Integration for Advanced Learners [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Proving $int_0^infty mathrme^-x^2 dx = fracsqrt pi2$

    19 answers



I am a Young leaner of Mathematics in the university and I found this problem a bit challenging et me.



Please can someone help me integrate



$$int_-infty^infty e^-x^-2 dx$$
Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question













marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, user 108128, Batominovski, Mark Viola, Jack D'Aurizio♦ definite-integrals
Users with the  definite-integrals badge can single-handedly close definite-integrals questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Jul 29 at 21:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • @Sobi this is actually quite challenging for a beginner...
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • I tried to use integration by part. But it never finishes. Then when I applied the limits, it turns to pi
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • @JordanFondja this integral doesn't converge actually. If you plot the integrand out, you will notice that $e^-x^-2to1$ as $xtopminfty$ so the area under the graph till infinity can't be found.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:23










  • @KarnWatcharasupat I am well aware of that. Just wanted to see how he thinks.
    – Sobi
    Jul 29 at 13:23







  • 2




    @KarnWatcharasupat No. It is x To the power -2
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:42














up vote
0
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Proving $int_0^infty mathrme^-x^2 dx = fracsqrt pi2$

    19 answers



I am a Young leaner of Mathematics in the university and I found this problem a bit challenging et me.



Please can someone help me integrate



$$int_-infty^infty e^-x^-2 dx$$
Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question













marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, user 108128, Batominovski, Mark Viola, Jack D'Aurizio♦ definite-integrals
Users with the  definite-integrals badge can single-handedly close definite-integrals questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Jul 29 at 21:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • @Sobi this is actually quite challenging for a beginner...
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • I tried to use integration by part. But it never finishes. Then when I applied the limits, it turns to pi
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • @JordanFondja this integral doesn't converge actually. If you plot the integrand out, you will notice that $e^-x^-2to1$ as $xtopminfty$ so the area under the graph till infinity can't be found.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:23










  • @KarnWatcharasupat I am well aware of that. Just wanted to see how he thinks.
    – Sobi
    Jul 29 at 13:23







  • 2




    @KarnWatcharasupat No. It is x To the power -2
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:42












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • Proving $int_0^infty mathrme^-x^2 dx = fracsqrt pi2$

    19 answers



I am a Young leaner of Mathematics in the university and I found this problem a bit challenging et me.



Please can someone help me integrate



$$int_-infty^infty e^-x^-2 dx$$
Thanks.







share|cite|improve this question














This question already has an answer here:



  • Proving $int_0^infty mathrme^-x^2 dx = fracsqrt pi2$

    19 answers



I am a Young leaner of Mathematics in the university and I found this problem a bit challenging et me.



Please can someone help me integrate



$$int_-infty^infty e^-x^-2 dx$$
Thanks.





This question already has an answer here:



  • Proving $int_0^infty mathrme^-x^2 dx = fracsqrt pi2$

    19 answers









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 31 at 9:48
























asked Jul 29 at 13:17









Jordan Fondja

11




11




marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, user 108128, Batominovski, Mark Viola, Jack D'Aurizio♦ definite-integrals
Users with the  definite-integrals badge can single-handedly close definite-integrals questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Jul 29 at 21:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Hans Lundmark, user 108128, Batominovski, Mark Viola, Jack D'Aurizio♦ definite-integrals
Users with the  definite-integrals badge can single-handedly close definite-integrals questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Jul 29 at 21:12


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • @Sobi this is actually quite challenging for a beginner...
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • I tried to use integration by part. But it never finishes. Then when I applied the limits, it turns to pi
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • @JordanFondja this integral doesn't converge actually. If you plot the integrand out, you will notice that $e^-x^-2to1$ as $xtopminfty$ so the area under the graph till infinity can't be found.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:23










  • @KarnWatcharasupat I am well aware of that. Just wanted to see how he thinks.
    – Sobi
    Jul 29 at 13:23







  • 2




    @KarnWatcharasupat No. It is x To the power -2
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:42
















  • @Sobi this is actually quite challenging for a beginner...
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • I tried to use integration by part. But it never finishes. Then when I applied the limits, it turns to pi
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:20










