Creating new constants in differential field extensions via superfluous solutions to a D.E.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I am reading the lecture series book Lectures on Differential Galois Theory by Andy Magid. I came across an example, and I am wondering if it generalizes.



The example



Let $F_1=mathbbC(z)$ be the field of rational functions in indeterminate $z$, and $F_2=mathbbC((z))$ the corresponding field of formal power series. Then with the derivation $D(z)=1$, and $D$ trivial on $mathbbC$, $F_2$ is a differential field, and $F_1$ a differential sub-field. Let $f$ be the usual exponential series, so that $D(f)=f$, and let $F=mathbbClangle f rangle$ be the field obtained by adjoining $f$ to $mathbbC$. Consider the differential equation $$Y'-Y=0$$ over $F$. The universal solution algebra is $R=F[y]$ with $D(y)=y$. This construction is superfluous since $F$ already contains the solutions to the differential equation. The existence of these two solutions gives the following equations on their ratios:



$$Dleft(fracyfright)=fracfD(y)-yD(f)f^2=fracfy-yff^2=0$$



In other words, the extra solution gives rise to a new constant.



My question



Suppose $L$ is a monic homogeneous linear differential operator of order $n$ over a differential field $F$ which contains $n$ solutions to $L=0$ linearly independent over constants. Does the adjunction of a new formal solution to $L=0$ result in a new constant? Is this the reason for the no new constant condition in the definition for a Picard Vessiot extension?







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I am reading the lecture series book Lectures on Differential Galois Theory by Andy Magid. I came across an example, and I am wondering if it generalizes.



    The example



    Let $F_1=mathbbC(z)$ be the field of rational functions in indeterminate $z$, and $F_2=mathbbC((z))$ the corresponding field of formal power series. Then with the derivation $D(z)=1$, and $D$ trivial on $mathbbC$, $F_2$ is a differential field, and $F_1$ a differential sub-field. Let $f$ be the usual exponential series, so that $D(f)=f$, and let $F=mathbbClangle f rangle$ be the field obtained by adjoining $f$ to $mathbbC$. Consider the differential equation $$Y'-Y=0$$ over $F$. The universal solution algebra is $R=F[y]$ with $D(y)=y$. This construction is superfluous since $F$ already contains the solutions to the differential equation. The existence of these two solutions gives the following equations on their ratios:



    $$Dleft(fracyfright)=fracfD(y)-yD(f)f^2=fracfy-yff^2=0$$



    In other words, the extra solution gives rise to a new constant.



    My question



    Suppose $L$ is a monic homogeneous linear differential operator of order $n$ over a differential field $F$ which contains $n$ solutions to $L=0$ linearly independent over constants. Does the adjunction of a new formal solution to $L=0$ result in a new constant? Is this the reason for the no new constant condition in the definition for a Picard Vessiot extension?







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I am reading the lecture series book Lectures on Differential Galois Theory by Andy Magid. I came across an example, and I am wondering if it generalizes.



      The example



      Let $F_1=mathbbC(z)$ be the field of rational functions in indeterminate $z$, and $F_2=mathbbC((z))$ the corresponding field of formal power series. Then with the derivation $D(z)=1$, and $D$ trivial on $mathbbC$, $F_2$ is a differential field, and $F_1$ a differential sub-field. Let $f$ be the usual exponential series, so that $D(f)=f$, and let $F=mathbbClangle f rangle$ be the field obtained by adjoining $f$ to $mathbbC$. Consider the differential equation $$Y'-Y=0$$ over $F$. The universal solution algebra is $R=F[y]$ with $D(y)=y$. This construction is superfluous since $F$ already contains the solutions to the differential equation. The existence of these two solutions gives the following equations on their ratios:



      $$Dleft(fracyfright)=fracfD(y)-yD(f)f^2=fracfy-yff^2=0$$



      In other words, the extra solution gives rise to a new constant.



      My question



      Suppose $L$ is a monic homogeneous linear differential operator of order $n$ over a differential field $F$ which contains $n$ solutions to $L=0$ linearly independent over constants. Does the adjunction of a new formal solution to $L=0$ result in a new constant? Is this the reason for the no new constant condition in the definition for a Picard Vessiot extension?







      share|cite|improve this question











      I am reading the lecture series book Lectures on Differential Galois Theory by Andy Magid. I came across an example, and I am wondering if it generalizes.



      The example



      Let $F_1=mathbbC(z)$ be the field of rational functions in indeterminate $z$, and $F_2=mathbbC((z))$ the corresponding field of formal power series. Then with the derivation $D(z)=1$, and $D$ trivial on $mathbbC$, $F_2$ is a differential field, and $F_1$ a differential sub-field. Let $f$ be the usual exponential series, so that $D(f)=f$, and let $F=mathbbClangle f rangle$ be the field obtained by adjoining $f$ to $mathbbC$. Consider the differential equation $$Y'-Y=0$$ over $F$. The universal solution algebra is $R=F[y]$ with $D(y)=y$. This construction is superfluous since $F$ already contains the solutions to the differential equation. The existence of these two solutions gives the following equations on their ratios:



      $$Dleft(fracyfright)=fracfD(y)-yD(f)f^2=fracfy-yff^2=0$$



      In other words, the extra solution gives rise to a new constant.



      My question



      Suppose $L$ is a monic homogeneous linear differential operator of order $n$ over a differential field $F$ which contains $n$ solutions to $L=0$ linearly independent over constants. Does the adjunction of a new formal solution to $L=0$ result in a new constant? Is this the reason for the no new constant condition in the definition for a Picard Vessiot extension?









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 19 at 20:02









      J.Kennedy

      486




      486

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857012%2fcreating-new-constants-in-differential-field-extensions-via-superfluous-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857012%2fcreating-new-constants-in-differential-field-extensions-via-superfluous-solution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?