To show: Galois group of a polynomial is not an alternating group .
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have a polynomial of this type: $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$ in $F_q(a)[t]$, where a=(a_0,...,a_m)$ are specialization.
I could show that this polynomial is doubly transitive, by making $a_0=0$ (specialization technique for irreducibility and assumptions on f and g).
Now I need to show that the discriminant of this polynomial is not a square. Here I do not know how to proceed. Could any one please help me
polynomials galois-theory discriminant
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have a polynomial of this type: $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$ in $F_q(a)[t]$, where a=(a_0,...,a_m)$ are specialization.
I could show that this polynomial is doubly transitive, by making $a_0=0$ (specialization technique for irreducibility and assumptions on f and g).
Now I need to show that the discriminant of this polynomial is not a square. Here I do not know how to proceed. Could any one please help me
polynomials galois-theory discriminant
1
It may be my limitation and lack of exposure to specializations, but why couldn't you get an alternating group here? Say, if $p(t)$ is a cubic, irreducible over $BbbF_q$, and $ell(t)=0$. Then the splitting field is $BbbF_q^3(a)$ and the Galois group is cyclic of order three, i.e. $A_3$. It is also easy make $A_2$ appear - make your polynomial a reducible quadratic. I know I'm nitpicking, but...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jul 24 at 4:21
so your polynomial can be any polynomial in $Bbb F_q(a)[t]$ ?
– mercio
Jul 24 at 7:32
@JyrkiLahtonen, I thought the polynomial $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$, is linear in $F(a,t)$. (By taking this polynomial as a polynomial in $a_0$,), hence irreducible,
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:43
@JyrkiLahtonen, the author further assumes p(t) and l(t) are relatively prime polynomials. and the doubly irreducibility is proved similarly
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:51
@JyrkiLahtonen, is there a general method to show the discriminant is not a square
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:53
 |Â
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I have a polynomial of this type: $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$ in $F_q(a)[t]$, where a=(a_0,...,a_m)$ are specialization.
I could show that this polynomial is doubly transitive, by making $a_0=0$ (specialization technique for irreducibility and assumptions on f and g).
Now I need to show that the discriminant of this polynomial is not a square. Here I do not know how to proceed. Could any one please help me
polynomials galois-theory discriminant
I have a polynomial of this type: $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$ in $F_q(a)[t]$, where a=(a_0,...,a_m)$ are specialization.
I could show that this polynomial is doubly transitive, by making $a_0=0$ (specialization technique for irreducibility and assumptions on f and g).
Now I need to show that the discriminant of this polynomial is not a square. Here I do not know how to proceed. Could any one please help me
polynomials galois-theory discriminant
asked Jul 24 at 3:49
user152394
957
957
1
It may be my limitation and lack of exposure to specializations, but why couldn't you get an alternating group here? Say, if $p(t)$ is a cubic, irreducible over $BbbF_q$, and $ell(t)=0$. Then the splitting field is $BbbF_q^3(a)$ and the Galois group is cyclic of order three, i.e. $A_3$. It is also easy make $A_2$ appear - make your polynomial a reducible quadratic. I know I'm nitpicking, but...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jul 24 at 4:21
so your polynomial can be any polynomial in $Bbb F_q(a)[t]$ ?
– mercio
Jul 24 at 7:32
@JyrkiLahtonen, I thought the polynomial $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$, is linear in $F(a,t)$. (By taking this polynomial as a polynomial in $a_0$,), hence irreducible,
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:43
@JyrkiLahtonen, the author further assumes p(t) and l(t) are relatively prime polynomials. and the doubly irreducibility is proved similarly
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:51
@JyrkiLahtonen, is there a general method to show the discriminant is not a square
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:53
 |Â
show 1 more comment
1
It may be my limitation and lack of exposure to specializations, but why couldn't you get an alternating group here? Say, if $p(t)$ is a cubic, irreducible over $BbbF_q$, and $ell(t)=0$. Then the splitting field is $BbbF_q^3(a)$ and the Galois group is cyclic of order three, i.e. $A_3$. It is also easy make $A_2$ appear - make your polynomial a reducible quadratic. I know I'm nitpicking, but...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jul 24 at 4:21
so your polynomial can be any polynomial in $Bbb F_q(a)[t]$ ?
