Relatively compactness of uniformly limited measures in variation w.r.t. weak convergence

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












Let $f_n(x).dx$ be measures with density wrt Lebesgue measure, $f_n$ derivable, $f_n rightarrow f$ in uniform norm; $ n rightarrow infty$.



Assume that they are uniformly limited in variation, i.e. $exists M: int |Df_n|(dx)<M forall n$, where $Df$ is the distributional derivative of $f$.



This means $forall phi in C_c^1(mathbbR^n), int f(x)fracdelta phidelta x_i (x)dx=intphi(x)(D_i f)(dx)$.



Than there is a subsuccession $f_k_n n in mathbbN$ such that $f_k_n(x).dx$ converges weakly. How can i show it?



Original De Giorgi paper says it's an "easy" consequence of a theorem of de La Vallee Poussin.



Notice that i have very few confidence with this field, so please try to be as detailed as possible.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • The notions of Lebesgue measure, distributional derivative, and weak convergence are themselves not "elementary," so I'm not sure how you expect an answer to this question to be such.
    – Math1000
    Jul 23 at 22:09










  • You are right, i need answers to be detailful, with all implications needed, or with references.
    – Andro
    Jul 23 at 22:20














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












Let $f_n(x).dx$ be measures with density wrt Lebesgue measure, $f_n$ derivable, $f_n rightarrow f$ in uniform norm; $ n rightarrow infty$.



Assume that they are uniformly limited in variation, i.e. $exists M: int |Df_n|(dx)<M forall n$, where $Df$ is the distributional derivative of $f$.



This means $forall phi in C_c^1(mathbbR^n), int f(x)fracdelta phidelta x_i (x)dx=intphi(x)(D_i f)(dx)$.



Than there is a subsuccession $f_k_n n in mathbbN$ such that $f_k_n(x).dx$ converges weakly. How can i show it?



Original De Giorgi paper says it's an "easy" consequence of a theorem of de La Vallee Poussin.



Notice that i have very few confidence with this field, so please try to be as detailed as possible.







share|cite|improve this question





















  • The notions of Lebesgue measure, distributional derivative, and weak convergence are themselves not "elementary," so I'm not sure how you expect an answer to this question to be such.
    – Math1000
    Jul 23 at 22:09










  • You are right, i need answers to be detailful, with all implications needed, or with references.
    – Andro
    Jul 23 at 22:20












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2






2





Let $f_n(x).dx$ be measures with density wrt Lebesgue measure, $f_n$ derivable, $f_n rightarrow f$ in uniform norm; $ n rightarrow infty$.



Assume that they are uniformly limited in variation, i.e. $exists M: int |Df_n|(dx)<M forall n$, where $Df$ is the distributional derivative of $f$.



This means $forall phi in C_c^1(mathbbR^n), int f(x)fracdelta phidelta x_i (x)dx=intphi(x)(D_i f)(dx)$.



Than there is a subsuccession $f_k_n n in mathbbN$ such that $f_k_n(x).dx$ converges weakly. How can i show it?



Original De Giorgi paper says it's an "easy" consequence of a theorem of de La Vallee Poussin.



Notice that i have very few confidence with this field, so please try to be as detailed as possible.







share|cite|improve this question













Let $f_n(x).dx$ be measures with density wrt Lebesgue measure, $f_n$ derivable, $f_n rightarrow f$ in uniform norm; $ n rightarrow infty$.



Assume that they are uniformly limited in variation, i.e. $exists M: int |Df_n|(dx)<M forall n$, where $Df$ is the distributional derivative of $f$.



This means $forall phi in C_c^1(mathbbR^n), int f(x)fracdelta phidelta x_i (x)dx=intphi(x)(D_i f)(dx)$.



Than there is a subsuccession $f_k_n n in mathbbN$ such that $f_k_n(x).dx$ converges weakly. How can i show it?



Original De Giorgi paper says it's an "easy" consequence of a theorem of de La Vallee Poussin.



Notice that i have very few confidence with this field, so please try to be as detailed as possible.









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 23 at 22:23
























asked Jul 23 at 21:09









Andro

787




787











  • The notions of Lebesgue measure, distributional derivative, and weak convergence are themselves not "elementary," so I'm not sure how you expect an answer to this question to be such.
    – Math1000
    Jul 23 at 22:09










  • You are right, i need answers to be detailful, with all implications needed, or with references.
    – Andro
    Jul 23 at 22:20
















  • The notions of Lebesgue measure, distributional derivative, and weak convergence are themselves not "elementary," so I'm not sure how you expect an answer to this question to be such.
    – Math1000
    Jul 23 at 22:09










  • You are right, i need answers to be detailful, with all implications needed, or with references.
    – Andro
    Jul 23 at 22:20















The notions of Lebesgue measure, distributional derivative, and weak convergence are themselves not "elementary," so I'm not sure how you expect an answer to this question to be such.
– Math1000
Jul 23 at 22:09




The notions of Lebesgue measure, distributional derivative, and weak convergence are themselves not "elementary," so I'm not sure how you expect an answer to this question to be such.
– Math1000
Jul 23 at 22:09












You are right, i need answers to be detailful, with all implications needed, or with references.
– Andro
Jul 23 at 22:20




You are right, i need answers to be detailful, with all implications needed, or with references.
– Andro
Jul 23 at 22:20















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860782%2frelatively-compactness-of-uniformly-limited-measures-in-variation-w-r-t-weak-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest



































active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860782%2frelatively-compactness-of-uniformly-limited-measures-in-variation-w-r-t-weak-co%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon