Finding zeros of function by integration: a novel relationship or not?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












It seems that in certain cases one can find the zero of a function by solving an integration problem instead. This surprises me, and I am wondering to what extent this (1) has been studied, and/or (2) is interesting.



For example, consider $f(x) = x^3 +ax -1$. This has a (unique) zero on the positive real axis, $x_0 in mathbb R^+$ (for any value of $a in mathbb R$). I am surprised to find that one can express this zero as follows:
$$ x_0 = frac34a left( 2 - frac1mathcal I right) qquad textrm where qquad mathcal I := frac1pi int_0^infty frac11+(y^2/3-a)^2 ; y^2/3 mathrm d y. $$



I was indeed able to prove this using some unconventional methods (which can be found in a physicist's toolbox). Is the above correspondence surprising to mathematicians?



(By the way, the fact that the $f(x)$ I chose above is a third-order polynomial is a red herring, as I found similar relationships where $f(x)$ contains, for example, logarithms.)







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    You can find the roots of complex function using cauchys integral formula. chebfun.org/examples/roots/ComplexRoots.html It looks like you are doing something similar.
    – RHowe
    Jul 20 at 4:29






  • 2




    If I remember correctly, the roots of higher-degree polynomials ($n>5$) can be expressed via elliptic integrals (they don't have an expression in terms of radicals in general by Abel-Ruffini theorem).
    – lisyarus
    Jul 20 at 17:46














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












It seems that in certain cases one can find the zero of a function by solving an integration problem instead. This surprises me, and I am wondering to what extent this (1) has been studied, and/or (2) is interesting.



For example, consider $f(x) = x^3 +ax -1$. This has a (unique) zero on the positive real axis, $x_0 in mathbb R^+$ (for any value of $a in mathbb R$). I am surprised to find that one can express this zero as follows:
$$ x_0 = frac34a left( 2 - frac1mathcal I right) qquad textrm where qquad mathcal I := frac1pi int_0^infty frac11+(y^2/3-a)^2 ; y^2/3 mathrm d y. $$



I was indeed able to prove this using some unconventional methods (which can be found in a physicist's toolbox). Is the above correspondence surprising to mathematicians?



(By the way, the fact that the $f(x)$ I chose above is a third-order polynomial is a red herring, as I found similar relationships where $f(x)$ contains, for example, logarithms.)







share|cite|improve this question

















  • 1




    You can find the roots of complex function using cauchys integral formula. chebfun.org/examples/roots/ComplexRoots.html It looks like you are doing something similar.
    – RHowe
    Jul 20 at 4:29






  • 2




    If I remember correctly, the roots of higher-degree polynomials ($n>5$) can be expressed via elliptic integrals (they don't have an expression in terms of radicals in general by Abel-Ruffini theorem).
    – lisyarus
    Jul 20 at 17:46












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





It seems that in certain cases one can find the zero of a function by solving an integration problem instead. This surprises me, and I am wondering to what extent this (1) has been studied, and/or (2) is interesting.



For example, consider $f(x) = x^3 +ax -1$. This has a (unique) zero on the positive real axis, $x_0 in mathbb R^+$ (for any value of $a in mathbb R$). I am surprised to find that one can express this zero as follows:
$$ x_0 = frac34a left( 2 - frac1mathcal I right) qquad textrm where qquad mathcal I := frac1pi int_0^infty frac11+(y^2/3-a)^2 ; y^2/3 mathrm d y. $$



I was indeed able to prove this using some unconventional methods (which can be found in a physicist's toolbox). Is the above correspondence surprising to mathematicians?



(By the way, the fact that the $f(x)$ I chose above is a third-order polynomial is a red herring, as I found similar relationships where $f(x)$ contains, for example, logarithms.)







share|cite|improve this question













It seems that in certain cases one can find the zero of a function by solving an integration problem instead. This surprises me, and I am wondering to what extent this (1) has been studied, and/or (2) is interesting.



For example, consider $f(x) = x^3 +ax -1$. This has a (unique) zero on the positive real axis, $x_0 in mathbb R^+$ (for any value of $a in mathbb R$). I am surprised to find that one can express this zero as follows:
$$ x_0 = frac34a left( 2 - frac1mathcal I right) qquad textrm where qquad mathcal I := frac1pi int_0^infty frac11+(y^2/3-a)^2 ; y^2/3 mathrm d y. $$



I was indeed able to prove this using some unconventional methods (which can be found in a physicist's toolbox). Is the above correspondence surprising to mathematicians?



(By the way, the fact that the $f(x)$ I chose above is a third-order polynomial is a red herring, as I found similar relationships where $f(x)$ contains, for example, logarithms.)









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 20 at 17:34
























asked Jul 20 at 4:10









Ruben Verresen

529212




529212







  • 1




    You can find the roots of complex function using cauchys integral formula. chebfun.org/examples/roots/ComplexRoots.html It looks like you are doing something similar.
    – RHowe
    Jul 20 at 4:29






  • 2




    If I remember correctly, the roots of higher-degree polynomials ($n>5$) can be expressed via elliptic integrals (they don't have an expression in terms of radicals in general by Abel-Ruffini theorem).
    – lisyarus
    Jul 20 at 17:46












  • 1




    You can find the roots of complex function using cauchys integral formula. chebfun.org/examples/roots/ComplexRoots.html It looks like you are doing something similar.
    – RHowe
    Jul 20 at 4:29






  • 2




    If I remember correctly, the roots of higher-degree polynomials ($n>5$) can be expressed via elliptic integrals (they don't have an expression in terms of radicals in general by Abel-Ruffini theorem).
    – lisyarus
    Jul 20 at 17:46







1




1




You can find the roots of complex function using cauchys integral formula. chebfun.org/examples/roots/ComplexRoots.html It looks like you are doing something similar.
– RHowe
Jul 20 at 4:29




You can find the roots of complex function using cauchys integral formula. chebfun.org/examples/roots/ComplexRoots.html It looks like you are doing something similar.
– RHowe
Jul 20 at 4:29




2




2




If I remember correctly, the roots of higher-degree polynomials ($n>5$) can be expressed via elliptic integrals (they don't have an expression in terms of radicals in general by Abel-Ruffini theorem).
– lisyarus
Jul 20 at 17:46




If I remember correctly, the roots of higher-degree polynomials ($n>5$) can be expressed via elliptic integrals (they don't have an expression in terms of radicals in general by Abel-Ruffini theorem).
– lisyarus
Jul 20 at 17:46















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857263%2ffinding-zeros-of-function-by-integration-a-novel-relationship-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2857263%2ffinding-zeros-of-function-by-integration-a-novel-relationship-or-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?