  • @JordanFondja this integral doesn't converge actually. If you plot the integrand out, you will notice that $e^-x^-2to1$ as $xtopminfty$ so the area under the graph till infinity can't be found.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:23










  • @KarnWatcharasupat I am well aware of that. Just wanted to see how he thinks.
    – Sobi
    Jul 29 at 13:23







  • 2




    @KarnWatcharasupat No. It is x To the power -2
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:42















@Sobi this is actually quite challenging for a beginner...
– Karn Watcharasupat
Jul 29 at 13:20




@Sobi this is actually quite challenging for a beginner...
– Karn Watcharasupat
Jul 29 at 13:20












I tried to use integration by part. But it never finishes. Then when I applied the limits, it turns to pi
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:20




I tried to use integration by part. But it never finishes. Then when I applied the limits, it turns to pi
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:20












@JordanFondja this integral doesn't converge actually. If you plot the integrand out, you will notice that $e^-x^-2to1$ as $xtopminfty$ so the area under the graph till infinity can't be found.
– Karn Watcharasupat
Jul 29 at 13:23




@JordanFondja this integral doesn't converge actually. If you plot the integrand out, you will notice that $e^-x^-2to1$ as $xtopminfty$ so the area under the graph till infinity can't be found.
– Karn Watcharasupat
Jul 29 at 13:23












@KarnWatcharasupat I am well aware of that. Just wanted to see how he thinks.
– Sobi
Jul 29 at 13:23





@KarnWatcharasupat I am well aware of that. Just wanted to see how he thinks.
– Sobi
Jul 29 at 13:23





2




2




@KarnWatcharasupat No. It is x To the power -2
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:42




@KarnWatcharasupat No. It is x To the power -2
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













You probably want $-x^2$, and not $-x^-2$, because in the latter case the integral does not converge.



There is no known way to calculate this integral directly. The indirect method involves moving one dimension upwards, and looking at the double integral



$$int_-infty^inftyint_-infty^inftye^-x^2-y^2,dx,dy$$



Using some non-trivial theory, it is possible to show that this integral is precisely the square of the integral you are looking for, on one hand, and on the other hand, using some non-trivial theory of coordinate-transformations, it is possible to calculate this double integral directly, by showing that it is equal to the integral
$$2piint_0^inftyre^-r^2,dr$$
which can actually be easily computed, as the integrand is the derivative of $-e^-r^2/2$.



But you need to know a few things in order to get there. Don't waste time on trying to compute it directly. It is probably impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I'm loss. As you said i've to know few things before I reach there.
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:37










  • @JordanFondja yeah it's really a very difficult integral to handle. You can google 'Gaussian integrals'.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:38










  • @KarnWatcharasupat Ok. Thanks
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:40






  • 2




    From what author said, it's $e^x^-2$, not $e^-x^2$...
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 29 at 14:07

















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













You probably want $-x^2$, and not $-x^-2$, because in the latter case the integral does not converge.



There is no known way to calculate this integral directly. The indirect method involves moving one dimension upwards, and looking at the double integral



$$int_-infty^inftyint_-infty^inftye^-x^2-y^2,dx,dy$$



Using some non-trivial theory, it is possible to show that this integral is precisely the square of the integral you are looking for, on one hand, and on the other hand, using some non-trivial theory of coordinate-transformations, it is possible to calculate this double integral directly, by showing that it is equal to the integral
$$2piint_0^inftyre^-r^2,dr$$
which can actually be easily computed, as the integrand is the derivative of $-e^-r^2/2$.



But you need to know a few things in order to get there. Don't waste time on trying to compute it directly. It is probably impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I'm loss. As you said i've to know few things before I reach there.
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:37










  • @JordanFondja yeah it's really a very difficult integral to handle. You can google 'Gaussian integrals'.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:38










  • @KarnWatcharasupat Ok. Thanks
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:40






  • 2




    From what author said, it's $e^x^-2$, not $e^-x^2$...
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 29 at 14:07














up vote
2
down vote













You probably want $-x^2$, and not $-x^-2$, because in the latter case the integral does not converge.



