Easiest way to solve this system of equations

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
15
down vote

favorite
4












I have these two equations:



$$x=fracab(1+k)b+ka\ y=fracab(1+k)a+kb$$



where $a,b$ are constants and $k$ is a parameter to be eliminated.



A relation between $x,y$ is to be found. What is the best way to do it? Cross multiplying and solving is a bit too hectic. Is there a way we can maybe exploit the symmetry of the situation? Thanks!!







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 5




    Don't know if this helps but $frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$
    – iamwhoiam
    Jul 16 at 3:37






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam. Is that easy to see? Oh yeah. That's easy. I think you should make that an answer.
    – Mason
    Jul 16 at 3:40











  • I think it is, since the the numerator of $x$ and $y$ is the same. So it kinda makes sense that you might take a closer look on $x^-1$ and $y^-1$.
    – Cornman
    Jul 16 at 3:42










  • @iamwhoiam This was what I was looking for!! Thanks a lot!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:43






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam I think you should post it as an answer!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:48














up vote
15
down vote

favorite
4












I have these two equations:



$$x=fracab(1+k)b+ka\ y=fracab(1+k)a+kb$$



where $a,b$ are constants and $k$ is a parameter to be eliminated.



A relation between $x,y$ is to be found. What is the best way to do it? Cross multiplying and solving is a bit too hectic. Is there a way we can maybe exploit the symmetry of the situation? Thanks!!







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 5




    Don't know if this helps but $frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$
    – iamwhoiam
    Jul 16 at 3:37






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam. Is that easy to see? Oh yeah. That's easy. I think you should make that an answer.
    – Mason
    Jul 16 at 3:40











  • I think it is, since the the numerator of $x$ and $y$ is the same. So it kinda makes sense that you might take a closer look on $x^-1$ and $y^-1$.
    – Cornman
    Jul 16 at 3:42










  • @iamwhoiam This was what I was looking for!! Thanks a lot!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:43






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam I think you should post it as an answer!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:48












up vote
15
down vote

favorite
4









up vote
15
down vote

favorite
4






4





I have these two equations:



$$x=fracab(1+k)b+ka\ y=fracab(1+k)a+kb$$



where $a,b$ are constants and $k$ is a parameter to be eliminated.



A relation between $x,y$ is to be found. What is the best way to do it? Cross multiplying and solving is a bit too hectic. Is there a way we can maybe exploit the symmetry of the situation? Thanks!!







share|cite|improve this question













I have these two equations:



$$x=fracab(1+k)b+ka\ y=fracab(1+k)a+kb$$



where $a,b$ are constants and $k$ is a parameter to be eliminated.



A relation between $x,y$ is to be found. What is the best way to do it? Cross multiplying and solving is a bit too hectic. Is there a way we can maybe exploit the symmetry of the situation? Thanks!!









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 16 at 8:35









Rodrigo de Azevedo

12.5k41751




12.5k41751









asked Jul 16 at 3:25









tatan

5,02442053




5,02442053







  • 5




    Don't know if this helps but $frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$
    – iamwhoiam
    Jul 16 at 3:37






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam. Is that easy to see? Oh yeah. That's easy. I think you should make that an answer.
    – Mason
    Jul 16 at 3:40











  • I think it is, since the the numerator of $x$ and $y$ is the same. So it kinda makes sense that you might take a closer look on $x^-1$ and $y^-1$.
    – Cornman
    Jul 16 at 3:42










  • @iamwhoiam This was what I was looking for!! Thanks a lot!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:43






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam I think you should post it as an answer!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:48












  • 5




    Don't know if this helps but $frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$
    – iamwhoiam
    Jul 16 at 3:37






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam. Is that easy to see? Oh yeah. That's easy. I think you should make that an answer.
    – Mason
    Jul 16 at 3:40











  • I think it is, since the the numerator of $x$ and $y$ is the same. So it kinda makes sense that you might take a closer look on $x^-1$ and $y^-1$.
    – Cornman
    Jul 16 at 3:42










  • @iamwhoiam This was what I was looking for!! Thanks a lot!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:43






  • 1




    @iamwhoiam I think you should post it as an answer!
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:48







5




5




Don't know if this helps but $frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$
– iamwhoiam
Jul 16 at 3:37




Don't know if this helps but $frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$
– iamwhoiam
Jul 16 at 3:37




1




1




@iamwhoiam. Is that easy to see? Oh yeah. That's easy. I think you should make that an answer.
– Mason
Jul 16 at 3:40





@iamwhoiam. Is that easy to see? Oh yeah. That's easy. I think you should make that an answer.
– Mason
Jul 16 at 3:40













