Help needed understanding Iterated Limits $lim_nrightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)$ and …

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $a_m,n= fracmm+n.$
Compute the iterated limits $$lim_nrightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)$$ and $$lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn)$$



My attempt at solving the first limit is that if we take $(lim_m rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$, for a fixed value of $n$ it should converge to $1$. And then $lim_nrightarrow infty (1)=1.$ And similary for the the second limit if we take $(lim_n rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$ for a fixed value of m, it converges to $0$ and then $lim_mrightarrow infty(0)=0$.



Query 1: I haven't a good understanding of iterated limits as this is the first time I'm encountering the topic. Is my reasoning correct?



Query 2: Also Stephen Abbott doesn't cover iterated limits in his book but gives it as a difficult last question to a chapter (I'm guessing I'm supposed to struggle with this a while) so are there any other sources/book out there that cover iterated limits for sequences (not integrals)?A simple google search does not help.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • You are correct.
    – RRL
    Jul 23 at 23:51














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $a_m,n= fracmm+n.$
Compute the iterated limits $$lim_nrightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)$$ and $$lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn)$$



My attempt at solving the first limit is that if we take $(lim_m rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$, for a fixed value of $n$ it should converge to $1$. And then $lim_nrightarrow infty (1)=1.$ And similary for the the second limit if we take $(lim_n rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$ for a fixed value of m, it converges to $0$ and then $lim_mrightarrow infty(0)=0$.



Query 1: I haven't a good understanding of iterated limits as this is the first time I'm encountering the topic. Is my reasoning correct?



Query 2: Also Stephen Abbott doesn't cover iterated limits in his book but gives it as a difficult last question to a chapter (I'm guessing I'm supposed to struggle with this a while) so are there any other sources/book out there that cover iterated limits for sequences (not integrals)?A simple google search does not help.







share|cite|improve this question



















  • You are correct.
    – RRL
    Jul 23 at 23:51












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Let $a_m,n= fracmm+n.$
Compute the iterated limits $$lim_nrightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)$$ and $$lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn)$$



My attempt at solving the first limit is that if we take $(lim_m rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$, for a fixed value of $n$ it should converge to $1$. And then $lim_nrightarrow infty (1)=1.$ And similary for the the second limit if we take $(lim_n rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$ for a fixed value of m, it converges to $0$ and then $lim_mrightarrow infty(0)=0$.



Query 1: I haven't a good understanding of iterated limits as this is the first time I'm encountering the topic. Is my reasoning correct?



Query 2: Also Stephen Abbott doesn't cover iterated limits in his book but gives it as a difficult last question to a chapter (I'm guessing I'm supposed to struggle with this a while) so are there any other sources/book out there that cover iterated limits for sequences (not integrals)?A simple google search does not help.







share|cite|improve this question











Let $a_m,n= fracmm+n.$
Compute the iterated limits $$lim_nrightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)$$ and $$lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn)$$



My attempt at solving the first limit is that if we take $(lim_m rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$, for a fixed value of $n$ it should converge to $1$. And then $lim_nrightarrow infty (1)=1.$ And similary for the the second limit if we take $(lim_n rightarrow infty fracmm+n)$ for a fixed value of m, it converges to $0$ and then $lim_mrightarrow infty(0)=0$.



Query 1: I haven't a good understanding of iterated limits as this is the first time I'm encountering the topic. Is my reasoning correct?



Query 2: Also Stephen Abbott doesn't cover iterated limits in his book but gives it as a difficult last question to a chapter (I'm guessing I'm supposed to struggle with this a while) so are there any other sources/book out there that cover iterated limits for sequences (not integrals)?A simple google search does not help.









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 23 at 23:37









Red

1,747733




1,747733











  • You are correct.
    – RRL
    Jul 23 at 23:51
















  • You are correct.
    – RRL
    Jul 23 at 23:51















You are correct.
– RRL
Jul 23 at 23:51




You are correct.
– RRL
Jul 23 at 23:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










There is a general theory that considers iterated limits in relation to double limits and, among other things, explains under what conditions



$$tag*A=lim_n,m to infty a_mn = lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn) = lim_n.rightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)
$$



The general double limit is $A$ if for every $epsilon > 0$ there exists a positive integer $N$ such that if $n,m > N$, then $|a_mn - A| < epsilon$.



