Proving a limit for a fraction

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $rin (0,1)$. How can I prove



$$lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r=0?$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Since you're taking a limit as $varepsilonto0$, you don't "choose" $varepsilon$.
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:01










  • You are right. I am sorry. I wanted to fix r, not epsilon.
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Have you made any attempts on the problem?
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Try l'Hopital's rule
    – Green.H
    Jul 19 at 16:03






  • 2




    Yes, l'Hopital doesn't help
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:10















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Let $rin (0,1)$. How can I prove



$$lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r=0?$$







share|cite|improve this question





















  • Since you're taking a limit as $varepsilonto0$, you don't "choose" $varepsilon$.
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:01










  • You are right. I am sorry. I wanted to fix r, not epsilon.
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Have you made any attempts on the problem?
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Try l'Hopital's rule
    – Green.H
    Jul 19 at 16:03






  • 2




    Yes, l'Hopital doesn't help
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:10













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Let $rin (0,1)$. How can I prove



$$lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r=0?$$







share|cite|improve this question













Let $rin (0,1)$. How can I prove



$$lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r=0?$$









share|cite|improve this question












share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jul 19 at 16:00









Clayton

17.9k22882




17.9k22882









asked Jul 19 at 15:59









Dai Jinaid

194




194











  • Since you're taking a limit as $varepsilonto0$, you don't "choose" $varepsilon$.
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:01










  • You are right. I am sorry. I wanted to fix r, not epsilon.
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Have you made any attempts on the problem?
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Try l'Hopital's rule
    – Green.H
    Jul 19 at 16:03






  • 2




    Yes, l'Hopital doesn't help
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:10

















  • Since you're taking a limit as $varepsilonto0$, you don't "choose" $varepsilon$.
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:01










  • You are right. I am sorry. I wanted to fix r, not epsilon.
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Have you made any attempts on the problem?
    – Clayton
    Jul 19 at 16:03










  • Try l'Hopital's rule
    – Green.H
    Jul 19 at 16:03






  • 2




    Yes, l'Hopital doesn't help
    – Dai Jinaid
    Jul 19 at 16:10
















Since you're taking a limit as $varepsilonto0$, you don't "choose" $varepsilon$.
– Clayton
Jul 19 at 16:01




Since you're taking a limit as $varepsilonto0$, you don't "choose" $varepsilon$.
– Clayton
Jul 19 at 16:01












You are right. I am sorry. I wanted to fix r, not epsilon.
– Dai Jinaid
Jul 19 at 16:03




You are right. I am sorry. I wanted to fix r, not epsilon.
– Dai Jinaid
Jul 19 at 16:03












Have you made any attempts on the problem?
– Clayton
Jul 19 at 16:03




Have you made any attempts on the problem?
– Clayton
Jul 19 at 16:03












Try l'Hopital's rule
– Green.H
Jul 19 at 16:03




Try l'Hopital's rule
– Green.H
Jul 19 at 16:03




2




2




Yes, l'Hopital doesn't help
– Dai Jinaid
Jul 19 at 16:10





Yes, l'Hopital doesn't help
– Dai Jinaid
Jul 19 at 16:10











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













By L'Hospital, twice,



$$frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2rtofrac(1+epsilon)^r-1-(1-epsilon)^r-12epsilon^2r-1tofracr-12r-1frac(1+epsilon)^r-2+(1-epsilon)^r-22epsilon^2r-2
\tofracr-12r-1epsilon^2-2rto0.$$






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The numerator is a smooth, even function so that by Taylor it is



    $$aepsilon^2+o(epsilon^2)$$



    which decays faster than $epsilon^2r$.



    (More precisely $a=r(r-1)$, but this is unimportant.)






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      With the definition of derivative:
      beginalign
      lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r
      &=left(lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r-1epsilon + lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1-epsilon)^r-1epsilonright)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
      &=left(((1+epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0 + ((1-epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0right)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
      &=2rtimes0\
      &=0
      endalign
      only valid for $r<dfrac12$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























      • Shouldn't it be 1-2r instead of 2-2r?
        – Dai Jinaid
        Jul 19 at 16:20










      • Unfortunately yes!
        – Nosrati
        Jul 19 at 16:23










      • Apparently it is true for all r in (0,1)
        – Dai Jinaid
        Jul 19 at 16:23

