I think it is, since the the numerator of $x$ and $y$ is the same. So it kinda makes sense that you might take a closer look on $x^-1$ and $y^-1$.
– Cornman
Jul 16 at 3:42




I think it is, since the the numerator of $x$ and $y$ is the same. So it kinda makes sense that you might take a closer look on $x^-1$ and $y^-1$.
– Cornman
Jul 16 at 3:42












@iamwhoiam This was what I was looking for!! Thanks a lot!
– tatan
Jul 16 at 3:43




@iamwhoiam This was what I was looking for!! Thanks a lot!
– tatan
Jul 16 at 3:43




1




1




@iamwhoiam I think you should post it as an answer!
– tatan
Jul 16 at 3:48




@iamwhoiam I think you should post it as an answer!
– tatan
Jul 16 at 3:48










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
44
down vote



accepted










Notice that the numerators of the two fractions are equal. It might thus be helpful to consider $frac1x$ and $frac1y$. With this approach, we observe that $$frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Nicely done (+1).
    – dxiv
    Jul 16 at 4:00










  • What step am I missing to get to $frac1a + frac1b $?$frac1x + frac1y = fraca + ak + b + kbab(1 + k) iff fraca (1 + k) + b (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b) (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b)ab iff ???$
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 16 at 20:43






  • 7




    @PhilPatterson $frac(a+b)ab$ <-> $fracaab + fracbab$ <-> $frac1b + frac1a$ <-> $frac1a+frac1b$
    – pizzapants184
    Jul 16 at 21:18






  • 2




    @pizzapants184 somehow I forgot that you could split the terms in that way ... amazing how much you can forget 15 years after university ... Thanks for spelling it out for me!
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 17 at 4:28






  • 1




    This was literally the first time in my life using MathJax to create equations ... now that you've said something about it @Mason, I have to assume those double arrows have another meaning and I just used them erroneously. Reflecting on it I picked them because I liked the way they looked ... FWIW
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 19 at 17:37

















up vote
16
down vote













Direct elimination doesn't look so hectic in this case:



$$(b+ka)x=ab(1+k) iff ka(x-b)=b(a-x)iff k = - fracb(x-a)a(x-b)$$



Doing the same for the second equation then equating eliminates $,k,$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    Thanks! But I think that adding $x^-1$ and $y^-1$ and adding them (as mentioned in the comments) is a nice trick here ;-)
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:44










  • @tatan I agree, and will upvote that once posted as an answer ;-)
    – dxiv
    Jul 16 at 3:47

















up vote
4
down vote













Alternatively, note that $$frac xy=fraca+kbb+kaimplies (bx-ay)=k(by-ax)implies k=fracbx-ayby-ax$$ and equate with @dxiv's answer.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853054%2feasiest-way-to-solve-this-system-of-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    44
    down vote



    accepted










    Notice that the numerators of the two fractions are equal. It might thus be helpful to consider $frac1x$ and $frac1y$. With this approach, we observe that $$frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Nicely done (+1).
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 4:00










    • What step am I missing to get to $frac1a + frac1b $?$frac1x + frac1y = fraca + ak + b + kbab(1 + k) iff fraca (1 + k) + b (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b) (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b)ab iff ???$
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 16 at 20:43






    • 7




      @PhilPatterson $frac(a+b)ab$ <-> $fracaab + fracbab$ <-> $frac1b + frac1a$ <-> $frac1a+frac1b$
      – pizzapants184
      Jul 16 at 21:18






    • 2




      @pizzapants184 somehow I forgot that you could split the terms in that way ... amazing how much you can forget 15 years after university ... Thanks for spelling it out for me!
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 17 at 4:28






    • 1




      This was literally the first time in my life using MathJax to create equations ... now that you've said something about it @Mason, I have to assume those double arrows have another meaning and I just used them erroneously. Reflecting on it I picked them because I liked the way they looked ... FWIW
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 19 at 17:37














    up vote
    44
    down vote



    accepted










    Notice that the numerators of the two fractions are equal. It might thus be helpful to consider $frac1x$ and $frac1y$. With this approach, we observe that $$frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$$






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Nicely done (+1).
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 4:00










    • What step am I missing to get to $frac1a + frac1b $?$frac1x + frac1y = fraca + ak + b + kbab(1 + k) iff fraca (1 + k) + b (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b) (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b)ab iff ???$
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 16 at 20:43






    • 7




      @PhilPatterson $frac(a+b)ab$ <-> $fracaab + fracbab$ <-> $frac1b + frac1a$ <-> $frac1a+frac1b$
      – pizzapants184
      Jul 16 at 21:18






