is continuous.)






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865827%2fcomputing-cohomology-of-s2-sim-not-hausdorff%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    NVM -- induced by the null-homotopy on Euclidean space we have a null-homotopy on $U_N$. (Check that the induced map is continuous.)






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      NVM -- induced by the null-homotopy on Euclidean space we have a null-homotopy on $U_N$. (Check that the induced map is continuous.)






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        NVM -- induced by the null-homotopy on Euclidean space we have a null-homotopy on $U_N$. (Check that the induced map is continuous.)






        share|cite|improve this answer













        NVM -- induced by the null-homotopy on Euclidean space we have a null-homotopy on $U_N$. (Check that the induced map is continuous.)







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 29 at 7:24









        foaly

        447414




        447414






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2865827%2fcomputing-cohomology-of-s2-sim-not-hausdorff%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?