      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Use series expansion at $x=0$
      beginalign
      (1+x)^r &= sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk\
      (1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2 & =sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk + sum_k=0^infty (-x)^kbinomrk -2 \
      &=2sum_k=1^infty x^2kbinomr2k\
      frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r&=2sum_k=1^infty x^2k-2rbinomr2k
      endalign
      Since $rin (0,1)$, $2rin (0,2)$ and $2k-2r >0$ $forall kgeq 1$ so
      $$
      lim_xto 0frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r = 0
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer




        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: false,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );








         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2856777%2fproving-a-limit-for-a-fraction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest






























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        1
        down vote













        By L'Hospital, twice,



        $$frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2rtofrac(1+epsilon)^r-1-(1-epsilon)^r-12epsilon^2r-1tofracr-12r-1frac(1+epsilon)^r-2+(1-epsilon)^r-22epsilon^2r-2
        \tofracr-12r-1epsilon^2-2rto0.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer



























          up vote
          1
          down vote













          By L'Hospital, twice,



          $$frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2rtofrac(1+epsilon)^r-1-(1-epsilon)^r-12epsilon^2r-1tofracr-12r-1frac(1+epsilon)^r-2+(1-epsilon)^r-22epsilon^2r-2
          \tofracr-12r-1epsilon^2-2rto0.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer

























            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            By L'Hospital, twice,



            $$frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2rtofrac(1+epsilon)^r-1-(1-epsilon)^r-12epsilon^2r-1tofracr-12r-1frac(1+epsilon)^r-2+(1-epsilon)^r-22epsilon^2r-2
            \tofracr-12r-1epsilon^2-2rto0.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer















            By L'Hospital, twice,



            $$frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2rtofrac(1+epsilon)^r-1-(1-epsilon)^r-12epsilon^2r-1tofracr-12r-1frac(1+epsilon)^r-2+(1-epsilon)^r-22epsilon^2r-2
            \tofracr-12r-1epsilon^2-2rto0.$$







            share|cite|improve this answer















            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jul 19 at 16:32


























            answered Jul 19 at 16:27









            Yves Daoust

            111k665204




            111k665204




















                up vote
                1
                down vote













                The numerator is a smooth, even function so that by Taylor it is



                $$aepsilon^2+o(epsilon^2)$$



                which decays faster than $epsilon^2r$.



                (More precisely $a=r(r-1)$, but this is unimportant.)






                share|cite|improve this answer



























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote













                  The numerator is a smooth, even function so that by Taylor it is



                  $$aepsilon^2+o(epsilon^2)$$



                  which decays faster than $epsilon^2r$.



                  (More precisely $a=r(r-1)$, but this is unimportant.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    The numerator is a smooth, even function so that by Taylor it is



                    $$aepsilon^2+o(epsilon^2)$$



                    which decays faster than $epsilon^2r$.



                    (More precisely $a=r(r-1)$, but this is unimportant.)






                    share|cite|improve this answer















                    The numerator is a smooth, even function so that by Taylor it is



                    $$aepsilon^2+o(epsilon^2)$$



                    which decays faster than $epsilon^2r$.



                    (More precisely $a=r(r-1)$, but this is unimportant.)







                    share|cite|improve this answer















                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Jul 19 at 16:49


























                    answered Jul 19 at 16:40









                    Yves Daoust

                    111k665204




                    111k665204




















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        With the definition of derivative:
                        beginalign
                        lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r
                        &=left(lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r-1epsilon + lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1-epsilon)^r-1epsilonright)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=left(((1+epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0 + ((1-epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0right)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=2rtimes0\
                        &=0
                        endalign
                        only valid for $r<dfrac12$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                        • Shouldn't it be 1-2r instead of 2-2r?
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:20










                        • Unfortunately yes!
                          – Nosrati
                          Jul 19 at 16:23










                        • Apparently it is true for all r in (0,1)
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:23














                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        With the definition of derivative:
                        beginalign
                        lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r
                        &=left(lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r-1epsilon + lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1-epsilon)^r-1epsilonright)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=left(((1+epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0 + ((1-epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0right)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=2rtimes0\
                        &=0
                        endalign
                        only valid for $r<dfrac12$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer























                        • Shouldn't it be 1-2r instead of 2-2r?
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:20










                        • Unfortunately yes!
                          – Nosrati
                          Jul 19 at 16:23










                        • Apparently it is true for all r in (0,1)
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:23












                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote










                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote









                        With the definition of derivative:
                        beginalign
                        lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r
                        &=left(lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r-1epsilon + lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1-epsilon)^r-1epsilonright)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=left(((1+epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0 + ((1-epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0right)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=2rtimes0\
                        &=0
                        endalign
                        only valid for $r<dfrac12$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer















                        With the definition of derivative:
                        beginalign
                        lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r+(1-epsilon)^r-2epsilon^2r
                        &=left(lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1+epsilon)^r-1epsilon + lim_epsilonrightarrow 0frac(1-epsilon)^r-1epsilonright)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=left(((1+epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0 + ((1-epsilon)^r)'Big|_epsilon=0right)lim_epsilonrightarrow 0epsilon^1-2r\
                        &=2rtimes0\
                        &=0
                        endalign
                        only valid for $r<dfrac12$.