For example, if the double limit $lim_n,m to inftya_mn$ exists and each of the single limits $lim_n to infty a_mn$ and $lim_m to infty a_mn$ exist for all $m$ in the first case and all $n$ in the second case, then (*) holds.



A good reference is The Elements of Real Analysis (2nd edition) by Bartle.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • See The Moore-Osgood Theorem.
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 24 at 2:41










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860872%2fhelp-needed-understanding-iterated-limits-lim-n-rightarrow-infty-lim-m-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










There is a general theory that considers iterated limits in relation to double limits and, among other things, explains under what conditions



$$tag*A=lim_n,m to infty a_mn = lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn) = lim_n.rightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)
$$



The general double limit is $A$ if for every $epsilon > 0$ there exists a positive integer $N$ such that if $n,m > N$, then $|a_mn - A| < epsilon$.



For example, if the double limit $lim_n,m to inftya_mn$ exists and each of the single limits $lim_n to infty a_mn$ and $lim_m to infty a_mn$ exist for all $m$ in the first case and all $n$ in the second case, then (*) holds.



A good reference is The Elements of Real Analysis (2nd edition) by Bartle.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • See The Moore-Osgood Theorem.
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 24 at 2:41














up vote
3
down vote



accepted










There is a general theory that considers iterated limits in relation to double limits and, among other things, explains under what conditions



$$tag*A=lim_n,m to infty a_mn = lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn) = lim_n.rightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)
$$



The general double limit is $A$ if for every $epsilon > 0$ there exists a positive integer $N$ such that if $n,m > N$, then $|a_mn - A| < epsilon$.



For example, if the double limit $lim_n,m to inftya_mn$ exists and each of the single limits $lim_n to infty a_mn$ and $lim_m to infty a_mn$ exist for all $m$ in the first case and all $n$ in the second case, then (*) holds.



A good reference is The Elements of Real Analysis (2nd edition) by Bartle.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • See The Moore-Osgood Theorem.
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 24 at 2:41












up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






There is a general theory that considers iterated limits in relation to double limits and, among other things, explains under what conditions



$$tag*A=lim_n,m to infty a_mn = lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn) = lim_n.rightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)
$$



The general double limit is $A$ if for every $epsilon > 0$ there exists a positive integer $N$ such that if $n,m > N$, then $|a_mn - A| < epsilon$.



For example, if the double limit $lim_n,m to inftya_mn$ exists and each of the single limits $lim_n to infty a_mn$ and $lim_m to infty a_mn$ exist for all $m$ in the first case and all $n$ in the second case, then (*) holds.



A good reference is The Elements of Real Analysis (2nd edition) by Bartle.






share|cite|improve this answer















There is a general theory that considers iterated limits in relation to double limits and, among other things, explains under what conditions



$$tag*A=lim_n,m to infty a_mn = lim_mrightarrow infty(lim_n rightarrow infty a_mn) = lim_n.rightarrow infty(lim_m rightarrow infty a_mn)
$$



The general double limit is $A$ if for every $epsilon > 0$ there exists a positive integer $N$ such that if $n,m > N$, then $|a_mn - A| < epsilon$.



For example, if the double limit $lim_n,m to inftya_mn$ exists and each of the single limits $lim_n to infty a_mn$ and $lim_m to infty a_mn$ exist for all $m$ in the first case and all $n$ in the second case, then (*) holds.



A good reference is The Elements of Real Analysis (2nd edition) by Bartle.







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jul 24 at 1:46


























answered Jul 23 at 23:51









RRL

43.6k42260




43.6k42260











  • See The Moore-Osgood Theorem.
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 24 at 2:41
















  • See The Moore-Osgood Theorem.
    – Mark Viola
    Jul 24 at 2:41















See The Moore-Osgood Theorem.
– Mark Viola
Jul 24 at 2:41




See The Moore-Osgood Theorem.
– Mark Viola
Jul 24 at 2:41












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860872%2fhelp-needed-understanding-iterated-limits-lim-n-rightarrow-infty-lim-m-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?