Simplifying the division of integrals

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is there a way to simplify this division of integrals, or at least find a bound for it, without writing it in terms of CDF of Beta?



I tried to use the idea here but didn't have much luck.



$$fracint_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 ;dxint_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 ; dx$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Are ther any restrictions for $l$ and $u$? Because if $l=0$ and $u=1$ you could rewrite this fraction using Beta or Gamma functions. Or, without these conditions, maybe in terms of the incomplete Beta function. I have asked similiar question by myself and I would be interested in an answer too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 22:14







  • 1




    @mrtaurho $l >0$ and $u < 1$.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 22:19










  • Doesn't the identity $$int_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 , dx=int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 , dx-int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b , dx$$, and that the integrals are all positive, imply that the division of the above integrals is bounded between 0 and 1?
    – James Arathoon
    Jul 24 at 23:59














up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Is there a way to simplify this division of integrals, or at least find a bound for it, without writing it in terms of CDF of Beta?



I tried to use the idea here but didn't have much luck.



$$fracint_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 ;dxint_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 ; dx$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Are ther any restrictions for $l$ and $u$? Because if $l=0$ and $u=1$ you could rewrite this fraction using Beta or Gamma functions. Or, without these conditions, maybe in terms of the incomplete Beta function. I have asked similiar question by myself and I would be interested in an answer too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 22:14







  • 1




    @mrtaurho $l >0$ and $u < 1$.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 22:19










  • Doesn't the identity $$int_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 , dx=int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 , dx-int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b , dx$$, and that the integrals are all positive, imply that the division of the above integrals is bounded between 0 and 1?
    – James Arathoon
    Jul 24 at 23:59












up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Is there a way to simplify this division of integrals, or at least find a bound for it, without writing it in terms of CDF of Beta?



I tried to use the idea here but didn't have much luck.



$$fracint_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 ;dxint_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 ; dx$$







share|cite|improve this question













Is there a way to simplify this division of integrals, or at least find a bound for it, without writing it in terms of CDF of Beta?



I tried to use the idea here but didn't have much luck.



$$fracint_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 ;dxint_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 ; dx$$









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 24 at 22:37
























asked Jul 23 at 22:08









mathlover

416




416











  • Are ther any restrictions for $l$ and $u$? Because if $l=0$ and $u=1$ you could rewrite this fraction using Beta or Gamma functions. Or, without these conditions, maybe in terms of the incomplete Beta function. I have asked similiar question by myself and I would be interested in an answer too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 22:14







  • 1




    @mrtaurho $l >0$ and $u < 1$.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 22:19










  • Doesn't the identity $$int_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 , dx=int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 , dx-int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b , dx$$, and that the integrals are all positive, imply that the division of the above integrals is bounded between 0 and 1?
    – James Arathoon
    Jul 24 at 23:59
















  • Are ther any restrictions for $l$ and $u$? Because if $l=0$ and $u=1$ you could rewrite this fraction using Beta or Gamma functions. Or, without these conditions, maybe in terms of the incomplete Beta function. I have asked similiar question by myself and I would be interested in an answer too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 22:14







  • 1




    @mrtaurho $l >0$ and $u < 1$.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 22:19










  • Doesn't the identity $$int_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 , dx=int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 , dx-int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b , dx$$, and that the integrals are all positive, imply that the division of the above integrals is bounded between 0 and 1?
    – James Arathoon
    Jul 24 at 23:59















Are ther any restrictions for $l$ and $u$? Because if $l=0$ and $u=1$ you could rewrite this fraction using Beta or Gamma functions. Or, without these conditions, maybe in terms of the incomplete Beta function. I have asked similiar question by myself and I would be interested in an answer too.
– mrtaurho
Jul 23 at 22:14





Are ther any restrictions for $l$ and $u$? Because if $l=0$ and $u=1$ you could rewrite this fraction using Beta or Gamma functions. Or, without these conditions, maybe in terms of the incomplete Beta function. I have asked similiar question by myself and I would be interested in an answer too.
– mrtaurho
Jul 23 at 22:14





1




1




@mrtaurho $l >0$ and $u < 1$.
– mathlover
Jul 23 at 22:19




@mrtaurho $l >0$ and $u < 1$.
– mathlover
Jul 23 at 22:19












Doesn't the identity $$int_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 , dx=int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 , dx-int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b , dx$$, and that the integrals are all positive, imply that the division of the above integrals is bounded between 0 and 1?
– James Arathoon
Jul 24 at 23:59




Doesn't the identity $$int_l^u x^a (1-x)^b-1 , dx=int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b-1 , dx-int_l^u x^a-1 (1-x)^b , dx$$, and that the integrals are all positive, imply that the division of the above integrals is bounded between 0 and 1?
– James Arathoon
Jul 24 at 23:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













I would try it as follows:



$$int_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



$$int_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



With the incomplete Beta function



$$B(x; a,b)~=~ int_0^x x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



The fraction would become



$$beginalignfracint_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~&=~fracint_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx\~&=~fracB(u;a+1,b)-B(l;a+1,b)B(u;a,b)-B(l;a,b)endalign$$



First of all I am not sure if this is even possible to do so in this way and on the other hand I am not sure if this helps.