– mercio
Jul 24 at 7:32
@JyrkiLahtonen, I thought the polynomial $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$, is linear in $F(a,t)$. (By taking this polynomial as a polynomial in $a_0$,), hence irreducible,
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:43
@JyrkiLahtonen, the author further assumes p(t) and l(t) are relatively prime polynomials. and the doubly irreducibility is proved similarly
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:51
@JyrkiLahtonen, is there a general method to show the discriminant is not a square
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:53
1
1
It may be my limitation and lack of exposure to specializations, but why couldn't you get an alternating group here? Say, if $p(t)$ is a cubic, irreducible over $BbbF_q$, and $ell(t)=0$. Then the splitting field is $BbbF_q^3(a)$ and the Galois group is cyclic of order three, i.e. $A_3$. It is also easy make $A_2$ appear - make your polynomial a reducible quadratic. I know I'm nitpicking, but...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jul 24 at 4:21
It may be my limitation and lack of exposure to specializations, but why couldn't you get an alternating group here? Say, if $p(t)$ is a cubic, irreducible over $BbbF_q$, and $ell(t)=0$. Then the splitting field is $BbbF_q^3(a)$ and the Galois group is cyclic of order three, i.e. $A_3$. It is also easy make $A_2$ appear - make your polynomial a reducible quadratic. I know I'm nitpicking, but...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jul 24 at 4:21
so your polynomial can be any polynomial in $Bbb F_q(a)[t]$ ?
– mercio
Jul 24 at 7:32
so your polynomial can be any polynomial in $Bbb F_q(a)[t]$ ?
– mercio
Jul 24 at 7:32
@JyrkiLahtonen, I thought the polynomial $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$, is linear in $F(a,t)$. (By taking this polynomial as a polynomial in $a_0$,), hence irreducible,
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:43
@JyrkiLahtonen, I thought the polynomial $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$, is linear in $F(a,t)$. (By taking this polynomial as a polynomial in $a_0$,), hence irreducible,
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:43
@JyrkiLahtonen, the author further assumes p(t) and l(t) are relatively prime polynomials. and the doubly irreducibility is proved similarly
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:51
@JyrkiLahtonen, the author further assumes p(t) and l(t) are relatively prime polynomials. and the doubly irreducibility is proved similarly
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:51
@JyrkiLahtonen, is there a general method to show the discriminant is not a square
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:53
@JyrkiLahtonen, is there a general method to show the discriminant is not a square
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:53
 |Â
show 1 more comment
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2860992%2fto-show-galois-group-of-a-polynomial-is-not-an-alternating-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
1
It may be my limitation and lack of exposure to specializations, but why couldn't you get an alternating group here? Say, if $p(t)$ is a cubic, irreducible over $BbbF_q$, and $ell(t)=0$. Then the splitting field is $BbbF_q^3(a)$ and the Galois group is cyclic of order three, i.e. $A_3$. It is also easy make $A_2$ appear - make your polynomial a reducible quadratic. I know I'm nitpicking, but...
– Jyrki Lahtonen
Jul 24 at 4:21
so your polynomial can be any polynomial in $Bbb F_q(a)[t]$ ?
– mercio
Jul 24 at 7:32
@JyrkiLahtonen, I thought the polynomial $p(t)+l(t)s(a,t)$, is linear in $F(a,t)$. (By taking this polynomial as a polynomial in $a_0$,), hence irreducible,
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:43
@JyrkiLahtonen, the author further assumes p(t) and l(t) are relatively prime polynomials. and the doubly irreducibility is proved similarly
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:51
@JyrkiLahtonen, is there a general method to show the discriminant is not a square
– user152394
Jul 24 at 10:53