                        share|cite|improve this answer















                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited Jul 19 at 16:20


























                        answered Jul 19 at 16:16









                        Nosrati

                        19.6k41544




                        19.6k41544











                        • Shouldn't it be 1-2r instead of 2-2r?
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:20










                        • Unfortunately yes!
                          – Nosrati
                          Jul 19 at 16:23










                        • Apparently it is true for all r in (0,1)
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:23
















                        • Shouldn't it be 1-2r instead of 2-2r?
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:20










                        • Unfortunately yes!
                          – Nosrati
                          Jul 19 at 16:23










                        • Apparently it is true for all r in (0,1)
                          – Dai Jinaid
                          Jul 19 at 16:23















                        Shouldn't it be 1-2r instead of 2-2r?
                        – Dai Jinaid
                        Jul 19 at 16:20




                        Shouldn't it be 1-2r instead of 2-2r?
                        – Dai Jinaid
                        Jul 19 at 16:20












                        Unfortunately yes!
                        – Nosrati
                        Jul 19 at 16:23




                        Unfortunately yes!
                        – Nosrati
                        Jul 19 at 16:23












                        Apparently it is true for all r in (0,1)
                        – Dai Jinaid
                        Jul 19 at 16:23




                        Apparently it is true for all r in (0,1)
                        – Dai Jinaid
                        Jul 19 at 16:23










                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Use series expansion at $x=0$
                        beginalign
                        (1+x)^r &= sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk\
                        (1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2 & =sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk + sum_k=0^infty (-x)^kbinomrk -2 \
                        &=2sum_k=1^infty x^2kbinomr2k\
                        frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r&=2sum_k=1^infty x^2k-2rbinomr2k
                        endalign
                        Since $rin (0,1)$, $2rin (0,2)$ and $2k-2r >0$ $forall kgeq 1$ so
                        $$
                        lim_xto 0frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r = 0
                        $$






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          Use series expansion at $x=0$
                          beginalign
                          (1+x)^r &= sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk\
                          (1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2 & =sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk + sum_k=0^infty (-x)^kbinomrk -2 \
                          &=2sum_k=1^infty x^2kbinomr2k\
                          frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r&=2sum_k=1^infty x^2k-2rbinomr2k
                          endalign
                          Since $rin (0,1)$, $2rin (0,2)$ and $2k-2r >0$ $forall kgeq 1$ so
                          $$
                          lim_xto 0frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r = 0
                          $$






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            Use series expansion at $x=0$
                            beginalign
                            (1+x)^r &= sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk\
                            (1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2 & =sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk + sum_k=0^infty (-x)^kbinomrk -2 \
                            &=2sum_k=1^infty x^2kbinomr2k\
                            frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r&=2sum_k=1^infty x^2k-2rbinomr2k
                            endalign
                            Since $rin (0,1)$, $2rin (0,2)$ and $2k-2r >0$ $forall kgeq 1$ so
                            $$
                            lim_xto 0frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r = 0
                            $$






                            share|cite|improve this answer













                            Use series expansion at $x=0$
                            beginalign
                            (1+x)^r &= sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk\
                            (1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2 & =sum_k=0^infty x^kbinomrk + sum_k=0^infty (-x)^kbinomrk -2 \
                            &=2sum_k=1^infty x^2kbinomr2k\
                            frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r&=2sum_k=1^infty x^2k-2rbinomr2k
                            endalign
                            Since $rin (0,1)$, $2rin (0,2)$ and $2k-2r >0$ $forall kgeq 1$ so
                            $$
                            lim_xto 0frac(1+x)^r+(1-x)^r-2x^2r = 0
                            $$







                            share|cite|improve this answer













                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer











                            answered Jul 19 at 16:23









                            Rafael Gonzalez Lopez

                            652112




                            652112






















                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded


























                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2856777%2fproving-a-limit-for-a-fraction%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest













































































                                Comments

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                What is the equation of a 3D cone with generalised tilt?

                                Relationship between determinant of matrix and determinant of adjoint?

                                Color the edges and diagonals of a regular polygon