There is no known way to calculate this integral directly. The indirect method involves moving one dimension upwards, and looking at the double integral



$$int_-infty^inftyint_-infty^inftye^-x^2-y^2,dx,dy$$



Using some non-trivial theory, it is possible to show that this integral is precisely the square of the integral you are looking for, on one hand, and on the other hand, using some non-trivial theory of coordinate-transformations, it is possible to calculate this double integral directly, by showing that it is equal to the integral
$$2piint_0^inftyre^-r^2,dr$$
which can actually be easily computed, as the integrand is the derivative of $-e^-r^2/2$.



But you need to know a few things in order to get there. Don't waste time on trying to compute it directly. It is probably impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • I'm loss. As you said i've to know few things before I reach there.
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:37










  • @JordanFondja yeah it's really a very difficult integral to handle. You can google 'Gaussian integrals'.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:38










  • @KarnWatcharasupat Ok. Thanks
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:40






  • 2




    From what author said, it's $e^x^-2$, not $e^-x^2$...
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 29 at 14:07












up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









You probably want $-x^2$, and not $-x^-2$, because in the latter case the integral does not converge.



There is no known way to calculate this integral directly. The indirect method involves moving one dimension upwards, and looking at the double integral



$$int_-infty^inftyint_-infty^inftye^-x^2-y^2,dx,dy$$



Using some non-trivial theory, it is possible to show that this integral is precisely the square of the integral you are looking for, on one hand, and on the other hand, using some non-trivial theory of coordinate-transformations, it is possible to calculate this double integral directly, by showing that it is equal to the integral
$$2piint_0^inftyre^-r^2,dr$$
which can actually be easily computed, as the integrand is the derivative of $-e^-r^2/2$.



But you need to know a few things in order to get there. Don't waste time on trying to compute it directly. It is probably impossible.






share|cite|improve this answer













You probably want $-x^2$, and not $-x^-2$, because in the latter case the integral does not converge.



There is no known way to calculate this integral directly. The indirect method involves moving one dimension upwards, and looking at the double integral



$$int_-infty^inftyint_-infty^inftye^-x^2-y^2,dx,dy$$



Using some non-trivial theory, it is possible to show that this integral is precisely the square of the integral you are looking for, on one hand, and on the other hand, using some non-trivial theory of coordinate-transformations, it is possible to calculate this double integral directly, by showing that it is equal to the integral
$$2piint_0^inftyre^-r^2,dr$$
which can actually be easily computed, as the integrand is the derivative of $-e^-r^2/2$.



But you need to know a few things in order to get there. Don't waste time on trying to compute it directly. It is probably impossible.







share|cite|improve this answer













share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer











answered Jul 29 at 13:27









uniquesolution

7,536721




7,536721











  • I'm loss. As you said i've to know few things before I reach there.
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:37










  • @JordanFondja yeah it's really a very difficult integral to handle. You can google 'Gaussian integrals'.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:38










  • @KarnWatcharasupat Ok. Thanks
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:40






  • 2




    From what author said, it's $e^x^-2$, not $e^-x^2$...
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 29 at 14:07
















  • I'm loss. As you said i've to know few things before I reach there.
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:37










  • @JordanFondja yeah it's really a very difficult integral to handle. You can google 'Gaussian integrals'.
    – Karn Watcharasupat
    Jul 29 at 13:38










  • @KarnWatcharasupat Ok. Thanks
    – Jordan Fondja
    Jul 29 at 13:40






  • 2




    From what author said, it's $e^x^-2$, not $e^-x^2$...
    – Rumpelstiltskin
    Jul 29 at 14:07















I'm loss. As you said i've to know few things before I reach there.
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:37




I'm loss. As you said i've to know few things before I reach there.
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:37












@JordanFondja yeah it's really a very difficult integral to handle. You can google 'Gaussian integrals'.
– Karn Watcharasupat
Jul 29 at 13:38




@JordanFondja yeah it's really a very difficult integral to handle. You can google 'Gaussian integrals'.
– Karn Watcharasupat
Jul 29 at 13:38












@KarnWatcharasupat Ok. Thanks
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:40




@KarnWatcharasupat Ok. Thanks
– Jordan Fondja
Jul 29 at 13:40




2




2




From what author said, it's $e^x^-2$, not $e^-x^2$...
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 29 at 14:07




From what author said, it's $e^x^-2$, not $e^-x^2$...
– Rumpelstiltskin
Jul 29 at 14:07


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?