Convergence in probability implies convergence in expectation.
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to see a full solution to the following problem. I have tried approaching it in a number of different ways, however I don't seem to get to the desired result. No point posting what I did, as they just lead to dead end roads.
Show that if $X_nto 0$ in probability then:
$$
Eleft[frac1+right]to 0, mbox as ntoinfty
$$
The converse implication holds as well, but that one is easy to prove using Chebyshev's Inequality.
probability expectation
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to see a full solution to the following problem. I have tried approaching it in a number of different ways, however I don't seem to get to the desired result. No point posting what I did, as they just lead to dead end roads.
Show that if $X_nto 0$ in probability then:
$$
Eleft[frac1+right]to 0, mbox as ntoinfty
$$
The converse implication holds as well, but that one is easy to prove using Chebyshev's Inequality.
probability expectation
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I would like to see a full solution to the following problem. I have tried approaching it in a number of different ways, however I don't seem to get to the desired result. No point posting what I did, as they just lead to dead end roads.
Show that if $X_nto 0$ in probability then:
$$
Eleft[frac1+right]to 0, mbox as ntoinfty
$$
The converse implication holds as well, but that one is easy to prove using Chebyshev's Inequality.
probability expectation
I would like to see a full solution to the following problem. I have tried approaching it in a number of different ways, however I don't seem to get to the desired result. No point posting what I did, as they just lead to dead end roads.
Show that if $X_nto 0$ in probability then:
$$
Eleft[frac1+right]to 0, mbox as ntoinfty
$$
The converse implication holds as well, but that one is easy to prove using Chebyshev's Inequality.
probability expectation
asked Jul 20 at 10:30
Andrei Crisan
3219
3219
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Use Dominated Convergence Theorem. $frac 1+leq 1$. To use the usual version of DCT you have to go to a.s. convergent subsequences, but DCT is valid for convergence in probability too. Alternatively, let $epsilon in (0,1)$ and $delta =frac epsilon 1-epsilon $ Then $Efrac 1+ =Efrac 1+I_X_n+Efrac 1+I_ <delta leq EI_X_n+frac delta 1+delta =PX_n +epsilon $. The result follows from this.
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Use Dominated Convergence Theorem. $frac 1+leq 1$. To use the usual version of DCT you have to go to a.s. convergent subsequences, but DCT is valid for convergence in probability too. Alternatively, let $epsilon in (0,1)$ and $delta =frac epsilon 1-epsilon $ Then $Efrac 1+ =Efrac 1+I_X_n+Efrac 1+I_ <delta leq EI_X_n+frac delta 1+delta =PX_n +epsilon $. The result follows from this.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Use Dominated Convergence Theorem. $frac 1+leq 1$. To use the usual version of DCT you have to go to a.s. convergent subsequences, but DCT is valid for convergence in probability too. Alternatively, let $epsilon in (0,1)$ and $delta =frac epsilon 1-epsilon $ Then $Efrac 1+ =Efrac 1+I_X_n+Efrac 1+I_ <delta leq EI_X_n+frac delta 1+delta =PX_n +epsilon $. The result follows from this.
add a comment |Â
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Use Dominated Convergence Theorem. $frac 1+leq 1$. To use the usual version of DCT you have to go to a.s. convergent subsequences, but DCT is valid for convergence in probability too. Alternatively, let $epsilon in (0,1)$ and $delta =frac epsilon 1-epsilon $ Then $Efrac 1+ =Efrac 1+I_X_n+Efrac 1+I_ <delta leq EI_X_n+frac delta 1+delta =PX_n +epsilon $. The result follows from this.
Use Dominated Convergence Theorem. $frac 1+leq 1$. To use the usual version of DCT you have to go to a.s. convergent subsequences, but DCT is valid for convergence in probability too. Alternatively, let $epsilon in (0,1)$ and $delta =frac epsilon 1-epsilon $ Then $Efrac 1+ =Efrac 1+I_X_n+Efrac 1+I_ <delta leq EI_X_n+frac delta 1+delta =PX_n +epsilon $. The result follows from this.
edited Jul 20 at 10:41
answered Jul 20 at 10:34


Kavi Rama Murthy
20.6k2830
20.6k2830
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857501%2fconvergence-in-probability-implies-convergence-in-expectation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password