    • 2




      @pizzapants184 somehow I forgot that you could split the terms in that way ... amazing how much you can forget 15 years after university ... Thanks for spelling it out for me!
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 17 at 4:28






    • 1




      This was literally the first time in my life using MathJax to create equations ... now that you've said something about it @Mason, I have to assume those double arrows have another meaning and I just used them erroneously. Reflecting on it I picked them because I liked the way they looked ... FWIW
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 19 at 17:37












    up vote
    44
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    44
    down vote



    accepted






    Notice that the numerators of the two fractions are equal. It might thus be helpful to consider $frac1x$ and $frac1y$. With this approach, we observe that $$frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$$






    share|cite|improve this answer













    Notice that the numerators of the two fractions are equal. It might thus be helpful to consider $frac1x$ and $frac1y$. With this approach, we observe that $$frac1x + frac1y = frac1a + frac1b$$







    share|cite|improve this answer













    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer











    answered Jul 16 at 3:55









    iamwhoiam

    1,016612




    1,016612







    • 1




      Nicely done (+1).
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 4:00










    • What step am I missing to get to $frac1a + frac1b $?$frac1x + frac1y = fraca + ak + b + kbab(1 + k) iff fraca (1 + k) + b (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b) (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b)ab iff ???$
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 16 at 20:43






    • 7




      @PhilPatterson $frac(a+b)ab$ <-> $fracaab + fracbab$ <-> $frac1b + frac1a$ <-> $frac1a+frac1b$
      – pizzapants184
      Jul 16 at 21:18






    • 2




      @pizzapants184 somehow I forgot that you could split the terms in that way ... amazing how much you can forget 15 years after university ... Thanks for spelling it out for me!
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 17 at 4:28






    • 1




      This was literally the first time in my life using MathJax to create equations ... now that you've said something about it @Mason, I have to assume those double arrows have another meaning and I just used them erroneously. Reflecting on it I picked them because I liked the way they looked ... FWIW
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 19 at 17:37












    • 1




      Nicely done (+1).
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 4:00










    • What step am I missing to get to $frac1a + frac1b $?$frac1x + frac1y = fraca + ak + b + kbab(1 + k) iff fraca (1 + k) + b (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b) (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b)ab iff ???$
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 16 at 20:43






    • 7




      @PhilPatterson $frac(a+b)ab$ <-> $fracaab + fracbab$ <-> $frac1b + frac1a$ <-> $frac1a+frac1b$
      – pizzapants184
      Jul 16 at 21:18






    • 2




      @pizzapants184 somehow I forgot that you could split the terms in that way ... amazing how much you can forget 15 years after university ... Thanks for spelling it out for me!
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 17 at 4:28






    • 1




      This was literally the first time in my life using MathJax to create equations ... now that you've said something about it @Mason, I have to assume those double arrows have another meaning and I just used them erroneously. Reflecting on it I picked them because I liked the way they looked ... FWIW
      – Phil Patterson
      Jul 19 at 17:37







    1




    1




    Nicely done (+1).
    – dxiv
    Jul 16 at 4:00




    Nicely done (+1).
    – dxiv
    Jul 16 at 4:00












    What step am I missing to get to $frac1a + frac1b $?$frac1x + frac1y = fraca + ak + b + kbab(1 + k) iff fraca (1 + k) + b (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b) (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b)ab iff ???$
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 16 at 20:43




    What step am I missing to get to $frac1a + frac1b $?$frac1x + frac1y = fraca + ak + b + kbab(1 + k) iff fraca (1 + k) + b (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b) (1 + k)ab(1 + k) iff frac(a + b)ab iff ???$
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 16 at 20:43




    7




    7




    @PhilPatterson $frac(a+b)ab$ <-> $fracaab + fracbab$ <-> $frac1b + frac1a$ <-> $frac1a+frac1b$
    – pizzapants184
    Jul 16 at 21:18




    @PhilPatterson $frac(a+b)ab$ <-> $fracaab + fracbab$ <-> $frac1b + frac1a$ <-> $frac1a+frac1b$
    – pizzapants184
    Jul 16 at 21:18




    2




    2




    @pizzapants184 somehow I forgot that you could split the terms in that way ... amazing how much you can forget 15 years after university ... Thanks for spelling it out for me!
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 17 at 4:28




    @pizzapants184 somehow I forgot that you could split the terms in that way ... amazing how much you can forget 15 years after university ... Thanks for spelling it out for me!
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 17 at 4:28




