Limit point of the closed set $[0,1]$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to understand the concept of limit point in general.



For the open set $(0,1)$, earlier discussions on stackexchange showed that all point in the open set $(0,1)$ is a limit point. Similarly, we can say the same about the closed set $[0,1]$, right ?. For every point $x$ in the set $[0,1]$, we can find $epsilon$ neighborhood ($V_epsilon$) such that $V_epsilon(x) cap A neq emptyset,x$.



If the above comment is true, anyone can give an example of a continuous set containing isolated points ?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • If by "continuous set" you mean an interval, the only possibility is a singleton $ a $.
    – Crostul
    Jul 18 at 20:19






  • 1




    Yes it's true. Continuous set is unfortunately a little bit ambiguous. But if I understood well, indeed, set as $[a,b]$ has no isolated point. But if you take the discrete topology and $xin [0,1]$, then $[0,1]capx, -3=x$ and thus $x$ is an isolated point of $[0,1]$
    – Peter
    Jul 18 at 20:21






  • 1




    You need to show that for every $varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $x$, $V_varepsilon(x) cap A$ is contains a point in $A setminus x$, not that there is one. But indeed all $xin [0,1]$ are limit points.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Jul 18 at 21:33










  • /= $emptyset$,x is a misunderstanding
    – William Elliot
    Jul 19 at 2:46







  • 1




    As an intersection of A and an open set will never have the empty set as a member, your statement is always true. You are misusing set notation. Not subset of x is correct. @Shew
    – William Elliot
    Jul 20 at 8:09














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am trying to understand the concept of limit point in general.



For the open set $(0,1)$, earlier discussions on stackexchange showed that all point in the open set $(0,1)$ is a limit point. Similarly, we can say the same about the closed set $[0,1]$, right ?. For every point $x$ in the set $[0,1]$, we can find $epsilon$ neighborhood ($V_epsilon$) such that $V_epsilon(x) cap A neq emptyset,x$.



If the above comment is true, anyone can give an example of a continuous set containing isolated points ?







share|cite|improve this question



















  • If by "continuous set" you mean an interval, the only possibility is a singleton $ a $.
    – Crostul
    Jul 18 at 20:19






  • 1




    Yes it's true. Continuous set is unfortunately a little bit ambiguous. But if I understood well, indeed, set as $[a,b]$ has no isolated point. But if you take the discrete topology and $xin [0,1]$, then $[0,1]capx, -3=x$ and thus $x$ is an isolated point of $[0,1]$
    – Peter
    Jul 18 at 20:21






  • 1




    You need to show that for every $varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $x$, $V_varepsilon(x) cap A$ is contains a point in $A setminus x$, not that there is one. But indeed all $xin [0,1]$ are limit points.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Jul 18 at 21:33










  • /= $emptyset$,x is a misunderstanding
    – William Elliot
    Jul 19 at 2:46







  • 1




    As an intersection of A and an open set will never have the empty set as a member, your statement is always true. You are misusing set notation. Not subset of x is correct. @Shew
    – William Elliot
    Jul 20 at 8:09












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I am trying to understand the concept of limit point in general.



For the open set $(0,1)$, earlier discussions on stackexchange showed that all point in the open set $(0,1)$ is a limit point. Similarly, we can say the same about the closed set $[0,1]$, right ?. For every point $x$ in the set $[0,1]$, we can find $epsilon$ neighborhood ($V_epsilon$) such that $V_epsilon(x) cap A neq emptyset,x$.



If the above comment is true, anyone can give an example of a continuous set containing isolated points ?







share|cite|improve this question











I am trying to understand the concept of limit point in general.



For the open set $(0,1)$, earlier discussions on stackexchange showed that all point in the open set $(0,1)$ is a limit point. Similarly, we can say the same about the closed set $[0,1]$, right ?. For every point $x$ in the set $[0,1]$, we can find $epsilon$ neighborhood ($V_epsilon$) such that $V_epsilon(x) cap A neq emptyset,x$.



If the above comment is true, anyone can give an example of a continuous set containing isolated points ?









share|cite|improve this question










share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question









asked Jul 18 at 20:15









Shew

454411




454411











  • If by "continuous set" you mean an interval, the only possibility is a singleton $ a $.
    – Crostul
    Jul 18 at 20:19






  • 1




    Yes it's true. Continuous set is unfortunately a little bit ambiguous. But if I understood well, indeed, set as $[a,b]$ has no isolated point. But if you take the discrete topology and $xin [0,1]$, then $[0,1]capx, -3=x$ and thus $x$ is an isolated point of $[0,1]$
    – Peter
    Jul 18 at 20:21






  • 1




    You need to show that for every $varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $x$, $V_varepsilon(x) cap A$ is contains a point in $A setminus x$, not that there is one. But indeed all $xin [0,1]$ are limit points.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Jul 18 at 21:33










