Does the limit of the recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$ converge to the same value regardless of whatever $a_0$ is?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
    – Michael Lugo
    Jul 18 at 19:26










  • @MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:28














up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1












I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?







share|cite|improve this question





















  • I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
    – Michael Lugo
    Jul 18 at 19:26










  • @MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:28












up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
1






1





I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?







share|cite|improve this question













I found an interesting recursive sequence $a_n+1=fracn+1frac1a_n-(n+1)$. In playing with $a_0$ on Desmos, it seems that no matter what $a_0$ is, the sequence converges to some fixed value. Is this the case? Is this sequence the same regardless of its initial value? If so, what is the limit of this sequence?









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 18 at 19:26









Michael Lugo

17.4k33475




17.4k33475









asked Jul 18 at 19:05









user189728

33329




33329











  • I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
    – Michael Lugo
    Jul 18 at 19:26










  • @MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:28
















  • I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
    – Michael Lugo
    Jul 18 at 19:26










  • @MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:28















I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26




I've added parentheses around the $n+1$ in the denominator as this looks to be your intent based on the Desmos link.
– Michael Lugo
Jul 18 at 19:26












@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28




@MichaelLugo Yes, thank you, I tend to simplify to the point of my own detriment
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:28










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:32










  • Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
    – Did
    Jul 18 at 19:34










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855894%2fdoes-the-limit-of-the-recursive-sequence-a-n1-fracn1-frac1a-n-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:32










  • Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
    – Did
    Jul 18 at 19:34














up vote
3
down vote



accepted










The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:32










  • Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
    – Did
    Jul 18 at 19:34












up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$






share|cite|improve this answer













The sequence $$b_n=fracn!a_n$$ solves the recursion $$b_n+1=b_n-(n+1)!$$ hence $$b_n=b_0-sum_k=1^nk!$$ which yields $$frac1a_n=frac1n!a_0-sum_k=1^nfrack!n!$$ Now, for every $ngeqslant2$,
$$1leqslantsum_k=1^nfrack!n!leqslant1+frac1n+fracn-2n(n-1)$$
Thus, for every initial condition $a_0$ not in the set of the sums $sumlimits_k=1^nk!$ for $ngeqslant0$, one has $$lim a_n=-1$$







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 18 at 19:30









Did

242k23208443




242k23208443











  • I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:32










  • Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
    – Did
    Jul 18 at 19:34
















  • I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
    – user189728
    Jul 18 at 19:32










  • Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
    – Did
    Jul 18 at 19:34















I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32




I'm admittedly not experienced with any of this, for my sake, could you bridge the gap between the first two lines for laymen?
– user189728
Jul 18 at 19:32












Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34




Dear layman, did you try to find a relation between $b_n+1$ and $b_n$?
– Did
Jul 18 at 19:34












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855894%2fdoes-the-limit-of-the-recursive-sequence-a-n1-fracn1-frac1a-n-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?