    1




    1




    This was literally the first time in my life using MathJax to create equations ... now that you've said something about it @Mason, I have to assume those double arrows have another meaning and I just used them erroneously. Reflecting on it I picked them because I liked the way they looked ... FWIW
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 19 at 17:37




    This was literally the first time in my life using MathJax to create equations ... now that you've said something about it @Mason, I have to assume those double arrows have another meaning and I just used them erroneously. Reflecting on it I picked them because I liked the way they looked ... FWIW
    – Phil Patterson
    Jul 19 at 17:37










    up vote
    16
    down vote













    Direct elimination doesn't look so hectic in this case:



    $$(b+ka)x=ab(1+k) iff ka(x-b)=b(a-x)iff k = - fracb(x-a)a(x-b)$$



    Doing the same for the second equation then equating eliminates $,k,$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Thanks! But I think that adding $x^-1$ and $y^-1$ and adding them (as mentioned in the comments) is a nice trick here ;-)
      – tatan
      Jul 16 at 3:44










    • @tatan I agree, and will upvote that once posted as an answer ;-)
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 3:47














    up vote
    16
    down vote













    Direct elimination doesn't look so hectic in this case:



    $$(b+ka)x=ab(1+k) iff ka(x-b)=b(a-x)iff k = - fracb(x-a)a(x-b)$$



    Doing the same for the second equation then equating eliminates $,k,$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      Thanks! But I think that adding $x^-1$ and $y^-1$ and adding them (as mentioned in the comments) is a nice trick here ;-)
      – tatan
      Jul 16 at 3:44










    • @tatan I agree, and will upvote that once posted as an answer ;-)
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 3:47












    up vote
    16
    down vote










    up vote
    16
    down vote









    Direct elimination doesn't look so hectic in this case:



    $$(b+ka)x=ab(1+k) iff ka(x-b)=b(a-x)iff k = - fracb(x-a)a(x-b)$$



    Doing the same for the second equation then equating eliminates $,k,$.






    share|cite|improve this answer















    Direct elimination doesn't look so hectic in this case:



    $$(b+ka)x=ab(1+k) iff ka(x-b)=b(a-x)iff k = - fracb(x-a)a(x-b)$$



    Doing the same for the second equation then equating eliminates $,k,$.







    share|cite|improve this answer















    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jul 16 at 3:45


























    answered Jul 16 at 3:41









    dxiv

    54.3k64797




    54.3k64797







    • 1




      Thanks! But I think that adding $x^-1$ and $y^-1$ and adding them (as mentioned in the comments) is a nice trick here ;-)
      – tatan
      Jul 16 at 3:44










    • @tatan I agree, and will upvote that once posted as an answer ;-)
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 3:47












    • 1




      Thanks! But I think that adding $x^-1$ and $y^-1$ and adding them (as mentioned in the comments) is a nice trick here ;-)
      – tatan
      Jul 16 at 3:44










    • @tatan I agree, and will upvote that once posted as an answer ;-)
      – dxiv
      Jul 16 at 3:47







    1




    1




    Thanks! But I think that adding $x^-1$ and $y^-1$ and adding them (as mentioned in the comments) is a nice trick here ;-)
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:44




    Thanks! But I think that adding $x^-1$ and $y^-1$ and adding them (as mentioned in the comments) is a nice trick here ;-)
    – tatan
    Jul 16 at 3:44












    @tatan I agree, and will upvote that once posted as an answer ;-)
    – dxiv
    Jul 16 at 3:47




    @tatan I agree, and will upvote that once posted as an answer ;-)
    – dxiv
    Jul 16 at 3:47










    up vote
    4
    down vote













    Alternatively, note that $$frac xy=fraca+kbb+kaimplies (bx-ay)=k(by-ax)implies k=fracbx-ayby-ax$$ and equate with @dxiv's answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      Alternatively, note that $$frac xy=fraca+kbb+kaimplies (bx-ay)=k(by-ax)implies k=fracbx-ayby-ax$$ and equate with @dxiv's answer.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        Alternatively, note that $$frac xy=fraca+kbb+kaimplies (bx-ay)=k(by-ax)implies k=fracbx-ayby-ax$$ and equate with @dxiv's answer.






        share|cite|improve this answer













        Alternatively, note that $$frac xy=fraca+kbb+kaimplies (bx-ay)=k(by-ax)implies k=fracbx-ayby-ax$$ and equate with @dxiv's answer.







        share|cite|improve this answer













        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer











        answered Jul 16 at 8:24









        TheSimpliFire

        9,70261951




        9,70261951






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2853054%2feasiest-way-to-solve-this-system-of-equations%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Comments

            Popular posts from this blog

            What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

            Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

            Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?