Does the limit of the recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$ converge to the same value regardless of whatever $a_0$ is?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?
sequences-and-series limits recursion
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?
sequences-and-series limits recursion
I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26
@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28
add a comment |Â
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
up vote
5
down vote
favorite
I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?
sequences-and-series limits recursion
I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?
sequences-and-series limits recursion
edited Jul 18 at 19:26
Michael Lugo
17.4k33475
17.4k33475
asked Jul 18 at 19:05
user189728
33329
33329
I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26
@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28
add a comment |Â
I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26
@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28
I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26
I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26
@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28
@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$
I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32
Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$
I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32
Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$
I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32
Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34
add a comment |Â
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$
The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$
answered Jul 18 at 19:30
Did
242k23208443
242k23208443
I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32
Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34
add a comment |Â
I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32
Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34
I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32
I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32
Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34
Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855894%2fdoes-the-limit-of-the-recursive-sequence-a-n1-fracn1-frac1a-n-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26
@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28