On concave distance metrics.

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












We know that the most Euclidean distance metric is convex due $f''(x) = 2 > 0$ where $f(x) = |x|^2$. Also because norms are convex.
However, $|x|^a$ where a is $0 le a le 1$ is strictly concave. Several works in the literature [1], [2], [3] show that Euclidean distance is probably not a good distance metric in high dimensionality due to several reasons.
So, is it possible that there exists a concave function that can effectively capture the distance between two vectors when they are in the same embedding space much more efficiently than its convex counterpart?

Also, is it possible that combination of both convex and concave functions can be a better approach to accurately computing distance than if used individually?
Fractional distance metrics do not satisfy the triangle inequality, does this affect their optimization?



[1] https://bib.dbvis.de/uploadedFiles/155.pdf

[2] https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~pedrod/papers/cacm12.pdf

[3] https://members.loria.fr/MOBerger/Enseignement/Master2/Exposes/beyer.pdf







share|cite|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    We know that the most Euclidean distance metric is convex due $f''(x) = 2 > 0$ where $f(x) = |x|^2$. Also because norms are convex.
    However, $|x|^a$ where a is $0 le a le 1$ is strictly concave. Several works in the literature [1], [2], [3] show that Euclidean distance is probably not a good distance metric in high dimensionality due to several reasons.
    So, is it possible that there exists a concave function that can effectively capture the distance between two vectors when they are in the same embedding space much more efficiently than its convex counterpart?

    Also, is it possible that combination of both convex and concave functions can be a better approach to accurately computing distance than if used individually?
    Fractional distance metrics do not satisfy the triangle inequality, does this affect their optimization?



    [1] https://bib.dbvis.de/uploadedFiles/155.pdf

    [2] https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~pedrod/papers/cacm12.pdf

    [3] https://members.loria.fr/MOBerger/Enseignement/Master2/Exposes/beyer.pdf







    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      We know that the most Euclidean distance metric is convex due $f''(x) = 2 > 0$ where $f(x) = |x|^2$. Also because norms are convex.
      However, $|x|^a$ where a is $0 le a le 1$ is strictly concave. Several works in the literature [1], [2], [3] show that Euclidean distance is probably not a good distance metric in high dimensionality due to several reasons.
      So, is it possible that there exists a concave function that can effectively capture the distance between two vectors when they are in the same embedding space much more efficiently than its convex counterpart?

      Also, is it possible that combination of both convex and concave functions can be a better approach to accurately computing distance than if used individually?
      Fractional distance metrics do not satisfy the triangle inequality, does this affect their optimization?



      [1] https://bib.dbvis.de/uploadedFiles/155.pdf

      [2] https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~pedrod/papers/cacm12.pdf

      [3] https://members.loria.fr/MOBerger/Enseignement/Master2/Exposes/beyer.pdf







      share|cite|improve this question













      We know that the most Euclidean distance metric is convex due $f''(x) = 2 > 0$ where $f(x) = |x|^2$. Also because norms are convex.
      However, $|x|^a$ where a is $0 le a le 1$ is strictly concave. Several works in the literature [1], [2], [3] show that Euclidean distance is probably not a good distance metric in high dimensionality due to several reasons.
      So, is it possible that there exists a concave function that can effectively capture the distance between two vectors when they are in the same embedding space much more efficiently than its convex counterpart?

      Also, is it possible that combination of both convex and concave functions can be a better approach to accurately computing distance than if used individually?
      Fractional distance metrics do not satisfy the triangle inequality, does this affect their optimization?



      [1] https://bib.dbvis.de/uploadedFiles/155.pdf

      [2] https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~pedrod/papers/cacm12.pdf

      [3] https://members.loria.fr/MOBerger/Enseignement/Master2/Exposes/beyer.pdf









      share|cite|improve this question












      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jul 23 at 23:36









      Michael Hardy

      204k23186462




      204k23186462









      asked Jul 23 at 21:59









      Kamran Janjua

      43




      43

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer




          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860818%2fon-concave-distance-metrics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest



































          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes










           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860818%2fon-concave-distance-metrics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Comments

          Popular posts from this blog

          What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

          Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

          Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?