Using polynomial $x^n+ax+b=0$ and proving an equation

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












If $ a_1$, $ a_2$, $ a_3$,..., $ a_n$ are roots of the equation $x^n+ax+b=0$, then prove that $( a_1- a_2)( a_1- a_3)( a_1- a_4)..( a_1- a_n)=n a_1^n-1+a$.



By taking n=3 and using the roots 2,4 &-6 i am able to prove the answer but not able to do via substitution.







share|cite|improve this question























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    If $ a_1$, $ a_2$, $ a_3$,..., $ a_n$ are roots of the equation $x^n+ax+b=0$, then prove that $( a_1- a_2)( a_1- a_3)( a_1- a_4)..( a_1- a_n)=n a_1^n-1+a$.



    By taking n=3 and using the roots 2,4 &-6 i am able to prove the answer but not able to do via substitution.







    share|cite|improve this question





















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      If $ a_1$, $ a_2$, $ a_3$,..., $ a_n$ are roots of the equation $x^n+ax+b=0$, then prove that $( a_1- a_2)( a_1- a_3)( a_1- a_4)..( a_1- a_n)=n a_1^n-1+a$.



      By taking n=3 and using the roots 2,4 &-6 i am able to prove the answer but not able to do via substitution.







      share|cite|improve this question











      If $ a_1$, $ a_2$, $ a_3$,..., $ a_n$ are roots of the equation $x^n+ax+b=0$, then prove that $( a_1- a_2)( a_1- a_3)( a_1- a_4)..( a_1- a_n)=n a_1^n-1+a$.



      By taking n=3 and using the roots 2,4 &-6 i am able to prove the answer but not able to do via substitution.









      share|cite|improve this question










      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question









      asked Jul 24 at 1:55









      Samar Imam Zaidi

      1,063316




      1,063316




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          Since $a_1 ldots a_n$ are roots of $x^n + ax + b$, then
          $$x^n + ax + b = (x-a_1)ldots(x-a_n)$$
          Derive both sides w.r.t $x$ you get:
          beginequation
          beginsplit
          nx^n-1 + a
          &= (x-a_2)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
          &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
          &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n) \
          &+ vdots \
          & + (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n-1)
          endsplit
          endequation
          Plug $x = a_1$ on both sides you get
          beginequation
          beginsplit
          na_1^n-1 + a
          &= (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
          &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
          &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
          &+ vdots \
          & + (a_1-a_1)(a_1-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n-1)
          endsplit
          endequation
          Notice that all terms from the second to the last rows above are zeros due to $a_1-a_1$, hence we get
          $$na_1^n-1 + a = (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer




























            up vote
            4
            down vote













            If you are using $a$ as a coefficient, then using $a_j$ for a typical
            root is not a good choice of notation.



            You might want to observe that if $f(x)=x^n+ax+b$, then $f'(x)=
            nx^n-1+a$, so your RHS is $f'(a_1)$. Is that significant?






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • I copied this question as it appear in question paper, i used roots and then it worked but not able to rove it
              – Samar Imam Zaidi
              Jul 24 at 2:01










            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860931%2fusing-polynomial-xnaxb-0-and-proving-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            Since $a_1 ldots a_n$ are roots of $x^n + ax + b$, then
            $$x^n + ax + b = (x-a_1)ldots(x-a_n)$$
            Derive both sides w.r.t $x$ you get:
            beginequation
            beginsplit
            nx^n-1 + a
            &= (x-a_2)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
            &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
            &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n) \
            &+ vdots \
            & + (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n-1)
            endsplit
            endequation
            Plug $x = a_1$ on both sides you get
            beginequation
            beginsplit
            na_1^n-1 + a
            &= (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
            &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
            &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
            &+ vdots \
            & + (a_1-a_1)(a_1-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n-1)
            endsplit
            endequation
            Notice that all terms from the second to the last rows above are zeros due to $a_1-a_1$, hence we get
            $$na_1^n-1 + a = (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              Since $a_1 ldots a_n$ are roots of $x^n + ax + b$, then
              $$x^n + ax + b = (x-a_1)ldots(x-a_n)$$
              Derive both sides w.r.t $x$ you get:
              beginequation
              beginsplit
              nx^n-1 + a
              &= (x-a_2)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
              &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
              &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n) \
              &+ vdots \
              & + (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n-1)
              endsplit
              endequation
              Plug $x = a_1$ on both sides you get
              beginequation
              beginsplit
              na_1^n-1 + a
              &= (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
              &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
              &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
              &+ vdots \
              & + (a_1-a_1)(a_1-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n-1)
              endsplit
              endequation
              Notice that all terms from the second to the last rows above are zeros due to $a_1-a_1$, hence we get
              $$na_1^n-1 + a = (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted






                Since $a_1 ldots a_n$ are roots of $x^n + ax + b$, then
                $$x^n + ax + b = (x-a_1)ldots(x-a_n)$$
                Derive both sides w.r.t $x$ you get:
                beginequation
                beginsplit
                nx^n-1 + a
                &= (x-a_2)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
                &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
                &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n) \
                &+ vdots \
                & + (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n-1)
                endsplit
                endequation
                Plug $x = a_1$ on both sides you get
                beginequation
                beginsplit
                na_1^n-1 + a
                &= (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
                &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
                &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
                &+ vdots \
                & + (a_1-a_1)(a_1-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n-1)
                endsplit
                endequation
                Notice that all terms from the second to the last rows above are zeros due to $a_1-a_1$, hence we get
                $$na_1^n-1 + a = (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer













                Since $a_1 ldots a_n$ are roots of $x^n + ax + b$, then
                $$x^n + ax + b = (x-a_1)ldots(x-a_n)$$
                Derive both sides w.r.t $x$ you get:
                beginequation
                beginsplit
                nx^n-1 + a
                &= (x-a_2)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
                &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(x-a_n) \
                &+ (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n) \
                &+ vdots \
                & + (x-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(x-a_n-1)
                endsplit
                endequation
                Plug $x = a_1$ on both sides you get
                beginequation
                beginsplit
                na_1^n-1 + a
                &= (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
                &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
                &+ (a_1-a_1)(x-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n) \
                &+ vdots \
                & + (a_1-a_1)(a_1-a_2)ldots(a_1-a_n-1)
                endsplit
                endequation
                Notice that all terms from the second to the last rows above are zeros due to $a_1-a_1$, hence we get
                $$na_1^n-1 + a = (a_1-a_2)(a_1-a_3)ldots(a_1-a_n)$$







                share|cite|improve this answer













                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer











                answered Jul 24 at 2:06









                Ahmad Bazzi

                2,6271417




                2,6271417




















                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    If you are using $a$ as a coefficient, then using $a_j$ for a typical
                    root is not a good choice of notation.



                    You might want to observe that if $f(x)=x^n+ax+b$, then $f'(x)=
                    nx^n-1+a$, so your RHS is $f'(a_1)$. Is that significant?






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I copied this question as it appear in question paper, i used roots and then it worked but not able to rove it
                      – Samar Imam Zaidi
                      Jul 24 at 2:01














                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote













                    If you are using $a$ as a coefficient, then using $a_j$ for a typical
                    root is not a good choice of notation.



                    You might want to observe that if $f(x)=x^n+ax+b$, then $f'(x)=
                    nx^n-1+a$, so your RHS is $f'(a_1)$. Is that significant?






                    share|cite|improve this answer





















                    • I copied this question as it appear in question paper, i used roots and then it worked but not able to rove it
                      – Samar Imam Zaidi
                      Jul 24 at 2:01












                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote









                    If you are using $a$ as a coefficient, then using $a_j$ for a typical
                    root is not a good choice of notation.



                    You might want to observe that if $f(x)=x^n+ax+b$, then $f'(x)=
                    nx^n-1+a$, so your RHS is $f'(a_1)$. Is that significant?






                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    If you are using $a$ as a coefficient, then using $a_j$ for a typical
                    root is not a good choice of notation.



                    You might want to observe that if $f(x)=x^n+ax+b$, then $f'(x)=
                    nx^n-1+a$, so your RHS is $f'(a_1)$. Is that significant?







                    share|cite|improve this answer













                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    answered Jul 24 at 1:59









                    Lord Shark the Unknown

                    85.2k950111




                    85.2k950111











                    • I copied this question as it appear in question paper, i used roots and then it worked but not able to rove it
                      – Samar Imam Zaidi
                      Jul 24 at 2:01
















                    • I copied this question as it appear in question paper, i used roots and then it worked but not able to rove it
                      – Samar Imam Zaidi
                      Jul 24 at 2:01















                    I copied this question as it appear in question paper, i used roots and then it worked but not able to rove it
                    – Samar Imam Zaidi
                    Jul 24 at 2:01




                    I copied this question as it appear in question paper, i used roots and then it worked but not able to rove it
                    – Samar Imam Zaidi
                    Jul 24 at 2:01












                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860931%2fusing-polynomial-xnaxb-0-and-proving-an-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Comments

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                    Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

                    Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?