  • /= $emptyset$,x is a misunderstanding
    – William Elliot
    Jul 19 at 2:46







  • 1




    As an intersection of A and an open set will never have the empty set as a member, your statement is always true. You are misusing set notation. Not subset of x is correct. @Shew
    – William Elliot
    Jul 20 at 8:09
















  • If by "continuous set" you mean an interval, the only possibility is a singleton $ a $.
    – Crostul
    Jul 18 at 20:19






  • 1




    Yes it's true. Continuous set is unfortunately a little bit ambiguous. But if I understood well, indeed, set as $[a,b]$ has no isolated point. But if you take the discrete topology and $xin [0,1]$, then $[0,1]capx, -3=x$ and thus $x$ is an isolated point of $[0,1]$
    – Peter
    Jul 18 at 20:21






  • 1




    You need to show that for every $varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $x$, $V_varepsilon(x) cap A$ is contains a point in $A setminus x$, not that there is one. But indeed all $xin [0,1]$ are limit points.
    – Henno Brandsma
    Jul 18 at 21:33










  • /= $emptyset$,x is a misunderstanding
    – William Elliot
    Jul 19 at 2:46







  • 1




    As an intersection of A and an open set will never have the empty set as a member, your statement is always true. You are misusing set notation. Not subset of x is correct. @Shew
    – William Elliot
    Jul 20 at 8:09















If by "continuous set" you mean an interval, the only possibility is a singleton $ a $.
– Crostul
Jul 18 at 20:19




If by "continuous set" you mean an interval, the only possibility is a singleton $ a $.
– Crostul
Jul 18 at 20:19




1




1




Yes it's true. Continuous set is unfortunately a little bit ambiguous. But if I understood well, indeed, set as $[a,b]$ has no isolated point. But if you take the discrete topology and $xin [0,1]$, then $[0,1]capx, -3=x$ and thus $x$ is an isolated point of $[0,1]$
– Peter
Jul 18 at 20:21




Yes it's true. Continuous set is unfortunately a little bit ambiguous. But if I understood well, indeed, set as $[a,b]$ has no isolated point. But if you take the discrete topology and $xin [0,1]$, then $[0,1]capx, -3=x$ and thus $x$ is an isolated point of $[0,1]$
– Peter
Jul 18 at 20:21




1




1




You need to show that for every $varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $x$, $V_varepsilon(x) cap A$ is contains a point in $A setminus x$, not that there is one. But indeed all $xin [0,1]$ are limit points.
– Henno Brandsma
Jul 18 at 21:33




You need to show that for every $varepsilon$-neighbourhood of $x$, $V_varepsilon(x) cap A$ is contains a point in $A setminus x$, not that there is one. But indeed all $xin [0,1]$ are limit points.
– Henno Brandsma
Jul 18 at 21:33












/= $emptyset$,x is a misunderstanding
– William Elliot
Jul 19 at 2:46





/= $emptyset$,x is a misunderstanding
– William Elliot
Jul 19 at 2:46





1




1




As an intersection of A and an open set will never have the empty set as a member, your statement is always true. You are misusing set notation. Not subset of x is correct. @Shew
– William Elliot
Jul 20 at 8:09




As an intersection of A and an open set will never have the empty set as a member, your statement is always true. You are misusing set notation. Not subset of x is correct. @Shew
– William Elliot
Jul 20 at 8:09










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













By "continuous", I think you mean connected. But a connected set might not have all of its limit points.



Here's an example. Consider the set $(0,1)$. It is true that every point in the set is a limit point. For example, let's look at the point $1/2$. Is this a limit point? To be a limit point, we need to create a sequence of points in the set that approach this point. The Sequence $1/2, 1/2, 1/2, ...$ is such a set of points.



What about the point $0$? Is $0$ a limit point of this set? It is! Consider the sequence $1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, ...$ This sequence is getting closer and closer to the point $0$, and no point in this sequence will ever leave the set $(0,1)$. Therefore, the set $(0,1)$ does not contain all its limit points.



Any set that contains all of its limit points is called a "closed" set. So $(0,1)$ is not a compact set. But $[0,1]$ is.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • A set that contains all it's limit points is closed, but not necessarily compact; for example, $[0,infty)$ contains all it's limit points but is not compact.
    – User8128
    Jul 18 at 20:57










  • @User8128 Thank you for correcting my mistake.
    – NicNic8
    Jul 18 at 20:58










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855955%2flimit-point-of-the-closed-set-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













By "continuous", I think you mean connected. But a connected set might not have all of its limit points.



Here's an example. Consider the set $(0,1)$. It is true that every point in the set is a limit point. For example, let's look at the point $1/2$. Is this a limit point? To be a limit point, we need to create a sequence of points in the set that approach this point. The Sequence $1/2, 1/2, 1/2, ...$ is such a set of points.