I do not know another way without the incomplete Beta function.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks. I was aware of this way of derivation(I mentioned in the question without using CDF of beta). I'm interested in another way without using the incomplete beta.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 23:31










  • I just realized it afterwards. I am not familiar with another of simplification but as I already mentioned I would be interested in one too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 23:34










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860823%2fsimplifying-the-division-of-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote













I would try it as follows:



$$int_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



$$int_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



With the incomplete Beta function



$$B(x; a,b)~=~ int_0^x x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



The fraction would become



$$beginalignfracint_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~&=~fracint_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx\~&=~fracB(u;a+1,b)-B(l;a+1,b)B(u;a,b)-B(l;a,b)endalign$$



First of all I am not sure if this is even possible to do so in this way and on the other hand I am not sure if this helps.



I do not know another way without the incomplete Beta function.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks. I was aware of this way of derivation(I mentioned in the question without using CDF of beta). I'm interested in another way without using the incomplete beta.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 23:31










  • I just realized it afterwards. I am not familiar with another of simplification but as I already mentioned I would be interested in one too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 23:34














up vote
1
down vote













I would try it as follows:



$$int_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



$$int_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



With the incomplete Beta function



$$B(x; a,b)~=~ int_0^x x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



The fraction would become



$$beginalignfracint_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~&=~fracint_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx\~&=~fracB(u;a+1,b)-B(l;a+1,b)B(u;a,b)-B(l;a,b)endalign$$



First of all I am not sure if this is even possible to do so in this way and on the other hand I am not sure if this helps.



I do not know another way without the incomplete Beta function.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks. I was aware of this way of derivation(I mentioned in the question without using CDF of beta). I'm interested in another way without using the incomplete beta.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 23:31










  • I just realized it afterwards. I am not familiar with another of simplification but as I already mentioned I would be interested in one too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 23:34












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









I would try it as follows:



$$int_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



$$int_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



With the incomplete Beta function



$$B(x; a,b)~=~ int_0^x x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



The fraction would become



$$beginalignfracint_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~&=~fracint_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx\~&=~fracB(u;a+1,b)-B(l;a+1,b)B(u;a,b)-B(l;a,b)endalign$$



First of all I am not sure if this is even possible to do so in this way and on the other hand I am not sure if this helps.



I do not know another way without the incomplete Beta function.






share|cite|improve this answer













I would try it as follows:



$$int_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



$$int_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~=~int_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



With the incomplete Beta function



$$B(x; a,b)~=~ int_0^x x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx$$



The fraction would become



$$beginalignfracint_l^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_l^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~&=~fracint_0^u x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a(1-x)^b-1mathrmdxint_0^u x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx~-~int_0^l x^a-1(1-x)^b-1mathrmdx\~&=~fracB(u;a+1,b)-B(l;a+1,b)B(u;a,b)-B(l;a,b)endalign$$



First of all I am not sure if this is even possible to do so in this way and on the other hand I am not sure if this helps.



I do not know another way without the incomplete Beta function.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 23 at 22:27









mrtaurho

750219




750219











  • Thanks. I was aware of this way of derivation(I mentioned in the question without using CDF of beta). I'm interested in another way without using the incomplete beta.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 23:31










  • I just realized it afterwards. I am not familiar with another of simplification but as I already mentioned I would be interested in one too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 23:34
















  • Thanks. I was aware of this way of derivation(I mentioned in the question without using CDF of beta). I'm interested in another way without using the incomplete beta.
    – mathlover
    Jul 23 at 23:31










  • I just realized it afterwards. I am not familiar with another of simplification but as I already mentioned I would be interested in one too.
    – mrtaurho
    Jul 23 at 23:34















Thanks. I was aware of this way of derivation(I mentioned in the question without using CDF of beta). I'm interested in another way without using the incomplete beta.
– mathlover
Jul 23 at 23:31




Thanks. I was aware of this way of derivation(I mentioned in the question without using CDF of beta). I'm interested in another way without using the incomplete beta.
– mathlover
Jul 23 at 23:31












I just realized it afterwards. I am not familiar with another of simplification but as I already mentioned I would be interested in one too.
– mrtaurho
Jul 23 at 23:34




I just realized it afterwards. I am not familiar with another of simplification but as I already mentioned I would be interested in one too.
– mrtaurho
Jul 23 at 23:34












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860823%2fsimplifying-the-division-of-integrals%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?