What about the point $0$? Is $0$ a limit point of this set? It is! Consider the sequence $1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, ...$ This sequence is getting closer and closer to the point $0$, and no point in this sequence will ever leave the set $(0,1)$. Therefore, the set $(0,1)$ does not contain all its limit points.



Any set that contains all of its limit points is called a "closed" set. So $(0,1)$ is not a compact set. But $[0,1]$ is.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • A set that contains all it's limit points is closed, but not necessarily compact; for example, $[0,infty)$ contains all it's limit points but is not compact.
    – User8128
    Jul 18 at 20:57










  • @User8128 Thank you for correcting my mistake.
    – NicNic8
    Jul 18 at 20:58














up vote
0
down vote













By "continuous", I think you mean connected. But a connected set might not have all of its limit points.



Here's an example. Consider the set $(0,1)$. It is true that every point in the set is a limit point. For example, let's look at the point $1/2$. Is this a limit point? To be a limit point, we need to create a sequence of points in the set that approach this point. The Sequence $1/2, 1/2, 1/2, ...$ is such a set of points.



What about the point $0$? Is $0$ a limit point of this set? It is! Consider the sequence $1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, ...$ This sequence is getting closer and closer to the point $0$, and no point in this sequence will ever leave the set $(0,1)$. Therefore, the set $(0,1)$ does not contain all its limit points.



Any set that contains all of its limit points is called a "closed" set. So $(0,1)$ is not a compact set. But $[0,1]$ is.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • A set that contains all it's limit points is closed, but not necessarily compact; for example, $[0,infty)$ contains all it's limit points but is not compact.
    – User8128
    Jul 18 at 20:57










  • @User8128 Thank you for correcting my mistake.
    – NicNic8
    Jul 18 at 20:58












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









By "continuous", I think you mean connected. But a connected set might not have all of its limit points.



Here's an example. Consider the set $(0,1)$. It is true that every point in the set is a limit point. For example, let's look at the point $1/2$. Is this a limit point? To be a limit point, we need to create a sequence of points in the set that approach this point. The Sequence $1/2, 1/2, 1/2, ...$ is such a set of points.



What about the point $0$? Is $0$ a limit point of this set? It is! Consider the sequence $1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, ...$ This sequence is getting closer and closer to the point $0$, and no point in this sequence will ever leave the set $(0,1)$. Therefore, the set $(0,1)$ does not contain all its limit points.



Any set that contains all of its limit points is called a "closed" set. So $(0,1)$ is not a compact set. But $[0,1]$ is.






share|cite|improve this answer















By "continuous", I think you mean connected. But a connected set might not have all of its limit points.



Here's an example. Consider the set $(0,1)$. It is true that every point in the set is a limit point. For example, let's look at the point $1/2$. Is this a limit point? To be a limit point, we need to create a sequence of points in the set that approach this point. The Sequence $1/2, 1/2, 1/2, ...$ is such a set of points.



What about the point $0$? Is $0$ a limit point of this set? It is! Consider the sequence $1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, 1/32, ...$ This sequence is getting closer and closer to the point $0$, and no point in this sequence will ever leave the set $(0,1)$. Therefore, the set $(0,1)$ does not contain all its limit points.



Any set that contains all of its limit points is called a "closed" set. So $(0,1)$ is not a compact set. But $[0,1]$ is.







share|cite|improve this answer















share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jul 18 at 20:58


























answered Jul 18 at 20:50









NicNic8

3,7113922




3,7113922











  • A set that contains all it's limit points is closed, but not necessarily compact; for example, $[0,infty)$ contains all it's limit points but is not compact.
    – User8128
    Jul 18 at 20:57










  • @User8128 Thank you for correcting my mistake.
    – NicNic8
    Jul 18 at 20:58
















  • A set that contains all it's limit points is closed, but not necessarily compact; for example, $[0,infty)$ contains all it's limit points but is not compact.
    – User8128
    Jul 18 at 20:57










  • @User8128 Thank you for correcting my mistake.
    – NicNic8
    Jul 18 at 20:58















A set that contains all it's limit points is closed, but not necessarily compact; for example, $[0,infty)$ contains all it's limit points but is not compact.
– User8128
Jul 18 at 20:57




A set that contains all it's limit points is closed, but not necessarily compact; for example, $[0,infty)$ contains all it's limit points but is not compact.
– User8128
Jul 18 at 20:57












@User8128 Thank you for correcting my mistake.
– NicNic8
Jul 18 at 20:58




@User8128 Thank you for correcting my mistake.
– NicNic8
Jul 18 at 20:58












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2855955%2flimit-point-of-the-closed-set-0-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon

Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?